pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12141 · v1 · pith:OHEZBHMJnew · submitted 2019-06-28 · 💻 cs.CG

MGOS: A Library for Molecular Geometry and its Operating System

Deok-Soo Kima , Joonghyun Ryua , Youngsong Choa , Mokwon Leeb , Jehyun Cha , Chanyoung Song , Sangwha Kim , Roman A Laskowskid
show 3 more authors
Kokichi Sugihara Jong Bhak Seong Eon Ryu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CG
keywords molecular geometryMGOSatomic arrangementgeometric algorithmsmolecular structurevolume and areacomputational libraryspherical entities
0
0 comments X

The pith

Molecular Geometry framework lets researchers model atomic arrangements using volume, area, and other standard measures, implemented through the MGOS library of callable functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Molecular Geometry as a framework that reduces problems of atomic arrangement to elementary geometric quantities such as volume and area. It pairs this framework with MGOS, a library whose functions implement the theory so that application programs can call them directly. Researchers gain the ability to embed these functions for efficient solutions to geometric queries without writing their own algorithms. The approach mirrors the role of standard math libraries in scientific programming, shifting effort from geometry implementation to core domain questions.

Core claim

Molecular Geometry (MG) is a theoretical framework for the geometry of atomic arrangement that expresses complicated molecular structure problems in terms of standard notions such as volume and area. MGOS consists of callable functions that realize the MG theory, allowing these functions to be embedded in application programs. This combination supplies accurate solutions to geometric queries involving atomic arrangements and frees users from the task of developing geometric algorithms.

What carries the argument

The MG framework, which recasts molecular structure problems as calculations over volume, area, and related geometric primitives, realized through the MGOS set of callable functions.

If this is right

  • MG simplifies the modeling of molecular structure problems to elementary geometric notions.
  • MGOS functions embed directly into application programs for accurate geometric query solutions.
  • Researchers avoid the development and implementation of geometric algorithms.
  • Use of MGOS for spherical entities parallels the role of math libraries in general-purpose scientific programming.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standardization around MG primitives could reduce duplication of geometric code across separate molecular modeling projects.
  • The spherical-entity focus leaves open whether the same reduction to volume and area extends cleanly to non-spherical molecular components.
  • Embedding MGOS in existing simulation packages might allow direct comparison of geometric accuracy against hand-coded alternatives.

Load-bearing premise

No general framework of mathematical or computational theory for the geometry of atomic arrangement already exists.

What would settle it

A documented prior framework that already permits modeling of atomic arrangements through volume, area, and similar standard measures without requiring users to develop custom geometric algorithms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.12141 by Chanyoung Song, Deok-Soo Kima, Jehyun Cha, Jong Bhak, Joonghyun Ryua, Kokichi Sugihara, Mokwon Leeb, Roman A Laskowskid, Sangwha Kim, Seong Eon Ryu, Youngsong Choa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lee-Richards voids corresponding to a water molecule probe (i.e. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The Molecular Geometry (MG) framework. (A) The MG ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Protein structure analysis using Program-Use-Case-I in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Program-Use-Case-I computes the voids, channels, etc. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Geometric features in atomic arrangements shown in ball-and-stick [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Program-Use-Case-II that computes the volumes, areas, and voids of 100 molecular structures 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of files for Program-Use-Case-II: (a) The input file storing the 100 PDB codes. (b) The output file for computation result. The program begins by including MGUtilityFunctions.h in addition to MolecularGeometry.h because the program also uses some utility functions related to file I/O. The command in line 7 opens a file, say FILE IN, which contains the 100 PDB codes to use. The first line of FILE I… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MGUtilityFunctions which are used in Program-Use-Case-II. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Graphs produced by Microsoft Excel using the output file [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The role of MGOS for creating application programs. MGOS is a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Class design of the topology structures in MGOS. The dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Data structure of REDS and IWDS. (a) REDS, (b) IWDS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The geometry of atomic arrangement underpins the structural understanding of molecules in many fields. However, no general framework of mathematical/computational theory for the geometry of atomic arrangement exists. Here we present "Molecular Geometry (MG)" as a theoretical framework accompanied by "MG Operating System (MGOS)" which consists of callable functions implementing the MG theory. MG allows researchers to model complicated molecular structure problems in terms of elementary yet standard notions of volume, area, etc. and MGOS frees them from the hard and tedious task of developing/implementing geometric algorithms so that they can focus more on their primary research issues. MG facilitates simpler modeling of molecular structure problems; MGOS functions can be conveniently embedded in application programs for the efficient and accurate solution of geometric queries involving atomic arrangements. The use of MGOS in problems involving spherical entities is akin to the use of math libraries in general purpose programming languages in science and engineering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents 'Molecular Geometry (MG)' as a new theoretical framework for modeling the geometry of atomic arrangements in molecules using elementary notions such as volume and area, accompanied by the 'MG Operating System (MGOS)' library consisting of callable functions that implement MG theory. It claims this approach simplifies molecular structure problems and eliminates the need for researchers to develop geometric algorithms, positioning MGOS as a foundational library akin to math libraries in general-purpose programming.

Significance. If the MG framework proves general and the MGOS implementations are efficient and accurate for queries involving atomic (spherical) arrangements, the work could provide a useful standardized interface for geometric computations in computational chemistry and structural biology, reducing redundant implementation effort across applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central premise that 'no general framework of mathematical/computational theory for the geometry of atomic arrangement exists' is stated without citations, literature review, or explicit comparison to prior computational geometry tools for molecules (such as those based on Voronoi diagrams, alpha shapes, or existing molecular surface libraries). This assertion is load-bearing for the claimed novelty and necessity of both MG and MGOS.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'spherical entities' and 'atomic arrangement' but provides no explicit scope, assumptions, or limitations of the MG framework.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central premise that 'no general framework of mathematical/computational theory for the geometry of atomic arrangement exists' is stated without citations, literature review, or explicit comparison to prior computational geometry tools for molecules (such as those based on Voronoi diagrams, alpha shapes, or existing molecular surface libraries). This assertion is load-bearing for the claimed novelty and necessity of both MG and MGOS.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract states the absence of a general framework without citations or comparisons, and that this claim supports the novelty argument. The full manuscript develops MG as a framework centered on elementary geometric measures (volume, area) together with an OS-style library interface; however, the abstract itself does not reference existing molecular computational-geometry literature. In the revised manuscript we will shorten and qualify the claim in the abstract, add a brief clause acknowledging Voronoi-diagram and alpha-shape approaches, and indicate how MGOS differs by supplying a standardized callable interface rather than requiring per-application algorithm development. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: library description with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper presents a software library (MGOS) implementing a conceptual framework (MG) for molecular geometry but contains no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or mathematical claims that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central premise that no prior general framework exists is an unsubstantiated novelty assertion rather than a load-bearing derivation step; per the analysis rules this falls under correctness/novelty risk, not circularity. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in a way that creates the enumerated circular patterns. The work is self-contained as a descriptive library contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available. The paper introduces MG as a new framework but supplies no mathematical details, so the ledger reflects the high-level claims without specific parameters or axioms.

invented entities (1)
  • Molecular Geometry (MG) framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as a general theoretical framework for the geometry of atomic arrangements
    Presented in the abstract as a new framework where none previously existed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5731 in / 1276 out tokens · 28483 ms · 2026-05-25T13:29:44.106755+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Morgan, A

    D. Morgan, A. V. der Ven, G. Ceder, Li conductivity in lixmpo4 (m = mn, fe, co, ni) olivine materials, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters 7 (2) (2004) A30–A32

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework, Nature 402 (1999) 276–279

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Furukawa, N

    H. Furukawa, N. Ko, Y. B. Go, N. Aratani, S. B. Choi, E. Choi, A. Yazaydin, R. Q.Snurr, M. OKeeffe, Ultrahigh porosity in metal- organic frameworks, Science 329 (5990) (2010) 424–428

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Chothia, Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in pro- teins, Nature 248 (1974) 338–339

    C. Chothia, Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in pro- teins, Nature 248 (1974) 338–339

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    M. L. Connolly, Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids, Science 221 (1983) 709–713

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    S. J. Hubbard, K.-H. Gross, P. Argos, Intramolecular cavities in globular proteins, Protein Engineering 7 (5) (1994) 613–626

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    D. A. Doyle, joao Morais Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzer, A. Kuo, J. M. Gulbis, S. L. Cohan, B. T. Chait, R. Mackinnon, The structure of the potassium channel: Molecular basis of k conduction and selectivity, Science 280 (1998) 69–77

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Yonath, K

    A. Yonath, K. R. Leonard, H. G. Wittmann, A tunnel in the large ribosomal subunit revealed by three-dimensional image reconstruction, Science 236 (4803) (1987) 813–816. 27

    work page 1987

  9. [9]

    X. Liu, E. C.Theil, Ferritins: Dynamic management of biological iron oxygen chemistry, Accounts of Chemical Research 38 (3) (2005) 167–175

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    C. H. Park, S. Y. Lee, D. S. Hwang, D. W. Shin, D. H. Cho, K. H. Lee, T.-W. Kim, T.-W. Kim, M. Lee, D.-S. Kim, C. M. Doherty, A. W. Thornton, A. J. Hill, M. D. Guiver, Y. M. Lee, Nano-crack regulated self-humidifying membranes, Nature 532 (7600) (2016) 480–483

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Gerling, K

    T. Gerling, K. F. Wagenbauer, A. M. Neuner, H. Dietz, Dynamic dna devices and assemblies formed by shape-complementary, nonbase pairing 3d components, Science 347 (6229) (2015) 1446–1452

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    M. N. O’Brien, M. R. Jones, B. Lee, C. A. Mirkin, Anisotropic nanopar- ticle complementarity in DNA-mediated co-crystallization, Nature Ma- terials 14 (2015) 833–839

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Fischer, Synthesen in der zuckergruppe, Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 23 (2) (1890) 2114–2141

    E. Fischer, Synthesen in der zuckergruppe, Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 23 (2) (1890) 2114–2141

    work page

  14. [14]

    Daniel E

    J. Daniel E. Koshland, Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis, Proceedings of National Academy of Science 44 (1958) 98–104

    work page 1958

  15. [15]

    Shrake, J

    A. Shrake, J. A. Rupley, Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. lysozyme and insulin, Journal of Molecular Biology 79 (2) (1973) 351–371

    work page 1973

  16. [16]

    G. J. Kleywegt, T. A. Jones, Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures, Acta Crystallographica Section D 50 (1994) 178–185

    work page 1994

  17. [17]

    F. M. Richards, Areas, volumes, packing, and protein structure, Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering 6 (1977) 151–176

    work page 1977

  18. [18]

    J.-K. Kim, Y. Cho, R. A. Laskowski, S. E. Ryu, K. Sugihara, D.-S. Kim, BetaVoid: molecular voids via beta-complexes and Voronoi diagrams, Proteins: Structure, Functions, and Bioinformatics 82 (9) (2014) 1829– 1849

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    J.-K. Kim, Y. Cho, M. Lee, R. A. Laskowski, S. E. Ryu, K. Sugihara, D.- S. Kim, BetaCavityWeb: a webserver for molecular voids and channels, Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1) (2015) W413–W418. 28

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    RCSB Protein Data Bank, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/

    work page

  21. [21]

    Vlassi, G

    M. Vlassi, G. Cesareni, M. Kokkinidis, A correlation between the loss of hydrophobic core packing interactions and protein stability, Journal of Molecular Biology 285 (2) (1999) 817–827

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    Horiuchi, H

    S. Horiuchi, H. Tanaka, E. Sakuda, Y. Arikawa, K. Umakoshi, Encapsu- lation condition dependent photophysical properties of polypyridyl ru(ii) complexes within a hydrogen-bonded capsule, Dalton Transactions 48 (2019) 5156–5160

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Shimada, M

    A. Shimada, M. Kubo, S. Baba, K. Yamashita, K. Hirata, G. Ueno, T. Nomura, T. Kimura, K. Shinzawa-Itoh, J. Baba, K. Hatano, Y. Eto, A. Miyamoto, H. Murakami, T. Kumasaka, S. Owada, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Yanagisawa, M. Sakaguchi, T. Ogura, R. Komiya, J. Yan, E. Yamashita, M. Yamamoto, H. Ago, S. Yoshikawa, T. Tsukihara, A nanosecond time-re...

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Ducassoua, L

    L. Ducassoua, L. Dhers, G. Jonasson, N. Pietrancosta, J.-L. Boucher, D. Mansuy, F. Andr´ e, Membrane-bound human orphan cytochrome P450 2U1: Sequence singularities, construction of a full 3d model, and substrate docking, Biochimie 140 (2017) 166–175

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Molcan, S

    T. Molcan, S. Swigonska, K. Orlowska, K. Myszczynski, A. Nynca, A. Sadowska, M. Ruszkowska, J. P. Jastrzebski, R. E. Ciereszko, Structural-functional adaptations of porcine CYP1A1 to metabolize polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, Chemosphere 168 (2017) 205–216

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    F. J. Rizzuto, J. R. Nitschke, Stereochemical plasticity modulates coop- erative binding in a Co II 12L6 cuboctahedron, Nature Chemistry 9 (2017) 903–908

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Markiewicz, A

    G. Markiewicz, A. Jenczak, M. Ko lodziejski, J. J. Holstein, J. K. M. Sanders, A. R. Stefankiewicz, SelectiveC70 encapsulation by a robust oc- tameric nanospheroid held together by 48 cooperative hydrogen bonds, Nature Communications 8 (15109) (2017) 1–8

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Chaptal, F

    V. Chaptal, F. Delolme, A. Kilburg, S. Magnard, C. Montigny, M. Pi- card, C. Prier, L. Monticelli, O. Bornert, M. Agez, S. Ravaud, C. Orelle, 29 R. Wagner, A. Jawhari, I. Broutin, E. Pebay-Peyroula, J.-M. Jault, H. R. Kaback, M. le Maire, P. Falson, Quantification of detergents com- plexed with membrane proteins, Scientific Reports 7 (41751) (2017) 1– 12

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. B. Bailey, R. H. Subramanian, A. Groisman, F. A. Tezcan, Hyperexpandable, self-healing macromolecular crystals with integrated polymer networks, Nature 557 (2018) 86–91

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Kitanovic, C

    S. Kitanovic, C. A. Marks-Fife, Q. A. Parkes, P. R. Wilderman, J. R. Halpert, M. D. Dearing, Cytochrome p450 2b diversity in a dietary spe- cialistthe red tree vole (arborimus longicaudus), Journal of Mammalogy 99 (3) (2018) 578–585

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Nagae, H

    T. Nagae, H. Yamada, N. Watanabe, High-pressure protein crystal structure analysis of escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase complexed with folate and nadp+, Acta Crystallographica Section D 74 (2018) 895–905

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    B. Htan, D. Luo, C. Ma, J. Zhang, Q. Gan, Water-trapping of metal- organic cages with endohedral variation, Crystal Growth & Design 19 (5) (2019) 2862–2868

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Chakravorty, E

    A. Chakravorty, E. Gallicchio, A gridbased algorithm in conjunction with a gaussianbased model of atoms for describing molecular geometry, Computational Chemistry 40 (12) (2019) 1290–1304

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    D.-S. Kim, Y. Cho, D. Kim, Euclidean Voronoi diagram of 3D balls and its computation via tracing edges, Computer-Aided Design 37 (13) (2005) 1412–1424

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    D.-S. Kim, D. Kim, Y. Cho, K. Sugihara, Quasi-triangulation and in- terworld data structure in three dimensions, Computer-Aided Design 38 (7) (2006) 808–819

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    D.-S. Kim, Y. Cho, K. Sugihara, Quasi-worlds and quasi-operators on quasi-triangulations, Computer-Aided Design 42 (10) (2010) 874–888

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    D.-S. Kim, Y. Cho, K. Sugihara, J. Ryu, D. Kim, Three-dimensional beta-shapes and beta-complexes via quasi-triangulation, Computer- Aided Design 42 (10) (2010) 911–929. 30

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    J. A. Le Bel, On the relations which exist between the atomic formulas of organic compounds and the rotatory power of their solutions (orig. publ. 1874), in: G. M. Richardson (Ed.), The Foundations of Stereochemistry, 1901, pp. 47–59, the Richardson translations have been reprinted in Benfey, O.T., Ed. Classics in the Theory of Chemical Combination; Dover: New

    work page 1901

  39. [39]

    J. H. van’t Hoff, A suggestion looking to the extension into space of the structural formulas at present used in chemistry, and a note upon the relations between the optical activity and the chemical constitution of organic compounds (orig. publ. 1874), in: G. M. Richardson (Ed.), The Foundations of Stereochemistry, 1901, pp. 66–73

    work page 1901

  40. [40]

    R. B. Grossman, Van’t hoff, le bel, and the development of stereochem- istry: A reassessment, Journal of chemical education 66 (1) (1989) 30– 33

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    Sidgwick, H

    N. Sidgwick, H. Powell, Bakerian lecture. stereochemical types and va- lency groups, in: Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, Vol. 176, 1940

    work page 1940

  42. [42]

    R. J. Gillespie, Molecular Geometry, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1972

    work page 1972

  43. [43]

    R. J. Gillespie, R. S. Nyholm, Inorganic stereochemistry, Quarterly Re- views, Chemical Society 11 (4) (1957) 339–380

    work page 1957

  44. [44]

    R. J. Gillespie, The valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) the- ory of directed valency, Journal of chemical education 40 (6) (1963) 295–301

    work page 1963

  45. [45]

    Gillespie, Electron correlation and molecular shape, Canadian Jour- nal of Chemistry 38 (1960) 818–826

    R. Gillespie, Electron correlation and molecular shape, Canadian Jour- nal of Chemistry 38 (1960) 818–826

    work page 1960

  46. [46]

    Fischer, Syntheses in the purine and sugar group, Nobel Lectures in Chemistry 1901-1921, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1966

    E. Fischer, Syntheses in the purine and sugar group, Nobel Lectures in Chemistry 1901-1921, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1966

    work page 1901

  47. [47]

    Crick, The packing of a-Helices: Simple coiled-coils, Acta Crystallo- graphica 6 (1953) 689–697

    F. Crick, The packing of a-Helices: Simple coiled-coils, Acta Crystallo- graphica 6 (1953) 689–697

    work page 1953

  48. [48]

    Daniel E

    J. Daniel E. Koshland, Correlation of structure and function in enzyme action, Science 142 (3599) (1963) 1533–1541. 31

    work page 1963

  49. [49]

    Daniel E

    J. Daniel E. Koshland, The key-lock theory and the induced fit theory, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 33 (1994) 2375–2378

    work page 1994

  50. [50]

    J. C. Kendrew, R. E. Dickerson, B. E. Strandberg, R. G. Hart, D. R. Davies, Structure of myoglobin: A three-dimensional fourier synthesis at 2 ˚ a. resolution, Nature 185 (4711) (1960) 422–427

    work page 1960

  51. [51]

    B. Lee, F. M. Richards, The interpretation of protein structures: Es- timation of static accessibility, Journal of Molecular Biology 55 (1971) 379–400

    work page 1971

  52. [52]

    Chothia, Structural invariants in protein folding, Nature 254 (27) (1975) 304–308

    C. Chothia, Structural invariants in protein folding, Nature 254 (27) (1975) 304–308

    work page 1975

  53. [53]

    F. M. Richards, The interpretation of protein structures: Total volume, group volume distributions and packing density, Journal of Molecular Biology 82 (1974) 1–14

    work page 1974

  54. [54]

    R. A. Laskowski, M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, J. M. Thornton, PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures, Journal of Applied Crystallography 26 (1993) 283–291

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    V. B. Chen, W. B. A. III, J. J. Headd, D. A. Keedy, R. M. Immormino, G. J. Kapral, L. W. Murray, J. S. Richardson, D. C. Richardson, Mol- Probity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallogra- phy, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography 66 (1) (2010) 12–21

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    I. W. Davis, A. Leaver-Fay, V. B. Chen, J. N. Block, G. J. Kapral, X. Wang, L. W. Murray, W. B. A. III, J. Snoeyink, J. S. Richardson, D. C. Richardson, MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure valida- tion for proteins and nucleic acids, Nucleic Acids Research 35 (2007) W375–383

    work page 2007

  57. [57]

    Shin, J.-K

    W.-H. Shin, J.-K. Kim, D.-S. Kim, C. Seok, GalaxyDock2: protein- ligand docking using beta-complex and global optimization, Journal of Computational Chemistry 34 (30) (2013) 2647–2656

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    J. Ryu, M. Lee, J. cha, R. A. Laskowski, S. E. Ryu, D.-S. Kim, Be- taSCPWeb: side-chain prediction for protein structures using voronoi 32 diagrams and geometry prioritization, Nucleic Acids Research 44 (W1) (2016) W416–W423

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Bondi, van der Waals volumes and radii, Journal of Physical Chem- istry 68 (1964) 441–451

    A. Bondi, van der Waals volumes and radii, Journal of Physical Chem- istry 68 (1964) 441–451

    work page 1964

  60. [60]

    J. C. Slater, Atomic radii in crystals, Journal of Chemical Physics 41 (10) (1964) 3199–3204

    work page 1964

  61. [61]

    W. C. Still, A. Tempczyk, R. C. Hawley, T. Hendrickson, Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics, Journal of the American Chemical Society 112 (16) (1990) 6127–6129

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    Onufriev, D

    A. Onufriev, D. Bashford, D. A.Case, Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 55 (2) (2004) 383–394

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    S. W. Lockless, M. Zhou, R. MacKinnon, Structural and thermodynamic properties of selective ion binding in a K+ channel, PLOS BIOLOGY 5 (5) (2007) 1079–1088

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    J. Tsai, R. Taylor, C. Chothia, M. Gerstein, The packing density in proteins: Standard radii and volumes, Journal of Molecular Biology 290 (1999) 253–266

    work page 1999

  65. [65]

    J. D. Bernal, J. L. Finney, Random close-packed hard-sphere model II. Geometry of random packing of hard spheres, Discussions of the Faraday Society 43 (1967) 62–69

    work page 1967

  66. [66]

    Okabe, B

    A. Okabe, B. Boots, K. Sugihara, S. N. Chiu, Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1999

    work page 1999

  67. [67]

    Lee, Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1999

    K. Lee, Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1999. 33 (a) (b) Figure 12: Data structure of REDS and IWDS. (a) REDS, (b) IWDS. 34 Appendix 1. 300 Test PDB Models Table .1: The 300 tested PDB models. 1AA2 1ARL 1BWW 1C26 1CEX 1CT4 1D2K 1D4T 1DC9 1DKL 1DQ0 1DQZ 1E2T 1EAI 1EDQ 1EKG 1EQP 1ES9 1EUM 1EY4 1EZG 1F2V 1F41 1F46 1F60 1FA8 1FCQ 1F...

    work page 1999

  68. [68]

    number of atoms() • Entity locator API (proximity query I) : Twelve APIs

    work page

  69. [69]

    find boundary atoms in van der Waals model()

    work page

  70. [70]

    find buried atoms in van der Waals model()

    work page

  71. [71]

    find first order neighbor atoms in van der Waals model( atom )

    work page

  72. [72]

    find first order neighbor atoms in van der Waals model( atomAr- rangement )

    work page

  73. [73]

    find second order neighbor atoms in van der Waals model( atom )

    work page

  74. [74]

    find second order neighbor atoms in van der Waals model( atom- Arrangement )

    work page

  75. [75]

    find boundary atoms in Lee Richards model( solventProbeRadius )

    work page

  76. [76]

    find buried atoms in Lee Richards model( solventProbeRadius )

    work page

  77. [77]

    find first order neighbor atoms in Lee Richards model( solventProbeRa- dius, atom )

    work page

  78. [78]

    find first order neighbor atoms in Lee Richards model( solventProbeRa- dius, atomArrangement )

    work page

  79. [79]

    find second order neighbor atoms in Lee Richards model( solvent- ProbeRadius, atom )

    work page

  80. [80]

    find second order neighbor atoms in Lee Richards model( solvent- ProbeRadius, atomArrangement ) 36 • Entity verifier API (proximity query II) : Six APIs

    work page

Showing first 80 references.