Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Using machine learning to understand physics graduate school admissions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.01570 v2 pith:KVMJ2VJM submitted 2019-07-02 physics.ed-ph

classification physics.ed-ph
keywords physicsadmissionsprogramadmittedgraduatewillapplicantcollected
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Among all of the first-year graduate students enrolled in doctoral-granting physics departments, the percentage of female and racial minority students has remained unchanged for the past 20 years. The current graduate program admissions process can create challenges for achieving diversity goals in physics. In this paper, we will investigate how the various aspects of a prospective student's application to a physics doctoral program affect the likelihood the applicant will be admitted. Admissions data was collected from a large, Midwestern public research university that has a decentralized admissions process and included applicants' undergraduate GPAs and institutions, research interests, and GRE scores. Because the collected data varied in scale, we used supervised machine learning algorithms to create models that predict who was admitted into the PhD program. We find that using only the applicant's undergraduate GPA and physics GRE score, we are able to predict with 75% accuracy who will be admitted to the program.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bias Analysis of AI Models for Undergraduate Student Admissions

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A case study showing that AI admissions models can have persistent specificity and sensitivity bias by race and first-generation status, even when overall accuracy is high and common fairness metrics look satisfied.

Pith tools