pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02276 · v2 · pith:YSQAE4TRnew · submitted 2019-07-04 · 🌊 nlin.AO · nlin.CD

Phase reduction beyond the first order: the case of the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation

Iv\'an Le\'on , Diego Paz\'o This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.AO nlin.CD
keywords phase reductionmean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equationisochronsmulti-body interactionscollective chaosweak couplingKuramoto modellimit cycle oscillators
0
0 comments X

The pith

An isochron-based scheme produces a second-order phase reduction for the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation that captures its weak-coupling collective dynamics through multi-body interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an isochron-based scheme to obtain the second-order phase approximation for the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation. This approximation reproduces the weak coupling dynamics of the MF-CGLE, going beyond the first-order Kuramoto model that only produces synchronization or incoherence. Extending the calculation to third order shows that each new term adds higher-order multi-body interactions. The authors conclude that these intricate multi-body phase interactions are the source of pure collective chaos in the MF-CGLE at moderate coupling.

Core claim

We develop an isochron-based scheme to obtain the second-order phase approximation, which reproduces the weak coupling dynamics of the MF-CGLE. The practicality of our method is evidenced by extending the calculation up to third order. Each new term of the power series expansion contributes with additional higher-order multi-body interactions. This points to intricate multi-body phase interactions as the source of pure collective chaos in the MF-CGLE at moderate coupling.

What carries the argument

The isochron-based scheme for computing successive orders of the phase reduction, where each order introduces higher-order multi-body phase interactions.

If this is right

  • The second-order phase approximation reproduces the weak coupling dynamics of the MF-CGLE.
  • Extending to third order confirms the addition of higher-order multi-body terms.
  • Multi-body phase interactions are the source of pure collective chaos at moderate coupling.
  • The method allows systematic expansion beyond the first-order Kuramoto model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This scheme could be applied to derive higher-order reductions in other oscillator ensembles to identify similar interaction structures.
  • The emphasis on multi-body terms implies that pairwise interaction models may be insufficient for capturing collective chaos in many physical systems.
  • Convergence of the power series could be tested by comparing models of increasing order to the full system at fixed weak coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The isochron construction can be carried to higher orders without encountering singularities or requiring additional regularization when the coupling strength is increased from the strictly linear regime.

What would settle it

Simulating both the MF-CGLE and the derived second-order phase model at a small but finite coupling strength and checking if their collective behaviors match; any significant discrepancy would falsify the reproduction claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02276 by Diego Paz\'o, Iv\'an Le\'on.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Snapshot of the positions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Partial phase diagram of the MF-CGLE for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison between the bifurcation lines of FS, UIS a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Two-cluster solutions of Eq. (15). Each panel repres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Bifurcation diagram for Eq. (15) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Stability boundaries of (a) UIS and (b) FS obtained ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Phase reduction is a powerful technique that makes possible describe the dynamics of a weakly perturbed limit-cycle oscillator in terms of its phase. For ensembles of oscillators, a classical example of phase reduction is the derivation of the Kuramoto model from the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (MF-CGLE). Still, the Kuramoto model is a first-order phase approximation that displays either full synchronization or incoherence, but none of the nontrivial dynamics of the MF-CGLE. This fact calls for an expansion beyond the first order in the coupling constant. We develop an isochron-based scheme to obtain the second-order phase approximation, which reproduces the weak coupling dynamics of the MF-CGLE. The practicality of our method is evidenced by extending the calculation up to third order. Each new term of the power series expansion contributes with additional higher-order multi-body (i.e.non-pairwise) interactions. This points to intricate multi-body phase interactions as the source of pure collective chaos in the MF-CGLE at moderate coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an isochron-based perturbative scheme to derive second- and third-order phase reductions for the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (MF-CGLE). The resulting phase equations incorporate higher-order multi-body interaction terms beyond the standard Kuramoto model and are shown to reproduce the known weak-coupling dynamics of the MF-CGLE. The authors argue that these multi-body terms are the origin of collective chaos observed in the MF-CGLE at moderate coupling strengths.

Significance. If the expansion is valid, the work supplies a systematic route to phase reductions that capture nontrivial collective dynamics inaccessible to first-order models. The explicit third-order calculation demonstrates practicality and shows how interaction complexity grows with order, providing a concrete link between microscopic oscillator equations and macroscopic chaos via non-pairwise phase couplings.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and concluding discussion] The central interpretive claim—that higher-order multi-body terms explain collective chaos at moderate coupling—rests on the assumption that the isochron-based power series remains regular and free of singularities when the coupling strength is increased beyond the weak-coupling regime. No explicit check (analytic or numeric) of the radius of convergence or basin-boundary effects is provided to secure this extension.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the phase response functions and isochrons should be introduced with explicit definitions before their use in the expansion.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement of the precise weak-coupling limit (e.g., scaling of the coupling constant) used to benchmark the reduced equations against direct MF-CGLE simulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the work and for the constructive comment. We address the major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and concluding discussion] The central interpretive claim—that higher-order multi-body terms explain collective chaos at moderate coupling—rests on the assumption that the isochron-based power series remains regular and free of singularities when the coupling strength is increased beyond the weak-coupling regime. No explicit check (analytic or numeric) of the radius of convergence or basin-boundary effects is provided to secure this extension.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript contains no explicit analytic or numeric determination of the radius of convergence of the isochron expansion. The derivation itself is perturbative and is validated only in the weak-coupling regime, where the resulting second- and third-order phase equations reproduce the known MF-CGLE dynamics. The interpretive statement that multi-body interactions are responsible for collective chaos at moderate coupling is therefore an extrapolation based on two facts: (i) the first-order (Kuramoto) truncation cannot produce chaos, and (ii) each successive order systematically introduces additional non-pairwise couplings whose functional form is fixed by the isochron geometry. While a dedicated convergence study would be desirable, it is outside the scope of the present paper, whose primary contribution is the construction of the higher-order reduction procedure itself. We will add a brief clarifying paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly qualifies the moderate-coupling claim as suggestive and dependent on the (unverified) regularity of the series. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: perturbative isochron expansion derives reduced model directly from MF-CGLE

full rationale

The paper constructs a systematic power-series expansion in the coupling strength using isochrons to obtain higher-order phase equations from the mean-field complex Ginzburg-Landau equation. Each term in the expansion (pairwise at first order, multi-body at higher orders) is obtained by solving the original ODE system order-by-order; no parameters are fitted to the target dynamics, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that closes the loop, and the resulting multi-body interactions are not presupposed but generated by the algebra of the expansion. The derivation therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard assumptions of phase reduction for weakly perturbed limit-cycle oscillators; no free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or additional axioms are introduced beyond those of the classical framework.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system consists of weakly perturbed limit-cycle oscillators for which an isochron foliation exists and the phase reduction remains valid order by order in the coupling strength.
    Invoked throughout the development of the isochron-based scheme and the power-series expansion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5715 in / 1312 out tokens · 17846 ms · 2026-05-25T02:35:29.485176+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references

  1. [1]

    1), (b) Quasiperiodic partial synchrony ( c1 = −2, ǫ = 0 . 4135). (c) Pure collective chaos ( c1 = −2, ǫ = 0. 4165). (d) Collective and microscopic chaos ( c1 = −2, ǫ = 0. 47) for N = 500. ordinary differential equations: ˙Aj = Aj − (1 + ic2)|Aj |2Aj + ǫ(1 + ic1)( ¯A − Aj). (1) Here, Aj = rjeiϕ j is a complex variable (index j runs from 1 to N ), and the ...

  2. [2]

    that captures as much as possible of the phase- describable states (NUIS, QPS, modulated QPS, pure collec- tive chaos,etc.). B. Basic phase diagrams Before presenting our results it is convenient to review pre - vious results on the MF-CGLE. For fixed c1 and c2 values, let us denote by ǫs and ǫ0, the ǫ values of marginal linear stability for FS and UIS. Cl...

  3. [3]

    At Q = 1 the NUIS collapses into a two-cluster state with equally populated groups

    with the important qualitative information that the size of the stability regi on in- creases as Q grows, reaching its maximum for Q = 1 . At Q = 1 the NUIS collapses into a two-cluster state with equally populated groups. The value of Q is still far from breaking the degeneracy of a NUIS, provided Q ̸= 1 , since the values of all ‘higher-order’ mean field...

  4. [4]

    The dynamics of Eq

    is the disorder-free version of the paradig- matic Kuramoto-Sakaguchi model [13, 40] and related mod- els [41]. The dynamics of Eq. (

  5. [5]

    In the latter case, among infinitely many oscillator densities with R = 0 , there is a convergence to the UIS under an arbitrarily weak noise [22]

    is determined by the sign of 1 + c1c2 (Benjamin-Feir-Newell criterion): full synchrony —corresponding to R = 1 — is stable for 1 + c1c2 > 0, and unstable for 1 + c1c2 < 0. In the latter case, among infinitely many oscillator densities with R = 0 , there is a convergence to the UIS under an arbitrarily weak noise [22]. As discussed above, the MF-CGLE has mu...

  6. [6]

    nonisochronicity

    no phase reduction be- yond the first order is currently available. Finding higher order 4 terms in the phase reduction is necessary to unfold the singu - larity at (c1, ǫ ) = ( − 1/c 2, 0), see Fig. 2. This path of investi- gation should allow us to discern which are the true behavior s of the MF-CGLE in the small coupling limit |ǫ| ≪ 1. More- over, it mi...

  7. [7]

    In compari- son to Eq

    become multi-body interactions, as higher orders of ǫ are considered. In compari- son to Eq. ( 1) our phase model can be much more efficiently analyzed, both analytically and numerically. We devote there- mainder of this section to analyze the phase model in Eq. ( 15). We note that, as expected, the model is invariant under globa l phase shift θj → θj + φ....

  8. [8]

    For illustration, the curve defined by (19) is represented by a blue dotted line in Figs

    (19) where we have written cos α and cos β in terms of c1 and c2. For illustration, the curve defined by (19) is represented by a blue dotted line in Figs. 3(a) and (b) for c2 = 3 and c1 = 1 , respectively. Equation (19) is asymptotically exact as ǫs → 0, and deviates progressively from the FS boundary of the MF- CGLE (represented by a solid line) as ǫs in...

  9. [9]

    It is easy to notice that only the first mode may destabilize

    Uniform incoherent state The stability boundary of the UIS ( ρ(θ) = (2 π )− 1 ⇔ ρn̸=0 = 0 ) is obtained linearizing the previous equation. It is easy to notice that only the first mode may destabilize. We have for |ρ1| ≪ 1: d dt δρ1 = ǫη 2 [ e− iα + ǫηe− iβ 4 ] δρ1. (23) Neglecting the trivial marginal case ǫ = 0, the stability bound- ary satisfies cos α +(...

  10. [10]

    3(a) and 3(b), we can contrast this formula with the exact one for the MF-CGLE, Eq

    (24) In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), we can contrast this formula with the exact one for the MF-CGLE, Eq. (3), for two c2 values

  11. [11]

    The linearization of (22) around ρ1 = 0 and ρn ̸= 0 (|n| ≥ 2) is (schematically) as follows: d dt       δρ1 δρ∗ 1 δρ2 δρ∗ 2

    Nonuniform incoherent states According to ( 22), in an incoherent state ( ρ1 = 0 ) higher- order modes are at rest: ˙ρn = 0 (n > 2). The linearization of (22) around ρ1 = 0 and ρn ̸= 0 (|n| ≥ 2) is (schematically) as follows: d dt       δρ1 δρ∗ 1 δρ2 δρ∗ 2 . . .       =        • • 0 0 · · · • • 0 0 · · · • • 0 0 · · · • • 0 0 · · · . . ...

  12. [12]

    NUIS-like

    + η2Q2 . (27) As occurs in the MF-CGLE the larger Q is, the larger is the stability region of the NUIS. Our empirical observation is that , for given c1 and c2, if ǫ is set at a certain ǫ = ǫQ∗ the nu- merical integration of the system (either oscillators or Fo urier modes), under a very weak noise, always converges to a NUIS with ρn≥ 3 = 0 ; and, |ρ2| = ...

  13. [13]

    The overall O(ǫ3) contribution is not proportional to η3 —though some terms indeed are— in contrast to O(ǫ) and O(ǫ2), which are proportional to η and η2, respec- tively

  14. [14]

    ( 15) and ( 29) we can expect that truncation of the power series to order ǫn yields up to (n + 1) - body interactions, but not higher-order non-pairwise couplings

    From Eqs. ( 15) and ( 29) we can expect that truncation of the power series to order ǫn yields up to (n + 1) - body interactions, but not higher-order non-pairwise couplings. We can also expect that only Kuramoto- Daido order parameters Zk with k ≤ n appear

  15. [15]

    ( 29) are somewhat unex- pected, (nonetheless see [17]) , since they depend on the mean fields Z1 and Z2, but not on θj itself

    The last two terms in Eq. ( 29) are somewhat unex- pected, (nonetheless see [17]) , since they depend on the mean fields Z1 and Z2, but not on θj itself. They are hence irrelevant concerning synchronization bound- aries

  16. [16]

    As occurs with the O(ǫ2) term, FS and (N)UIS states are consistent with the MF-CGLE dynamics: (i) all terms in (

  17. [17]

    Accord- ingly, it holds that D + ∑ j Cj sin γj = 0, cf

    are proportional to R ensuring that the contribution to the oscillators’ frequencies vanishes in 10 one incoherent state; (ii) in the FS state, the contribu- tion also vanishes, as expected since the frequency of FS in the MF-CGLE varies linearly with ǫ. Accord- ingly, it holds that D + ∑ j Cj sin γj = 0, cf. Appendix II. Unfortunately, there is not a rec...

  18. [18]

    = 0 , (30) 4(1 + c1c2) + ǫQ(1 + c2 2) [ (1 − c2

  19. [19]

    (31) In Fig

    − Q2(1 + c2 1) ] + ǫ2 Q 2 (1 + c2 2) [ (2 − 2c2 1 − 3c1c2 + c3 1c2) − Q2(1 + c2 1)(− 2 + 3c1c2) ] = 0. (31) In Fig. 7 we depict (a) ǫ0, and (b) ǫs from the previous ex- pressions and compare them with the result of the MF-CGLE, and with the second-order approximation. The slopes and the curvatures of the bifurcation lines of the third-order phas e re- duc...

  20. [20]

    Analogous reasoning permits us to obtain the bi- furcation lines for the third-order phase reduction of (33) from Eqs

    satisfies (in coordinate ǫ) a1ǫ∗ / (1 − ǫ∗ ) + (1 + c1c2) = 0 , which is slightly different from ( 35). Analogous reasoning permits us to obtain the bi- furcation lines for the third-order phase reduction of (33) from Eqs. (30) and ( 31). A comparison of the bifurcations lines of UIS and FS is dis- played in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b) for c2 = 3. We see that the ...

  21. [21]

    evaporates

    Stability First of all, note that, one zero eigenvalue is always presen t due to the global phase shift invariance of the model, θj → θj + const . , and we ignore it hereafter. For the analysis that follows it is simpler to assume the thermodynamic limit (eigenvalues are the same for finite N , but the calculation is more convoluted.) As already known from...

  22. [22]

    does not hold, and in fact the cluster solution destabilized when we implemented it in the MF-CGLE. 13

  23. [23]

    In this phenomenon, the clusters switch between two differ- ent ∆ values with identical p value

    No slow switching With unstable two-cluster states, the system might still ex - hibit one nontrivial phenomenon called slow switching [48] . In this phenomenon, the clusters switch between two differ- ent ∆ values with identical p value. The explanation for this behavior is a stable heteroclinic connection between the pa ir of two-cluster states that caus...

  24. [24]

    Additionally, D = (c2 1 + 1)(c2 − c1) (47)

    (5c1c2 − 1) A9 = (1 + c2 1)(1 + c1c2), and B1 = 2(4c1 + c2 − 3c2 1c2) B2 = (c3 1 + 9c2 1c2 − 11c1 − 3c2) B3 = 2c1(c2 1 + 1) B4 = 2(c2 1 + 1)(c1 − c2) B5 = (c3 1 + 5c2c2 1 − c1 − c2) B6 = − 3(c2 1 + 1)(c1 + c2) B7 = 1 2 ( − 3c3 1 − 15c2c2 1 + 9c1 + 5c2 ) B8 = 1 2 ( c2 1 + 1 ) (c1 + 5c2) B9 = (1 + c2 1)(c2 − c1). Additionally, D = (c2 1 + 1)(c2 − c1) (47)

  25. [25]

    A. T. Winfree,The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, New Y ork, 1980)

    1980

  26. [26]

    F. C. Hoppensteadt and E. M. Izhikevich, W eakly connected neural networks. (Spinger V erlag, N.Y ., 1997)

    1997

  27. [27]

    S. H. Strogatz, Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous or- der .(Hyperion Press, New Y ork, 2003)

    2003

  28. [28]

    A. S. Pikovsky, M. G. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchroniza- tion, a Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    2001

  29. [29]

    Synchronization and stimulated emission in an array of mechanical phase oscillators on a res o- nant support,

    D. Mertens and R. Weaver, “Synchronization and stimulated emission in an array of mechanical phase oscillators on a res o- nant support,” Phys. Rev. E 83, 046221 (2011) ; “Individual and collective behavior of vibrating motors interacting throu gh a resonant plate,” Complexity 16, 45–53 (2011)

    2011

  30. [30]

    Engineerin g complex dynamical structures: Sequential patterns and des yn- chronization,

    I. Z. Kiss, C. G. Rusin, H. Kori, and J. L. Hudson, “Engineerin g complex dynamical structures: Sequential patterns and des yn- chronization,” Science 316, 1886–1889 (2007)

    2007

  31. [31]

    Phase-lag synchronization in networks of co u- pled chemical oscillators,

    J. F. Totz, R. Snari, D. Yengi, M. R. Tinsley, H. Engel, and K. Showalter, “Phase-lag synchronization in networks of co u- pled chemical oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E 92, 022819 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Averaged equa- tions for Josephson junction series arrays,

    K. Wiesenfeld and J. W. Swift, “Averaged equa- tions for Josephson junction series arrays,” Phys. Rev. E 51, 1020–1025 (1995)

    1995

  33. [33]

    Synchro- nization transitions in a disordered Josephson series arra y,

    K. Wiesenfeld, P . Colet, and S. H. Strogatz, “Synchro- nization transitions in a disordered Josephson series arra y,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 404–407 (1996)

    1996

  34. [34]

    Experiments on oscillator ensembles with global nonlinear coupling,

    A. A. Temirbayev, Z. Zh. Zhanabaev, S. B. Tarasov, V . I. Ponomarenko, and M. Rosenblum, “Experiments on oscillator ensembles with global nonlinear coupling,” Phys. Rev. E 85, 015204(R) (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    Experimen- tal study of synchronization of coupled electrical self- oscillators and comparison to the Sakaguchi-Kuramoto mode l,

    L. Q. English, Z. Zeng, and D. Mertens, “Experimen- tal study of synchronization of coupled electrical self- oscillators and comparison to the Sakaguchi-Kuramoto mode l,” Phys. Rev. E 92, 052912 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    Exotic states in a simple network of nanoelectromechanical oscillators,

    M. H. Matheny, J. Emenheiser, W. Fon, A. Chapman, A. Sa- lova, M. Rohden, J. Li, M. Hudoba de Badyn, M. P´ osfai, L. Duenas-Osorio, M. Mesbahi, J. P . Crutchfield, M. C. Cross, R. M. D’Souza, and M. L. Roukes, “Exotic states in a simple network of nanoelectromechanical oscillators, ” Science 363, eaav7932 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, W aves, and Turbulence (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984)

    Y . Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, W aves, and Turbulence (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984)

    1984

  38. [38]

    Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators,

    H. Nakao, “Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators,” Contemp. Phys. 57, 188–214 (2016)

    2016

  39. [39]

    Phase re- duction and phase-based optimal control for biological systems: a tutorial,

    B. Monga, D. Wilson, T. Matchen, and J. Moehlis, “Phase re- duction and phase-based optimal control for biological systems: a tutorial,” Biol. Cybern. 113, 11–46 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Multistable attractors in a net- 14 work of phase oscillators with three-body interactions,

    T. Tanaka and T. Aoyagi, “Multistable attractors in a net- 14 work of phase oscillators with three-body interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 224101 (2011)

    2011

  41. [41]

    Hopf normal form with sn sym- metry and reduction to systems of nonlinearly coupled phase oscillators,

    P . Ashwin and A. Rodrigues, “Hopf normal form with sn sym- metry and reduction to systems of nonlinearly coupled phase oscillators,” Physica D 325, 14 – 24 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Self-organized quasiperiod - icity in oscillator ensembles with global nonlinear coupli ng,

    M. Rosenblum and A. Pikovsky, “Self-organized quasiperiod - icity in oscillator ensembles with global nonlinear coupli ng,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 064101 (2007)

    2007

  43. [43]

    Re- constructing phase dynamics of oscillator networks,

    B. Kralemann, A. Pikovsky, and M. Rosenblum, “Re- constructing phase dynamics of oscillator networks,” Chaos 21, 025104 (2011) ; “Reconstructing effective phase connectivity of oscillator networks from observations,” New J. Phys. 16, 085013 (2014)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Dynamics of globally cou- pled oscillators: Progress and perspectives,

    A. Pikovsky and M. Rosenblum, “Dynamics of globally cou- pled oscillators: Progress and perspectives,” Chaos 25, 097616 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Dynamics of the globally coupled complex Ginzburg-Landau equation

    V . Hakim and W. J. Rappel, “Dynamics of the globally coupled complex Ginzburg-Landau equation.” Phys. Rev. A 46, R7347– R7350 (1992)

    1992

  46. [46]

    Collective chaos in a popu- lation of globally coupled oscillators,

    N. Nakagawa and Y . Kuramoto, “Collective chaos in a popu- lation of globally coupled oscillators,” Prog. Theor. Phys . 89, 313–323 (1993)

    1993

  47. [47]

    From collective oscillationsto collective chaos in a globally coupled oscillator system,

    N. Nakagawa and Y . Kuramoto, “From collective oscillationsto collective chaos in a globally coupled oscillator system,” Phys- ica D 75, 74–80 (1994)

    1994

  48. [48]

    Anomalous lyapunov spec- trum in globally coupled oscillators,

    N. Nakagawa and Y . Kuramoto, “Anomalous lyapunov spec- trum in globally coupled oscillators,” Physica D 80, 307–316 (1995)

    1995

  49. [49]

    Collective chaos and noise in the globally coupled complex Ginzburg- Landau equation,

    M.-L. Chabanol, V . Hakim, and W.-J. Rappel, “Collective chaos and noise in the globally coupled complex Ginzburg- Landau equation,” Physica D 103, 273 – 293 (1997)

    1997

  50. [50]

    Towards a quasi-periodic mean field theory for globally coupled oscillators,

    M. Banaji and P . Glendinning, “Towards a quasi-periodic mean field theory for globally coupled oscillators,” Phys. Lett. A 251, 297 – 302 (1999)

    1999

  51. [51]

    Clustering in globally coupled oscillators,

    M. Banaji, “Clustering in globally coupled oscillators,” Dynam. Syst. 17, 263–285 (2002)

    2002

  52. [52]

    Diffusion-induced inhomogeneity in globally coupled oscillators: Swing-by mechanism,

    H. Daido and K. Nakanishi, “Diffusion-induced inhomogeneity in globally coupled oscillators: Swing-by mechanism,” Phy s. Rev. Lett. 96, 054101 (2006)

    2006

  53. [53]

    Aging and clustering in globally coupled oscillators,

    H. Daido and K. Nakanishi, “Aging and clustering in globally coupled oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E 75, 056206 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    Lyapunov analy- sis captures the collective dynamics of large chaotic syste ms,

    K. A. Takeuchi, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, “Lyapunov analy- sis captures the collective dynamics of large chaotic syste ms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 154103 (2009)

    2009

  55. [55]

    Collective lyapunov modes,

    K. A. Takeuchi and H. Chat´ e, “Collective lyapunov modes,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 254007 (2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    Chimera states: The existence crite ria revisited,

    G. C. Sethia and A. Sen, “Chimera states: The existence crite ria revisited,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 144101 (2014)

    2014

  57. [57]

    Dynami- cal transitions in large systems of mean field-coupled Landa u- Stuart oscillators: Extensive chaos and cluster states,

    Wai Lim Ku, Michelle Girvan, and Edward Ott, “Dynami- cal transitions in large systems of mean field-coupled Landa u- Stuart oscillators: Extensive chaos and cluster states,” C haos 25, 123122 (2015)

    2015

  58. [58]

    Two types of quasiperiodic partial synchrony in oscillator ensembles,

    M. Rosenblum and A. Pikovsky, “Two types of quasiperiodic partial synchrony in oscillator ensembles, ” Phys. Rev. E 92, 012919 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Cluster singu- larity: The unfolding of clustering behavior in globally co upled Stuart-Landau oscillators,

    F. P . Kemeth, S. W. Haugland, and K. Krischer, “Cluster singu- larity: The unfolding of clustering behavior in globally co upled Stuart-Landau oscillators,” Chaos 29, 023107 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    Between phase and amplitude osci l- lators,

    P . Clusella and A. Politi, “Between phase and amplitude osci l- lators,” Phys. Rev. E 99, 062201 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non- linear oscillators,

    Y . Kuramoto, “Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non- linear oscillators,” in International Symposium on Mathemati- cal Problems in Theoretical Physics , Lecture Notes in Physics, V ol. 39, edited by Huzihiro Araki (Springer, Berlin, 1975) p p. 420–422

    1975

  62. [62]

    Walgraef, Spatio-Temporal Pattern F ormation (Springer- V erlag, New Y ork, 1997)

    D. Walgraef, Spatio-Temporal Pattern F ormation (Springer- V erlag, New Y ork, 1997)

    1997

  63. [63]

    The world of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation,

    I. S. Aranson and L. Kramer, “The world of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 99 (2002)

    2002

  64. [64]

    A soluble active rotator model showing phase transitions via mutual entrainment,

    H. Sakaguchi and Y . Kuramoto, “A soluble active rotator model showing phase transitions via mutual entrainment,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 76, 576–581 (1986)

    1986

  65. [65]

    Collective synchronization in the presence of reactive coupling and shear diversity,

    E. Montbri´ o and D. Paz´ o, “Collective synchronization in the presence of reactive coupling and shear diversity,” Phys. Rev. E 84, 046206 (2011) ; “Shear diversity prevents col- lective synchronization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 254101 (2011) ; D. Paz´ o and E. Montbri´ o, “The Kuramoto model with dis- tributed shear,” EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 95, 60007 (2011)

    2011

  66. [66]

    Patterns of phase compromise in biological c y- cles,

    A. T. Winfree, “Patterns of phase compromise in biological c y- cles,” J. Math. Biol. 1, 73–93 (1974)

    1974

  67. [67]

    Isochrons and phaseless sets,

    J. Guckenheimer, “Isochrons and phaseless sets,” J. Math. Biol. 1, 259–273 (1975)

    1975

  68. [68]

    E. A. Coddington and N. Levinson, Theory of Ordinary Differ- ential Equations (McGraw-Hill, New Y ork, 1955) Chap. 13

    1955

  69. [69]

    Onset of cooperative entrainment in limit-cycle os- cillators with uniform all-to-all interactions: bifurcat ion of the order function,

    H. Daido, “Onset of cooperative entrainment in limit-cycle os- cillators with uniform all-to-all interactions: bifurcat ion of the order function,” Physica D 91, 24–66 (1996)

    1996

  70. [70]

    Partial synchronization in populations of pulse-coupled oscillators,

    C. van Vreeswijk, “Partial synchronization in populations of pulse-coupled oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E 54, 5522–5537 (1996)

    1996

  71. [71]

    Clustering in globally coupled phase oscillato rs,

    D. Golomb, D. Hansel, B. Shraiman, and H. Som- polinsky, “Clustering in globally coupled phase oscillato rs,” Phys. Rev. A 45, 3516–3530 (1992)

    1992

  72. [72]

    Clustering and slow switching in globally coupled phase oscillators,

    D. Hansel, G. Mato, and C. Meunier, “Clustering and slow switching in globally coupled phase oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E 48, 3470–3477 (1993)

    1993

  73. [73]

    Symmetries of chimera states,

    F. P . Kemeth, S. W. Haugland, and K. Krischer, “Symmetries of chimera states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 214101 (2018)

    2018

  74. [74]

    The dynamics ofn weakly coupled identical oscillators,

    P . Ashwin and J. W. Swift, “The dynamics ofn weakly coupled identical oscillators,” J. Nonlin. Sci. 2, 69–108 (1992)

    1992

  75. [75]

    Bifurcation to het- eroclinic cycles and sensitivity in three and four coupled p hase oscillators,

    P . Ashwin, O. Burylko, and Y . Maistrenko, “Bifurcation to het- eroclinic cycles and sensitivity in three and four coupled p hase oscillators,” Physica D 237, 454 – 466 (2008)

    2008

  76. [76]

    Phase- and center-manifold reduc- tions for large populations of coupled oscillators with application to non-locally coupled systems,

    Y . Kuramoto, “Phase- and center-manifold reduc- tions for large populations of coupled oscillators with application to non-locally coupled systems,” Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 7, 789–805 (1997)

    1997

  77. [77]

    Phase compactons,

    A. Pikovsky and P . Rosenau, “Phase compactons,” Physica D 218, 56 – 69 (2006)

    2006

  78. [78]

    Clustering in globally coupled oscilla- tors near a hopf bifurcation: Theory and experiments,

    H. Kori, Y . Kuramoto, S. Jain, I. Z. Kiss, and J. L. Hudson, “Clustering in globally coupled oscilla- tors near a hopf bifurcation: Theory and experiments,” Phys. Rev. E 89, 062906 (2014)

    2014

  79. [79]

    From quasiperiodic partial synchro- nization to collective chaos in populations of inhibitory n eu- rons with delay,

    D. Paz´ o and E. Montbri´ o, “From quasiperiodic partial synchro- nization to collective chaos in populations of inhibitory n eu- rons with delay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 238101 (2016) ; F. De- valle, E. Montbri´ o, and D. Paz´ o, “Dynamics of a large system of spiking neurons with synaptic delay,” Phys. Rev. E 98, 042214 (2018)

    2016

  80. [80]

    Otherwise, the frequency of (N)UIS would depend nonlinearl y on ǫ, in disagreement with the MF-CGLE

Showing first 80 references.