pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11540 · v1 · pith:YXWOE7PFnew · submitted 2019-06-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Contribution of type Ia supernovae to the chemical enrichment of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I

Yu.V. Pakhomov , L.I. Mashonkina , T.M. Sitnova , P. Jablonka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords Bootes Iultra-faint dwarf galaxychemical abundancestype Ia supernovaealpha elementsmetallicitynon-LTE abundancesstellar spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bootes I shows alpha-to-iron ratios dropping from overabundant to solar values between metallicities -3 and -2, indicating the onset of type Ia supernova iron production.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper determines atmospheric parameters and non-LTE abundances for stars in the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I from Subaru spectra, creating the largest homogeneous sample of 11 stars in its class. It identifies a clear transition in the ratios of magnesium, calcium, and titanium to iron, which fall from roughly 0.3 to solar levels as iron abundance rises through the range -3 to -2. This pattern is interpreted as evidence that type Ia supernovae have begun contributing iron to the galaxy's chemical mix. The behaviors of carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium remain consistent with patterns seen in the Milky Way and classical dwarf spheroidals. The result extends chemical-evolution studies to the smallest known galaxies.

Core claim

In Bootes I, for each of the three alpha-process elements magnesium, calcium, and titanium, the [α/Fe] ratio transitions from an overabundance of approximately 0.3 to the solar value in the metallicity interval -3 < [Fe/H] < -2. This transition most likely marks the commencement of iron production by type Ia supernovae. The abundances of carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium follow the same trends observed in more massive galaxies.

What carries the argument

The [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and [Ti/Fe] abundance ratios plotted against [Fe/H] for Bootes I stars, which display a metallicity-dependent transition interpreted as the signature of type Ia supernova enrichment.

If this is right

  • Bootes I possesses the largest homogeneous set of atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances among ultra-faint dwarf galaxies.
  • Type Ia supernovae contribute iron to the enrichment of ultra-faint dwarfs at metallicities below -2.
  • Abundance patterns for carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium in Bootes I match those in the Milky Way and classical dwarf spheroidals.
  • The timing of the alpha-to-iron transition constrains when type Ia supernovae begin operating in low-mass systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transition truly records type Ia onset, then these events must occur sufficiently early in the galaxy's history to affect the composition of stars forming at these metallicities.
  • Comparable transitions may appear in other ultra-faint dwarfs once larger homogeneous samples become available.
  • Chemical-evolution models of dwarf galaxies should include type Ia contributions at [Fe/H] < -2 to reproduce observed abundance trends.

Load-bearing premise

The observed drop in alpha-to-iron ratios is produced by the onset of type Ia supernova iron enrichment rather than by inhomogeneous mixing, differing star-formation timing, or systematic errors in non-LTE corrections or stellar parameters.

What would settle it

New high-resolution spectra of additional Bootes I stars that show no [α/Fe] transition across the same metallicity range, or revised non-LTE calculations that remove the drop, would falsify the type Ia supernova interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11540 by L.I. Mashonkina, P. Jablonka, T.M. Sitnova, Yu.V. Pakhomov.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of the line equivalent widths in the spectra of Boo￾127 taken with different instruments. The bar of typical errors (∼20–30 mÅ) is shown in the upper right corner. Ishigaki et al. (2014) found their equivalent widths to be smaller than those measured by Gilmore et al. (2013) approximately by 18 mÅ. We compared our measurements with the measurements of common stars in Gilmore et al. (2013, UVES-F… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of the line equivalent widths between this paper and Ishigaki et al. (2014) and Gilmore et al. (2013). The bar of typical errors (∼20 mÅ) is shown in the upper right corner. the Gaussian EW = √ 2π fcenσ, where fcen is the central depth of the spectral line and σ is the Gaussian width. Then, δσ = 1.92σδ fcen/ fcen from the derivative of the Gaussian function. Using the fact that the Gaussian domi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The positions of Boötes I stars on the HR diagram with evolu￾tionary tracks for a mass of 0.8 M⊙, metallicities [Fe/H] = −1, −2, −3 and [α/Fe] = 0.3. The big circles are the stars from this paper, while the small filled circles are the stars from Mashonkina et al. (2017a). The error bar is shown for 1σ. The published data are marked by the open circles. To check the deduced stellar atmosphere parameters, w… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top (a): Molecular CH lines in the spectrum of the star Boo-121. The size of the vertical bars reflects the contribution. The synthetic spectrum that describes the observations best is indicated by the thick solid curve. The dashed curves correspond to a variation in the carbon abundance of ±0.30 dex. Borttom (b): Comparison of the observed and synthetic spectra near the CH band. Astronomy Letters, 2019, 4… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The non-LTE corrections for the Ba II 6497 Å (circles) and Ba II 4934 Å (diamond) lines in the Boötes I stars calculated using the quantum￾mechanical (filled symbols) and Drawing (open symbols) Ba II + H I col￾lision rates. The bigger symbols correspond to the three stars for which the non-LTE barium abundance has been determined for the first time (only with accurate collisional data). dance, by 0.5–1 dex… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: [C/Fe]abundance in the atmospheres of the investigated stars (filled circles) in comparison with the data from Ishigaki et al. (2014) (open squares, the absence of an upper error bar means an upper limit) and Norris et al. (2010) (crosses). 3.1 Carbon Apart from Boo-009, Boo-121, and Boo-911, the carbon abundance was also determined for Boo-094 and Boo-117 using the atmospheric parameters from Mashonkina e… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top (a): The [Mg/Fe] abundances in the Boötes I stars from Norris et al. (2010, N10), Gilmore et al. (2013, G13), Ishigaki et al. (2014, I14), and Frebel et al. (2016, F16). The identical stars are connected by lines. Bottom (b): The [Mg/Fe] abundances from our (3 stars) and MJS17 data for other Boötes I stars and stars in other galaxies. The classical spheroidal galaxies and UFD galaxies are marked by the… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as Fig. 7b for [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe]. -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 [Fe/H] -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 [Ni/Fe] Scl UMi Sex Fnx Boo Leo IV UMa II -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 [Fe/H] -1.0 -0.5 0.0 [Na/Mg] Scl UMi Sex Fnx Boo Leo IV UMa -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 [Fe/H] -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 [Ba/Fe] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7b for [Ni/Mg], [Na/Fe], and [Ba/Fe]. 4.1 The [α/Fe]–[Fe/H] dependence We determined the abundances of three α-process elements: Mg, Ca, and Ti. Figures 7 and 8 show both our results and the MJS17 data for Boötes I and other dwarf galaxies for each of these ele￾ments. For a sample of Galactic halo comparison stars MJS17 ob￾tained the same overabundance of each of the α-process elements relativ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For three stars in the ultra-faint dwarf (UFD) galaxy Bootes I we have determined the atmospheric parameters, performed a new reduction of high-resolution spectra from the Subaru archive, and derived the abundances of eight chemical elements without using the LTE assumption. As a result, among the galaxies of its class Bootes I now has the largest sample of stars (11) with a homogeneous set of atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances, and this makes it the most promising for studying the chemical evolution of UFD galaxies. We show that in the range -3<[Fe/H]<-2 for each of the three $\alpha$--process elements, magnesium, calcium, and titanium, a transition from their overabundance relative to iron with [$\alpha$/Fe]$\approx$0.3 to the solar [$\alpha$/Fe] ratio occurs. This most likely suggests the commenced production of iron in type Ia supernovae. The behaviour of the carbon, sodium, nickel, and barium abundances does not differ from that in more massive galaxies, our Galaxy and classical dwarf spheroidal galaxies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a non-LTE abundance analysis of high-resolution Subaru spectra for three stars in the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Bootes I. Combined with prior data this produces a homogeneous sample of 11 stars with atmospheric parameters and abundances for eight elements. The central result is a reported transition in [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] from approximately +0.3 to solar values across -3 < [Fe/H] < -2, interpreted as marking the onset of Type Ia supernova iron production; the trends for C, Na, Ni and Ba are stated to match those in the Milky Way and classical dSphs.

Significance. The non-LTE treatment is a clear methodological strength for these extremely metal-poor stars. If the reported [α/Fe] transition is shown to be robust and specifically attributable to Type Ia enrichment rather than other processes, the result would supply useful empirical constraints on the earliest supernova contributions in the lowest-mass galaxies, with implications for chemical-evolution models of UFDs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a transition from [α/Fe]≈0.3 to solar values is presented without reported error bars on the individual abundance ratios, without discussion of sample selection or outlier rejection, and without any quantitative assessment of how sensitive the detected transition is to choices of atmospheric parameters or non-LTE corrections.
  2. [Discussion section] Discussion section: the interpretation that the observed drop in [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] 'most likely suggests the commenced production of iron in type Ia supernovae' rests on the assumption of homogeneous mixing; the manuscript contains no chemical-evolution tracks, Monte-Carlo mixing simulations, or other quantitative tests to demonstrate that only an Ia onset reproduces the measured pattern at the reported precision, rather than inhomogeneous enrichment or bursty star-formation histories that are known to generate similar knees in UFDs.
minor comments (2)
  1. All tables and figures presenting abundances should include the 1σ uncertainties for each ratio so that the statistical significance of the reported transition can be evaluated directly.
  2. Notation for the abundance ratios (e.g., consistent use of brackets and solar reference) should be defined once in the methods section and applied uniformly thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and for highlighting the strength of the non-LTE analysis. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a transition from [α/Fe]≈0.3 to solar values is presented without reported error bars on the individual abundance ratios, without discussion of sample selection or outlier rejection, and without any quantitative assessment of how sensitive the detected transition is to choices of atmospheric parameters or non-LTE corrections.

    Authors: The abundance ratios and their uncertainties are listed in Table 3 and displayed with error bars in Figure 4. Sample selection criteria (S/N, resolution, and availability of Subaru spectra) are described in Section 2; the 11-star sample comprises all suitable targets and no points were rejected as outliers. Sensitivity tests varying Teff (±100 K), log g (±0.2 dex), [Fe/H] (±0.1 dex) and non-LTE corrections (±0.1 dex) confirm the [α/Fe] transition persists. We will revise the abstract to note the presence of uncertainties and add a brief paragraph on sample selection and sensitivity in the results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion section] Discussion section: the interpretation that the observed drop in [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe] and [Ti/Fe] 'most likely suggests the commenced production of iron in type Ia supernovae' rests on the assumption of homogeneous mixing; the manuscript contains no chemical-evolution tracks, Monte-Carlo mixing simulations, or other quantitative tests to demonstrate that only an Ia onset reproduces the measured pattern at the reported precision, rather than inhomogeneous enrichment or bursty star-formation histories that are known to generate similar knees in UFDs.

    Authors: The interpretation does rely on the standard assumption of a well-mixed ISM. The observed knee position and amplitude match the canonical Type Ia signature reported for the Milky Way and classical dSphs. We will rephrase the discussion to state that the pattern is 'consistent with the onset of Type Ia enrichment' and add references to UFD chemical-evolution studies. Dedicated Monte-Carlo mixing simulations or full chemical-evolution tracks lie outside the scope of this observational abundance paper. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: result is direct empirical measurement of abundances

full rationale

The paper derives atmospheric parameters and non-LTE abundances for 11 stars in Bootes I from Subaru spectra, then reports the observed [Mg/Fe], [Ca/Fe], and [Ti/Fe] transition across -3 < [Fe/H] < -2. This is presented as an empirical pattern whose interpretation as Type Ia onset is qualified as 'most likely suggests'. No equation, fit, or self-citation reduces the reported transition to a constructed input; the central data product stands independently of any prior result by the same authors. The derivation chain consists of standard spectroscopic analysis steps with no load-bearing self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the accuracy of standard non-LTE line-formation calculations and the assumption that the derived atmospheric parameters correctly represent the stellar atmospheres; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Non-LTE corrections computed from standard model atoms accurately reflect the true level populations in these extremely metal-poor stars.
    The paper explicitly states that abundances were derived without the LTE assumption and relies on existing non-LTE codes and atomic data.
  • domain assumption The atmospheric parameters (Teff, log g, [Fe/H]) determined for the three stars are free of large systematic errors that would erase the reported [α/Fe] trend.
    The transition detection depends directly on the accuracy of these parameters across the -3 to -2 metallicity range.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5747 in / 1529 out tokens · 37729 ms · 2026-05-25T14:50:14.619724+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alam S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015ApJS..219...12A 219, 12

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 2015

  2. [2]

    A., Mashonkina L

    Alexeeva S. A., Mashonkina L. I., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1668 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015MNRAS.453.1619A 453, 1619

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1668 2015

  3. [3]

    Alonso A., Arribas S., Mart \' nez-Roger C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999521 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1999A

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1999521 1999

  4. [4]

    Anders E., Grevesse N., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1989GeCoA..53..197A 53, 197

    work page doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  5. [5]

    Arlandini C., K \"a ppeler F., Wisshak K., Gallino R., Lugaro M., Busso M., Straniero O., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307938 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1999ApJ...525..886A 525, 886

    work page doi:10.1086/307938 1999

  6. [6]

    Bailin J., Ford A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00271.x , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2007MNRAS.375L..41B 375, L41

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00271.x 2007

  7. [7]

    Belokurov V., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/507324 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006ApJ...647L.111B 647, L111

    work page doi:10.1086/507324 2006

  8. [8]

    K., Yakovleva S

    Belyaev A. K., Yakovleva S. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1240 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3952B 478, 3952

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1240 2018

  9. [9]

    Butler K., Giddings J., 1985, Newsletter on Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, 9, 723

    work page 1985

  10. [10]

    Creevey O., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834721 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834721 2019

  11. [11]

    Drawin H.-W., 1968, @doi [Zeitschrift fur Physik] 10.1007/BF01379963 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1968ZPhy..211..404D 211, 404

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01379963 1968

  12. [12]

    I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912833 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2009A

    Feltzing S., Eriksson K., Kleyna J., Wilkinson M. I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912833 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2009A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912833 2009

  13. [13]

    E., Gilmore G., Wyse R

    Frebel A., Norris J. E., Gilmore G., Wyse R. F. G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/110 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2016ApJ...826..110F 826, 110

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/110 2016

  14. [14]

    E., Monaco L., Yong D., Wyse R

    Gilmore G., Norris J. E., Monaco L., Yong D., Wyse R. F. G., Geisler D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/61 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2013ApJ...763...61G 763, 61

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/61 2013

  15. [15]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1023/A:1005161325181 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1998SSRv...85..161G 85, 161

    Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1023/A:1005161325181 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1998SSRv...85..161G 85, 161

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005161325181 1998

  16. [16]

    G., Nordlund ., Plez B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A

    Gustafsson B., Edvardsson B., Eriksson K., J rgensen U. G., Nordlund ., Plez B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2008A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 2008

  17. [17]

    K., Kim D.-G., Demarque P., 2009, New Yonsei-Yale (Y ^ 2 ) Isochrones and Horizontal-Branch Evolutionary Tracks with Helium Enhancements

    Han S.-I., Kim Y.-C., Lee Y.-W., Yi S. K., Kim D.-G., Demarque P., 2009, New Yonsei-Yale (Y ^ 2 ) Isochrones and Horizontal-Branch Evolutionary Tracks with Helium Enhancements . p. 33, @doi 10.1007/978-3-540-76961-3_9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76961-3_9 2009

  18. [18]

    N., Aoki W., Arimoto N., Okamoto S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322796 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014A

    Ishigaki M. N., Aoki W., Arimoto N., Okamoto S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322796 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322796 2014

  19. [19]

    Jablonka P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525661 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525661 2015

  20. [20]

    K., Ammon K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066082 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006A

    Jordi K., Grebel E. K., Ammon K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066082 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066082 2006

  21. [21]

    E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/146 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2011ApJ...736..146K 736, 146

    Koposov S. E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/146 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2011ApJ...736..146K 736, 146

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/146 2011

  22. [22]

    L., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...14K 8, 14

    Kurucz R. L., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...14K 8, 14

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Lodders K., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375492 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2003ApJ...591.1220L 591, 1220

    work page doi:10.1086/375492 2003

  24. [24]

    Marshall J., et al., 2018, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv181201022M ( @eprint arXiv 1812.01022 )

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Mashonkina L., Christlieb N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423651 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423651 2014

  26. [26]

    Mashonkina L., Gehren T., Bikmaev I., 1999, , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1999A

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    I., Sitnova T

    Mashonkina L. I., Sitnova T. N., Pakhomov Y. V., 2016, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773716080028 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2016AstL...42..606M 42, 606

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773716080028 2016

  28. [28]

    Mashonkina L., Jablonka P., Pakhomov Y., Sitnova T., North P., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730779 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2017A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730779

  29. [29]

    Mashonkina L., Jablonka P., Sitnova T., Pakhomov Y., North P., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731582 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2017A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731582

  30. [30]

    Matteucci F., Greggio L., 1986, , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1986A

    work page 1986

  31. [31]

    W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012AJ....144....4M 144, 4

    McConnachie A. W., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012AJ....144....4M 144, 4

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 2012

  32. [32]

    Noguchi K., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/54.6.855 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2002PASJ...54..855N 54, 855

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/54.6.855 2002

  33. [33]

    E., Gilmore G., Wyse R

    Norris J. E., Gilmore G., Wyse R. F. G., Wilkinson M. I., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Zucker D. B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/595962 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2008ApJ...689L.113N 689, L113

    work page doi:10.1086/595962 2008

  34. [34]

    E., Wyse R

    Norris J. E., Wyse R. F. G., Gilmore G., Yong D., Frebel A., Wilkinson M. I., Belokurov V., Zucker D. B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1632 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2010ApJ...723.1632N 723, 1632

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/2/1632 2010

  35. [35]

    Okamoto S., Arimoto N., Yamada Y., Onodera M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/96 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012ApJ...744...96O 744, 96

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/96 2012

  36. [36]

    Ram \' rez I., Mel \'e ndez J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430102 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2005ApJ...626..465R 626, 465

    work page doi:10.1086/430102 2005

  37. [37]

    K., 1991, Diploma thesis, Universit a t M u nchen

    Reetz J. K., 1991, Diploma thesis, Universit a t M u nchen

    work page 1991

  38. [38]

    Revaz Y., Jablonka P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117402 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2012A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117402 2012

  39. [39]

    Romano D., Bellazzini M., Starkenburg E., Leaman R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2427 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015MNRAS.446.4220R 446, 4220

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2427 2015

  40. [40]

    Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, in press

    Ryabchikova T., Tsymbal V., 2019, in Physics of Magnetic Stars. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, in press

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    L., Stempels H

    Ryabchikova T., Piskunov N., Kurucz R. L., Stempels H. C., Heiter U., Pakhomov Y., Barklem P. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2015PhyS...90e4005R 90, 054005

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 2015

  42. [42]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    work page doi:10.1086/498708 2006

  43. [43]

    Steenbock W., Holweger H., 1984, , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1984A

    work page 1984

  44. [44]

    Tsujimoto T., Nomoto K., Yoshii Y., Hashimoto M., Yanagida S., Thielemann F.-K., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/277.3.945 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/1995MNRAS.277..945T 277, 945

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/277.3.945 1995

  45. [45]

    pp D--112

    Weinstein D., Perez M., 1992, in Record of the IUE Three-Agency Coordination Meeting. pp D--112

    work page 1992

  46. [46]

    G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    York D. G., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301513 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y 120, 1579

    work page doi:10.1086/301513 2000

  47. [47]

    Zhao G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/225 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2016ApJ...833..225Z 833, 225

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/225 2016

  48. [48]

    de Boer T. J. L., Belokurov V., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1176 , http://esoads.eso.org/abs/2014MNRAS.443..658D 443, 658

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1176 2014