REVIEW 1 cited by
Do we need Truesdell's empirical inequalities? On the coaxiality of stress and stretch
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Truesdell's empirical inequalities are considered essential in various fields of nonlinear elasticity. However, they are often used merely as a sufficient criterion for semi-invertibility of the isotropic stress strain-relation, even though weaker and much less restricting constitutive requirements like the strict Baker-Ericksen inequalities are available for this purpose. We elaborate the relations between such constitutive conditions, including a weakened version of the empirical inequalities, and their connection to bi-coaxiality and related matrix properties. In particular, we discuss a number of issues arising from the seemingly ubiquitous use of the phrase "$X,Y$ have the same eigenvectors" when referring to commuting symmetric tensors $X,Y$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Monotonicity of isotropic tensor functions on the set of symmetric matrices: completing Rodney Hill's generalization of the Chandler Davis convexity theorem
Vector-monotonicity of a symmetric eigenvalue function is equivalent to matrix-monotonicity of the induced isotropic tensor function, with strict versions, invertibility criteria, and consequences for the Baker-Ericks...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.