REVIEW 2 cited by
Automatic Rumor Detection on Microblogs: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The ever-increasing amount of multimedia content on modern social media platforms are valuable in many applications. While the openness and convenience features of social media also foster many rumors online. Without verification, these rumors would reach thousands of users immediately and cause serious damages. Many efforts have been taken to defeat online rumors automatically by mining the rich content provided on the open network with machine learning techniques. Most rumor detection methods can be categorized in three paradigms: the hand-crafted features based classification approaches, the propagation-based approaches and the neural networks approaches. In this survey, we introduce a formal definition of rumor in comparison with other definitions used in literatures. We summary the studies of automatic rumor detection so far and present details in three paradigms of rumor detection. We also give an introduction on existing datasets for rumor detection which would benefit following researches in this area. We give our suggestions for future rumors detection on microblogs as a conclusion.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Detection of Rumors and Their Sources in Social Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that unifies the literature on rumor detection, rumor source detection, and joint detection into one taxonomy with formal definitions.
-
The Mass, Fake News, and Cognition Security
The paper defines Cognition Security (CogSec) as a multidisciplinary field studying cognitive impacts of fake news and outlines research challenges, techniques, and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.