pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00322 · v1 · pith:QKZPO4NQnew · submitted 2019-06-30 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.NI

Analog Signal Compression and Multiplexing Techniques for Healthcare Internet of Things

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 12:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.NI
keywords analog compressionAJSCCFPMMIoT healthcaresignal multiplexinglow-power sensorsanalog encodingfrequency modulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Analog Joint Source Channel Coding compresses multiple IoT sensor signals in the analog domain without ADCs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a method to compress and encode multiple healthcare sensor signals entirely in analog form using Analog Joint Source Channel Coding. This avoids power-hungry Analog-to-Digital Converters by quantizing all input signals except one. The signals are transmitted via a Frequency Position Modulation and Multiplexing technique that is robust to interference, protects against eavesdropping, and operates at low power in a low SNR region. A reader would care as it addresses scalability and power issues in IoT healthcare applications by potentially reducing the number of devices and energy use. Simulations evaluate the approach through mean square error for compression and miss detection rate for the modulation.

Core claim

The paper establishes that a multi-signal compression and encoding method based on Analog Joint Source Channel Coding operates fully in the analog domain without Analog-to-Digital Converters. Compression occurs by quantizing all input signals but one, and communication uses Frequency Position Modulation and Multiplexing which provides robustness to interference at particular frequency bands, protection against eavesdropping, and low power consumption from a very low SNR operating region at the receiver. Performance is assessed via simulations measuring Mean Square Error and Miss Detection Rate.

What carries the argument

Analog Joint Source Channel Coding (AJSCC) for multi-signal compression by selective quantization, combined with Frequency Position Modulation and Multiplexing (FPMM) for joint modulation and multiplexing.

Load-bearing premise

The analog AJSCC compression and FPMM technique can be realized in practical hardware with distortion levels that match the simulation results on MSE and MDR.

What would settle it

A physical implementation of the AJSCC device and FPMM receiver that exhibits substantially higher mean square error or miss detection rate than the simulations predict under real operating conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00322 by Dario Pompili, Vidyasagar Sadhu, Xueyuan Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: AJSCC devices (1-6) compress two or more sensor values into [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The mapped signal is the accumulated length of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) The proposed AJSCC device sensing two values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Power analysis at FPMM receiver. the signal power analysis at the FPMM receiver. The signal power values at the receiver antenna output and ADC input are depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Dynamic range analysis at the ADC input; (b) Mean Square Error (MSE) vs. number of levels for analog signal compression by Shannon mapping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Optimal L1 and L2 values, quantized to integers, of dimension N = 3, for varying Dmax and SNR (note that, due to the symmetric structure of the problem, L1 and L2 have co-located optimal values); (b) Optimal L = L1, ..., LN−1 vs. number of dimensions N, for different Dmax values at SNR equal to 20 dB; (c) Sum MSE at optimal L = L1, ..., LN−1 vs. number of dimensions N, for different Dmax values for SNR… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Miss Detection Rate (MDR) vs. SNR for different BWs for the AWGN case (no. of users set to 1000); (b) MDR vs. SNR for the AWGN case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Scalability is a major issue for Internet of Things (IoT) as the total amount of traffic data collected and/or the number of sensors deployed grow. In some IoT applications such as healthcare, power consumption is also a key design factor for the IoT devices. In this paper, a multi-signal compression and encoding method based on Analog Joint Source Channel Coding (AJSCC) is proposed that works fully in the analog domain without the need for power-hungry Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs). Compression is achieved by quantizing all the input signals but one. While saving power, this method can also reduce the number of devices by combining one or more sensing functionalities into a single device (called 'AJSCC device'). Apart from analog encoding, AJSCC devices communicate to an aggregator node (FPMM receiver) using a novel Frequency Position Modulation and Multiplexing (FPMM) technique. Such joint modulation and multiplexing technique presents three mayor advantages---it is robust to interference at particular frequency bands, it protects against eavesdropping, and it consumes low power due to a very low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) operating region at the receiver. Performance of the proposed multi-signal compression method and FPMM technique is evaluated via simulations in terms of Mean Square Error (MSE) and Miss Detection Rate (MDR), respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal evaluated by external simulation

full rationale

The paper introduces a novel AJSCC-based analog compression scheme (quantizing all but one signal) and FPMM modulation/multiplexing, with performance claims supported only by simulation results on MSE and MDR. No equations, parameters, or uniqueness claims reduce to self-definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain consists of a new hardware-oriented proposal whose validity is tested externally rather than by construction from its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the introduction of AJSCC-based compression and FPMM without external benchmarks or independent evidence beyond the paper's own simulations; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities with falsifiable handles are detailed in the abstract.

invented entities (2)
  • AJSCC device no independent evidence
    purpose: Single device combining multiple sensing functionalities via analog compression
    Introduced to reduce device count; no independent evidence provided.
  • FPMM receiver no independent evidence
    purpose: Aggregator node implementing the novel modulation and multiplexing
    Novel receiver concept introduced; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5781 in / 1226 out tokens · 62015 ms · 2026-05-25T12:58:05.362033+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Communication in the presence of noise,

    C. Shannon, “Communication in the presence of noise,” Proceedings of the IRE , 1949

  2. [2]

    Using 2:1 Shannon mapping for joint source-channel coding,

    F. Hekland, G. Oien, and T. Ramstad, “Using 2:1 Shannon mapping for joint source-channel coding,” in Data Compression Conference, 2005. Proceedings. DCC 2005 , March 2005, pp. 223–232

  3. [3]

    WSN430 Open Node,

    “WSN430 Open Node,” https://www.iot-lab.info/hardware/wsn430/

  4. [4]

    Low-power all-analog circuit for rectangular-type analog joint source channel coding,

    X. Zhao, V . Sadhu, and D. Pompili, “Low-power all-analog circuit for rectangular-type analog joint source channel coding,” in Proc of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits & Systems (ISCAS) , Montreal, Canada, May 2016

  5. [5]

    A modular and power-intelligent architecture for wireless sensor nodes,

    D. Riley and M. Younis, “A modular and power-intelligent architecture for wireless sensor nodes,” in Local Computer Networks (LCN), 2012 IEEE 37th Conference on , Oct 2012, pp. 304–307

  6. [6]

    MoteIV Telos (RevB) Low Power Wireless Sensor Module,

    “MoteIV Telos (RevB) Low Power Wireless Sensor Module,” http:// www4.ncsu.edu/∼kkolla/CSC714/datasheet.pdf

  7. [7]

    MICA2 Wireless Sensor Mote,

    “MICA2 Wireless Sensor Mote,” http://www.eol.ucar.edu/isf/facilities/ isa/internal/CrossBow/DataSheets/mica2.pdf

  8. [8]

    Yang, Ed., Body Sensor Networks

    G.-Z. Yang, Ed., Body Sensor Networks . Springer London, 2014

  9. [9]

    From Wearable Sensors to Smart Implants–Toward Pervasive and Personalized Healthcare,

    J. Andreu-Perez, D. R. Leff, H. M. D. Ip, and G.-Z. Yang, “From Wearable Sensors to Smart Implants–Toward Pervasive and Personalized Healthcare,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 2750–2762, 12 2015

  10. [10]

    Assessment of the e-AR sensor for gait analysis of Parkinson;s Disease patients,

    D. Jarchi, A. Peters, B. Lo, E. Kalliolia, I. Di Giulio, P. Limousin, B. L. Day, and G.-Z. Yang, “Assessment of the e-AR sensor for gait analysis of Parkinson;s Disease patients,” in 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN) . IEEE, 6 2015, pp. 1–6

  11. [11]

    Power Efficient Ultra Wide Band Based Wireless Body Area Networks with Narrowband Feedback Path,

    K. M. S. Thotahewa, J. Y . Khan, and M. R. Yuce, “Power Efficient Ultra Wide Band Based Wireless Body Area Networks with Narrowband Feedback Path,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1829–1842, 8 2014

  12. [12]

    WE-Harvest: A Wearable Piezoelectric-Electromagnetic Energy Harvester,

    M. Yuce, R. Hamid, and A. Mohammadi, “WE-Harvest: A Wearable Piezoelectric-Electromagnetic Energy Harvester,” in Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Body Area Networks . ICST, 2015, pp. 62–66

  13. [13]

    Body sensor networks for human activity recognition,

    G. Chetty and M. White, “Body sensor networks for human activity recognition,” in 2016 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) . IEEE, 2 2016, pp. 660–665

  14. [14]

    Experimental evaluation of analog joint source-channel coding in indoor environments,

    J. Garcia-Naya, O. Fresnedo, F. Vazquez-Araujo, M. Gonzalez-Lopez, L. Castedo, and J. Garcia-Frias, “Experimental evaluation of analog joint source-channel coding in indoor environments,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , June 2011, pp. 1–5

  15. [15]

    Analog joint source channel coding for wireless optical communications and image transmission,

    S. Romero, M. Hassanin, J. Garcia-Frias, and G. Arce, “Analog joint source channel coding for wireless optical communications and image transmission,” Journal of Lightwave Technology , vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1654–1662, May 2014

  16. [16]

    Compressed sensing with nonlinear analog mapping in a noisy environment,

    A. Abou Saleh, W.-Y . Chan, and F. Alajaji, “Compressed sensing with nonlinear analog mapping in a noisy environment,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 39–42, Jan 2012

  17. [17]

    Device method and system for communicating data,

    D. Stopler, “Device method and system for communicating data,” Jan 2014, uS Patent 8,625,709

  18. [18]

    Spatial diversity using analog joint source channel coding in wireless channels,

    G. Brante, R. Souza, and J. Garcia-Frias, “Spatial diversity using analog joint source channel coding in wireless channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 301–311, January 2013

  19. [19]

    Interlaced pilot channel estimation in MIMO- OFDM systems,

    X. Zhao and X. Hou, “Interlaced pilot channel estimation in MIMO- OFDM systems,” in 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems , May 2006, pp. 1–5

  20. [20]

    A comparative analysis of pilot placement schemes in frequency-selective fast fading MIMO channel,

    X. Zhao, R. S. K. Cheng, and D. C. Y . Ong, “A comparative analysis of pilot placement schemes in frequency-selective fast fading MIMO channel,” in Wireless Telecommunications Symposium , April 2007, pp. 1–7

  21. [21]

    Sending a laplacian source using hybrid digital-analog codes,

    F. Abbasi, A. Aghagolzadeh, and H. Behroozi, “Sending a laplacian source using hybrid digital-analog codes,” IEEE Transactions on Com- munications, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 2544–2557, July 2014

  22. [22]

    On the performance of hybrid digital-analog coding for broadcasting correlated gaussian sources,

    H. Behroozi, F. Alajaji, and T. Linder, “On the performance of hybrid digital-analog coding for broadcasting correlated gaussian sources,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3335–3342, December 2011

  23. [23]

    Towards low-power wearable wireless sensors for molecular biomarker and phys- iological signal monitoring,

    X. Zhao, V . Sadhu, T. Le, D. Pompili, and M. Javanmard, “Towards low-power wearable wireless sensors for molecular biomarker and phys- iological signal monitoring,” in To appear in Proc of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits & Systems (ISCAS) , Baltimore, USA, May 2017

  24. [24]

    Energy-efficient analog sensing for large-scale, high-density persistent wireless monitoring,

    V . Sadhu, X. Zhao, and D. Pompili, “Energy-efficient analog sensing for large-scale, high-density persistent wireless monitoring,” in 2017 13th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), Feb 2017, pp. 61–68

  25. [25]

    Data Compression by Temporal and Spatial Correlations in a Body-Area Sensor Network: A Case Study in Pilates Motion Recognition,

    C.-H. Wu and Y .-C. Tseng, “Data Compression by Temporal and Spatial Correlations in a Body-Area Sensor Network: A Case Study in Pilates Motion Recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1459–1472, 10 2011

  26. [26]

    Analog scrambler,

    J. Seitner, “Analog scrambler,” Feb. 19 2008, US Patent 7,333,608. [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/patents/US7333608

  27. [27]

    Degradation in convolutionally coded V-BLAST system and a performance improvement method,

    X. Zhao, Z. Pan, P. W. C. Chan, C. L. I, R. S. K. Cheng, and V . K. N. Lau, “Degradation in convolutionally coded V-BLAST system and a performance improvement method,” in VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE V ehicular Technology Conference, May 2008, pp. 544–548

  28. [28]

    BD-ZCS: Multi-cell interference coordina- tion via Zadoff-Chu sequence-based block diagonalization,

    X. Zhao and D. Pompili, “BD-ZCS: Multi-cell interference coordina- tion via Zadoff-Chu sequence-based block diagonalization,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications , April 2016, pp. 1–9