pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09850 · v1 · pith:PVIQ5C3Dnew · submitted 2019-06-24 · 💻 cs.HC

Multisensory cues facilitate coordination of stepping movements with a virtual reality avatar

Omar Khan , Imran Ahmed , Joshua Cottingham , Musa Rahhal , Theodoros N Arvanitis , Mark Elliott This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords virtual realitygait entrainmentmultisensory cuesavatar coordinationstepping movementsauditory-visual integrationphase perturbationasynchrony
0
0 comments X

The pith

An avatar in VR guides human stepping when footstep sounds match the visuals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether a virtual avatar can entrain real stepping movements by mapping motion-capture data to an avatar viewed in a VR headset. It measures timing differences between the participant's steps and the avatar's steps, including responses to a sudden 15% acceleration or deceleration in the avatar's cycle. Asynchronies drift over time with visuals alone but remain stable when congruent footstep sounds are added, and participants correct their timing to the perturbation only in the auditory-visual case. This setup matters for anyone interested in using virtual partners to shape physical movement, such as in training or therapy contexts.

Core claim

Participants instructed to step in time with a virtual avatar showed slow drift in step asynchronies under visual-only conditions, but asynchronies stabilized when footstep sounds were included. A phase perturbation of 15% in the avatar's step cycle produced a clear corrective response in the auditory-visual conditions. The authors conclude that an avatar's movements can influence a person's gait provided relevant auditory cues are present to achieve suitable accuracy.

What carries the argument

Asynchrony measurement between participant step onsets and avatar step onsets, tested with and without added congruent footstep sounds and with a 15% phase perturbation applied to one avatar step cycle.

If this is right

  • An avatar's movements can influence a person's own gait when congruent auditory cues are included.
  • Visual cues alone produce unstable coordination that drifts over repeated steps.
  • Congruent footstep sounds enable both stable timing and corrective adjustments when the avatar's movement timing changes.
  • Humanoid avatars provide a feasible method for visually cued gait guidance once auditory cues are added.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same multisensory approach might support coordination training in other rhythmic movements beyond walking.
  • Designers of VR movement systems could test whether different sound types or timings further improve correction speed.
  • The method could be extended to cases where the avatar leads or follows the user at varying ratios rather than strict synchrony.

Load-bearing premise

Any difference in stepping stability between the visual-only and auditory-visual conditions is caused only by the added footstep sounds and not by other differences in the experimental setup or instructions.

What would settle it

A replication in which the only change is the presence or absence of footstep sounds still shows equivalent drift in asynchronies and no corrective response to the phase perturbation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09850 by Imran Ahmed, Joshua Cottingham, Mark Elliott, Musa Rahhal, Omar Khan, Theodoros N Arvanitis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example step onsets and resulting temporal performance measures a). Example of step onsets (red circles) extracted from the vertical heel marker trajectory (blue line) during the stepping task. Onsets were extracted from the avatar and participants in the same way. b). Schematic showing temporal performance measures based on the step onset times of the avatar and participant. Asynchrony (A) was measured as… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Asynchrony between participant step onsets and corresponding Avatar steps a). Mean Asynchrony between participant step onsets and corresponding Avatar steps, for all conditions. Negative asynchronies indicate the participants are, on average, stepping ahead of the Avatar cue. Error bars show SEM. b). Mean standard deviation of asynchrony for all conditions. Error bars show SEM. Variability of asynchronies … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean relative asynchronies before and after the perturbation (vertical grey bar) at time T for Auditory-Visual cues. Dotted horizontal line shows the zero relative asynchrony measure, to which participants were expected to correct towards following the perturbation. Separate plots are shown for Fast, shortened (a) and lengthened (b) intervals, and Slow, shortened (c) and lengthened (d) intervals. Error bar… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean correction gain as calculated by a linear phase correction model fitted to the asynchrony data of each participant. Higher values indicate participants are correcting their movements to a bigger proportion of the preceding step asynchrony between themselves and the Avatar. Correction gains are shown for Fast versus Slow and Visual-Only (VO) versus Auditory-Visual (AV) conditions. Error bars show SEM. … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Asynchronies before and after phase wrapping removed a). Asynchronies observed for a fast tempo trial when matching participant onsets to the nearest Avatar step onsets. Wrapping of the asynchrony can be seen between the intervals of +/-0.4 seconds which does not correspond to an attempt to regain synchrony. b). Asynchronies for the same trial but with phase wrapping removed and steps assigned to ensure as… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The effectiveness of simple sensory cues for retraining gait have been demonstrated, yet the feasibility of humanoid avatars for entrainment have yet to be investigated. Here, we describe the development of a novel method of visually cued training, in the form of a virtual partner, and investigate its ability to provide movement guidance in the form of stepping. Real stepping movements were mapped onto an avatar using motion capture data. The trajectory of one of the avatar step cycles was then accelerated or decelerated by 15% to create a perturbation. Healthy participants were motion captured while instructed to step in time to the avatar's movements, as viewed through a virtual reality headset. Step onset times were used to measure the timing errors (asynchronies) between them. Participants completed either a visual-only condition, or auditory-visual with footstep sounds included. Participants' asynchronies exhibited slow drift in the Visual-Only condition, but became stable in the Auditory-Visual condition. Moreover, we observed a clear corrective response to the phase perturbation in both auditory-visual conditions. We conclude that an avatar's movements can be used to influence a person's own gait, but should include relevant auditory cues congruent with the movement to ensure a suitable accuracy is achieved.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes an experiment in which participants stepped in time with a VR avatar whose movements were derived from motion capture. One step cycle was perturbed by accelerating or decelerating it 15%. Participants completed either a visual-only condition or an auditory-visual condition that added congruent footstep sounds. The reported results are that asynchronies between participant and avatar steps drifted slowly in the visual-only condition but remained stable in the auditory-visual condition, and a corrective response to the perturbation appeared in the auditory-visual conditions. The authors conclude that an avatar can influence gait but requires congruent auditory cues to achieve suitable accuracy.

Significance. If the empirical claims are robust, the work provides evidence that multisensory cues improve entrainment to a virtual partner during stepping, which could inform the design of VR-based gait training or rehabilitation systems. The perturbation method and direct measurement of asynchronies constitute a clear test of both stability and error correction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: The description states that participants completed 'either a visual-only condition, or auditory-visual with footstep sounds included' but supplies no information confirming that visual rendering, avatar motion parameters, trial structure, instructions, or participant expectations were identical across conditions. Because the central claim attributes the difference in asynchrony drift and the presence of corrective responses specifically to the addition of auditory cues, any unmentioned covariation between conditions undermines the causal attribution.
  2. [Results] Results: The abstract and provided summary contain no participant numbers, statistical tests, measures of variability, or raw data summaries for the reported slow drift versus stability or for the corrective responses. Without these, it is not possible to assess whether the stabilization and corrective-response claims are supported by the measurements.
  3. [Conclusion] Conclusion: The recommendation that 'relevant auditory cues congruent with the movement' should be included to ensure accuracy rests on the assumption that the observed difference is caused by audition rather than other factors; the manuscript does not report controls that would support this attribution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'in both auditory-visual conditions' appears, yet only a single auditory-visual condition is described; clarify whether multiple AV conditions existed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for these detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of our methods and results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: The description states that participants completed 'either a visual-only condition, or auditory-visual with footstep sounds included' but supplies no information confirming that visual rendering, avatar motion parameters, trial structure, instructions, or participant expectations were identical across conditions. Because the central claim attributes the difference in asynchrony drift and the presence of corrective responses specifically to the addition of auditory cues, any unmentioned covariation between conditions undermines the causal attribution.

    Authors: The Methods section specifies that the visual avatar rendering, motion-capture parameters, trial structure, and participant instructions were identical in both conditions; the sole difference was the addition of congruent footstep sounds. Participant expectations were controlled via the same instructions in both conditions. We will revise the Abstract and Methods to state this equivalence explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results: The abstract and provided summary contain no participant numbers, statistical tests, measures of variability, or raw data summaries for the reported slow drift versus stability or for the corrective responses. Without these, it is not possible to assess whether the stabilization and corrective-response claims are supported by the measurements.

    Authors: The full Results section contains the participant count, the statistical tests performed on asynchronies and phase correction, and associated variability measures. We agree the Abstract should summarize these quantitative elements and will revise it accordingly. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Conclusion] Conclusion: The recommendation that 'relevant auditory cues congruent with the movement' should be included to ensure accuracy rests on the assumption that the observed difference is caused by audition rather than other factors; the manuscript does not report controls that would support this attribution.

    Authors: The design held all factors constant except the auditory cues, as described in Methods. We will revise the Conclusion to explicitly note these controls and thereby support the attribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical timing measurements with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The paper reports a behavioral experiment measuring step asynchronies via motion capture in visual-only vs. auditory-visual conditions. No equations, models, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains appear in the abstract or described methods. Results rest on direct timing data rather than any construction that reduces to its own inputs. No self-citations of uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are invoked. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular empirical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study relies on standard experimental psychology methods for measuring entrainment; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the experimental setup itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Step onset times provide a valid and sensitive measure of coordination with the avatar
    Used throughout to quantify asynchronies, drift, and corrective responses.
  • domain assumption Participants will attempt to follow the instruction to step in time with the avatar
    The experiment design depends on this behavioral compliance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5758 in / 1416 out tokens · 43453 ms · 2026-05-25T17:15:35.055361+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    the Mirror-Neuron System

    Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. the Mirror-Neuron System. Annu Rev Neurosci [Internet]. 2004;27(1):169–92. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 2004

  2. [2]

    Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition

    Haggard P, Rossetti Y, Kawato M. Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition. Oxford University Press; 2008. 683 p

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action

    Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep;2(9):661

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Sensorimotor synchronization with different metrical levels of point-light dance movements

    Su Y. Sensorimotor synchronization with different metrical levels of point-light dance movements. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10(April):1–15

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Step in time: exploration of synchrony and timing correction in response to virtual reality avatars for gait re-training

    Khan O, Ahmed I, Rahhal M, Arvanitis TN, Elliott MT. Step in time: exploration of synchrony and timing correction in response to virtual reality avatars for gait re-training. In: Sharkey PM, Rizzo AA, editors. Proc 11th Intl Conf on Disability, Virtual Reality and Assoc Technologies [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. p. 323–6. Available from: http://ce...

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide

    Bovend’Eerdt TJH, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):352–61

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: A synthesis of the evidence

    Eng JJ, Fang Tang P. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: A synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;7(10):1417–36

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Internal and external focus of attention during gait re- education: an observational study of physical therapist practice in stroke rehabilitation

    Johnson L, Burridge JH, Demain SH. Internal and external focus of attention during gait re- education: an observational study of physical therapist practice in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Ther [Internet]. 2013;93(7):957–66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559523

    work page arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Why don’t patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee

    Campbell R. Why don’t patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Heal [Internet]. 2001 Feb 1 [cited 2017 Oct 30];55(2):132–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11154253

    work page arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Effects of sensory cueing in virtual motor rehabilitation

    Palacios-Navarro G, Albiol-Pérez S, García-Magariño García I. Effects of sensory cueing in virtual motor rehabilitation. A review. J Biomed Inform [Internet]. 2016;60:49–57. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.006 2016

  11. [11]

    Hemiparetic stepping to the beat: asymmetric response to metronome phase shift during treadmill gait

    Pelton TA, Johannsen L, Chen H, Wing AM. Hemiparetic stepping to the beat: asymmetric response to metronome phase shift during treadmill gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair [Internet]. 2010;24(5):428–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19952366

    work page arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Rhythmic auditory-motor facilitation of gait patterns in patients with Parkinson’s disease

    McIntosh GC, Brown SH, Rice RR, Thaut MH. Rhythmic auditory-motor facilitation of gait patterns in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(1):22– 6

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: Steps to follow! Exp Brain Res

    Bank PJM, Roerdink M, Peper CE. Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: Steps to follow! Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(2):159–69

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Modality-specific communication enabling gait synchronization during over-ground side-by-side walking

    Zivotofsky AZ, Gruendlinger L, Hausdorff JM. Modality-specific communication enabling gait synchronization during over-ground side-by-side walking. Hum Mov Sci [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2013 Nov 18];31(5):1268–85. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945712000127

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    How visual information influences coordination dynamics when following the leader

    Meerhoff LA, De Poel HJ, Button C. How visual information influences coordination dynamics when following the leader. Neurosci Lett [Internet]. 2014 Oct [cited 2015 Jul 12];582:12–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.022 2014

  16. [16]

    Sensorimotor synchronization with audio-visual stimuli: limited multisensory integration

    Armstrong A, Issartel J. Sensorimotor synchronization with audio-visual stimuli: limited multisensory integration. Exp Brain Res [Internet]. 2014 Nov 16 [cited 2017 Oct 30];232(11):3453–63. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-014-4031-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4031-9 2014

  17. [17]

    The supplementation of spatial information improves coordination

    Armstrong A, Issartel J, Varlet M, Marin L. The supplementation of spatial information improves coordination. Neurosci Lett [Internet]. 2013 Aug [cited 2014 Jan 10];548:212–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.013 2013

  18. [18]

    Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization

    Hove MJ, Spivey MJ, Krumhansl CL. Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1525–34

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Audiovisual beat induction in complex auditory rhythms: Point-light figure movement as an effective visual beat

    Su Y-H. Audiovisual beat induction in complex auditory rhythms: Point-light figure movement as an effective visual beat. Acta Psychol (Amst) [Internet]. 2014 Sep [cited 2015 Jan 22];151:40–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.016 2014

  20. [20]

    Multisensory cues improve sensorimotor synchronisation

    Elliott MT, Wing AM, Welchman AE. Multisensory cues improve sensorimotor synchronisation. Eur J Neurosci [Internet]. 2010 May 17 [cited 2017 Oct 30];31(10):1828–35. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07205.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07205.x 2010

  21. [22]

    A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique

    Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 1991;10(5):575–87

    work page 1991

  22. [23]

    Parameter Estimation of Linear Sensorimotor Synchronization Models : Phase Correction , Period Correction , and Ensemble Synchronization

    Jacoby N, Tishby N, Repp BH, Ahissar M, Keller PE, Jacoby N, et al. Parameter Estimation of Linear Sensorimotor Synchronization Models : Phase Correction , Period Correction , and Ensemble Synchronization. Timing Time Percept [Internet]. 2015 May 25 [cited 2017 Sep 25];3(1–2):52–87. Available from: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/...

    work page doi:10.1163/22134468-00002048 2015

  23. [24]

    Visual enhancement of auditory beat perception across auditory interference levels

    Su Y-H. Visual enhancement of auditory beat perception across auditory interference levels. Brain Cogn [Internet]. 2014 Oct [cited 2015 May 6];90:19–31. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262614000864

    work page 2014

  24. [25]

    Stepping to phase-perturbed metronome cues: multisensory advantage in movement synchrony but not correction

    Wright RL, Elliott MT. Stepping to phase-perturbed metronome cues: multisensory advantage in movement synchrony but not correction. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 Dec 8];8(September):724. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00724/full

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00724/full 2014

  25. [26]

    Perceiving and reenacting spatiotemporal characteristics of walking sounds

    Young W, Rodger M, Craig CM. Perceiving and reenacting spatiotemporal characteristics of walking sounds. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [27]

    Multisensory processing in review: From physiology to behaviour

    Alais D, Newell FN, Mamassian P. Multisensory processing in review: From physiology to behaviour. Seeing and Perceiving. 2010

    work page 2010

  27. [28]

    Causal inference in multisensory perception

    Körding KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS One. 2007

    work page 2007

  28. [29]

    Moving in time: Bayesian causal inference explains movement coordination to auditory beats

    Elliott MT, Wing AM, Welchman AE. Moving in time: Bayesian causal inference explains movement coordination to auditory beats. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2014

    work page 2014

  29. [30]

    The effects of rhythmic sensory cues on the temporal dynamics of human gait

    Sejdić E, Fu Y, Pak A, Fairley J a., Chau T. The effects of rhythmic sensory cues on the temporal dynamics of human gait. PLoS One. 2012;7(8)

    work page 2012

  30. [31]

    The synchronisation of lower limb responses with a variable metronome: The effect of biomechanical constraints on timing

    Chen HY, Wing AM, Pratt D. The synchronisation of lower limb responses with a variable metronome: The effect of biomechanical constraints on timing. Gait Posture. 2006;23(3):307–14

    work page 2006

  31. [32]

    Variability of timing in expressive piano performance increases with interval duration

    Repp BH. Variability of timing in expressive piano performance increases with interval duration. Psychon Bull Rev. 1997

    work page 1997

  32. [33]

    Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature

    Repp BH. Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychon Bull Rev [Internet]. 2005;12(6):969–92. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03206433

    work page doi:10.3758/bf03206433 2005

  33. [34]

    Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete or continuous sounds

    Rodger MWM, Craig CM. Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete or continuous sounds. Exp Brain Res [Internet]. 2011 Aug [cited 2015 Mar 5];214(3):393–402. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-011-2837-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2837-2 2011

  34. [35]

    Peak velocity as a cue in audiovisual synchrony perception of rhythmic stimuli

    Su Y-H. Peak velocity as a cue in audiovisual synchrony perception of rhythmic stimuli. Cognition [Internet]. 2014 Jun [cited 2014 Dec 17];131(3):330–44. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027714000298

    work page 2014

  35. [36]

    Influence of stimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination

    Varlet M, Coey CA, Schmidt RC, Marin L, Bardy BG, Richardson MJ. Influence of stimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform [Internet]. 2014 Oct;40(5):1849–60. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0037417

    work page doi:10.1037/a0037417 2014

  36. [37]

    Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuomotor coordination

    Hajnal A, Richardson MJ, Harrison SJ, Schmidt RC. Location but not amount of stimulus occlusion influences the stability of visuomotor coordination. Exp Brain Res. 2012;221(3):351–5

    work page 2012

  37. [38]

    Three-dimensional human gait pattern – reference data for normal men

    Pietraszewski B, Winiarski S, Jaroszczuk S. Three-dimensional human gait pattern – reference data for normal men. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2012;14(3):9–16

    work page 2012

  38. [39]

    Properties of pedestrians walking in line

    Jelić A, Appert-Rolland C, Lemercier S, Pettré J. Properties of pedestrians walking in line. II. Stepping behavior. Phys Rev E [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2014 May 20];86(4):46111. Available from: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.046111

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.86.046111 2012

  39. [40]

    Quantifying phase correction in sensorimotor synchronization: Empirical comparison of three paradigms

    Repp BH, Keller PE, Jacoby N. Quantifying phase correction in sensorimotor synchronization: Empirical comparison of three paradigms. Acta Psychol (Amst) [Internet]. 2012;139(2):281–

    work page 2012

  40. [41]

    Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.002 2011

  41. [42]

    Follow the leader: Visual control of speed in pedestrian following

    Rio KW, Rhea CK, Warren WH. Follow the leader: Visual control of speed in pedestrian following. J Vis [Internet]. 2014;14(2):4–4. Available from: http://jov.arvojournals.org/Article.aspx?doi=10.1167/14.2.4

    work page doi:10.1167/14.2.4 2014

  42. [43]

    Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review - Springer

    Chen L, Vroomen J. Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review - Springer. Atten Percept Psychophys [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 May 28];75:790–811. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4/fulltext.html

    work page doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4/fulltext.html 2013

  43. [44]

    Visuomotor synchronization: Analysis of the initiation and stable synchronization phases

    Kurgansky A V. Visuomotor synchronization: Analysis of the initiation and stable synchronization phases. Hum Physiol [Internet]. 2008 Jun [cited 2015 Mar 17];34(3):289–98. Available from: http://0- link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/article/10.1134/S0362119708030043

    work page doi:10.1134/s0362119708030043 2008

  44. [45]

    Linear Phase-Correction in Synchronization: Predictions, Parameter Estimation, and Simulations

    Vorberg D, Schulze H-H. Linear Phase-Correction in Synchronization: Predictions, Parameter Estimation, and Simulations. J Math Psychol [Internet]. 2002 Feb [cited 2017 Sep 25];46(1):56–87. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022249601913756

    work page 2002

  45. [46]

    Handbook of perception and action

    Vorberg D, Wing A. Handbook of perception and action. Modeling variability and dependence in timing. 1996. Figure 1 Click here to access/download;Figure;Fig1.tiff Figure 2 Click here to access/download;Figure;Fig2.tiff Figure 3 Click here to access/download;Figure;Fig3.tiff Figure 4 Click here to access/download;Figure;Fig4.tiff Figure 5 Click here to acc...

    work page 1996