Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Governance on Social Media Data: Different Focuses between Government and Internet Company

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.11242 v1 pith:3GMWQKT4 submitted 2019-04-25 stat.OT

classification stat.OT
keywords datarequestsfacebookcountrieslevelsocialusergovernment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How governments and Internet companies regulate user data on social media attracts public attention. This study tried to answer two questions: What kind of countries send more requests for Facebook user data? What kind of countries get more requests replies from Facebook? We aim to figure out how a country's economic, political and social factors affect its government requests for user data and Facebook's responses rate to those requests. Results show that countries with higher GDP per capita, a higher level of human freedom and a lower level of rule of law send more requests for user data; while Facebook tends to reply to government requests from countries with a higher level of human freedom and a lower level of political stability. In conclusion, governments and Facebook show different focuses on governance on social media data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools