pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09251 · v1 · pith:CFVE5GCKnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

varepsilon Lupi: measuring the heartbeat of a doubly-magnetic massive binary with BRITE-Constellation

H. Pablo , M. Shultz , J. Fuller , G.A. Wade , E. Paunzen , S.Mathis , J.-B. Le Bouquin , A. Pigulski
show 10 more authors
G. Handler E. Alecian R. Kuschnig A.F.J. Moffat C. Neiner A. Popowicz S. Rucinski R. Smolec W. Weiss K. Zwintz
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords binary starsmassive starsmagnetic starsphotometrypulsationsorbital solutionBRITE-Constellationheartbeat stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

The doubly-magnetic binary ε Lupi yields a full orbital solution with empirical masses and radii from combined BRITE photometry and radial velocities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines photometric observations of ε Lupi, a short-period eccentric binary of two early B-type stars that is the only known doubly-magnetic massive system. It detects a modest heartbeat signal in the light curve and merges this with radial-velocity data for both components to produce a complete orbital solution that includes measured masses and radii. Frequency analysis of extra photometric signals shows they align with gravity-mode pulsations expected in slowly pulsating B stars and are inconsistent with tidally excited oscillations. The work concludes that, despite the strong magnetic fields, tidal forces will continue to dominate the system's long-term evolution.

Core claim

Using BRITE-Constellation photometry, the authors identify a heartbeat variation in ε Lupi A. When this is combined with radial velocities of both stars, a full orbital solution is obtained that supplies empirical masses and radii. The remaining photometric frequencies are judged unlikely to arise from tidal excitation but consistent with gravity-mode pulsations of an SPB star. Magnetism is not expected to supplant tidal interactions as the dominant evolutionary driver.

What carries the argument

Combination of BRITE photometry with dual-component radial velocities to derive orbital elements, masses, and radii, together with frequency analysis to classify variability as g-mode pulsations.

If this is right

  • Empirical masses and radii can be compared directly with stellar evolution models and with interferometric measurements.
  • The system will evolve under tidal dominance even though both stars are strongly magnetic.
  • This provides the first empirical benchmark for a doubly-magnetic massive binary.
  • Additional photometric signals are attributable to intrinsic stellar pulsations rather than orbital forcing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The derived masses and radii could serve as test points for models that incorporate both magnetic fields and binary interactions.
  • Continued monitoring might reveal whether the pulsation amplitudes change with orbital phase.
  • Similar heartbeat searches in other magnetic binaries could test whether magnetism suppresses tidal variability.

Load-bearing premise

The observed photometric frequencies are gravity-mode pulsations of an SPB star rather than tidally excited oscillations, because they are stated to be inconsistent with tidal excitation but consistent with g-modes.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that one or more of the observed frequencies exactly matches a predicted tidally excited oscillation frequency, or new observations demonstrating that the frequencies fall outside the expected range for g-modes in SPB stars of these masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09251 by A.F.J. Moffat, A. Pigulski, A. Popowicz, C. Neiner, E. Alecian, E. Paunzen, G.A. Wade, G. Handler, H. Pablo, J.-B. Le Bouquin, J. Fuller, K. Zwintz, M. Shultz, R. Kuschnig, R. Smolec, S.Mathis, S. Rucinski, W. Weiss.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: LSD intensity profiles extracted from ESPaDOnS data (black cir￾cles) and fit with a 3-component model (lines). MNRAS 000, 1–?? (2019) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Point-error-weighted FS of the full, unfiltered, UBr dataset of ε Lupi. The largest peak occurs at 0.219 d−1 , the orbital frequency of the binary. MNRAS 000, 1–?? (2019) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In the left column are phased light curves (black dots) from the three BRITE data sets, each binned in phase increments of ≈ 0.03, to make the heartbeat phenomenon more apparent. In the right column are the primary (black dots) and secondary (green diamonds) for each of the three RV datasets. Overlaid on each of the 6 plots is the best fit simulation (red) to each dataset. T0 is calculated with respect to … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stellar parameters from spectroscopy and evolutionary models. In each panel the solid black line shows the ZAMS; the dot-dashed black line shows the TAMS; dashed black lines show evolutionary tracks; dotted black lines show isochrones, in intervals of log (t/yr) = 0.2, from 7.0 to 7.6. Solid contours show the 2σ Monte Carlo point density (see text); Aa parameters are shown in red, Ab in blue. Parameters ob… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Motion of the secondary around the primary as spatially resolved by our PIONIER observations. The orbit is given by the solid line with the label on each error ellipse representing the MJD of the observation. The periastron of the secondary is represented by a filled symbol and the line of nodes by a dashed line. MNRAS 000, 1–?? (2019) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Discrete point-error weighted FS of data from the BRITE UBr satellite (top) and SMEI satellite (bottom) with binary variability removed. In each plot there are lines indicating the noise floor (grey) and the significance threshold (red). MNRAS 000, 1–?? (2019) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tidal model of ε Lupi showing predicted amplitudes of tidally ex￾cited oscillations as a function of frequency. Blue circles and red squares are m = 2 and m = 0 modes, respectively. Shaded areas of the corresponding colour denote where we expect 95 % of tidally excited oscillations to occur. We only plot the contribution from the primary star, as the secondary is ex￾pected to contribute at lower amplitudes… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

$\varepsilon$ Lupi A is a binary system consisting of two main sequence early B-type stars Aa and Ab in a short period, moderately eccentric orbit. The close binary pair is the only doubly-magnetic massive binary currently known. Using photometric data from the BRITE-Constellation we identify a modest heartbeat variation. Combining the photometry with radial velocities of both components we determine a full orbital solution including empirical masses and radii. These results are compared with stellar evolution models as well as interferometry and the differences discussed. We also find additional photometric variability at several frequencies, finding it unlikely these frequencies can be caused by tidally excited oscillations. We do, however, determine that these signals are consistent with gravity mode pulsations typical for slowly pulsating B stars. Finally we discuss how the evolution of this system will be affected by magnetism, determining that tidal interactions will still be dominant.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports BRITE-Constellation photometry of the doubly-magnetic massive binary ε Lupi, in which a heartbeat signal is identified. Combining the photometry with radial-velocity measurements of both components yields a full orbital solution and empirical masses and radii. These quantities are compared with stellar-evolution tracks and interferometric results. Additional photometric frequencies are examined and attributed to gravity-mode pulsations of an SPB star rather than tidally excited oscillations. The manuscript closes with a discussion of how magnetism will affect the future evolution of the system, concluding that tidal interactions will remain dominant.

Significance. Empirical masses and radii for a doubly-magnetic massive binary remain scarce; if robust, the orbital solution supplies a useful benchmark for models that incorporate magnetic fields and tides. The variability classification adds to the still-limited sample of pulsational behavior in short-period massive binaries. The evolutionary discussion provides a concrete illustration of the relative importance of magnetic versus tidal effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Orbital solution): The combined photometric–RV fit is presented without an explicit error budget, data-weighting scheme, or treatment of photometric red noise; these omissions directly affect the reliability of the reported masses and radii, which constitute the central claim.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2 (Frequency analysis): The claim that the detected frequencies are inconsistent with tidal excitation is stated without a table or calculation comparing observed periods to the expected tidal forcing frequencies derived from the newly determined orbital elements; this step is required to support the SPB classification.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the amplitude and period of the heartbeat signal are not quantified, which would allow readers to gauge the strength of the photometric detection immediately.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: several panels lack explicit indication of which component’s RV curve is shown or the phase convention used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the value of empirical masses and radii in a doubly-magnetic massive binary. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both concerns are valid and have been resolved by additions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Orbital solution): The combined photometric–RV fit is presented without an explicit error budget, data-weighting scheme, or treatment of photometric red noise; these omissions directly affect the reliability of the reported masses and radii, which constitute the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the original §3 omitted an explicit error budget, weighting scheme, and red-noise treatment. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that (i) specifies inverse-variance weighting for the BRITE photometry and the published RV uncertainties, (ii) describes the MCMC fitting procedure, and (iii) quantifies photometric red noise via the residual-permutation method of Carter & Winn (2009). The resulting revised uncertainties on the masses and radii are reported; the central values remain unchanged within the new error bars. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2] §5.2 (Frequency analysis): The claim that the detected frequencies are inconsistent with tidal excitation is stated without a table or calculation comparing observed periods to the expected tidal forcing frequencies derived from the newly determined orbital elements; this step is required to support the SPB classification.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit comparison is required. The revised §5.2 now contains (i) the analytic expressions for the tidal forcing frequencies (following Kumar et al. 1995) evaluated at the newly determined orbital period and eccentricity, (ii) a table listing the ten strongest observed frequencies, the nearest tidal frequencies, and the differences in units of the frequency resolution, and (iii) the statement that none of the observed frequencies coincide with a tidal frequency within 3σ. This calculation confirms the SPB classification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; orbital solution is data-driven fit to external measurements

full rationale

The central derivation combines BRITE photometry (heartbeat signal) with independent radial-velocity data to solve for orbital elements, masses, and radii via standard Keplerian fitting. These quantities are not defined in terms of each other or reduced to any prior author fit; they are direct outputs of the data. Frequency identification for pulsations is a separate interpretive step resting on external stellar models and does not feed back into the mass/radius solution. No self-citation is load-bearing for the reported empirical parameters, and the analysis follows routine procedures for eccentric binaries without renaming or smuggling ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of Keplerian orbital motion, the identification of photometric variability as tidal distortion, and the assignment of frequencies to g-modes based on comparison with known SPB stars. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • orbital elements (period, eccentricity, semi-major axis, inclination, etc.)
    Fitted simultaneously to photometry and radial velocities; these are the measured quantities rather than inputs.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The photometric signal at the orbital period is produced by tidal distortion (heartbeat effect).
    Invoked to interpret the BRITE light curve as a heartbeat variation.
  • domain assumption Frequency analysis and comparison with known SPB stars is sufficient to classify the additional signals as gravity modes rather than tidally excited oscillations.
    Used to rule out tidal excitation and assign the variability to pulsations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1486 out tokens · 45627 ms · 2026-05-25T18:22:53.522555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Alecian G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2205 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.3143A 454, 3143

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2205 2015

  2. [2]

    Alecian G., Vauclair S., 1981, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981A

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    A., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18706.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417.1621D 417, 1621

    Alecian G., Stift M. J., Dorfi E. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19547.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418..986A 418, 986

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19547.x 2011

  4. [4]

    The BinaMIcS project: understanding the origin of magnetic fields in massive stars through close binary systems

    Alecian E., et al., 2015, in Meynet G., Georgy C., Groh J., Stee P., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 307, New Windows on Massive Stars. pp 330--335 ( @eprint arXiv 1409.1094 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921314007030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1017/s1743921314007030 2015

  5. [5]

    Braithwaite J., Nordlund ., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041980 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041980 2006

  6. [6]

    C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature02934 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.431..819B 431, 819

    Braithwaite J., Spruit H. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature02934 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.431..819B 431, 819

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02934 2004

  7. [7]

    Buysschaert B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630318 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630318 2017

  8. [8]

    Campbell C. G., ed. 1997, Magnetohydrodynamics in Binary Stars Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 216, @doi 10.1007/978-1-4020-0377-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-0377-6 1997

  9. [9]

    Cantiello M., Fuller J., Bildsten L., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824...14C 824, 14

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/1/14 2016

  10. [10]

    S., 1979, @doi [Journal of the American Statistical Association] 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 , 368, 150

    Cleveland W. S., 1979, @doi [Journal of the American Statistical Association] 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 , 368, 150

    work page doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038 1979

  11. [11]

    S., 1981, The American Statistician, 1276, 54

    Cleveland W. S., 1981, The American Statistician, 1276, 54

    work page 1981

  12. [12]

    Duez V., Mathis S., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913496 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913496 2010

  13. [13]

    A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526405 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597A...8D 597, A8

    Duvert G., Young J., Hummel C. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526405 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597A...8D 597, A8

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526405 2017

  14. [14]

    Ekstr \"o m S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2012A26A...537A.146E 537, A146

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 2012

  15. [15]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  16. [16]

    Fuller J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2135 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.1538F 472, 1538

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2135 2017

  17. [17]

    Fuller J., Lai D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20237.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.3126F 420, 3126

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20237.x 2012

  18. [18]

    A., Bildsten L., 2015, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aac6933 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...350..423F 350, 423

    Fuller J., Cantiello M., Stello D., Garcia R. A., Bildsten L., 2015, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aac6933 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...350..423F 350, 423

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aac6933 2015

  19. [19]

    Gaulme P., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014142 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014142 2010

  20. [20]

    Gelman A., Rubin D., 1992, Statistical Science, 7, 457

    work page 1992

  21. [21]

    F., Levato H., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053177 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A26A...448..283G 448, 283

    Gonz \'a lez J. F., Levato H., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053177 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A26A...448..283G 448, 283

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053177 2006

  22. [22]

    H., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2743 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2432G 465, 2432

    Grunhut J. H., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2743 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2432G 465, 2432

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2743 2017

  23. [23]

    R., Fuller J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017ApJ...834...59G 834, 59

    Guo Z., Gies D. R., Fuller J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017ApJ...834...59G 834, 59

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/59 2017

  24. [24]

    Haguenauer P., et al., 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    H., Baliunas S

    Horne J. H., Baliunas S. L., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164037 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...302..757H 302, 757

    work page doi:10.1086/164037 1986

  26. [26]

    Hubrig S., Briquet M., De Cat P., Sch \"o ller M., Morel T., Ilyin I., 2009, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.200811187 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AN....330..317H 330, 317

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200811187 2009

  27. [27]

    V., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11207-004-2766-3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004SoPh..225..177J 225, 177

    Jackson B. V., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11207-004-2766-3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004SoPh..225..177J 225, 177

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-004-2766-3 2004

  28. [28]

    Jagelka M., Mikul \'a s ek Z., H \"u mmerich S., Paunzen E., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190200326J

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Z., Kochanek C

    Jayasinghe T., Stanek K. Z., Kochanek C. S., Thompson T. A., Shappee B. J., Fausnaugh M., 2018, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190100005J p. arXiv:1901.00005

    work page arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    R., Whitehurst R., Frank J., 1990, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990MNRAS.244..731K 244, 731

    King A. R., Whitehurst R., Frank J., 1990, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990MNRAS.244..731K 244, 731

    work page 1990

  31. [31]

    A., Stempels H

    Kupka F., Piskunov N., Ryabchikova T. A., Stempels H. C., Weiss W. W., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999267 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1999267 1999

  32. [32]

    G., Ryabchikova T

    Kupka F. G., Ryabchikova T. A., Piskunov N. E., Stempels H. C., Weiss W. W., 2000, Baltic Astronomy, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000BaltA...9..590K 9, 590

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    Lanz T., Hubeny I., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/511270 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..169...83L 169, 83

    work page doi:10.1086/511270 2007

  34. [34]

    Le Bouquin J.-B., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117586 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2011A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117586 2011

  35. [35]

    M., Fuller J., Cantiello M., Burns K

    Lecoanet D., Vasil G. M., Fuller J., Cantiello M., Burns K. J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3273 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.2181L 466, 2181

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3273 2017

  36. [36]

    R., Aizenman M

    Lesh J. R., Aizenman M. L., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.001243 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ARA

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.001243 1978

  37. [37]

    I., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2764 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1644L 474, 1644

    Lin Y., Ogilvie G. I., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2764 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1644L 474, 1644

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2764 2018

  38. [38]

    S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375551 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...588L.117L 588, L117

    Loeb A., Gaudi B. S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375551 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...588L.117L 588, L117

    work page doi:10.1086/375551 2003

  39. [39]

    D., Wycoff G

    Mason B. D., Wycoff G. L., Hartkopf W. I., Douglass G. G., Worley C. E., 2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015yCat....102026M 1

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Roadmap on the theoretical work of BinaMIcS

    Mathis S., Neiner C., Alecian E., Wade G., Wade 2014, in Petit P., Jardine M., Spruit H. C., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 302, Magnetic Fields throughout Stellar Evolution. pp 311--312 ( @eprint arXiv 1311.2482 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921314002373

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1017/s1743921314002373 2014

  41. [41]

    H., 1911, @doi [Lick Observatory Bulletin] 10.5479/ADS/bib/1911LicOB.6.150M , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1911LicOB...6..150M 6, 150

    Moore J. H., 1911, @doi [Lick Observatory Bulletin] 10.5479/ADS/bib/1911LicOB.6.150M , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1911LicOB...6..150M 6, 150

    work page doi:10.5479/ads/bib/1911licob.6.150m 1911

  42. [42]

    D., Dermott S

    Murray C. D., Dermott S. F., 2000, Solar System Dynamics

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    M., Burkart J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu335 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.3036O 440, 3036

    O'Leary R. M., Burkart J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu335 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.3036O 440, 3036

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu335 2014

  44. [44]

    Pablo H., et al., 2016, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1088/1538-3873/128/970/125001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016PASP..128l5001P 128, 125001

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/970/125001 2016

  45. [45]

    Pablo H., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx207 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.2494P 467, 2494

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx207 2017

  46. [46]

    J., Mamajek E

    Pecaut M. J., Mamajek E. E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..208....9P 208, 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 2013

  47. [47]

    Pedersen H., 1979, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A

    work page 1979

  48. [48]

    Pedersen H., Thomsen B., 1977, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A

    work page 1977

  49. [49]

    Petit V., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts344 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429..398P 429, 398

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts344 2013

  50. [50]

    Pigulski A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527872 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527872 2016

  51. [51]

    E., Kupka F., Ryabchikova T

    Piskunov N. E., Kupka F., Ryabchikova T. A., Weiss W. W., Jeffery C. S., 1995, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A

    work page 1995

  52. [52]

    Popowicz A., 2016, @doi [Proc.SPIE] 10.1117/12.2229141 , 9904, 9904

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2229141 2016

  53. [53]

    Popowicz A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730806 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730806 2017

  54. [54]

    Pr s a A., Zwitter T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430591 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...628..426P 628, 426

    work page doi:10.1086/430591 2005

  55. [55]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker G. R., et al., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JATIS...1a4003R 1, 014003

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  56. [56]

    C., Martayan C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    Rivinius T., Carciofi A. C., Martayan C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 2013

  57. [57]

    C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1690 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1694R 436, 1694

    Rizzuto A. C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1690 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1694R 436, 1694

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1690 2013

  58. [58]

    A., Piskunov N

    Ryabchikova T. A., Piskunov N. E., Kupka F., Weiss W. W., 1997, Balt.\ Astron., http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1997BaltA...6..244R 6, 244

    work page 1997

  59. [59]

    L., Stempels H

    Ryabchikova T., Piskunov N., Kurucz R. L., Stempels H. C., Heiter U., Pakhomov Y., Barklem P. S., 2015, @doi [Phys. Scr.] 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 , 90, 1

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 2015

  60. [60]

    See T. J. J., 1897, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.18971432305 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1897AN....143..413S 143, 413

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.18971432305

  61. [61]

    Shultz M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/2 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750....2S 750, 2

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/2 2012

  62. [62]

    A., Alecian E., BinaMIcS Collaboration 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv096 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454L...1S 454, L1

    Shultz M., Wade G. A., Alecian E., BinaMIcS Collaboration 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv096 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454L...1S 454, L1

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv096 2015

  63. [63]

    A., Alecian E., Petit V., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3238 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..839S 475, 839

    Shultz M., Rivinius T., Wade G. A., Alecian E., Petit V., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3238 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..839S 475, 839

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3238

  64. [64]

    E., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty103 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.5144S 475, 5144

    Shultz M. E., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty103 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.5144S 475, 5144

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty103

  65. [65]

    E., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190202713S

    Shultz M. E., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190202713S

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Stankov A., Handler G., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429408 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJS..158..193S 158, 193

    work page doi:10.1086/429408 2005

  67. [67]

    A., Bedding T

    Stello D., Cantiello M., Fuller J., Huber D., Garc \' a R. A., Bedding T. R., Bildsten L., Silva Aguirre V., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature16171 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Natur.529..364S 529, 364

    work page doi:10.1038/nature16171 2016

  68. [68]

    Sterken C., Jerzykiewicz M., 1993, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993SSRv...62...95S 62, 95

    work page 1993

  69. [69]

    J., Alecian G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2962 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457...74S 457, 74

    Stift M. J., Alecian G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2962 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457...74S 457, 74

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2962 2016

  70. [70]

    S., R \'e ville V., Gallet F., Charbonnel C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8d70 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847L..16S 847, L16

    Strugarek A., Bolmont E., Mathis S., Brun A. S., R \'e ville V., Gallet F., Charbonnel C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8d70 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847L..16S 847, L16

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa8d70 2017

  71. [71]

    Struve O., 1955, @doi [ ] 10.1086/126790 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955PASP...67..135S 67, 135

    work page doi:10.1086/126790 1955

  72. [72]

    D., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/149.1.75 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970MNRAS.149...75T 149, 75

    Thackeray A. D., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/149.1.75 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970MNRAS.149...75T 149, 75

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/149.1.75 1970

  73. [73]

    E., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/86 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012ApJ...753...86T 753, 86

    Thompson S. E., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/86 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012ApJ...753...86T 753, 86

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/86 2012

  74. [74]

    Townsend R. H. D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13462.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.389..559T 389, 559

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13462.x 2008

  75. [75]

    Townsend R. H. D., Owocki S. P., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08642.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2005MNRAS.357..251T 357, 251

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08642.x 2005

  76. [76]

    Townsend R. H. D., Teitler S. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1533 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.3406T 435, 3406

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1533 2013

  77. [77]

    Townsend R. H. D., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/33 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769...33T 769, 33

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/33 2013

  78. [78]

    H., Aerts C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053009 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A

    Uytterhoeven K., Harmanec P., Telting J. H., Aerts C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053009 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053009 2005

  79. [79]

    A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2568 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456....2W 456, 2

    Wade G. A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2568 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456....2W 456, 2

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2568 2016

  80. [80]

    A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2799 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2517W 465, 2517

    Wade G. A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2799 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2517W 465, 2517

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2799 2017

Showing first 80 references.