Seymour's Second Neighborhood Conjecture for Subsets of Vertices
read the original abstract
Seymour conjectured that every oriented simple graph contains a vertex whose second neighborhood is at least as large as its first. In this note, we put forward a conjecture that we prove is actually equivalent: every oriented simple graph contains a subset of vertices $S$ whose second neighborhood is at least as large as its first. This subset perspective gives some insight into the original conjecture. For example, if there is a counterexample to the second neighborhood conjecture with minimum degree $\delta$, then there exists a counterexample on at most ${\delta + 1 \choose 2}$ vertices. Given a vertex $v$, let $d_1^+(v)$ and $d_2^+(v)$ be the size of its first and second neighborhoods respectively. A digraph is $m$-free if there is no directed cycle on $m$ or fewer vertices. Let $\lambda_m$ be the largest value such that every $m$-free graph contains a vertex $v$ with $d_2^+(v) \geq \lambda_m d_1^+(v)$. The second neighborhood conjecture implies $\lambda_m = 1$ for all $m \geq 2$. Liang and Xu provided lower bounds for all $\lambda_m$, and showed that $\lambda_m \to 1$ as $m \to \infty$. We improve on Liang and Xu's bound for $m \geq 3$ using this subset perspective.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A proof of Seymour's second neighborhood conjecture for oriented graphs with minimum out-degree equal to 7
Authors prove Seymour's second neighborhood conjecture for oriented graphs with minimum out-degree 7 via local reductions followed by computer-assisted infeasibility checks on finite obstructions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.