pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1902.04362 · v1 · submitted 2019-02-12 · 💻 cs.DC

Recognition: unknown

Distributed and Application-aware Task Scheduling in Edge-clouds

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.DC
keywords schedulingtaskcomputationcomputingedge-cloudsoffloadingapplication-awaredistributed
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Edge computing is an emerging technology which places computing at the edge of the network to provide an ultra-low latency. Computation offloading, a paradigm that migrates computing from mobile devices to remote servers, can now use the power of edge computing by offloading computation to cloudlets in edge-clouds. However, the task scheduling of computation offloading in edge-clouds faces a two-fold challenge. First, as cloudlets are geographically distributed, it is difficult for each cloudlet to perform load balancing without centralized control. Second, as tasks of computation offloading have a wide variety of types, to guarantee the user quality of experience (QoE) in terms of task types is challenging. In this paper, we present Petrel, a distributed and application-aware task scheduling framework for edge-clouds. Petrel implements a sample-based load balancing technology and further adopts adaptive scheduling policies according to task types. This application-aware scheduling not only provides QoE guarantee but also improves the overall scheduling performance. Trace-driven simulations show that Petrel achieves a significant improvement over existing scheduling strategies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ncsim: A Lightweight Simulator for Networked Edge Computing with Wireless Interference Modeling

    cs.DC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ncsim combines DAG workflow scheduling with physically grounded CSMA/CA interference modeling and shows that interference-free evaluations select suboptimal schedulers in 27.8% of tested scenarios.