Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Modeling baryonic physics in future weak lensing surveys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.01146 v2 pith:RNNB53ZM submitted 2018-09-04 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords baryonicphysicsmethodcosmologicalpowertextschmcodelensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Modifications of the matter power spectrum due to baryonic physics are one of the major theoretical uncertainties in cosmological weak lensing measurements. Developing robust mitigation schemes for this source of systematic uncertainty increases the robustness of cosmological constraints, and may increase their precision if they enable the use of information from smaller scales. Here we explore the performance of two mitigation schemes for baryonic effects in weak lensing cosmic shear: the PCA method and the halo-model approach in \textsc{HMcode}. We construct mock tomographic shear power spectra from four hydrodynamical simulations, and run simulated likelihood analyses with \textsc{CosmoLike} assuming LSST-like survey statistics. With an angular scale cut of $\ell_{\rm max}<2000$, both methods successfully remove the biases in cosmological parameters due to the various baryonic physics scenarios, with the PCA method causing less degradation in the parameter constraints than \textsc{HMcode}. For a more aggressive $\ell_{\rm max}=$5000, the PCA method performs well for all but one baryonic physics scenario, requiring additional training simulations to account for the extreme baryonic physics scenario of Illustris; \textsc{HMcode} exhibits tensions in the 2D posterior distributions of cosmological parameters due to lack of freedom in describing the power spectrum for $k > 10\ h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$. We investigate variants of the PCA method and improve the bias mitigation through PCA by accounting for the noise properties in the data via Cholesky decomposition of the covariance matrix. Our improved PCA method allows us to retain more statistical constraining power while effectively mitigating baryonic uncertainties even for a broad range of baryonic physics scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Direct shear $\times$ kSZ correlation: controlling baryons without modeling galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A shear×velocity kSZ template cross-correlated with the CMB is forecast to measure the electron–matter power spectrum to few-percent (ACT/SO) or sub-percent (CMB-HD) precision.

  2. Missing baryons recovered: a measurement of the gas fraction in galaxies and groups with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and CMB lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CMB lensing mass calibration of DESI galaxies, combined with kSZ gas profiles, measures gas fractions that reach the cosmic baryon fraction at large radii but drop to about 30 percent near the virial radius.

  3. Computing Nonlinear Power Spectra Across Dynamical Dark Energy Model Space with Neural ODEs

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A neural ODE trained only on LambdaCDM spectra predicts nonlinear matter power spectra to about 4 percent accuracy for smooth w(z) dark energy models, pending stronger validation.

  4. Modelling Galaxy Clustering and Tomographic Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing with HSC Y3 and SDSS using the Point-Mass Correction Model and Redshift Self-Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining SDSS clustering with HSC Y3 galaxy-galaxy lensing, with a point-mass correction down to 2 Mpc/h, gives S8 = 0.804 ± 0.051 and self-calibrated redshift shifts for the two highest source bins.

  5. Modeling Redshift Uncertainties in Roman Weak Lensing Cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A PCA-based redshift uncertainty model, implemented for Roman in CoCoA, matches or outperforms the nine-bin mean-shift model at mitigating S8 and Omega_m biases in simulated cosmic shear analyses.

Pith tools