REVIEW 1 cited by
Debiasing Cosmic Gravitational Wave Sirens
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Accurate estimation of the Hubble constant, and other cosmological parameters, from distances measured by cosmic gravitational wave sirens requires sufficient allowance for the dark energy evolution. We demonstrate how model independent statistical methods, specifically Gaussian process regression, can remove bias in the reconstruction of $H(z)$, and can be combined model independently with supernova distances. This allows stringent tests of both $H_0$ and $\Lambda$CDM, and can detect unrecognized systematics. We also quantify the redshift systematic control necessary for the use of dark sirens, showing that it must approach spectroscopic precision to avoid significant bias.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Hubble constant tension with next-generation galaxy surveys
Forecast: Euclid-like and SKA-like BAO surveys, combined with Gaussian-process regression, could measure H0 to about 1% precision and discriminate between Planck and Riess values at roughly 5 sigma.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.