Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 48 references

Contribution of type Ia supernovae to the chemical enrichment of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bootes I shows alpha-to-iron ratios dropping from overabundant to solar values between metallicities -3 and -2, indicating the onset of type Ia supernova iron production.

desk verdict Bootes I gains the largest homogeneous non-LTE sample among UFDs, showing a clear [α/Fe] drop the authors tie to early Type Ia iron production. read the letter →

arxiv 1906.11540 v1 pith:YXWOE7PF submitted 2019-06-27 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Yu.V. Pakhomov , L.I. Mashonkina , T.M. Sitnova , P. Jablonka This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords BootesIultra-faintdwarfgalaxychemicalabundancestypeIasupernovaealphaelementsmetallicitynon-LTEstellarspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper determines atmospheric parameters and non-LTE abundances for stars in the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I from Subaru spectra, creating the largest homogeneous sample of 11 stars in its class. It identifies a clear transition in the ratios of magnesium, calcium, and titanium to iron, which fall from roughly 0.3 to solar levels as iron abundance rises through the range -3 to -2. This pattern is interpreted as evidence that type Ia supernovae have begun contributing iron to the galaxy's chemical mix. The behaviors of carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium remain consistent with patterns seen in the Milky Way and classical dwarf spheroidals. The result extends chemical-evolution studies to the smallest known galaxies.

What carries the argument

The [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and [Ti/Fe] abundance ratios plotted against [Fe/H] for Bootes I stars, which display a metallicity-dependent transition interpreted as the signature of type Ia supernova enrichment.

What would settle it

New high-resolution spectra of additional Bootes I stars that show no [α/Fe] transition across the same metallicity range, or revised non-LTE calculations that remove the drop, would falsify the type Ia supernova interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In Bootes I, for each of the three alpha-process elements magnesium, calcium, and titanium, the [α/Fe] ratio transitions from an overabundance of approximately 0.3 to the solar value in the metallicity interval -3 < [Fe/H] < -2. This transition most likely marks the commencement of iron production by type Ia supernovae. The abundances of carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium follow the same trends observed in more massive galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The observed drop in alpha-to-iron ratios is produced by the onset of type Ia supernova iron enrichment rather than by inhomogeneous mixing, differing star-formation timing, or systematic errors in non-LTE corrections or stellar parameters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bootes I possesses the largest homogeneous set of atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances among ultra-faint dwarf galaxies.
  • Type Ia supernovae contribute iron to the enrichment of ultra-faint dwarfs at metallicities below -2.
  • Abundance patterns for carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium in Bootes I match those in the Milky Way and classical dwarf spheroidals.
  • The timing of the alpha-to-iron transition constrains when type Ia supernovae begin operating in low-mass systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transition truly records type Ia onset, then these events must occur sufficiently early in the galaxy's history to affect the composition of stars forming at these metallicities.
  • Comparable transitions may appear in other ultra-faint dwarfs once larger homogeneous samples become available.
  • Chemical-evolution models of dwarf galaxies should include type Ia contributions at [Fe/H] < -2 to reproduce observed abundance trends.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a non-LTE abundance analysis of high-resolution Subaru spectra for three stars in the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I. Combined with prior data this produces a homogeneous sample of 11 stars with atmospheric parameters and abundances for eight elements. The central result is a reported transition in [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] from approximately +0.3 to solar values across -3 < [Fe/H] < -2, interpreted as marking the onset of Type Ia supernova iron production; the trends for C, Na, Ni and Ba are stated to match those in the Milky Way and classical dSphs.

Significance. The non-LTE treatment is a clear methodological strength for these extremely metal-poor stars. If the reported [α/Fe] transition is shown to be robust and specifically attributable to Type Ia enrichment rather than other processes, the result would supply useful empirical constraints on the earliest supernova contributions in the lowest-mass galaxies, with implications for chemical-evolution models of UFDs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a transition from [α/Fe]≈0.3 to solar values is presented without reported error bars on the individual abundance ratios, without discussion of sample selection or outlier rejection, and without any quantitative assessment of how sensitive the detected transition is to choices of atmospheric parameters or non-LTE corrections.
  2. [Discussion section] Discussion section: the interpretation that the observed drop in [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] 'most likely suggests the commenced production of iron in type Ia supernovae' rests on the assumption of homogeneous mixing; the manuscript contains no chemical-evolution tracks, Monte-Carlo mixing simulations, or other quantitative tests to demonstrate that only an Ia onset reproduces the measured pattern at the reported precision, rather than inhomogeneous enrichment or bursty star-formation histories that are known to generate similar knees in UFDs.
minor comments (2)
  1. All tables and figures presenting abundances should include the 1σ uncertainties for each ratio so that the statistical significance of the reported transition can be evaluated directly.
  2. Notation for the abundance ratios (e.g., consistent use of brackets and solar reference) should be defined once in the methods section and applied uniformly thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and for highlighting the strength of the non-LTE analysis. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a transition from [α/Fe]≈0.3 to solar values is presented without reported error bars on the individual abundance ratios, without discussion of sample selection or outlier rejection, and without any quantitative assessment of how sensitive the detected transition is to choices of atmospheric parameters or non-LTE corrections.

    Authors: The abundance ratios and their uncertainties are listed in Table 3 and displayed with error bars in Figure 4. Sample selection criteria (S/N, resolution, and availability of Subaru spectra) are described in Section 2; the 11-star sample comprises all suitable targets and no points were rejected as outliers. Sensitivity tests varying Teff (±100 K), log g (±0.2 dex), [Fe/H] (±0.1 dex) and non-LTE corrections (±0.1 dex) confirm the [α/Fe] transition persists. We will revise the abstract to note the presence of uncertainties and add a brief paragraph on sample selection and sensitivity in the results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion section] Discussion section: the interpretation that the observed drop in [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] 'most likely suggests the commenced production of iron in type Ia supernovae' rests on the assumption of homogeneous mixing; the manuscript contains no chemical-evolution tracks, Monte-Carlo mixing simulations, or other quantitative tests to demonstrate that only an Ia onset reproduces the measured pattern at the reported precision, rather than inhomogeneous enrichment or bursty star-formation histories that are known to generate similar knees in UFDs.

    Authors: The interpretation does rely on the standard assumption of a well-mixed ISM. The observed knee position and amplitude match the canonical Type Ia signature reported for the Milky Way and classical dSphs. We will rephrase the discussion to state that the pattern is 'consistent with the onset of Type Ia enrichment' and add references to UFD chemical-evolution studies. Dedicated Monte-Carlo mixing simulations or full chemical-evolution tracks lie outside the scope of this observational abundance paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: result is direct empirical measurement of abundances

full rationale

The paper derives atmospheric parameters and non-LTE abundances for 11 stars in Bootes I from Subaru spectra, then reports the observed [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and [Ti/Fe] transition across -3 < [Fe/H] < -2. This is presented as an empirical pattern whose interpretation as Type Ia onset is qualified as 'most likely suggests'. No equation, fit, or self-citation reduces the reported transition to a constructed input; the central data product stands independently of any prior result by the same authors. The derivation chain consists of standard spectroscopic analysis steps with no load-bearing self-referential loop.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the accuracy of standard non-LTE line-formation calculations and the assumption that the derived atmospheric parameters correctly represent the stellar atmospheres; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Non-LTE corrections computed from standard model atoms accurately reflect the true level populations in these extremely metal-poor stars.
    The paper explicitly states that abundances were derived without the LTE assumption and relies on existing non-LTE codes and atomic data.
  • domain assumption The atmospheric parameters (Teff, log g, [Fe/H]) determined for the three stars are free of large systematic errors that would erase the reported [α/Fe] trend.
    The transition detection depends directly on the accuracy of these parameters across the -3 to -2 metallicity range.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Contribution of type Ia supernovae to the chemical enrichment of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YXWOE7PF

@misc{pith2026190611540,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Contribution of type Ia supernovae to the chemical enrichment of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YXWOE7PF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1906.11540}
}
abstract

For three stars in the ultra-faint dwarf (UFD) galaxy Bootes I we have determined the atmospheric parameters, performed a new reduction of high-resolution spectra from the Subaru archive, and derived the abundances of eight chemical elements without using the LTE assumption. As a result, among the galaxies of its class Bootes I now has the largest sample of stars (11) with a homogeneous set of atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances, and this makes it the most promising for studying the chemical evolution of UFD galaxies. We show that in the range -3<[Fe/H]<-2 for each of the three $\alpha$--process elements, magnesium, calcium, and titanium, a transition from their overabundance relative to iron with [$\alpha$/Fe]$\approx$0.3 to the solar [$\alpha$/Fe] ratio occurs. This most likely suggests the commenced production of iron in type Ia supernovae. The behaviour of the carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium abundances does not differ from that in more massive galaxies, our Galaxy and classical dwarf spheroidal galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11540 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the line equivalent widths in the spectra of Boo￾127 taken with different instruments. The bar of typical errors (∼20–30 mÅ) is shown in the upper right corner. Ishigaki et al. (2014) found their equivalent widths to be smaller than those measured by Gilmore et al. (2013) approximately by 18 mÅ. We compared our measurements with the measurements of common stars in Gilmore et al. (2013, UVES-FLAMES/VLT,… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the line equivalent widths between this paper and Ishigaki et al. (2014) and Gilmore et al. (2013). The bar of typical errors (∼20 mÅ) is shown in the upper right corner. the Gaussian EW = √ 2π fcenσ, where fcen is the central depth of the spectral line and σ is the Gaussian width. Then, δσ = 1.92σδ fcen/ fcen from the derivative of the Gaussian function. Using the fact that the Gaussian dominates in t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The positions of Boötes I stars on the HR diagram with evolu￾tionary tracks for a mass of 0.8 M⊙, metallicities [Fe/H] = −1, −2, −3 and [α/Fe] = 0.3. The big circles are the stars from this paper, while the small filled circles are the stars from Mashonkina et al. (2017a). The error bar is shown for 1σ. The published data are marked by the open circles. To check the deduced stellar atmosphere parameters, we ana￾lyze… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top (a): Molecular CH lines in the spectrum of the star Boo-121. The size of the vertical bars reflects the contribution. The synthetic spectrum that describes the observations best is indicated by the thick solid curve. The dashed curves correspond to a variation in t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The non-LTE corrections for the Ba II 6497 Å (circles) and Ba II 4934 Å (diamond) lines in the Boötes I stars calculated using the quantum￾mechanical (filled symbols) and Drawing (open symbols) Ba II + H I col￾lision rates. The bigger symbols correspond to the three st…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: [C/Fe]abundance in the atmospheres of the investigated stars (filled circles) in comparison with the data from Ishigaki et al. (2014) (open squares, the absence of an upper error bar means an upper limit) and Norris et al. (2010) (crosses). 3.1 Carbon Apart from Boo-00…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top (a): The [Mg/Fe] abundances in the Boötes I stars from Norris et al. (2010, N10), Gilmore et al. (2013, G13), Ishigaki et al. (2014, I14), and Frebel et al. (2016, F16). The identical stars are connected by lines. Bottom (b): The [Mg/Fe] abundances from our (3 star…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as Fig. 7b for [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe]. -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 [Fe/H] -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 [Ni/Fe] Scl UMi Sex Fnx Boo Leo IV UMa II -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 [Fe/H] -1.0 -0.5 0.0 [Na/Mg] Scl UMi Sex Fnx Boo Leo IV UMa -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7b for [Ni/Mg], [Na/Fe], and [Ba/Fe]. 4.1 The [α/Fe]–[Fe/H] dependence We determined the abundances of three α-process elements: Mg, Ca, and Ti. Figures 7 and 8 show both our results and the MJS17 data for Boötes I and other dwarf galaxies for each of thes…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alam S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015ApJS..219...12A 219, 12

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 2015

  2. [2]

    A., Mashonkina L

    Alexeeva S. A., Mashonkina L. I., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1668 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015MNRAS.453.1619A 453, 1619

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1668 2015

  3. [3]

    Alonso A., Arribas S., Mart \' nez-Roger C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999521 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1999A

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1999521 1999

  4. [4]

    Anders E., Grevesse N., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1989GeCoA..53..197A 53, 197

    work page doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  5. [5]

    Arlandini C., K \"a ppeler F., Wisshak K., Gallino R., Lugaro M., Busso M., Straniero O., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307938 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1999ApJ...525..886A 525, 886

    work page doi:10.1086/307938 1999

  6. [6]

    Bailin J., Ford A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00271.x , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2007MNRAS.375L..41B 375, L41

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00271.x 2007

  7. [7]

    Belokurov V., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/507324 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006ApJ...647L.111B 647, L111

    work page doi:10.1086/507324 2006

  8. [8]

    K., Yakovleva S

    Belyaev A. K., Yakovleva S. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1240 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3952B 478, 3952

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1240 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Butler K., Giddings J., 1985, Newsletter on Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, 9, 723

    1985

  2. [10]

    Creevey O., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834721 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Drawin H.-W., 1968, @doi [Zeitschrift fur Physik] 10.1007/BF01379963 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1968ZPhy..211..404D 211, 404

    1968 doi

  4. [12]

    I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912833 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2009A

    Feltzing S., Eriksson K., Kleyna J., Wilkinson M. I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912833 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2009A

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    E., Gilmore G., Wyse R

    Frebel A., Norris J. E., Gilmore G., Wyse R. F. G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/110 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2016ApJ...826..110F 826, 110

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    E., Monaco L., Yong D., Wyse R

    Gilmore G., Norris J. E., Monaco L., Yong D., Wyse R. F. G., Geisler D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/61 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2013ApJ...763...61G 763, 61

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1023/A:1005161325181 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1998SSRv...85..161G 85, 161

    Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1023/A:1005161325181 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1998SSRv...85..161G 85, 161

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    G., Nordlund ., Plez B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2008A

    Gustafsson B., Edvardsson B., Eriksson K., J rgensen U. G., Nordlund ., Plez B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2008A

    2008 doi

  9. [17]

    K., Kim D.-G., Demarque P., 2009, New Yonsei-Yale (Y ^ 2 ) Isochrones and Horizontal-Branch Evolutionary Tracks with Helium Enhancements

    Han S.-I., Kim Y.-C., Lee Y.-W., Yi S. K., Kim D.-G., Demarque P., 2009, New Yonsei-Yale (Y ^ 2 ) Isochrones and Horizontal-Branch Evolutionary Tracks with Helium Enhancements . p. 33, @doi 10.1007/978-3-540-76961-3_9

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    N., Aoki W., Arimoto N., Okamoto S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322796 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014A

    Ishigaki M. N., Aoki W., Arimoto N., Okamoto S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322796 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Jablonka P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525661 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    K., Ammon K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066082 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006A

    Jordi K., Grebel E. K., Ammon K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066082 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006A

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/146 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2011ApJ...736..146K 736, 146

    Koposov S. E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/146 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2011ApJ...736..146K 736, 146

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    L., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...14K 8, 14

    Kurucz R. L., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...14K 8, 14

    2005

  15. [23]

    Lodders K., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375492 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2003ApJ...591.1220L 591, 1220

    2003 doi

  16. [24]

    Marshall J., et al., 2018, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv181201022M ( @eprint arXiv 1812.01022 )

    2018

  17. [25]

    Mashonkina L., Christlieb N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423651 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    Mashonkina L., Gehren T., Bikmaev I., 1999, , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1999A

    1999

  19. [27]

    I., Sitnova T

    Mashonkina L. I., Sitnova T. N., Pakhomov Y. V., 2016, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773716080028 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2016AstL...42..606M 42, 606

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    Mashonkina L., Jablonka P., Pakhomov Y., Sitnova T., North P., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730779 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2017A

    doi

  21. [29]

    Mashonkina L., Jablonka P., Sitnova T., Pakhomov Y., North P., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731582 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2017A

    doi

  22. [30]

    Matteucci F., Greggio L., 1986, , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1986A

    1986

  23. [31]

    W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012AJ....144....4M 144, 4

    McConnachie A. W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012AJ....144....4M 144, 4

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    Noguchi K., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/54.6.855 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2002PASJ...54..855N 54, 855

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    E., Gilmore G., Wyse R

    Norris J. E., Gilmore G., Wyse R. F. G., Wilkinson M. I., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Zucker D. B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/595962 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2008ApJ...689L.113N 689, L113

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    E., Wyse R

    Norris J. E., Wyse R. F. G., Gilmore G., Yong D., Frebel A., Wilkinson M. I., Belokurov V., Zucker D. B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1632 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2010ApJ...723.1632N 723, 1632

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    Okamoto S., Arimoto N., Yamada Y., Onodera M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/96 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012ApJ...744...96O 744, 96

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    Ram \' rez I., Mel \'e ndez J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430102 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2005ApJ...626..465R 626, 465

    2005 doi

  29. [37]

    K., 1991, Diploma thesis, Universit a t M u nchen

    Reetz J. K., 1991, Diploma thesis, Universit a t M u nchen

    1991

  30. [38]

    Revaz Y., Jablonka P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117402 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    Romano D., Bellazzini M., Starkenburg E., Leaman R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2427 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015MNRAS.446.4220R 446, 4220

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, in press

    Ryabchikova T., Tsymbal V., 2019, in Physics of Magnetic Stars. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, in press

    2019

  33. [41]

    L., Stempels H

    Ryabchikova T., Piskunov N., Kurucz R. L., Stempels H. C., Heiter U., Pakhomov Y., Barklem P. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015PhyS...90e4005R 90, 054005

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    2006 doi

  35. [43]

    Steenbock W., Holweger H., 1984, , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1984A

    1984

  36. [44]

    Tsujimoto T., Nomoto K., Yoshii Y., Hashimoto M., Yanagida S., Thielemann F.-K., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/277.3.945 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1995MNRAS.277..945T 277, 945

    1995 doi

  37. [45]

    pp D--112

    Weinstein D., Perez M., 1992, in Record of the IUE Three-Agency Coordination Meeting. pp D--112

    1992

  38. [46]

    G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    York D. G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    2000 doi

  39. [47]

    Zhao G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/225 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2016ApJ...833..225Z 833, 225

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    de Boer T. J. L., Belokurov V., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1176 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014MNRAS.443..658D 443, 658

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.