pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11380 · v1 · pith:KIJAZQQEnew · submitted 2019-06-26 · 🧮 math.RT

Some extension algebras for standard modules over KLR algebras of type A

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.RT
keywords KLR algebrasYoneda algebrastandard modulesextension algebrasA-infinity algebrastype Aintrinsically formaltorsion free
0
0 comments X

The pith

For positive roots in type A and Lie type A2, the Yoneda algebra of standard modules over KLR algebras is torsion free and intrinsically formal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explicitly computes the Yoneda algebra E_θ of standard modules over Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier algebras R_θ in two cases. When θ is a positive root of type A or of type A2, this algebra turns out to be torsion-free and intrinsically formal. This allows the A_∞-structure to be used without higher operations to reconstruct the category of standardly filtered modules. The authors also exhibit a case where the algebra is not formal in general.

Core claim

When θ is a positive root in type A or of Lie type A2, the Yoneda algebra E_θ is torsion free and intrinsically formal. In these cases the algebra can be described explicitly.

What carries the argument

The Yoneda algebra E_θ = Ext^*_{R_θ}(Δ, Δ), which carries an A_∞-algebra structure used to reconstruct the category of standardly filtered modules.

If this is right

  • The category of standardly filtered R_θ-modules is reconstructed from the A_∞-algebra E_θ in these special cases.
  • E_θ has no torsion elements.
  • The A_∞-structure on E_θ is formal, so higher products vanish up to homotopy.
  • E_θ can be presented explicitly as an ordinary algebra without A_∞ operations in these cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If E_θ is intrinsically formal, then the Ext groups between standards determine the filtered module category without additional data.
  • The explicit descriptions may allow computation of higher Ext groups in these root systems.
  • Non-formality in general suggests that A_∞ structures are essential outside these cases.

Load-bearing premise

The A_∞-algebra structure on E_θ reconstructs the category of standardly filtered R_θ-modules.

What would settle it

A computation showing torsion in E_θ or a non-vanishing higher A_∞ product for a positive root θ in type A would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier algebras $R_\theta$ of finite Lie type are affine quasihereditary with standard modules $\Delta(\pi)$ labeled by Kostant partitions of $\theta$. Let $\Delta$ be the direct sum of all standard modules. It is known that the Yoneda algebra $\mathcal{E}_\theta:=\operatorname{Ext}_{R_\theta}^*(\Delta, \Delta)$ carries a structure of an $A_\infty$-algebra which can be used to reconstruct the category of standardly filtered $R_\theta$-modules. In this paper, we explicitly describe $\mathcal{E}_\theta$ in two special cases: (1) when $\theta$ is a positive root in type $\mathtt{A}$, and (2) when $\theta$ is of Lie type $\mathtt{A_2}$. In these cases, $\mathcal{E}_\theta$ turns out to be torsion free and intrinsically formal. We provide an example to show that the $A_\infty$-algebra $\mathcal{E}_\theta$ is non-formal in general.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explicitly computes the Yoneda algebra E_θ = Ext^*_{R_θ}(Δ, Δ) over KLR algebras R_θ of finite Lie type A in two special cases: (1) when θ is a positive root, and (2) when θ is of Lie type A2. In both cases it establishes that E_θ is torsion-free and intrinsically formal. It also supplies an explicit counter-example demonstrating that E_θ fails to be formal for general θ.

Significance. The explicit descriptions furnish concrete, checkable instances in which the A_∞-structure on the extension algebra is formal, thereby simplifying the reconstruction of the standardly filtered category in these cases. The counter-example delineates the boundary of the phenomenon and supplies a useful negative result. The work rests on previously established facts about KLR algebras and A_∞-structures rather than introducing new unverified assumptions.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'it is known that the Yoneda algebra carries an A_∞-structure which can be used to reconstruct the category' would benefit from a specific citation to the prior literature establishing this reconstruction.
  2. The manuscript would be improved by a short table or diagram summarizing the explicit generators and relations obtained for E_θ in the two special cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of explicit computation of the Yoneda algebra E_θ (including A_∞ operations) in the two special cases, followed by direct verification that the resulting algebra is torsion-free and intrinsically formal. The background statement that the A_∞-structure reconstructs the standardly filtered category is cited as prior knowledge and is not invoked to establish the new claims about torsion-freeness or formality. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the argument chain; the counter-example for non-formality is likewise external to the positive claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms beyond the two domain assumptions stated as known.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption KLR algebras of finite Lie type are affine quasihereditary with standard modules labeled by Kostant partitions of θ.
    Stated as known in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The Yoneda algebra E_θ carries an A_∞-algebra structure that reconstructs the category of standardly filtered modules.
    Stated as known in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5723 in / 1090 out tokens · 29028 ms · 2026-05-25T14:46:11.101383+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Brundan, A

    J. Brundan, A. Kleshchev, and P. J. McNamara. Homologica l properties of finite type Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier algebras. Duke Math. J. , 163:1353–1404, 2014

  2. [2]

    Buursma, A

    D. Buursma, A. Kleshchev, and D. J. Steinberg. Resolutio ns of standard modules over KLR algebras in type A. 2019

  3. [3]

    Kadeishvili

    T. Kadeishvili. On the homology theory of fiber spaces. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 35:183–188, 1980. Translated in Russ. Math. Surv. 35:231-238, 1980

  4. [4]

    S. Kato. Poincar´ e-Birkhoff-Witt bases and Khovanov-La uda-Rouquier algebras. Duke Math. J., 163:619–663, 2014

  5. [5]

    B. Keller. Introduction to A-infinity algebras and modules. Homology, Homotopy Appl. , 3(1):1– 35, 2001

  6. [6]

    B. Keller. a-infinity algebras in representation theory. Representations of Algebras , I:64–86, 2002

  7. [7]

    Khovanov and A

    M. Khovanov and A. Lauda. A diagrammatic approach to cate gorification of quantum groups I. Represent. Theory, 13:309–347, 2009

  8. [8]

    Khovanov, A

    M. Khovanov, A. Lauda, M. Mackaay, and M. Stoˇ si´ c. Extended graphical calculus for categori- fied quantum sl(2). Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 219(1029), 2012

  9. [9]

    Kleshchev

    A. Kleshchev. Affine highest weight categories and affine qu asihereditary algebras. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. , 110:841–882, 2015

  10. [10]

    Kleshchev and J

    A. Kleshchev and J. Loubert. Affine cellularity of Khovan ov-Lauda-Rouquier algebras in finite types. Int. Math. Res. Not. , 14:5659–5709, 2015

  11. [11]

    Kleshchev and D

    A. Kleshchev and D. J. Steinberg. Homomorphisms betwee n standard modules over finite-type KLR algebras. Compos. Math. , 153:621–646, 2017

  12. [12]

    Koenig, J

    S. Koenig, J. K¨ ulshammer, and S. Ovsienko. Quasi-here ditary algebras, exact Borel subalge- bras, A∞ -categories and boxes. Adv. Math. , 262:546–592, 2014

  13. [13]

    Laksov, A

    D. Laksov, A. Lascoux, P. Pragacz, and A. Thorup. The LLP T notes, 1995

  14. [14]

    I. G. Macdonald. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials . Clarendon Press, 1995

  15. [15]

    L. Manivel. Symmetric Functions, Schubert Polynomials and Degeneracy Loci. Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France, 1998

  16. [16]

    Rouquier

    R. Rouquier. 2-Kac-Moody algebras. 2009. arXiv:0812. 5023. EXT ALGEBRAS FOR STANDARD MODULES 41

  17. [17]

    C. Weibel. An Introduction to Homological Algebra . Cambridge University Press, 1994

  18. [18]

    Williamson

    G. Williamson. On an analogue of the James conjecture. Represent. Theory, 18:15–27, 2014. Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, O R 97403, USA E-mail address : dbuursma@uoregon.edu Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, O R 97403, USA E-mail address : klesh@uoregon.edu Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, E...