Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reverse Mathematics of topology: dimension, paracompactness, and splittings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.08785 v3 pith:FH7LKZT3 submitted 2018-08-27 math.LO

classification math.LO
keywords mathematicsparacompactnesshigher-ordersecond-ordersplittingsaxiomsdimensioninterval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Reverse Mathematics (RM hereafter) is a program in the foundations of mathematics founded by Friedman and developed extensively by Simpson and others. The aim of RM is to find the minimal axioms needed to prove a theorem of ordinary, i.e. non-set-theoretic, mathematics. As suggested by the title, this paper deals with the study of the topological notions of dimension and paracompactness, inside Kohlenbach's higher-order RM. As to splittings, there are some examples in RM of theorems $A, B, C$ such that $A\leftrightarrow(B\wedge C)$, i.e. $A$ can be split into two independent (fairly natural) parts $B$ and $C$, and the aforementioned topological notions give rise to a number of splittings involving highly natural $A, B, C$. Nonetheless, the higher-order picture is markedly different from the second-one: in terms of comprehension axioms, the proof in higher-order RM of e.g. the paracompactness of the unit interval requires full second-order arithmetic, while the second-order/countable version of paracompactness of the unit interval is provable in the base theory of second-order RM. We obtain similarly 'exceptional' results for the Urysohn identity, the Lindel\"of lemma, and partitions of unity. We show that our results exhibit a certain robustness, in that they do not depend on the exact definition of cover, even in the absence of the axiom of choice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Plato and the foundations of mathematics

    math.LO 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A higher-order hierarchy built from net convergence and a bootstrap axiom maps via the ECF interpretation onto the Big Five of second-order Reverse Mathematics.

  2. Lifting countable to uncountable mathematics

    math.LO 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Reversals and recursive counterexamples from countable mathematics are lifted to higher-order theorems about nets, yielding principles like BOOT from monotone convergence for nets.

Pith tools