pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08548 · v1 · pith:HPA4GBTFnew · submitted 2019-06-20 · 🧬 q-bio.BM

Knotted Proteins: Tie Etiquette in Structural Biology

Ana Nunes , Patr\'icia FN Fa\'isca This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 19:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.BM
keywords knotted proteinsprotein foldinglattice Go modelsstructure-based modelsprotein entanglementGō modelsfolding mechanisms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice Gō models clarify how knotted proteins reach their entangled native folds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the role of lattice Gō models in studying the small fraction of proteins that form knots. These models belong to the class of structure-based approaches that incorporate native structural information to guide the simulation. They have been used to investigate both the properties of knotted proteins and the mechanisms of their folding. The review positions the results from these simplest models within the broader context of experimental findings and more detailed computational methods.

Core claim

Lattice Gō models, as structure-based models, have contributed to understanding the properties of knotted proteins and the how and why of their natural folding process by allowing direct comparison with experimental results and more realistic computational approaches.

What carries the argument

Lattice Gō models: the simplest structure-based models that explicitly bias the simulation toward the native protein structure using structural data.

If this is right

  • These models can simulate the sequence of events leading to knot formation during folding.
  • They identify which structural elements are necessary for a protein to form a knot.
  • Results from the models can be tested against in vitro refolding experiments.
  • They serve as a reference point for judging the added value of more complex off-lattice or all-atom simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If lattice models suffice, then sequence-specific energetic details beyond native contacts may not be required to explain knot formation in proteins.
  • The approach suggests that knotting is largely a geometric consequence of the native fold rather than an accidental byproduct of the folding route.
  • Extensions could test whether the same models predict folding success rates for designed sequences that avoid knots.

Load-bearing premise

The simplest lattice Gō models capture essential features of knotted protein folding sufficiently to be meaningfully compared with experimental results and more realistic computational approaches.

What would settle it

A direct mismatch between the folding pathways or knotting times predicted by lattice Gō models and those measured in single-molecule experiments on a specific knotted protein would undermine the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08548 by Ana Nunes, Patr\'icia FN Fa\'isca.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Structure of the knotting step as predicted by simulations. In splipknotting (A) one of the chain termini arranges itself in a hairpin like conformation that threads the knotting loop formed by the remainder of the chain. An alternative mechanism involves direct threading of the termini through the knotting loop (B) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three-dimensional structure of the GroEL-GroES complex (PDB ID: 1aon) (A), and end view of the GroEL-GroES, highlighting the central cavity where folding takes place (B). Simple models of steric confinement used to mimic excluded volume interactions between the protein and the chaperonin chamber. A spherical shape (C) was adopted in (119), while a cylindrical (D) one was adopted in (118) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cartoon representation of the ribosome highlighting the exit tunnel (located on on the larger ribosomal unit), and the vectorial nature of protein synthesis. The latter which proceeds from the N-terminus to the C-terminus that is tethered at the PTC on the larger ribosomal unit (A). Simulation set-up in which the larger ribosomal unit is represented by a steric plane, and the protein (represented by a C-al… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A small fraction of all protein structures characterized so far are entangled. The challenge of understanding the properties of these knotted proteins, and the why and the how of their natural folding process, has been taken up in the past decade with different approaches, such as structural characterization, in vitro experiments, and simulations of protein models with varying levels of complexity. The simplest among these are the lattice G\=o models, which belong to the class of structure-based models, i.e., models that are biased to the native structure by explicitly including structural data. In this review we highlight the contributions to the field made in the scope of lattice G\=o models, putting them into perspective in the context of the main experimental and theoretical results and of other, more realistic, computational approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article summarizing the contributions of lattice Gō models (structure-based models biased toward the native structure) to understanding the properties and folding processes of knotted proteins. It places these simplest models in perspective alongside experimental results and more complex computational approaches, without advancing new derivations or predictions.

Significance. The review synthesizes prior literature on lattice Gō models for knotted proteins and explicitly contextualizes them with experiments and higher-resolution simulations. This provides a coherent overview of how these models have contributed to the field, which is a strength for accessibility and synthesis.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the notation 'Gō' is rendered as 'G= o'; ensure consistent and standard typesetting of 'Gō' throughout the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The review aims to synthesize existing work on lattice Gō models for knotted proteins in the context of experiments and higher-resolution simulations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review summarizes external literature without internal derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is a review article that synthesizes existing studies on lattice Gō models for knotted proteins. It makes no novel predictions, derivations, or first-principles claims of its own. The central statements (e.g., that such models have contributed to understanding folding) are presented as summaries of prior external work, placed in context with experiments and higher-resolution simulations. No equations, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or self-citation chains are used to support load-bearing internal results. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no reduction of claims to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors themselves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5657 in / 972 out tokens · 27489 ms · 2026-05-25T19:20:11.840939+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

9 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mansfield, M. L. (1994) Are there knots in proteins? Nat Struct Mol Biol 1, 213-214 4. Adams, C. C. (2004) The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots American Mathematical Society 5. Taylor, W. R. (2000) A deeply knotted protein structure and how it might fold. Nature 406, 916-919 6. Koniaris, K., and Muthukumar, M. (199...

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    P., Yeates, E

    King, N. P., Yeates, E. O., and Yeates, T. O. (2007) Identification of Rare Slipknots in Proteins and Their Implications for Stability and Folding. Journal of Molecular Biology 373, 153-166 21. Mallam, A. L. (2009) How does a knotted protein fold? The FEBS Journal 276, 365-375 22. Faísca, P. F. N. (2015) Knotted proteins: A tangled tale of Structural Biol...

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    (2003) Prediction of folding rates and transition-state placement from native-state geometry

    Micheletti, C. (2003) Prediction of folding rates and transition-state placement from native-state geometry. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 51, 74-84 37. Gromiha, M. M., and Selvaraj, S. (2001) Comparison between long-range interactions and contact order in determining the folding rate of two-state proteins: application of long-range or...

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Das, S., Eisen, A., Lin, Y.-H., and Chan, H. S. (2018) A Lattice Model of Charge-Pattern-Dependent Polyampholyte Phase Separation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 53. Kazmirski, S. L., and Daggett, V. (1998) Non-native interactions in protein folding intermediates: molecular dynamics simulations of hen lysozyme11Edited by B. Honig. Journal of Molecula...

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    (2017) Non-monotonic knotting probability and knot length of semiflexible rings: the competing roles of entropy and bending energy

    Coronel, L., Orlandini, E., and Micheletti, C. (2017) Non-monotonic knotting probability and knot length of semiflexible rings: the competing roles of entropy and bending energy. Soft Matter 13, 4260-4267 70. Rybenkov, V. V., Cozzarelli, N. R., and Vologodskii, A. V. (1993) Probability of DNA knotting and the effective diameter of the DNA double helix. Pr...

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    G., Floor, M., Wilson, C

    Bustamante, A., Sotelo-Campos, J., Guerra, D. G., Floor, M., Wilson, C. A. M., Bustamante, C., and Báez, M. (2017) The energy cost of polypeptide knot formation and its folding consequences. Nature Communications 8, 1581 86. Mallam, A. L., Rogers, J. M., and Jackson, S. E. (2010) Experimental detection of knotted conformations in denatured proteins. Proce...

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    I., Pina, D

    Andersson, F. I., Pina, D. G., Mallam, A. L., Blaser, G., and Jackson, S. E. (2009) Untangling the folding mechanism of the 52-knotted protein UCH-L3. The FEBS Journal 276, 2625-2635 102. Mallam, A. L., and Jackson, S. E. (2007) A Comparison of the Folding of Two Knotted Proteins: YbeA and YibK. Journal of Molecular Biology 366, 650-665 103. Soler, M. A.,...

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Hayer-Hartl, M., Bracher, A., and Hartl, F. U. (2016) The GroEL–GroES Chaperonin Machine: A Nano-Cage for Protein Folding. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 41, 62-76 117. Kerner, M. J., Naylor, D. J., Ishihama, Y., Maier, T., Chang, H.-C., Stines, A. P., Georgopoulos, C., Frishman, D., Hayer-Hartl, M., Mann, M., and Hartl, F. U. (2005) Proteome-wide Analysi...

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    G., Shibata, T., Inoue, Y., Kuramitsu, S., and Yokoyama, S

    Nureki, O., Shirouzu, M., Hashimoto, K., Ishitani, R., Terada, T., Tamakoshi, M., Oshima, T., Chijimatsu, M., Takio, K., Vassylyev, D. G., Shibata, T., Inoue, Y., Kuramitsu, S., and Yokoyama, S. (2002) An enzyme with a deep trefoil knot for the active-site architecture. Acta Crystallographica Section D 58, 1129-1137 130. Nureki, O., Watanabe, K., Fukai, S...

    work page 2002