REVIEW 1 cited by
Exposed circuits, linear quotients, and chordal clutters
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
A graph $G$ is said to be chordal if it has no induced cycles of length four or more. In a recent preprint Culbertson, Guralnik, and Stiller give a new characterization of chordal graphs in terms of sequences of what they call `edge-erasures'. We show that these moves are in fact equivalent to a linear quotient ordering on $I_{\overline{G}}$, the edge ideal of the complement graph. Known results imply that $I_{\overline G}$ has linear quotients if and only if $G$ is chordal, and hence this recovers an algebraic proof of their characterization. We investigate higher-dimensional analogues of this result, and show that in fact linear quotients for more general circuit ideals of $d$-clutters can be characterized in terms of removing exposed circuits in the complement clutter. Restricting to properly exposed circuits can be characterized by a homological condition. This leads to a notion of higher dimensional chordal clutters which borrows from commutative algebra and simple homotopy theory. The interpretation of linear quotients in terms of shellability of simplicial complexes also has applications to a conjecture of Simon regarding the extendable shellability of $k$-skeleta of simplices. Other connections to combinatorial commutative algebra, chordal complexes, and hierarchical clustering algorithms are explored.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Extendable shellability for $d$-dimensional complexes on $d+3$ vertices
Every shellable d-dimensional simplicial complex with at most d+3 vertices is extendably shellable, proved through exposed-edge deletions in chordal graphs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.