Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finding Dominating Induced Matchings in $S_{1,1,5}$-Free Graphs in Polynomial Time

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.05582 v2 pith:WLZXQL5B submitted 2019-05-14 cs.DM math.CO

classification cs.DMmath.CO
keywords graphsfreeproblemedgetimedominatingemphinduced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a finite undirected graph. An edge set $E' \subseteq E$ is a {\em dominating induced matching} ({\em d.i.m.}) in $G$ if every edge in $E$ is intersected by exactly one edge of $E'$. The \emph{Dominating Induced Matching} (\emph{DIM}) problem asks for the existence of a d.i.m.\ in $G$; this problem is also known as the \emph{Efficient Edge Domination} problem; it is the Efficient Domination problem for line graphs. The DIM problem is \NP-complete even for very restricted graph classes such as planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree 3 but is solvable in linear time for $P_7$-free graphs, and in polynomial time for $S_{1,2,4}$-free graphs as well as for $S_{2,2,2}$-free graphs and for $S_{2,2,3}$-free graphs. In this paper, combining two distinct approaches, we solve it in polynomial time for $S_{1,1,5}$-free graphs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Finding Dominating Induced Matchings in $P_9$-Free Graphs in Polynomial Time

    cs.DM 2019-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors claim a polynomial-time algorithm for Dominating Induced Matching on P9-free graphs, generalizing earlier results, but a central observation in the proof is flawed.

Pith tools