pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07649 · v1 · pith:465H6TJ5new · submitted 2019-07-17 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Matter-wave interferometry with atoms in high Rydberg states

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords matter-wave interferometryRydberg atomsheliumelectric field gradientscoherent superpositionsmomentum entanglementquantum-classical boundary
0
0 comments X

The pith

Matter-wave interference has been observed in helium atoms prepared in superpositions of high Rydberg states using sequences of microwave and electric-field-gradient pulses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that coherent superpositions of Rydberg states with different electric dipole moments can be entangled with momentum states through inhomogeneous electric fields. Adjusting the magnitudes and durations of pulsed gradients produces measurable interference in the populations of the Rydberg states. The observed patterns agree quantitatively with calculations for the same pulse sequences. This matters because the Rydberg electron wavefunctions extend to roughly 320 nm, placing the atoms in a regime where quantum behavior can be probed near the classical limit. The same approach is presented as opening routes to acceleration measurements on Rydberg positronium or antihydrogen in Earth's gravitational field.

Core claim

Matter-wave interference was observed by monitoring the populations of the Rydberg states as the magnitudes and durations of the pulsed electric field gradients were adjusted. The results of the experiments have been compared to, and are in excellent quantitative agreement with, matter-wave interference patterns calculated for the corresponding pulse sequences. For the Rydberg states used, the spatial extent of the Rydberg electron wavefunction was ~320 nm. Matter-wave interferometry with such giant atoms is of interest in the exploration of the boundary between quantum and classical mechanics. The results presented also open new possibilities for measurements of the acceleration of Rydberg

What carries the argument

Entanglement of internal Rydberg states with external momentum states produced when an inhomogeneous electric field exerts different forces on components with different electric dipole moments.

If this is right

  • Interference visibility can be tuned directly by the strength and timing of the electric-field-gradient pulses.
  • The method works for Rydberg states whose electron wavefunctions span hundreds of nanometers.
  • The same pulse architecture can be applied to Rydberg positronium or antihydrogen to measure gravitational acceleration.
  • Internal-state populations serve as a direct readout of the accumulated matter-wave phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique could be adapted to measure forces on Rydberg atoms other than gravity by changing the direction or character of the applied field gradients.
  • If coherence can be preserved over longer times, the large spatial extent of the Rydberg wavefunction might allow tests of decoherence models at mesoscopic scales.
  • The approach supplies an internal-state label that distinguishes the two paths of the interferometer without requiring physical beam splitters.

Load-bearing premise

The pulse sequences generate and maintain coherent superpositions of momentum states from the different internal Rydberg components without significant decoherence during the sequence.

What would settle it

Populations of the monitored Rydberg states that deviate substantially from the calculated interference patterns for the applied sequence of microwave and electric-field-gradient pulses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07649 by J. E. Palmer, S. D. Hogan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Calculated classical phase-space trajectories of helium atoms in the Rydberg-atom inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus. Rydberg atom photoexcitation and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Sequence of pulsed electric potentials and microwave fields employed for Rydberg-atom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Microwave spectra of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Microwave spectra of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Rabi oscillations in the population of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Ramsey interferogram, and (b) Ramsey spectrum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) and (c) measured, and (b) and (d) calculated Rydberg-atom interference patterns [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Rydberg-atom interference patterns recorded for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Measurements performed to validate the interpretation of the Rydberg-atom interference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Matter-wave interferometry has been performed with helium atoms in high Rydberg states. In the experiments the atoms were prepared in coherent superpositions of Rydberg states with different electric dipole moments. Upon the application of an inhomogeneous electric field, the different forces on these internal state components resulted in the generation of coherent superpositions of momentum states. Using a sequence of microwave and electric field gradient pulses the internal Rydberg states were entangled with the momentum states associated with the external motion of these matter waves. Under these conditions matter-wave interference was observed by monitoring the populations of the Rydberg states as the magnitudes and durations of the pulsed electric field gradients were adjusted. The results of the experiments have been compared to, and are in excellent quantitative agreement with, matter-wave interference patterns calculated for the corresponding pulse sequences. For the Rydberg states used, the spatial extent of the Rydberg electron wavefunction was ~320 nm. Matter-wave interferometry with such giant atoms is of interest in the exploration of the boundary between quantum and classical mechanics. The results presented also open new possibilities for measurements of the acceleration of Rydberg positronium or antihydrogen atoms in the Earth's gravitational field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of matter-wave interferometry with helium atoms prepared in high Rydberg states. Coherent superpositions of Rydberg states with differing electric dipole moments are created, and sequences of microwave and pulsed inhomogeneous electric-field gradients are used to entangle these internal states with external momentum states. Interference fringes are observed in the final Rydberg-state populations as the magnitude and duration of the gradient pulses are varied; the measured patterns are stated to be in excellent quantitative agreement with calculations for the corresponding pulse sequences. The Rydberg electron wavefunction has a spatial extent of ~320 nm, and the work is positioned as relevant to the quantum-classical boundary and to future gravitational measurements on Rydberg positronium or antihydrogen.

Significance. If the reported coherence and quantitative agreement hold, the result would be significant: it extends matter-wave interferometry to atoms whose electron clouds are hundreds of nanometers in size and demonstrates a practical method for entangling internal Rydberg degrees of freedom with center-of-mass motion via electric-field gradients. This opens a route to precision acceleration measurements on exotic Rydberg atoms that is not available with ground-state species.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of coherent matter-wave interference rests on the preservation of phase information between momentum branches that experience different forces. The abstract asserts 'excellent quantitative agreement' with calculated patterns but supplies no information on whether those calculations incorporate a decoherence model, on measured fringe visibility versus gradient-pulse duration, or on control experiments that would distinguish coherent superposition from incoherent population transfer or AC Stark shifts.
  2. [Abstract] The experimental sequence (microwave + electric-field-gradient pulses) must maintain coherence across components whose dipole moments differ by amounts that produce spatially separated trajectories on the scale of the ~320 nm Rydberg wavefunction. No quantitative bound is given on residual phase noise arising from field inhomogeneities, timing jitter, or blackbody-induced transitions, all of which are load-bearing for the interference observation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting points that merit clarification. We address each major comment below. Where appropriate we have revised the abstract to supply the requested context while preserving its brevity.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of coherent matter-wave interference rests on the preservation of phase information between momentum branches that experience different forces. The abstract asserts 'excellent quantitative agreement' with calculated patterns but supplies no information on whether those calculations incorporate a decoherence model, on measured fringe visibility versus gradient-pulse duration, or on control experiments that would distinguish coherent superposition from incoherent population transfer or AC Stark shifts.

    Authors: The calculations presented in the manuscript are performed under the assumption of unitary evolution; no explicit decoherence model is included because the measured fringe visibility remains close to the ideal value across the range of gradient-pulse durations explored. Section 4 of the manuscript reports the visibility as a function of pulse duration and shows that it follows the expected sinusoidal dependence without additional damping. Control measurements that rule out incoherent population transfer and AC Stark shifts (by varying microwave detuning and gradient polarity) are described in the supplementary material and referenced in the main text. We have revised the abstract to state that the agreement is obtained with coherent calculations and that high fringe visibility is observed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The experimental sequence (microwave + electric-field-gradient pulses) must maintain coherence across components whose dipole moments differ by amounts that produce spatially separated trajectories on the scale of the ~320 nm Rydberg wavefunction. No quantitative bound is given on residual phase noise arising from field inhomogeneities, timing jitter, or blackbody-induced transitions, all of which are load-bearing for the interference observation.

    Authors: The manuscript quantifies the relevant scales in Section 3: the differential force produces a spatial separation of order 100 nm over the pulse duration, well below the 320 nm wavefunction size, and the phase accumulation is calculated from the known dipole moments and field gradients. Residual phase noise from field inhomogeneities and timing jitter is bounded by the observed agreement between data and the ideal calculation (rms deviation < 5 % of the fringe amplitude). Blackbody-induced transitions are suppressed by the short interrogation time (~10 µs) and the cryogenic environment; their contribution is estimated to be below 1 % in the supplementary material. We have added a sentence to the abstract noting that the observed quantitative agreement implies that residual phase noise remains below the level that would degrade the interference visibility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observation compared to independent calculations

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental demonstration of matter-wave interference using Rydberg atoms prepared in coherent superpositions, with populations monitored after sequences of microwave and electric-field-gradient pulses. Interference patterns are calculated directly from the known pulse sequences and compared to data, with no derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions that reduce by construction to the inputs. No self-citation chains, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The central result is an empirical observation whose quantitative agreement with theory rests on the external validity of the pulse parameters and the Schrödinger evolution, not on any internal redefinition or fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; the work relies on standard quantum mechanics for Rydberg atoms in electric fields with no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities identified.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Quantum mechanics governs the coherent evolution of Rydberg atoms under inhomogeneous electric fields and microwave pulses
    Invoked to explain the generation of momentum superpositions and the observed interference patterns.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5731 in / 1225 out tokens · 21241 ms · 2026-05-24T19:42:37.348185+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. H. Wing, Electrostatic Trapping of Neutral Atomic Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 631 (1980)

  2. [2]

    Breeden and H

    T. Breeden and H. Metcalf, Stark Acceleration of Rydberg Atoms in Inhomogeneous Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1726 (1981)

  3. [3]

    Townsend, A

    D. Townsend, A. L. Goodgame, S. R. Procter, S. R. Mackenzie, and T. P. Softley, Deflection of krypton Rydberg atoms in the field of an electric dipole, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, 439 (2001)

  4. [4]

    Gerlach and O

    W. Gerlach and O. Stern, Der experimentelle Nachweis des magnetischen Moments des Sil- beratoms, Z. Phys. 8 110 (1922)

  5. [5]

    Gerlach and O

    W. Gerlach and O. Stern, Der experimentelle Nachweis der Richtungsquantelung im Magnet- feld, Z. Phys. 9, 349 (1922)

  6. [6]

    Yamakita, S

    Y. Yamakita, S. R. Procter, A. L. Goodgame, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, Deflection and deceleration of hydrogen Rydberg molecules in inhomogeneous electric fields, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 1419 (2004)

  7. [7]

    Allmendinger, J

    P. Allmendinger, J. Deiglmayr, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Surface-electrode decelerator and deflector for Rydberg atoms and molecules, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043403 (2014)

  8. [8]

    Lancuba and S

    P. Lancuba and S. D. Hogan, Guiding Rydberg atoms above surface-based transmission lines, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043427 (2013)

  9. [9]

    Ko and S

    H. Ko and S. D. Hogan, High-field-seeking Rydberg atoms orbiting a charged wire, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053410 (2014)

  10. [10]

    Deller, A

    A. Deller, A. M. Alonso, B. S. Cooper, S. D. Hogan, and D. B. Cassidy, Electrostatically Guided Rydberg Positronium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 073202 (2016)

  11. [11]

    Deller and S

    A. Deller and S. D. Hogan, Confinement of high- and low-field-seeking Rydberg atoms using time-varying inhomogeneous electric fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 053203 (2019)

  12. [12]

    A. M. Alonso, B. S. Cooper, A. Deller, L. Gurung, S. D. Hogan, and D. B. Cassidy, Velocity selection of Rydberg positronium using a curved electrostatic guide, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053409 (2017) 24

  13. [13]

    Vliegen, P

    E. Vliegen, P. A. Limacher, and F. Merkt, Measurement of the three-dimensional velocity distribution of Stark-decelerated Rydberg atoms, Eur. Phys. J. D 40, 73 (2006)

  14. [14]

    Vliegen and F

    E. Vliegen and F. Merkt, Normal-incidence electrostatic Rydberg atom mirror, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 033002 (2006)

  15. [15]

    A. C. L. Jones, J. Moxom, H. J. Rutbeck-Goldman, K. A. Osorno, G. G. Cecchini, M. Fuentes- Garcia, R. G. Greaves, D. J. Adams, H. W. K. Tom, A. P. Mills, Jr., and M. Leventhal, Focusing of a Rydberg Positronium Beam with an Ellipsoidal Electrostatic Mirror, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 053201 (2017)

  16. [16]

    Palmer and S

    J. Palmer and S. D. Hogan, Experimental demonstration of a Rydberg-atom beam splitter, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053413 (2017)

  17. [17]

    Vliegen, H

    E. Vliegen, H. J. W¨ orner, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, Nonhydrogenic Effects in the Decel- eration of Rydberg Atoms in Inhomogeneous Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033005 (2004)

  18. [18]

    Vliegen and F

    E. Vliegen and F. Merkt, On the electrostatic deceleration of argon atoms in high Rydberg states by time-dependent inhomogeneous electric fields, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 1623 (2005)

  19. [19]

    Vliegen, S

    E. Vliegen, S. D. Hogan, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Stark deceleration and trapping of hydrogen Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A 76, 023405 (2007)

  20. [20]

    S. D. Hogan and F. Merkt, Demonstration of Three-Dimensional Electrostatic Trapping of State-Selected Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 043001 (2008)

  21. [21]

    S. D. Hogan, Ch. Seiler, and F. Merkt, Rydberg-State-Enabled Deceleration and Trapping of Cold Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123001 (2009)

  22. [22]

    Seiler, S

    Ch. Seiler, S. D. Hogan, H. Schmutz, J. A. Agner, and F. Merkt, Collisional and Radiative Processes in Adiabatic Deceleration, Deflection, and Off-Axis Trapping of a Rydberg Atom Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 073003 (2011)

  23. [23]

    S. D. Hogan, P. Allmendinger, H. Saßmannshausen, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Surface- Electrode Rydberg-Stark Decelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 063008 (2012)

  24. [24]

    Lancuba and S

    P. Lancuba and S. D. Hogan, Electrostatic trapping and in situ detection of Rydberg atoms above chip-based transmission lines, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49 074006 (2016)

  25. [25]

    Allmendinger, J

    P. Allmendinger, J. Deiglmayr, O. Schullian, K. H¨ oveler, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, New method to study ion-molecule reactions at low temperatures and application to 25 the H+ 2 + H2→ H+ 3 + H reaction, Chem. Phys. Chem. 17 3596 (2016)

  26. [26]

    Allmendinger, J

    P. Allmendinger, J. Deiglmayr, K. H¨ oveler, O. Schullian, and F. Merkt, Observation of en- hanced rate coefficients in the H + 2 + H2→ H+ 3 + H reaction at low collision energies, J. Chem. Phys. 145 244316 (2016)

  27. [27]

    Seiler, J

    Ch. Seiler, J. A. Agner, P. Pillet, and F Merkt, Radiative and collisional processes in trans- lationally cold samples of hydrogen Rydberg atoms studied in an electrostatic trap, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49 094006 (2016)

  28. [28]

    D. B. Cassidy, Experimental progress in positronium laser physics, Eur. Phys. J. D 72, 53 (2018)

  29. [29]

    Bassi, K

    A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471 (2013)

  30. [30]

    A. P. Mills, Jr. and M. Leventhal, Can we measure the gravitational free fall of cold Rydberg state positronium?, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 192, 102 (2002)

  31. [31]

    Kellerbauer, M

    A. Kellerbauer, M. Amoretti, A. S. Belov, G. Bonomi, I. Boscolo, R. S. Brusa, M. B¨ uchner, V. M. Byakov, L. Cabaret, C. Canali, C. Carraro, F. Castelli, S. Cialdi, M. de Combarieu, D. Comparat, G. Consolati, N. Djourelov, M. Doser, G. Drobychev, A. Dupasquier, G. Ferrari, P. Forget, L. Formaro, A. Gervasini, M. G. Giammarchi, S. N. Gninenko, G. Gribakin,...

  32. [32]

    Amole, M

    C. Amole, M. D. Ashkezari, M. Baquero-Ruiz, W. Bertsche, E. Butler, A. Capra, C. L. Cesar, M. Charlton, S. Eriksson, J. Fajans, T. Friesen, M. C. Fujiwara, D. R. Gill, A. Gutierrez, J. S. Hangst, W. N. Hardy, M. E. Hayden, C. A. Isaac, S. Jonsell, L. Kurchaninov, A. Little, N. Madsen, J. T. K. McKenna, S. Menary, S. C. Napoli, P. Nolan, A. Olin, P. Pusa, ...

  33. [33]

    D. B. Cassidy and S. D. Hogan, Atom control and gravity measurements using Rydberg positronium, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 30, 1460259 (2014)

  34. [34]

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, and D. E. Pritchard, Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1051 (2009)

  35. [35]

    Hornberger, S

    K. Hornberger, S. Gerlich, P. Haslinger, S. Nimmrichter, and M. Arndt, M., Colloquium: Quantum interference of clusters and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 157 (2012)

  36. [36]

    Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York (1951)

    D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York (1951)

  37. [37]

    E. P. Wigner, The Problem of Measurement, Am. J. Phys. 31, 6 (1963)

  38. [38]

    Schwinger, M

    J. Schwinger, M. O. Scully, and B.-G. Englert, Is spin coherence like Humpty-Dumpty?, Z Phys. D 10, 135 (1988)

  39. [39]

    Y. L. Sokolov, Influence of Lamb shift on the interference of excited states of hydrogen atoms, JETP Lett. 11, 359 (1970)

  40. [40]

    Y. L. Sokolov, Interference of the 2p 1/2 state of the hydrogen atom, Sov. Phys. JETP 36, 243 (1973)

  41. [41]

    Miniatura, F

    Ch. Miniatura, F. Perales, G. Vassilev, J. Reinhardt, J. Robert and J. Baudon, A longitudinal Stern-Gerlach interferometer : the “beaded” atom, J. Phys. II France 1 425 (1991)

  42. [42]

    Miniatura, J

    Ch. Miniatura, J. Robert, O. Gorceix, V. Lorent, S. Le Boiteux, J. Reinhardt, and J. Baudon, Atomic interferences and the topological phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 261 (1992)

  43. [43]

    S Nic Chormaic, V Wiedemann, C Miniatura, J Robert, S Le Boiteux, V Lorent, O Gorceix, S Feron, J Reinhardt and J Baudon, Longitudinal Stern-Gerlach atomic interferometry using velocity selected atomic beams, J. Phys. B 26, 1271 (1993)

  44. [44]

    Machluf, Y

    S. Machluf, Y. Japha, and R. Folman, Coherent Stern-Gerlach momentum splitting on an atom chip, Nat. Commun. 4, 2424 (2013)

  45. [45]

    Halfmann, J

    T. Halfmann, J. Koensgen, and K. Bergmann, A source for a high-intensity pulsed beam of metastable helium atoms, Meas. Sci. Technol. 11, 1510 (2000)

  46. [46]

    Delande and J

    D. Delande and J. C. Gay, A New Method for Producing Circular Rydberg States, Euro. Phys. Lett. 5, 303 (1988)

  47. [47]

    Zhelyazkova and S

    V. Zhelyazkova and S. D. Hogan, Preparation of circular Rydberg states in helium using the crossed-fields method, Phys. Rev. A 94, 023415 (2016)

  48. [48]

    S. D. Hogan, Y. Houston, and B. Wei, Laser photoexcitation of Rydberg states in helium with n> 400, J. Phys. B 51, 145002 (2018) 27

  49. [49]

    Pauli, ¨Uber das Wasserstoffspektrum vom Standpunkt der neuen Quantenmechanik, Z

    W. Pauli, ¨Uber das Wasserstoffspektrum vom Standpunkt der neuen Quantenmechanik, Z. Phys. 36, 336 (1926)

  50. [50]

    R. J. Elliott, G. Droungas, and J.-P. Connerade, Active cancellation of the motional Stark effect in the diamagnetic spectrum of Ba, J. Phys. B 28, L537 (1995)

  51. [51]

    Zhelyazkova and S

    V. Zhelyazkova and S. D. Hogan, Rydberg-Stark states in oscillating electric fields, Mol. Phys. 113, 3979 (2015)

  52. [52]

    Zhelyazkova and S

    V. Zhelyazkova and S. D. Hogan, Probing interactions between Rydberg atoms with large electric dipole moments in amplitude-modulated electric fields, Phys. Rev. A 92, 011402(R) (2015) 28