Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Group stability and Property (T)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.00632 v2 pith:PJN6C22D submitted 2018-09-03 math.GR

classification math.GR
keywords operatornameleftrightrespectstabilityhammingrespgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In recent years, there has been a considerable amount of interest in the stability of a finitely-generated group $\Gamma$ with respect to a sequence of groups $\left\{G_{n}\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$, equipped with bi-invariant metrics $\left\{d_{n}\right\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$. We consider the case $G_{n}=\operatorname{U}\left(n\right)$ (resp. $G_{n}=\operatorname{Sym}\left(n\right)$), equipped with the normalized Hilbert-Schmidt metric $d_{n}^{\operatorname{HS}}$ (resp. the normalized Hamming metric $d_{n}^{\operatorname{Hamming}}$). Our main result is that if $\Gamma$ is infinite, hyperlinear (resp. sofic) and has Property $\operatorname{(T)}$, then it is not stable with respect to $\left(\operatorname{U}\left(n\right),d_{n}^{\operatorname{HS}}\right)$ (resp. $\left(\operatorname{Sym}\left(n\right),d_{n}^{\operatorname{Hamming}}\right)$). This answers a question of Hadwin and Shulman regarding the stability of $\operatorname{SL}_{3}\left(\mathbb{Z}\right)$. We also deduce that the mapping class group $\operatorname{MCG}\left(g\right)$, $g\geq 3$, and $\operatorname{Aut}\left(\mathbb{F}_n\right)$, $n\geq 3$, are not stable with respect to $\left(\operatorname{Sym}\left(n\right),d_{n}^{\operatorname{Hamming}}\right)$. Our main result exhibits a difference between stability with respect to the normalized Hilbert-Schmidt metric on $\operatorname{U}\left(n\right)$ and the (unnormalized) $p$-Schatten metrics, since many groups with Property $\operatorname{(T)}$ are stable with respect to the latter metrics, as shown by De Chiffre-Glebsky-Lubotzky-Thom and Lubotzky-Oppenheim. We suggest a more flexible notion of stability that may repair this deficiency of stability with respect to $\left(\operatorname{U}\left(n\right),d_{n}^{\operatorname{HS}}\right)$ and $\left(\operatorname{Sym}\left(n\right),d_{n}^{\operatorname{Hamming}}\right)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stability for product groups and property $(\tau)$

    math.GR 2019-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Product groups Σ×Λ are not very flexibly P-stable when Σ admits a non-abelian free quotient and Λ lacks property (τ), so P-stability is not closed under direct products.

Pith tools