REVIEW 2 cited by
Peer Effects in Random Consideration Sets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We develop a dynamic model of discrete choice that incorporates peer effects into random consideration sets. We characterize the equilibrium behavior and study the empirical content of the model. In our setup, changes in the choices of friends affect the distribution of the consideration sets. We exploit this variation to recover the ranking of preferences, attention mechanisms, and network connections. These nonparametric identification results allow unrestricted heterogeneity across people and do not rely on the variation of either covariates or the set of available options. Our methodology leads to a maximum-likelihood estimator that performs well in simulations. We apply our results to an experimental dataset that has been designed to study the visual focus of attention.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Belief Identification in Populations
Anonymous belief data generically identifies a population's distribution of priors only when the event-induced graph is non-separable; separable graphs generically hide it.
-
Discrete Choice with Endogenous Peer Selection
A continuous-time discrete choice model with endogenous peer attention is shown to be nonparametrically identifiable from long choice panels using variation in the number of potential peers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.