REVIEW 1 cited by
A Bayesian Approach to Matching Thermonuclear X-ray Burst Observations with Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We present a new method of matching observations of Type I (thermonuclear) X-ray bursts with models, comparing the predictions of a semi-analytic ignition model with X-ray observations of the accretion-powered millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4--3658 in outburst. We used a Bayesian analysis approach to marginalise over the parameters of interest and determine parameters such as fuel composition, distance/anisotropy factors, neutron star mass and neutron star radius. Our study includes a treatment of the system inclination effects, inferring that the rotation axis of the system is inclined $\left(69^{+4}_{-2}\right)^\circ$ from the observers line of sight, assuming a flat disc model. This method can be applied to any accreting source that exhibits Type I X-ray bursts. We find a hydrogen mass fraction of $0.57^{+0.13}_{-0.14}$ and CNO metallicity of $0.013^{+0.006}_{-0.004}$ for the accreted fuel is required by the model to match the observed burst energies, for a distance to the source of $3.3^{+0.3}_{-0.2}\,\mathrm{kpc}$. We infer a neutron star mass of $1.5^{+0.6}_{-0.3}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$ and radius of $11.8^{+1.3}_{-0.9}\,\mathrm{km}$ for a surface gravity of $1.9^{+0.7}_{-0.4}\times10^{14}\,\mathrm{cm}\,\mathrm{s}^{-2}$ for SAX J1808.4--3658.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars
First consistent numerical simulations of dark-matter-admixed neutron star mergers show that dark matter cores favor black hole collapse, halos form common envelopes, and standard tidal deformability calculations fail...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.