pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09987 · v1 · pith:W5Y4R2GJnew · submitted 2019-06-24 · 🧮 math.DS

On the Solutions of Systems of Difference Equations via Tribonacci Numbers

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 16:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords difference equationsTribonacci numbersrational systemsexplicit solutionsstabilityglobal behaviorrecurrence relations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Solutions to these systems of rational difference equations take explicit forms in terms of Tribonacci numbers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines two systems of rational difference equations where each term depends rationally on prior terms with plus or minus variants. It shows that the generated sequences satisfy the Tribonacci recurrence exactly under the given initial conditions, yielding closed-form expressions. The link also supports analysis of stability and global behavior of the solutions. A reader would care because the association converts iterative rational recursions into direct formulas based on a standard integer sequence.

Core claim

The solutions of the systems are associated with Tribonacci numbers, providing explicit forms for the sequences.

What carries the argument

Association of the solution sequences with Tribonacci numbers that satisfy the three-term linear recurrence and match the rational system outputs.

If this is right

  • Explicit expressions for x_n and y_n are obtained via Tribonacci numbers.
  • Stability character of equilibria follows from the closed forms.
  • Global behavior such as convergence or periodicity is determined using Tribonacci properties.
  • The plus and minus variants of the systems each admit such Tribonacci representations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same linking technique could apply to other rational difference systems whose solutions obey higher-order linear recurrences.
  • Tribonacci numbers may appear in additional discrete systems where three prior terms influence the next rational expression.

Load-bearing premise

The specific rational forms and initial conditions permit the sequences to satisfy the Tribonacci recurrence relation exactly.

What would settle it

Compute the first several terms from the difference equations with chosen initial values and verify whether they equal the Tribonacci-based closed forms for those same initials.

read the original abstract

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the explicit form, stability character and global behavior of solutions of the following two systems of rational difference equations x_{n+1}=((+(-)1)/(y_{n}(x_{n-1}+(-)1)+1)), y_{n+1}=((+(-)1)/(x_{n}(y_{n-1}+(-)1)+1)), n=0,1,... such that their solutions are associated with Tribonacci numbers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates two systems of rational difference equations (with four sign combinations) of the form x_{n+1} = a / (y_n (x_{n-1} + b) + 1), y_{n+1} = c / (x_n (y_{n-1} + d) + 1) where a,b,c,d are chosen from {+1,-1}. It claims that, for suitable initial conditions, the solution sequences admit explicit closed forms in terms of Tribonacci numbers, and it studies the stability character and global behavior of these solutions.

Significance. If the explicit Tribonacci representations are derived independently and verified to satisfy the given rational recurrences exactly, the result would supply a concrete, non-trivial link between a class of nonlinear rational systems and a linear recurrence sequence. This is a standard but valuable contribution in the difference-equations literature when the derivation is parameter-free and the initial conditions are handled explicitly. The accompanying stability analysis would then rest on a firm foundation.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim requires an explicit verification that the proposed Tribonacci forms satisfy the rational equations for the stated initial conditions. The manuscript must supply the induction step or direct substitution that shows the rational right-hand side reduces to the next Tribonacci ratio (or equivalent expression) without additional fitting parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. The system notation in the abstract and introduction uses ambiguous shorthand ((+(-)1), (+(-)1)) that obscures the four distinct sign cases; these should be written out as four separate systems with clear equations.
  2. Initial conditions are mentioned only generically; the precise values that make the Tribonacci association hold should be stated explicitly (e.g., in terms of the first few Tribonacci numbers) before the main theorems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the constructive suggestion regarding verification of the central claim. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim requires an explicit verification that the proposed Tribonacci forms satisfy the rational equations for the stated initial conditions. The manuscript must supply the induction step or direct substitution that shows the rational right-hand side reduces to the next Tribonacci ratio (or equivalent expression) without additional fitting parameters.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification is required for rigor. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection containing a complete induction argument for each of the four sign combinations. The proof will begin from the given initial conditions, substitute the proposed Tribonacci-ratio expressions into the right-hand sides of the rational system, and show by direct algebraic reduction (using the Tribonacci recurrence) that the left-hand sides match the next terms exactly, with no auxiliary parameters introduced. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives explicit solution forms for the given rational systems by direct substitution and induction on the recurrence, showing that the sequences satisfy the Tribonacci relation under the stated initial conditions. This is a standard verification that the closed form matches the system, not a reduction of the result to a fitted parameter or self-citation. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is present in the abstract or described chain. The association with Tribonacci numbers is an output of the explicit-form calculation, not an input by construction. The central claim remains independently verifiable from the difference equations alone.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all fields left empty due to insufficient information.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5612 in / 881 out tokens · 25082 ms · 2026-05-25T16:53:28.365608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Applied Mathematics , 4:15-20 (2013)

    Y azlik, Y, T ollu, DT, T askara, N, On the Solutions of Difference Equation Systems with Padovan Numbers. Applied Mathematics , 4:15-20 (2013)

  2. [2]

    Balkan Journal of Mathematics , 2: 163-172 (2014)

    T ollu, DT, Y azlik, Y, T askara, N , The Solutions of Four Riccati Difference Equations Associated with Fibonacci numbers. Balkan Journal of Mathematics , 2: 163-172 (2014)

  3. [3]

    Applied Mathematics and Computation , 233: 310-319 (2014)

    T ollu, DT, Y azlik, Y, T askara, N , On fourteen solvable systems of difference equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 233: 310-319 (2014)

  4. [4]

    Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 3(1): 204-214 (2015)

    Halim, Y , Global Character of Systems of Rational Difference Equatio ns. Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 3(1): 204-214 (2015)

  5. [5]

    Dynamics of Con- tinuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems, (Serias A) to appear (2015)

    Bacani, JB , Rabago, JFT , On Two Nonlinear Difference Equations. Dynamics of Con- tinuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems, (Serias A) to appear (2015)

  6. [6]

    Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , 39: 2974- 2982 (2016)

    Halim, Y , Bayram, M , On the solutions of a higher-order difference equation in te rms of generalized Fibonacci sequences. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , 39: 2974- 2982 (2016)

  7. [7]

    International Journal of Difference Equations, 11(1): 65-77 (2016)

    Halim, Y , A System of Difference Equations with Solutions Associated to Fibonacci Num- bers. International Journal of Difference Equations, 11(1): 65-77 (2016)

  8. [8]

    On the Closed-Form Solution of a Nonlinear Difference Equation and Another Proof to Sroysang's Conjecture

    ??Rabago, JFT, On the Closed-Form Solution of a Nonlinear Difference Equati on and Another Proof to Sroysang’s Conjecture. arXiv:1604.06659v1 [math.NT] (2016)

  9. [9]

    Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 5(1): 166-178 (2017)

    Halim, Y , Rabago, JFT , On Some Solvable Systems of Difference Equations with Solu- tions Associated to Fibonacci Numbers. Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 5(1): 166-178 (2017)

  10. [10]

    Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society , Arti- cle ID 1743540, 11 pages (2018)

    Alotaibi, AM, Noorani, MSM , El-Moneam, MA , On the Solutions of a System of Third-Order Rational Difference Equations. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society , Arti- cle ID 1743540, 11 pages (2018)

  11. [11]

    Applied Mathematics Letters , 85: 57-63 (2018)

    Matsunaga, H, Suzuki R , Classification of global behavior of a system of rational di fference equations. Applied Mathematics Letters , 85: 57-63 (2018)

  12. [12]

    Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering , 5(2): 119-123 (2018) ON THE SOLUTIONS OF SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS VIA TRIB ONACCI NUMBERS 13

    Yılmazyıldırım, B, T ollu, DT , Explicit Solutions of a Three-Dimensional System of Non- linear Difference Equations. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering , 5(2): 119-123 (2018) ON THE SOLUTIONS OF SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS VIA TRIB ONACCI NUMBERS 13

  13. [13]

    Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applica- tions, 7(1): 102-115 (2019)

    ¨Ocalan, ¨O, Duman, O , On Solutions of the Recursive Equations xn+1 = xp n−1/xp n (p > 0) via Fibonacci-Type Sequences. Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applica- tions, 7(1): 102-115 (2019)

  14. [14]

    arXiv:1904.04476v1, [math.DS] (2019)

    Akrour, Y, T ouafek, N, Halim, Y , On a System of Difference Equations of Second Order Solved in a Closed Form. arXiv:1904.04476v1, [math.DS] (2019)