Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Curve counting in genus one: elliptic singularities & relative geometry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.00024 v2 pith:2PRW7P37 submitted 2019-06-28 math.AG

classification math.AG
keywords genusrelativegromov--wittenamplecomponentellipticgeometryinvariants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct and study the reduced, relative, genus one Gromov--Witten theory of very ample pairs. These invariants form the principal component contribution to relative Gromov--Witten theory in genus one and are relative versions of Zinger's reduced Gromov--Witten invariants. We relate the relative and absolute theories by degeneration of the tangency conditions, and the resulting formulas generalise a well-known recursive calculation scheme put forward by Gathmann in genus zero. The geometric input is a desingularisation of the principal component of the moduli space of genus one logarithmic stable maps to a very ample pair, using the geometry of elliptic singularities. Our study passes through general techniques for calculating integrals on logarithmic blowups of moduli spaces of stable maps, which may be of independent interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gromov-Witten theory with maximal contacts

    math.AG 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For simple normal crossings divisors, logarithmic and local/naive Gromov-Witten invariants with maximal contacts differ, and this paper gives the first counterexamples plus a blowup formula measuring the difference.

Pith tools