pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08153 · v1 · pith:W7WPYRC2new · submitted 2019-07-18 · 💻 cs.HC

ReconViguRation: Reconfiguring Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality

Daniel Schneider , Alexander Otte , Travis Gesslein , Philipp Gagel , Bastian Kuth , Mohamad Shahm Damlakhi , Oliver Dietz , Eyal Ofek
show 4 more authors
Michel Pahud Per Ola Kristensson J\"org M\"uller Jens Grubert
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 19:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords virtual realityphysical keyboardinput mappingoutput mappingreconfigurationimmersive interactionuser studytext entry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Physical keyboards can be reconfigured in VR to support specialized input and visual output mappings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores reconfiguring physical keyboards in virtual reality by changing how individual keys map to actions and how they are visually presented. Instead of replicating a standard desktop keyboard, the approach uses VR's immersiveness to enable new interactions. The authors design nine applications including emoji input, language switching, application shortcuts, macros, window management, photo browsing, games, secure password entry, and a virtual touch bar. A user study with 20 participants demonstrates that these applications are usable in VR. The work probes the design space of such remappings and discusses limitations and future directions.

Core claim

By defining input and output mappings that reconfigure the virtual presentation of physical keyboards, individual keys can be reassigned to the same or different actions with visual output distributed in various ways, enabling nine VR-relevant applications that users can interact with effectively.

What carries the argument

Input and output mappings for reconfiguring the virtual presentation of physical keyboards, where physical key presses trigger remapped actions and visuals are altered accordingly.

If this is right

  • Users can access emojis, special characters, and multiple languages via remapped keys on one physical keyboard.
  • Secure password entry is possible by hiding actual key visuals.
  • Tasks like window management and photo browsing can be controlled through keyboard remappings in VR.
  • Games such as whack-a-mole can integrate physical keyboard input with VR visuals.
  • Virtual text processing macros become accessible without switching devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Remapping could allow keyboards to serve as context-aware controllers in various VR scenarios beyond the tested apps.
  • The technique might extend to other physical input devices beyond keyboards.
  • Dynamic remapping based on VR context could reduce reliance on separate input hardware.

Load-bearing premise

VR tracking systems can identify and monitor individual physical keys with sufficient precision and low latency to enable reliable remapped interactions without errors.

What would settle it

If tracking errors cause frequent misidentification of pressed keys, leading to incorrect actions in the remapped applications during user testing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08153 by Alexander Otte, Bastian Kuth, Daniel Schneider, Eyal Ofek, Jens Grubert, J\"org M\"uller, Michel Pahud, Mohamad Shahm Damlakhi, Oliver Dietz, Per Ola Kristensson, Philipp Gagel, Travis Gesslein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example for reconfiguring the input and output space of individual keys of a physical keyboard in virtual reality. Top row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Input-output dimensions of reconfiguring physical keyboards [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top row from left to right: Window manager with three virtual buttons, photo browser with 24 and 104 images, view on virtual monitor with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Virtual Whack-A-Mole. Left: User hammering on the key [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Apparatus of the experiment showing a participant with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Conditions in the password entry experiment. From top to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ease of use ratings, Utility and Enjoyment ratings on a 7-item [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Ease of use (blue), Utility (green) and Enjoyment (yellow) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Ease of use (blue), Utility (green) and Enjoyment (yellow) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Physical keyboards are common peripherals for personal computers and are efficient standard text entry devices. Recent research has investigated how physical keyboards can be used in immersive head-mounted display-based Virtual Reality (VR). So far, the physical layout of keyboards has typically been transplanted into VR for replicating typing experiences in a standard desktop environment. In this paper, we explore how to fully leverage the immersiveness of VR to change the input and output characteristics of physical keyboard interaction within a VR environment. This allows individual physical keys to be reconfigured to the same or different actions and visual output to be distributed in various ways across the VR representation of the keyboard. We explore a set of input and output mappings for reconfiguring the virtual presentation of physical keyboards and probe the resulting design space by specifically designing, implementing and evaluating nine VR-relevant applications: emojis, languages and special characters, application shortcuts, virtual text processing macros, a window manager, a photo browser, a whack-a-mole game, secure password entry and a virtual touch bar. We investigate the feasibility of the applications in a user study with 20 participants and find that, among other things, they are usable in VR. We discuss the limitations and possibilities of remapping the input and output characteristics of physical keyboards in VR based on empirical findings and analysis and suggest future research directions in this area.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces ReconViguRation, a system that remaps both input actions and visual output on physical keyboards inside VR to enable novel interactions. It defines a design space of input/output mappings, implements nine concrete VR applications (emoji entry, language/special-character switching, shortcuts, macros, window management, photo browsing, whack-a-mole, secure password entry, virtual touch bar), and evaluates feasibility via a 20-participant user study that concludes the applications are usable in VR.

Significance. If the usability findings hold, the work meaningfully enlarges the interaction design space for physical keyboards in immersive VR by exploiting visual reconfiguration rather than merely replicating desktop layouts. The nine applications demonstrate concrete, task-relevant uses; the empirical study supplies initial feasibility evidence that can guide subsequent VR input research.

major comments (2)
  1. [User Study / Evaluation] User Study / Evaluation section: the central usability claim rests on the 20-participant study, yet no quantitative metrics (task times, error rates, NASA-TLX scores, statistical tests, or exclusion criteria) are reported in the abstract or results summary, weakening the evidential support for generalizability beyond the specific hardware and setup.
  2. [Implementation / System] Implementation / System section: the feasibility of all nine remapped applications presupposes that existing VR tracking can identify and monitor individual physical keys with sufficient spatial precision and low latency; the manuscript supplies no measured key-detection accuracy, false-positive rates, or end-to-end latency figures under the remapped conditions, leaving the load-bearing tracking assumption unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase “among other things, they are usable in VR” is vague; replace with a concise statement of the main quantitative or qualitative outcomes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the work's significance and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [User Study / Evaluation] User Study / Evaluation section: the central usability claim rests on the 20-participant study, yet no quantitative metrics (task times, error rates, NASA-TLX scores, statistical tests, or exclusion criteria) are reported in the abstract or results summary, weakening the evidential support for generalizability beyond the specific hardware and setup.

    Authors: The study was designed as an initial feasibility evaluation emphasizing qualitative participant feedback on the nine applications rather than a controlled comparative experiment. The results section details observations and comments supporting usability. We agree that the abstract and high-level summary would benefit from additional context. In revision we will expand the abstract with a concise statement on study outcomes and include a brief summary of key observations in the results overview. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Implementation / System] Implementation / System section: the feasibility of all nine remapped applications presupposes that existing VR tracking can identify and monitor individual physical keys with sufficient spatial precision and low latency; the manuscript supplies no measured key-detection accuracy, false-positive rates, or end-to-end latency figures under the remapped conditions, leaving the load-bearing tracking assumption unquantified.

    Authors: The applications rely on standard VR headset and controller tracking of the physical keyboard, which proved sufficient for all nine implemented applications during the user study. Specific quantitative tracking benchmarks were outside the scope of this work, which centers on input/output reconfiguration. We will add an explicit discussion of the tracking assumptions and their potential limitations to the revised manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical user study supplies independent evidence of usability

full rationale

The manuscript is an exploratory design paper that defines input/output mappings, implements nine concrete VR applications, and reports feasibility via a 20-participant user study. No equations, fitted parameters, or 'predictions' appear. The usability claim is grounded in the study results rather than any self-referential definition or self-citation chain. Prior keyboard-in-VR literature is cited only for context and does not substitute for the present evaluation. This matches the default case of a self-contained empirical contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard domain assumptions in VR and HCI rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existing VR tracking systems can identify and monitor individual physical keys with sufficient precision and low latency for remapped interactions.
    Invoked implicitly when the paper states that physical keys can be reconfigured to the same or different actions within the VR representation.
  • domain assumption Users can adapt to remapped keyboard layouts and visuals in VR without prohibitive cognitive load.
    Required for the claim that the nine applications are usable, as tested in the user study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5820 in / 1416 out tokens · 27531 ms · 2026-05-24T19:41:37.693882+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F. A. Alsulaiman and A. El Saddik. A novel 3d graphical password schema. In 2006 IEEE Symposium on Virtual Environments, Human- Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems , pp. 125–128. IEEE, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Apple touch bar

    Apple. Apple touch bar. https://developer.apple.com/macos/ touch-bar/. Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Azmandian, M

    M. Azmandian, M. Hancock, H. Benko, E. Ofek, and A. D. Wilson. Haptic retargeting: Dynamic repurposing of passive haptics for en- hanced virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI ’16, pp. 1968–1979. ACM, New York, NY , USA, 2016. doi: 10.1145/2858036. 2858226

    work page doi:10.1145/2858036 2016

  4. [4]

    Bailly, T

    G. Bailly, T. Pietrzak, J. Deber, and D. J. Wigdor. M´etamorphe: aug- menting hotkey usage with actuated keys. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 563–572. ACM, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Block, H

    F. Block, H. Gellersen, and N. Villar. Touch-display keyboards: trans- forming keyboards into interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 1145–1154. ACM, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Bovet, A

    S. Bovet, A. Kehoe, K. Crowley, N. Curran, M. Gutierrez, M. Meisser, D. O. Sullivan, and T. Rouvinez. Using traditional keyboards in vr: Steamvr developer kit and pilot game user study. In 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM), pp. 1–9. IEEE, 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Brooke et al

    J. Brooke et al. Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evalua- tion in industry, 189(194):4–7, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Burns, S

    E. Burns, S. Razzaque, M. Whitton, and F. Brooks. Macbeth: The avatar which i see before me and its movement toward my hand. in proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, p. 295296. IEEE, 2007

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Buschek, B

    D. Buschek, B. Roppelt, and F. Alt. Extending keyboard shortcuts with arm and wrist rotation gestures. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , p. 21. ACM, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    S. K. Card, T. P. Moran, and A. Newell. The psychology of human- computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983

    work page 1983

  11. [11]

    X. Chen, T. Grossman, D. J. Wigdor, and G. Fitzmaurice. Duet: ex- ploring joint interactions on a smart phone and a smart watch. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput- ing Systems, pp. 159–168. ACM, 2014

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    O. E. H. C. B. H. Cheng, Lung-Pan and A. D Wilson. Sparse haptic proxy: Touch feedback in virtual environments using a general passive prop. in proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 37183728. ACM, 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Conti and O

    F. Conti and O. Khatib. Spanning large workspaces using small haptic devices. in proceedings of first joint eurohaptics conference and sym- posium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator. In roceedings of First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator, p. 183188. ACM, 2005

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Corsten, I

    C. Corsten, I. Avellino, M. Mllers, and J. Borchers. Instant user inter- faces: repurposing everyday objects as input devices. in proceedings of the acm international conference on interactive tabletops and sur- faces (its ’13). In Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces , pp. 71–80. ACM, 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    J. A. de Guzman, K. Thilakarathna, and A. Seneviratne. Security and privacy approaches in mixed reality: A literature survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05797, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Dhakal, A

    V . Dhakal, A. M. Feit, P. O. Kristensson, and A. Oulasvirta. Obser- vations on typing from 136 million keystrokes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI ’18, pp. 646:1–646:12. ACM, New York, NY , USA, 2018. doi: 10. 1145/3173574.3174220

    work page arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    P. H. Dietz, B. Eidelson, J. Westhues, and S. Bathiche. A practical pressure sensitive computer keyboard. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology , pp. 55–58. ACM, 2009

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Dube and A

    T. Dube and A. Arif. Text entry in virtual reality: A comprehensive review of the literature. In Proceedings of HCI International 2019 , 2019

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Eiband, M

    M. Eiband, M. Khamis, E. V on Zezschwitz, H. Hussmann, and F. Alt. Understanding shoulder surfing in the wild: Stories from users and observers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4254–4265. ACM, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Flying with a vr headset isn’t as dorky as it sounds

    Engadget. Flying with a vr headset isn’t as dorky as it sounds. https://www.engadget.com/2018/02/22/ htc-vive-focus-in-flight-vr/ . Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Fallot-Burghardt, M

    W. Fallot-Burghardt, M. Fjeld, C. Speirs, S. Ziegenspeck, H. Krueger, and T. L ¨aubli. Touch&type: a novel pointing device for notebook computers. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human- computer interaction: changing roles , pp. 465–468. ACM, 2006

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    G. W. Fitzmaurice, H. Ishii, and A. S. W. Buxton. Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. in proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 442–449. ACM, 1995

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Fluet, O

    M.-C. Fluet, O. Lambercy, and R. Gassert. Effects of 2d/3d visual feedback and visuomotor collocation on motor performance in a virtual peg insertion test. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , pp. 4776–4779. IEEE, 2012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Follmer, D

    S. Follmer, D. Leithinger, A. Olwal, A. Hogge, and H. Ishii. inform: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and ob- ject actuation. in proceedings of the acm user interface software and technology symposium. In Proceedings of the ACM User Interface Software and Technology Symposium, p. 417426. ACM, 2013

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    M. J. Fu, A. D. Hershberger, K. Sano, and M. C. C ¸avus ¸o˘glu. Effect of visuomotor colocation on 3d fitts’ task performance in physical and virtual environments. Presence, 21(3):305–320, 2012

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Gellersen and F

    H. Gellersen and F. Block. Novel interactions on the keyboard. Com- puter, 45(4):36–40, 2012

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    George, M

    C. George, M. Khamis, E. von Zezschwitz, M. Burger, H. Schmidt, F. Alt, and H. Hussmann. Seamless and secure vr: Adapting and evaluating established authentication systems for virtual reality. NDSS, 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    K. R. Gray. Facilitating keyboard use while wearing a head-mounted display. 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Grubert, E

    J. Grubert, E. Ofek, M. Pahud, and P. O. Kristensson. The office of the future: Virtual, portable, and global. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 38(6):125–133, 2018

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Grubert, L

    J. Grubert, L. Witzani, E. Ofek, M. Pahud, M. Kranz, and P. O. Kris- tensson. Effects of hand representations for typing in virtual reality. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pp. 151–158, March 2018. doi: 10.1109/VR.2018.8446250

    work page doi:10.1109/vr.2018.8446250 2018

  31. [31]

    Grubert, L

    J. Grubert, L. Witzani, E. Ofek, M. Pahud, M. Kranz, and P. O. Kris- tensson. Text entry in immersive head-mounted display-based virtual reality using standard keyboards. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) , pp. 159–166, March 2018. doi: 10.1109/VR.2018.8446059

    work page doi:10.1109/vr.2018.8446059 2018

  32. [32]

    Habib, N

    I. Habib, N. Berggren, E. Rehn, G. Josefsson, A. Kunz, and M. Fjeld. Dgts: Integrated typing and pointing. In IFIP Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, pp. 232–235. Springer, 2009

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Hettiarachchi and D

    A. Hettiarachchi and D. Wigdor. Annexing reality: Enabling oppor- tunistic use of everyday objects as tangible proxies in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 19571967. ACM, 2016

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Hinckley, R

    K. Hinckley, R. Pausch, J. C. Goble, and N. F. Kassell. Passive real- world interface props for neurosurgical visualization. in proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. In Pro- ceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 452–458. ACM, 1994

    work page 1994

  35. [35]

    A. H. Hoppe, L. Otto, F. van de Camp, R. Stiefelhagen, and G. Unm¨ußig. qvrty: Virtual keyboard with a haptic, real-world represen- tation. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction , pp. 266–272. Springer, 2018

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Hughes, C

    C. Hughes, C. Stapleton, D. Hughes, and E. Smith. Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(6):24–30, 2005

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    I. U. T. Inc. A brief history of the lcd key technology. http://www. lcd-keys.com/english/history.htm. Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    J. Kato, D. Sakamoto, and T. Igarashi. Surfboard: keyboard with microphone as a low-cost interactive surface. In Adjunct proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 387–388. ACM, 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    D. Kim, S. Izadi, J. Dostal, C. Rhemann, C. Keskin, C. Zach, J. Shotton, T. Large, S. Bathiche, M. Nießner, et al. Retrodepth: 3d silhouette sensing for high-precision input on and above physical surfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1377–1386. ACM, 2014

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Knierim, V

    P. Knierim, V . Schwind, A. M. Feit, F. Nieuwenhuizen, and N. Henze. Physical keyboards in virtual reality: Analysis of typing performance and effects of avatar hands. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , p. 345. ACM, 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    D. A. Kontarinis, J. S. Son, W. Peine, and R. D. Howe. A tactile shape sensing and display system for teleoperated manipulation. in proceedings of the ieee conference on robotics and automation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation , p. 641646. IEEE, 1995

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    K. J. Kruszynski and R. van Liere. Tangible props for scientic vi- sualization: concept, requirements. Virtual reality, 13(4):235–244, 2009

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Kurosawa, B

    T. Kurosawa, B. Shizuki, and J. Tanaka. Keyboard clawing: input method by clawing key tops. In International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, pp. 272–280. Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    D. M. Lane, H. A. Napier, S. C. Peres, and A. Sandor. Hidden costs of graphical user interfaces: Failure to make the transition from menus and icon toolbars to keyboard shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(2):133–144, 2005

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Lebeck, K

    K. Lebeck, K. Ruth, T. Kohno, and F. Roesner. Securing augmented reality output. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) , pp. 320–337. IEEE, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    B. Lee, H. Park, and H. Bang. Multidirectional pointing input using a hardware keyboard. ETRI Journal, 35(6):1160–1163, 2013

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    J. R. Lewis. Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the asq. ACM Sigchi Bulletin, 23(1):78– 81, 1991

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    Lin, P.-H

    J.-W. Lin, P.-H. Han, J.-Y . Lee, Y .-S. Chen, T.-W. Chang, K.-W. Chen, and Y .-P. Hung. Visualizing the keyboard in virtual reality for enhanc- ing immersive experience. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Posters, p. 35. ACM, 2017

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    R. W. Lindeman, J. L. Sibert, and J. K. Hahn. Hand-held windows: towards effective 2d interaction in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316) , pp. 205–212. IEEE, 1999

    work page 1999

  50. [50]

    Logitech g19 keyboard for gaming

    Logitech. Logitech g19 keyboard for gaming. https://support. logitech.com/en_us/product/g19-keyboard-for-gaming . Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    K.-L. Low, G. Welch, A. Lastra, and H. Fuchs. Life-sized projector- based dioramas. in proceedings of the acm symposium on virtual reality software and technology (vrst ’01). In Proceedings of the IEEE Con- ference on Robotics and Automation , pp. 93–101. ACM, 2001

    work page 2001

  52. [52]

    C. C. Loy, W. Lai, and C. Lim. Development of a pressure-based typing biometrics user authentication system. ASEAN Virtual Instrumentation Applications Contest Submission, 2005

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Maiti, M

    A. Maiti, M. Jadliwala, and C. Weber. Preventing shoulder surfing using randomized augmented reality keyboards. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 630–635. IEEE, 2017

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Marquardt, R

    N. Marquardt, R. Jota, S. Greenberg, and J. A. Jorge. The continuous interaction space: interaction techniques unifying touch and gesture on and above a digital surface. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 461–476. Springer, 2011

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    McGill, D

    M. McGill, D. Boland, R. Murray-Smith, and S. Brewster. A dose of reality: overcoming usability challenges in vr head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 2143–2152. ACM, 2015. doi: 10.1145/ 2702123.2702382

    work page arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Milgram and F

    P. Milgram and F. Kishino. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems , 77(12):1321–1329, 1994

    work page 1994

  57. [57]

    D. Norman. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, 2013

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    P. K. Novak, J. Smailovi´c, B. Sluban, and I. Mozeti ˇc. Sentiment of emojis. PloS one, 10(12):e0144296, 2015

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    R. C. Omanson, C. S. Miller, E. Young, and D. Schwantes. Comparison of mouse and keyboard efficiency. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , vol. 54, pp. 600–604. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2010

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Optimus oled keyboards

    optimus. Optimus oled keyboards. https://www.artlebedev.com/ optimus/. Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    A. Otte, D. Schneider, T. Menzner, T. Gesslein, P. Gagel, and J. Grubert. Evaluating text entry in virtual reality using a touch-sensitive physical keyboard. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE, 2019

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Keyboard Surface Interaction: Making the keyboard into a pointing device

    J. Ramos, Z. Li, J. Rosas, N. Banovic, J. Mankoff, and A. Dey. Key- board surface interaction: Making the keyboard into a pointing device. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04029, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Razor deathstalker ultimate keyboard

    Razor. Razor deathstalker ultimate keyboard. https://support.razer.com/gaming-keyboards/ razer-deathstalker-ultimate . Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Rekimoto, T

    J. Rekimoto, T. Ishizawa, C. Schwesig, and H. Oba. Presense: in- teraction techniques for finger sensing input devices. InProceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 203–212. ACM, 2003

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    Roesner, T

    F. Roesner, T. Kohno, and D. Molnar. Security and privacy for aug- mented reality systems. Commun. ACM, 57(4):88–96, 2014

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Roudaut, D

    A. Roudaut, D. Krusteva, M. McCoy, A. Karnik, K. Ramani, and S. Subramanian. Cubimorph: designing modular interactive devices. in robotics and automation (icra). In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation , p. 33393334. IEEE, 2016

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Roudaut, R

    A. Roudaut, R. Reed, T. Hao, and S. Subramanian. changibles: analyz- ing and designing shape changing constructive assembly. in proceed- ings of the 32nd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 25932596. ACM, 2014

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    M. A. Sasse and I. Flechais. Usable security: Why do we need it? how do we get it? O’Reilly, 2005

    work page 2005

  69. [69]

    Sekimori, Y

    K. Sekimori, Y . Yamasaki, Y . Takagi, K. Murata, B. Shizuki, and S. Takahashi. Ex-space: Expanded space key by sliding thumb on home position. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 68–78. Springer, 2018

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Y . Shi, T. Vega G´alvez, H. Zhang, and S. Nanayakkara. Gestakey: Get more done with just-a-key on a keyboard. In Adjunct Publication of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 73–75. ACM, 2017

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Y . Shi, H. Zhang, H. Rajapakse, N. T. Perera, T. Vega G ´alvez, and S. Nanayakkara. Gestakey: Touch interaction on individual keycaps. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 596. ACM, 2018

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Strauss and J

    A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Basics of qualitative research. Sage publica- tions, 1990

    work page 1990

  73. [73]

    Taylor, C

    S. Taylor, C. Keskin, O. Hilliges, S. Izadi, and J. Helmes. Type- hover-swipe in 96 bytes: A motion sensing mechanical keyboard. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput- ing Systems, CHI ’14, pp. 1695–1704. ACM, New York, NY , USA,

    work page

  74. [74]

    doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557030

    work page doi:10.1145/2556288.2557030

  75. [75]

    Taylor, C

    S. Taylor, C. Keskin, O. Hilliges, S. Izadi, and J. Helmes. Type- hover-swipe in 96 bytes: a motion sensing mechanical keyboard. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1695–1704. ACM, 2014

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    R. J. Teather, R. S. Allison, and W. Stuerzlinger. Evaluating vi- sual/motor co-location in fish-tank virtual reality. In2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC- STH), pp. 624–629. IEEE, 2009

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    Y .-C. Tung, T. Y . Cheng, N.-H. Yu, C. Wang, and M. Y . Chen. Flick- board: Enabling trackpad interaction with automatic mode switching on a capacitive-sensing keyboard. In Proceedings of the 33rd An- nual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 1847–1850. ACM, 2015

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    Introducing the logitech bridge sdk

    VIVE. Introducing the logitech bridge sdk. https://blog.vive.com/us/2017/11/02/ introducing-the-logitech-bridge-sdk/ . Last accessed 19.03.2019

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Walker, S

    J. Walker, S. Kuhl, and K. Vertanen. Decoder-assisted typing using an HMD and a physical keyboard. In CHI 2016 Workshop on Inviscid Text Entry and Beyond, p. unpublished, 2016

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    Walker, B

    J. Walker, B. Li, K. Vertanen, and S. Kuhl. Efficient typing on a visually occluded physical keyboard. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 5457–5461. ACM, 2017

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.