Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hierarchy of Transportation Network Parameters and Hardness Results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.11166 v3 pith:HHSQB7BV submitted 2019-05-27 cs.DM cs.CC

classification cs.DMcs.CC
keywords dimensionparametersskeletonhighwayboundedgraphgraphsproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The graph parameters highway dimension and skeleton dimension were introduced to capture the properties of transportation networks. As many important optimization problems like Travelling Salesperson, Steiner Tree or $k$-Center arise in such networks, it is worthwhile to study them on graphs of bounded highway or skeleton dimension. We investigate the relationships between mentioned parameters and how they are related to other important graph parameters that have been applied successfully to various optimization problems. We show that the skeleton dimension is incomparable to any of the parameters distance to linear forest, bandwidth, treewidth and highway dimension and hence, it is worthwhile to study mentioned problems also on graphs of bounded skeleton dimension. Moreover, we prove that the skeleton dimension is upper bounded by the max leaf number and that for any graph on at least three vertices there are edge weights such that both parameters are equal. Then we show that computing the highway dimension according to most recent definition is NP-hard, which answers an open question stated by Feldmann et al. Finally we prove that on graphs $G=(V,E)$ of skeleton dimension $\mathcal{O}(\log^2 \vert V \vert)$ it is NP-hard to approximate the $k$-Center problem within a factor less than $2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools