pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08946 · v1 · pith:YBLIIXCKnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · 💻 cs.SI · physics.soc-ph

Appliance of network theory in economic geography

Alexandra Barina , Gabriel Barina , Mihai Udrescu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI physics.soc-ph
keywords network theoryeconomic geographycomplex networksevolutionary processesagent linksgeographical influencenetwork retention
0
0 comments X

The pith

Links between economic agents evolve through retention and variation shaped by geography.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review paper examines how complex network theory applies to geography and economic geography. It focuses on the idea that connections among agents create evolutionary dynamics involving the retention of some network structures and the variation of others. Geography is presented as a factor that influences these retention and variation processes. A reader would care because such an account could help explain how economic landscapes change over time through agent interactions.

Core claim

The paper states that links between agents lead to an evolutionary process of network retention as well as network variation, and that geography influences these mechanisms in the context of economic geography.

What carries the argument

The evolutionary process of network retention and variation, where agent links are retained or changed under geographic influence.

Load-bearing premise

Existing complex network concepts from other domains can be applied directly to explain evolutionary processes in economic geography.

What would settle it

Empirical data from a specific economic region showing that geographic factors have no measurable effect on which agent links are retained versus varied over time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08946 by Alexandra Barina, Gabriel Barina, Mihai Udrescu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: This is the caption of the figure displaying a white eagle and a white horse on a snow field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A continuously evolving geography requires a good understanding in networks. As such, this paper accounts for theories and applications of complex networks and their role both in geography in general, as well as in determining various geographical network trajectories. It assesses how links between agents lead to an evolutionary process of network retention, as well as network variation, and how geography influences these mechanisms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews theories and applications of complex networks to geography in general and economic geography in particular. It states that links between agents produce an evolutionary process involving network retention and variation, and that geography shapes these mechanisms.

Significance. The intersection of network science and economic geography is a relevant topic. A well-executed synthesis could usefully organize existing ideas for researchers in both fields, but the absence of any original models, derivations, datasets, or concrete mechanisms means the work does not advance testable claims or new insights beyond a descriptive overview.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the paper 'assesses how links between agents lead to an evolutionary process of network retention, as well as network variation' is presented without any explicit retention rule, variation operator, geographic distance term, or empirical illustration, rendering the assessment unevaluable from the given material.
  2. [Main text (no specific section or equation referenced)] No section supplies a concrete mechanism (e.g., a retention probability, variation operator, or distance-dependent term) shown to operate on economic-geography data or derived from first principles; this is load-bearing for the stated assessment of evolutionary network trajectories.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title] Title: 'Appliance' is incorrect; the intended term is 'Application'.
  2. [General] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of scope (review versus original synthesis) and from citing specific prior works when summarizing complex-network concepts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report. Our manuscript is a review surveying the application of complex network theory to economic geography and does not present original models or derivations. We address the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the paper 'assesses how links between agents lead to an evolutionary process of network retention, as well as network variation' is presented without any explicit retention rule, variation operator, geographic distance term, or empirical illustration, rendering the assessment unevaluable from the given material.

    Authors: The manuscript is a review that synthesizes how the existing literature models these processes. The assessment refers to mechanisms discussed across the cited studies rather than new operators introduced here. We will revise the abstract to clarify that the paper reviews existing approaches in the field. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main text (no specific section or equation referenced)] No section supplies a concrete mechanism (e.g., a retention probability, variation operator, or distance-dependent term) shown to operate on economic-geography data or derived from first principles; this is load-bearing for the stated assessment of evolutionary network trajectories.

    Authors: As a survey paper, the manuscript organizes and discusses mechanisms from the reviewed literature rather than deriving new ones from first principles or presenting new data. Specific examples and citations to concrete models in economic geography are included in the main text. We can expand selected sections with additional explicit references to retention/variation rules from key papers if helpful. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain or predictions present; paper is a conceptual survey

full rationale

The abstract states the paper 'accounts for theories and applications of complex networks' and 'assesses how links between agents lead to an evolutionary process', but supplies no equations, fitted parameters, first-principles derivations, or testable predictions. The reader's assessment of score 0.0 is confirmed: without any claimed mathematical chain, no circularity of the enumerated kinds can be identified. The work asserts straightforward applicability of existing network concepts rather than deriving new results from inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; insufficient detail for detailed ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5572 in / 1028 out tokens · 35624 ms · 2026-05-25T18:49:40.787898+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ubung Abb. Schl\

    11em plus .33em minus .07em @technote 4000 4000 100 4000 4000 500 `\.=1000 = #1 #1 #1 0pt [0pt][0pt] #1 * \| ** #1 \@IEEEauthorblockNstyle \@IEEEauthorblockAstyle \@IEEEauthordefaulttextstyle \@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace -0.25em \@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace 0.0ex \@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace 0.0ex \@IEEEauthorblockNinterlinespace 2.6ex \@IEEEauthorblockAinte...

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    Clarke, F., Ekeland, I.: Nonlinear oscillations and boundary-value problems for Hamiltonian systems. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 78, 315--333 (1982)

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Note CRAS Paris 287, 1013--1015 (1978)

    Clarke, F., Ekeland, I.: Solutions p\' e riodiques, du p\' e riode donn\' e e, des \' e quations hamiltoniennes. Note CRAS Paris 287, 1013--1015 (1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Michalek, R., Tarantello, G.: Subharmonic solutions with prescribed minimal period for nonautonomous Hamiltonian systems. J. Diff. Eq. 72, 28--55 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Annali di Matematica Pura (to appear)

    Tarantello, G.: Subharmonic solutions for Hamiltonian systems via a _ p pseudoindex theory. Annali di Matematica Pura (to appear)

    work page

  6. [6]

    Rabinowitz, P.: On subharmonic solutions of a Hamiltonian system. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33, 609--633 (1980)

    work page 1980

  7. [7]

    Neoclassical growth theory

    Solow, R.M., 1999. Neoclassical growth theory. Handbook of macroeconomics, 1, pp.637-667

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence

    Sala-i-Martin, X.X., 1996. Regional cohesion: evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40(6), pp.1325-1352

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    and Fingleton, B., 2019

    Le Gallo, J. and Fingleton, B., 2019. Regional growth and convergence empirics. Handbook of regional science, pp.1-28

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    and Thisse, J.F., 2003

    Fujita, M. and Thisse, J.F., 2003. Does geographical agglomeration foster economic growth? And who gains and loses from it?. The Japanese Economic Review, 54(2), pp.121-145

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    and Decrop, J., 2005

    Bertinelli, L. and Decrop, J., 2005. Geographical agglomeration: Ellison and Glaeser's index applied to the case of Belgian manufacturing industry. Regional Studies, 39(5), pp.567-583

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Do geographical agglomeration, growth and equity conflict?

    Dupont, V., 2007. Do geographical agglomeration, growth and equity conflict?. Papers in Regional Science, 86(2), pp.193-213

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Where do cities form? A geographical agglomeration model for Europe

    Stelder, D., 2005. Where do cities form? A geographical agglomeration model for Europe. Journal of Regional Science, 45(4), pp.657-679

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    and Lambooy, J.G., 1999

    Boschma, R.A. and Lambooy, J.G., 1999. Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of evolutionary economics, 9(4), pp.411-429

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    and Frenken, K., 2017

    Boschma, R.A. and Frenken, K., 2017. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. In Economy (pp. 127-156). Routledge

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    and Boschma, R.A., 2007

    Frenken, K. and Boschma, R.A., 2007. A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of economic geography, 7(5), pp.635-649

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    and Sunley, P., 2006

    Martin, R. and Sunley, P., 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of economic geography, 6(4), pp.395-437

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Evolutionary economic geography–Theoretical and empirical progress

    Kogler, D.F., 2015. Evolutionary economic geography–Theoretical and empirical progress

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    and Lutz, C., 2016

    Wiebe, K.S. and Lutz, C., 2016. Endogenous technological change and the policy mix in renewable power generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, pp.739-751

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    The regional world: territorial development in a global economy

    Storper, M., 1997. The regional world: territorial development in a global economy. Guilford press

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    The impact of social structure on economic outcomes

    Granovetter, M., 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of economic perspectives, 19(1), pp.33-50

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    and Rodríguez Mora, J.V., 2018

    Güell, M., Pellizzari, M., Pica, G. and Rodríguez Mora, J.V., 2018. Correlating social mobility and economic outcomes. The Economic Journal, 128(612), pp.F353-F403

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    and Montoro-Sánchez, Á., 2018

    Díez-Vial, I. and Montoro-Sánchez, Á., 2018. How Local Knowledge Networks and Firm Internal Characteristics Evolve Across Time Inside Science Parks. In Agglomeration and Firm Performance (pp. 139-153). Springer, Cham

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels ofnetworks' between economic sociology and economic geography

    Grabher, G., 2006. Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels ofnetworks' between economic sociology and economic geography. Progress in human geography, 30(2), pp.163-189

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    The False Prophecy of Hyperconnection: How to Survive the Networked Age

    Ferguson, N., 2017. The False Prophecy of Hyperconnection: How to Survive the Networked Age. Foreign Aff., 96, p.68

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    General selection theory and economic evolution: The price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction

    Knudsen, T.R., 2004. General selection theory and economic evolution: The price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2), pp.147-173

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    and Frenken, K., 2018

    Boschma, R. and Frenken, K., 2018. Evolutionary economic geography (pp. 213-229). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    and Hastak, M., 2018

    Kim, J. and Hastak, M., 2018. Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), pp.86-96

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    and Labianca, G., 2009

    Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J. and Labianca, G., 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. science, 323(5916), pp.892-895

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    and Kleinberg, J., 2010

    Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J., 2010. Networks, crowds, and markets (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge university press

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    and Boccaletti, S., 2015

    Kenett, D.Y., Perc, M. and Boccaletti, S., 2015. Networks of networks–An introduction. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 80, pp.1-6

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Tolerance-based interaction: A new model targeting opinion formation and diffusion in social networks

    Topirceanu, A., et al. "Tolerance-based interaction: A new model targeting opinion formation and diffusion in social networks." PeerJ Computer Science 2, 2016

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    A network motif based approach for classifying online social networks

    Duma, A., and Topirceanu, A. "A network motif based approach for classifying online social networks." Applied computational intelligence and informatics (SACI), 2014 IEEE 9th international symposium on, pp. 311-315. IEEE, 2014

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    and Vladutiu, M., 2014

    Topirceanu, A., Udrescu, M. and Vladutiu, M., 2014. Genetically optimized realistic social network topology inspired by facebook. In Online Social Media Analysis and Visualization (pp. 163-179). Springer, Cham

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    and Udrescu, M., 2014, September

    Topirceanu, A., Barina, G. and Udrescu, M., 2014, September. Musenet: Collaboration in the music artists industry. In 2014 European Network Intelligence Conference (pp. 89-94). IEEE

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    and Rigby, D., 2017

    Balland, P.A. and Rigby, D., 2017. The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1), pp.1-23

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Average distance, diameter, and clustering in social networks with homophily

    Jackson, M.O., 2008, December. Average distance, diameter, and clustering in social networks with homophily. In International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (pp. 4-11). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    and Venables, A.J., 2004

    Storper, M. and Venables, A.J., 2004. Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of economic geography, 4(4), pp.351-370

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    (2003) The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities

    Marquis, C. (2003) The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 655-89. Marsden, P. V. (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 435-63

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    The theory of the growth of the firm

    Penrose, E., 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. JohnW iley & Sons, New York

    work page 1959

  41. [41]

    (1991) Behind the locality debate: Deconstructing geography's dualisms

    Sayer, A. (1991) Behind the locality debate: Deconstructing geography's dualisms. Environment and Planning A, 23: 283-308

    work page 1991

  42. [42]

    and Glückler, J., 2005

    Bathelt, H. and Glückler, J., 2005. Resources in economic geography: from substantive concepts towards a relational perspective. Environment and Planning A, 37(9), pp.1545-1563

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    and Knoke, D., 2002

    Kenis, P. and Knoke, D., 2002. How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp.275-293

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    (2003) Social Networks and Organizations

    Kilduff, M., Tsai, W. (2003) Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    R., Winter, S

    Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (2002) Evolutionary theorizing in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 23-46

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    and Lamberg, J.A., 2018

    Hodgson, G.M. and Lamberg, J.A., 2018. The past and future of evolutionary economics: some reflections based on new bibliometric evidence. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 15(1), pp.167-187

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    (2002) Economic selection theory

    Knudsen, T. (2002) Economic selection theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 443-70

    work page 2002

  48. [48]

    (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances

    Gulati, R. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 85-112

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    Stuart, T. E. (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668-98

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439-93

    Gulati, R., Gargiulo, M. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439-93

    work page 1999

  51. [51]

    (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study

    Ahuja, G. (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-55

    work page 2000

  52. [52]

    (2004) Preferential linkage and network evolution: a conceptual model and empirical test in the US video game sector

    Venkatraman, N., Lee, C.-H. (2004) Preferential linkage and network evolution: a conceptual model and empirical test in the US video game sector. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 876-92

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    and Valverde, S., 2002

    Solé, R.V., Ferrer‐Cancho, R., Montoya, J.M. and Valverde, S., 2002. Selection, tinkering, and emergence in complex networks. Complexity, 8(1), pp.20-33

    work page 2002

  54. [54]

    Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row

    work page 1978

  55. [55]

    and Kecskés, A., 2013

    Derrien, F. and Kecskés, A., 2013. The real effects of financial shocks: Evidence from exogenous changes in analyst coverage. The Journal of Finance, 68(4), pp.1407-1440

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    and Ghil, M., 2008

    Hallegatte, S. and Ghil, M., 2008. Natural disasters impacting a macroeconomic model with endogenous dynamics. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), pp.582-592

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    and Lim, U., 2007

    Galster, G., Cutsinger, J. and Lim, U., 2007. Are neighbourhoods self-stabilising? Exploring endogenous dynamics. Urban Studies, 44(1), pp.167-185

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    (2000) Decay functions

    Burt, R. (2000) Decay functions. Social Networks, 22: 1-28

    work page 2000

  59. [59]

    and Meuleman, M., 2014

    Vanacker, T., Manigart, S. and Meuleman, M., 2014. Path‐dependent evolution versus intentional management of investment ties in science‐based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), pp.671-690

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T

    Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T. (2002) Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311: 590-614

    work page 2002

  61. [61]

    (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks

    Barabási, A.-L., Reka, A. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286: 509-12

    work page 1999

  62. [62]

    and Chen, G., 2003

    Wang, X.F. and Chen, G., 2003. Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond. IEEE circuits and systems magazine, 3(1), pp.6-20

    work page 2003

  63. [63]

    W., Koput, K

    Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-45

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    R., Liljeros, F

    Holme, P., Edling, C. R., Liljeros, F. (2004) Structure and time evolution of an internet dating community. Social Networks, 26: 155-74

    work page 2004

  65. [65]

    W., White, D., Koput, K

    Powell, W. W., White, D., Koput, K. W., Owen-Smith, J. (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 1132-205

    work page 2005

  66. [66]

    (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network

    Walker, G., Kogut, B., Shan, W. (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8: 109-25

    work page 1997

  67. [67]

    and Hesterly, W.S., 2001

    Hite, J.M. and Hesterly, W.S., 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic management journal, 22(3), pp.275-286

    work page 2001

  68. [68]

    and Todtling, F

    Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D. and Todtling, F. eds., 2011. Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar Publishing

    work page 2011

  69. [69]

    Economic geography and the evolution of networks

    Glückler, J., 2007. Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), pp.619-634

    work page 2007

  70. [70]

    Sorenson, O., Stuart, T. E. (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106: 1546–88

    work page 2001

  71. [71]

    W., Koput, K

    Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Bowie, J. I., Smith-Doerr, L. (2002) The spatial clusering of science and capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships. Regional Studies, 36: 291-306

    work page 2002

  72. [72]

    Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W. W. (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15: 5-21

    work page 2004

  73. [73]

    (2003) The evolution and nature of young firm networks: a longitudinal perspective

    Schutjens, V., Stam, E. (2003) The evolution and nature of young firm networks: a longitudinal perspective. Small Business Economics, 21: 114-34

    work page 2003

  74. [74]

    (2005) How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster

    Hassink, R. (2005) How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13: 521-35

    work page 2005

  75. [75]

    Burt, R. S. (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-99

    work page 2004

  76. [76]

    M., Popielarz, P

    McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P. A., Drobnic, S. (1992) Social networks and organizational dynamics. American Sociological Review, 57: 153-70

    work page 1992

  77. [77]

    A., Shipilov, A

    Baum, J. A., Shipilov, A. V., Rowley, T. J. (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 697-725

    work page 2003

  78. [78]

    J., Greve, H

    Rowley, T. J., Greve, H. R., Rao, H., Baum, J. A. C., Shipilov, A. V. (2005) Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 499-520

    work page 2005

  79. [79]

    and Buttel, F.H., 1990, June

    Dietz, T., Burns, T.R. and Buttel, F.H., 1990, June. Evolutionary theory in sociology: An examination of current thinking. In Sociological Forum (Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 155-171). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers

    work page 1990

  80. [80]

    and Martin, R., 2007

    Boschma, R. and Martin, R., 2007. Constructing an evolutionary economic geography

    work page 2007

Showing first 80 references.