REVIEW 1 cited by
ELUCID. VI: Cosmic variance of galaxy distribution in the local Universe
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Halo merger trees are constructed from ELUCID, a constrained $N$-body simulation in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) volume. These merger trees are used to populate dark matter halos with galaxies according to an empirical model of galaxy formation. Mock catalogs in the SDSS sky coverage are constructed, which can be used to study the spatial distribution of galaxies in the low-$z$ Universe. These mock catalogs are used to quantify the cosmic variance in the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) measured from the SDSS survey. The GSMF estimated from the SDSS magnitude-limited sample can be affected significantly by the presence of the under-dense region at $z<0.03$, so that the low-mass end of the function can be underestimated significantly. Several existing methods designed to deal with the effects of the cosmic variance in the estimate of GSMF are tested, and none is found to be able to fully account for the cosmic variance. We propose a method based on the conditional stellar mass functions in dark matter halos, which can provide an unbiased estimate of the global GSMF. The application of the method to the SDSS data shows that the GSMF has a significant upturn at $M_*< 10^{9.5} h^{-1}{\rm M}_\odot$, which has been missed in many earlier measurements of the local GSMF.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multi-tracer mass bias in matched cosmic voids from SDSS DR7 and the ELUCID constrained simulation
Galaxy and subhalo mass fractions relative to dark matter decrease towards the centres of matched cosmic voids, with galaxy-to-subhalo ratios limited by the scarcity of massive subhaloes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.