pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08965 · v1 · pith:FLRUHNV7new · submitted 2019-07-21 · 💻 cs.NI · eess.SP

Machine Learning for Resource Management in Cellular and IoT Networks: Potentials, Current Solutions, and Open Challenges

Fatima Hussain , Syed Ali Hassan , Rasheed Hussain , Ekram Hossain This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI eess.SP
keywords IoT networksresource managementmachine learningdeep learningcellular networksHetNetsMIMONOMA
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning and deep learning mechanisms address resource management challenges in large-scale IoT networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a systematic survey of machine learning and deep learning for resource management in cellular wireless and IoT networks. It first outlines the challenges from massive heterogeneous devices and data, reviews traditional mechanisms, and motivates ML and DL use. It then surveys existing techniques for wireless IoT networks and specific cases like HetNets, MIMO, D2D, and NOMA. The work ends by identifying future research directions. A reader would care because growing IoT scale demands new ways to allocate resources efficiently.

Core claim

ML and DL mechanisms will play a pivotal role to bring intelligence to the IoT networks and can play an essential role in addressing the challenges of resource management in large-scale IoT networks, as shown through review of current solutions and open challenges.

What carries the argument

Systematic survey that reviews challenges, traditional methods, and ML/DL-based resource allocation techniques for HetNets, MIMO, D2D communications, and NOMA networks.

If this is right

  • ML and DL techniques will be applied to resource allocation in HetNets, MIMO, D2D, and NOMA within IoT settings.
  • These methods will introduce intelligence into IoT network operations.
  • Open challenges identified will direct subsequent work on ML and DL for IoT resource management.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The surveyed methods could reduce energy consumption in battery-limited IoT devices.
  • Adoption might extend to latency-sensitive applications in dense urban deployments.
  • Empirical tests on real networks could validate scalability claims left implicit in the survey.

Load-bearing premise

The scale and variety of IoT devices and data make traditional resource management insufficient, requiring ML and DL techniques instead.

What would settle it

A direct performance comparison in which conventional optimization methods match or exceed ML and DL results for resource allocation across large-scale cellular IoT deployments would undermine the survey's core motivation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08965 by Ekram Hossain, Fatima Hussain, Rasheed Hussain, Syed Ali Hassan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The contributions of this article are summarized as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Taxonomy of this‘ survey. [ML: Machine Learning, DL: Deep Learning, RM: Resource Management, DRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning, NOMA: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Machine learning vs. Deep learning A. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) Basics Broadly speaking, ML is divided into three categories: su￾pervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning techniques. Supervised learning: These techniques use models and labels known a priori, and can estimate and predict unknown parameters. Support Vector Machine (SVM), naive Bayes classifier, Random Forest, and D… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Internet-of-Things (IoT) refers to a massively heterogeneous network formed through smart devices connected to the Internet. In the wake of disruptive IoT with a huge amount and variety of data, Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) mechanisms will play a pivotal role to bring intelligence to the IoT networks. Among other aspects, ML and DL can play an essential role in addressing the challenges of resource management in large-scale IoT networks. In this article, we conduct a systematic and in-depth survey of the ML- and DL-based resource management mechanisms in cellular wireless and IoT networks. We start with the challenges of resource management in cellular IoT and low-power IoT networks, review the traditional resource management mechanisms for IoT networks, and motivate the use of ML and DL techniques for resource management in these networks. Then, we provide a comprehensive survey of the existing ML- and DL-based resource allocation techniques in wireless IoT networks and also techniques specifically designed for HetNets, MIMO and D2D communications, and NOMA networks. To this end, we also identify the future research directions in using ML and DL for resource allocation and management in IoT networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey paper that reviews challenges of resource management in cellular IoT and low-power IoT networks, summarizes traditional mechanisms, motivates the application of ML and DL techniques, provides a comprehensive survey of existing ML/DL-based resource allocation solutions across wireless IoT networks with specific coverage of HetNets, MIMO, D2D communications and NOMA, and identifies open research directions. The central claim is that ML and DL mechanisms will play a pivotal role in bringing intelligence to IoT networks and addressing resource management challenges in large-scale deployments.

Significance. As a structured literature survey, the paper aggregates current ML/DL solutions and highlights future directions, offering a useful reference point for researchers entering the intersection of ML and IoT resource management. Its coverage of multiple network paradigms (HetNets, MIMO, D2D, NOMA) helps map the state of the art; the explicit motivation section drawn from reviewed works provides context for why traditional approaches may be insufficient at scale.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the description of the survey as 'systematic and in-depth' would be strengthened by briefly stating the paper selection methodology or inclusion criteria used to compile the reviewed works.
  2. [Motivation/Traditional mechanisms review] The transition from traditional mechanisms to ML/DL solutions would benefit from a summary table (e.g., in the motivation section) that contrasts key performance aspects or limitations cited from the literature, making the 'pivotal role' assertion more concrete for readers.
  3. [Future research directions] Open challenges section: several directions are listed at a high level; adding one or two concrete example problems or metrics for each would improve actionability without altering the survey scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive summary and positive evaluation of our survey on ML/DL-based resource management in cellular and IoT networks. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. However, the report lists no specific major comments under the MAJOR COMMENTS section. Consequently, we have no individual points to address in this rebuttal.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: survey aggregates external literature without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This is a literature survey paper that reviews challenges in IoT resource management, traditional mechanisms, and existing ML/DL solutions from the broader body of work. It presents no original equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems. The central claim that ML/DL will play a pivotal role is framed as motivation drawn from surveyed papers rather than derived internally. No steps reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. The derivation chain is absent by design, making the paper self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey paper, this work does not introduce or rely upon any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it aggregates and motivates from prior published research.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5755 in / 1024 out tokens · 27257 ms · 2026-05-24T18:20:37.877119+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 180 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hussain, Internet of Things; Building Blocks and Business Models

    F. Hussain, Internet of Things; Building Blocks and Business Models . Springer, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Internet of Things - Applications and Challenges in Technology and Standardization,

    D. B. J. Sen, “Internet of Things - Applications and Challenges in Technology and Standardization,” IEEE Transactions in Wireless Personal Communication, May 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    A Brief Survey of Machine Learning Methods and their Sensor and IoT Applications ,

    U. S. Shanthamallu, A. Spanias, C. Tepedelenlioglu, and M. Stanley, “A Brief Survey of Machine Learning Methods and their Sensor and IoT Applications ,” IEEE Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, March 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Resource man- agement for future mobile networks: Architecture and technologies,

    Y . Li, Z. Gao, L. Huang, X. Du, and M. Guizani, “Resource man- agement for future mobile networks: Architecture and technologies,” Elsevier, pp. 392–398, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Intelligent power control for spectrum sharing in cognitive radios: A deep rein- forcement learning approach,

    X. Li, J. Fang, W. Cheng, H. Duan, Z. Chen, and H. Li, “Intelligent power control for spectrum sharing in cognitive radios: A deep rein- forcement learning approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 25 463–25 473, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,

    A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, Fourthquarter 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    A survey of standards for machine-to-machine and the internet of things,

    V . Gazis, “A survey of standards for machine-to-machine and the internet of things,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 482–511, Firstquarter 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Internet-of- things-based smart environments: state of the art, taxonomy, and open research challenges,

    E. Ahmed, I. Yaqoob, A. Gani, M. Imran, and M. Guizani, “Internet-of- things-based smart environments: state of the art, taxonomy, and open research challenges,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 10–16, October 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Internet of things for smart healthcare: Technologies, challenges, and opportunities,

    S. B. Baker, W. Xiang, and I. Atkinson, “Internet of things for smart healthcare: Technologies, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 26 521–26 544, 2017

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Internet of things (iot) operating systems support, networking technologies, applications, and challenges: A comparative review,

    F. Javed, M. K. Afzal, M. Sharif, and B. Kim, “Internet of things (iot) operating systems support, networking technologies, applications, and challenges: A comparative review,”IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2062–2100, thirdquarter 2018

    work page 2062

  11. [11]

    Internet of things security: A top-down survey,

    D. E. Kouicem, A. Bouabdallah, and H. Lakhlef, “Internet of things security: A top-down survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 141, pp. 199 – 221, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1389128618301208

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    A survey study on internet of things resource management,

    A. Chowdhury and S. A. Raut, “A survey study on internet of things resource management,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 120, pp. 42 – 60, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804518302315

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Secure routing for internet of things: A survey,

    D. Airehrour, J. Gutierrez, and S. K. Ray, “Secure routing for internet of things: A survey,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 66, pp. 198 – 213, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804516300133 17

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    A survey of trust computation models for service management in internet of things systems,

    J. Guo, I.-R. Chen, and J. J. Tsai, “A survey of trust computation models for service management in internet of things systems,” Com- puter Communications, vol. 97, pp. 1 – 14, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366416304959

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    A survey on data fusion in internet of things: Towards secure and privacy-preserving fusion,

    W. Ding, X. Jing, Z. Yan, and L. T. Yang, “A survey on data fusion in internet of things: Towards secure and privacy-preserving fusion,” Information Fusion, vol. 51, pp. 129 – 144, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253518304731

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Deep learning for iot big data and streaming analytics: A survey,

    M. Mohammadi, A. Al-Fuqaha, S. Sorour, and M. Guizani, “Deep learning for iot big data and streaming analytics: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2923–2960, Fourthquarter 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    A very brief introduction to machine learning with ap- plications to communication systems,

    O. Simeone, “A very brief introduction to machine learning with ap- plications to communication systems,” IEEE Transaction on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 648–664, December 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Real-time multi-application network traffic identification based on machine learning,

    Q. et al., “Real-time multi-application network traffic identification based on machine learning,” in in Springer,, vol. 92, 2015, pp. 473–480

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Machine learning-based classification of encrypted internet traffic,

    T. et al., “Machine learning-based classification of encrypted internet traffic,” in in Springer,, 2017, p. 578592

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Data acquisition through joint compressive sensing and principal component analysis,

    R. Masiero, G. Quer, D. Munaretto, M. Rossi, J. Widmer, and M. Zorzi, “Data acquisition through joint compressive sensing and principal component analysis,” in GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Nov 2009, pp. 1–6

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Instruct: A clustering based identification of valid communications in iot net- works,

    M. S. Jamal, V . K. S, H. Ochiai, H. Esaki, and K. Kataoka, “Instruct: A clustering based identification of valid communications in iot net- works,” in 2018 Fifth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security , Oct 2018, pp. 228–233

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Accurateml: Information-aggregation- based approximate processing for fast and accurate machine learning on mapreduce,

    R. Han, F. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Accurateml: Information-aggregation- based approximate processing for fast and accurate machine learning on mapreduce,” in IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, May 2017, pp. 1–9

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Resource Allocation and Congestion Control in Clustered M2M Communication using Q-Learning,

    F. Hussain, A. Anpalagan, A. S. Khwaja, and M. Naeem, “Resource Allocation and Congestion Control in Clustered M2M Communication using Q-Learning,” Wiley Transactions on Emerging Telecommunica- tions Technologies, 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Advantages and disadvantages of heuristic and multi agents approaches to the solution of scheduling problem,

    B. FrankoviIvana and B. Budinska, “Advantages and disadvantages of heuristic and multi agents approaches to the solution of scheduling problem,” in in IFAC,, vol. 33, no. 13, May 2000, pp. 367–372

    work page 2000

  25. [25]

    Game theory for multi-access edge com- puting: Survey, use cases, and future trends,

    J. Moura and D. Hutchison, “Game theory for multi-access edge com- puting: Survey, use cases, and future trends,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 260–288, Firstquarter 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Sleeping Multi-Armed Bandit Learning for Fast Uplink Grant Allocation in Machine Type Communications

    S. et al., “Sleeping multi-armed bandit learning for fast up- link grant allocation in machine type communications,,” in https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12983, October 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Big-data streaming applications scheduling based on staged multi-armed bandits,,

    K. et al., “Big-data streaming applications scheduling based on staged multi-armed bandits,,” in IEEE Transactions on Computers , vol. 65, no. 12, November 2016, p. 115

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Device-to-device communication as an underlay to lte-advanced networks,

    K. Doppler, M. Rinne, C. Wijting, C. Ribeiro, and K. Hugl, “Device-to-device communication as an underlay to lte-advanced networks,” Comm. Mag. , vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 42–49, Dec. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.5350367

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.2009.5350367 2009

  29. [29]

    Performance analysis of device-to-device communications underlaying cellular networks,

    W. Wu, W. Xiang, Y . Zhang, K. Zheng, and W. Wang, “Performance analysis of device-to-device communications underlaying cellular networks,” Telecommun. Syst., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 29–41, Sep. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9919-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11235-014-9919-y 2015

  30. [30]

    Resource sharing optimization for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks,

    C. Yu, K. Doppler, C. B. Ribeiro, and O. Tirkkonen, “Resource sharing optimization for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2752–2763, August 2011

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Recent advances in radio resource management for heterogeneous lte/lte-a networks,

    Y . L. Lee, T. C. Chuah, J. Loo, and A. Vinel, “Recent advances in radio resource management for heterogeneous lte/lte-a networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2142–2180, Fourthquarter 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Radio resource management in heterogeneous networks, functional models and implementation requirements,

    S. T. A. N. National, “Radio resource management in heterogeneous networks, functional models and implementation requirements,” 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Common radio resource management algorithms in heterogeneous wireless networks with kpi analysis,

    S. Tarapiah, K. Aziz, and S. Atalla, “Common radio resource management algorithms in heterogeneous wireless networks with kpi analysis,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , vol. 6, no. 10, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.061007

    work page doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2015.061007 2015

  34. [34]

    Receiver and resource allocation optimization for uplink noma in 5g wireless networks,

    M. Al-Imari, P. Xiao, and M. A. Imran, “Receiver and resource allocation optimization for uplink noma in 5g wireless networks,” in 2015 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), Aug 2015, pp. 151–155

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Resource management in non-orthogonal multiple access networks for 5g and beyond,

    L. Song, Y . Li, Z. Ding, and H. V . Poor, “Resource management in non-orthogonal multiple access networks for 5g and beyond,” IEEE Network, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 8–14, July 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Low power wide area networks: An overview,

    U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, “Low power wide area networks: An overview,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 855–873, Secondquarter 2017

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    A comparative study of lpwan technologies for large-scale iot deployment,

    K. Mekki, E. Bajic, F. Chaxel, and F. Meyer, “A comparative study of lpwan technologies for large-scale iot deployment,” ICT Express, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1 – 7, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959517302953

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Scalability analysis of a lora network under imperfect orthogonality,

    A. Mahmood, E. Sisinni, L. Guntupalli, R. Rondn, S. A. Hassan, and M. Gidlund, “Scalability analysis of a lora network under imperfect orthogonality,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1425–1436, March 2019

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Dynamic resource allocation in cognitive radio networks,

    R. Zhang, Y . Liang, and S. Cui, “Dynamic resource allocation in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 102–114, May 2010

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Adaptive channel allocation spectrum etiquette for cognitive radio networks,

    N. Nie and C. Comaniciu, “Adaptive channel allocation spectrum etiquette for cognitive radio networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 779–797, Dec 2006. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-006-0049-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11036-006-0049-y 2006

  41. [41]

    Mobile internet of things (miot) and its applications for smart environments: A positional overview,

    A. Alnahdi and S. Liu, “Mobile internet of things (miot) and its applications for smart environments: A positional overview,” in 2017 IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (ICIOT), June 2017, pp. 151–154

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Internet of mobile things: Mobility-driven challenges, designs and implementa- tions,

    K. Nahrstedt, H. Li, P. Nguyen, S. Chang, and L. Vu, “Internet of mobile things: Mobility-driven challenges, designs and implementa- tions,” in 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internet-of- Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI) , April 2016, pp. 25–36

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Smart energy efficient gateway for internet of mobile things,

    I. Tcarenko, Y . Huan, D. Juhasz, A. M. Rahmani, Z. Zou, T. Wester- lund, P. Liljeberg, L. Zheng, and H. Tenhunen, “Smart energy efficient gateway for internet of mobile things,” in 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC), Jan 2017, pp. 1016–1017

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    The fog balancing: Load distribution for small cell cloud computing,

    O. at el., “The fog balancing: Load distribution for small cell cloud computing,” IEEE VTC, pp. 1–6, May 2015

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    An efficient resource allocation approach based on a genetic algorithm for composite services in iot environments,

    M. Kim and I.-Y . Ko, “An efficient resource allocation approach based on a genetic algorithm for composite services in iot environments,” IEEE International Conference on Web Services , pp. 543–550, 2015

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    An efficient resource allocation approach based on a genetic algorithm for composite services in iot environments,

    M. et al., “An efficient resource allocation approach based on a genetic algorithm for composite services in iot environments,” International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things , pp. 136–142, October 2018

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Game theoretic mecha- nisms for resource management in massive wireless iot systems,

    P. Semasinghe, S. Maghsudi, and E. Hossain, “Game theoretic mecha- nisms for resource management in massive wireless iot systems,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 121–127, February 2017

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    A game theoretic optimization of rpl for mobile internet of things applications,

    H. Kharrufa, H. Al-Kashoash, and A. H. Kemp, “A game theoretic optimization of rpl for mobile internet of things applications,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2520–2530, March 2018

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    A hierarchical game framework for resource management in fog computing,

    H. Zhang, Y . Zhang, Y . Gu, D. Niyato, and Z. Han, “A hierarchical game framework for resource management in fog computing,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 52–57, Aug 2017

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Energy-efficient resource allocation for d2d communications underlaying cloud-ran- based lte-a networks,

    Z. Zhou, M. Dong, K. Ota, G. Wang, and L. T. Yang, “Energy-efficient resource allocation for d2d communications underlaying cloud-ran- based lte-a networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 428–438, June 2016

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Computing resource allocation in three-tier iot fog networks: A joint optimization approach combining stackelberg game and matching,

    H. Zhang, Y . Xiao, S. Bu, D. Niyato, F. R. Yu, and Z. Han, “Computing resource allocation in three-tier iot fog networks: A joint optimization approach combining stackelberg game and matching,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1204–1215, Oct 2017

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks,

    M. Haenggi, J. G. Andrews, F. Baccelli, O. Dousse, and M. Franceschetti, “Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks,” IEEE J.Sel. A. Commun., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1029–1046, Sep. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2009.090902

    work page doi:10.1109/jsac.2009.090902 2009

  53. [53]

    Joint optimization of link scheduling and resource allocation in cooperative vehicular networks,

    Q. Zheng, K. Zheng, P. Chatzimisios, and F. Liu, “Joint optimization of link scheduling and resource allocation in cooperative vehicular networks,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2015, no. 1, p. 170, Jun 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-015-0392-4

    work page doi:10.1186/s13638-015-0392-4 2015

  54. [54]

    Graph-based radio resource management for vehicular networks,

    L. Liang, S. Xie, G. Y . Li, Z. J. Ding, and X. Yu, “Graph-based radio resource management for vehicular networks,”2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) , pp. 1–6, 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    An overview on resource allocation techniques for multi-user mimo systems,

    E. Castaeda, A. Silva, A. Gameiro, and M. Kountouris, “An overview on resource allocation techniques for multi-user mimo systems,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 239–284, Firstquarter 2017. 18

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Survey of large-scale mimo systems,

    K. Zheng, L. Zhao, J. Mei, B. Shao, W. Xiang, and L. Hanzo, “Survey of large-scale mimo systems,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1738–1760, thirdquarter 2015

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    A survey of resource management toward 5g radio access networks,

    T. O. Olwal, K. Djouani, and A. M. Kurien, “A survey of resource management toward 5g radio access networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1656–1686, thirdquarter 2016

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    1machine learning in iot security:current solutions and future challenges,

    S. A. H. Fatima Hussain, Rashhed Hussain and E. Hussain, “1machine learning in iot security:current solutions and future challenges,” in Arxiv.org, 2019

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Approxct: Approximate clustering techniques for energy efficient computer vision in cyber-physical systems,

    R. H. Javed, A. Siddique, R. Hafiz, O. Hasan, and M. Shafique, “Approxct: Approximate clustering techniques for energy efficient computer vision in cyber-physical systems,” in 2018 12th International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (ICOSST) , Dec 2018, pp. 64–70

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Novel technique for prediction analysis using normalization for an improvement in k-means clus- tering,

    S. Gupta, A. Thakral, and S. Sharma, “Novel technique for prediction analysis using normalization for an improvement in k-means clus- tering,” in 2016 International Conference on Information Technology (InCITe)-The Next Generation IT Summit on the Theme-Internet of Things: Connect your Worlds . IEEE, 2016, pp. 32–36

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    A semi-supervised intrusion detec- tion system using active learning svm and fuzzy c-means clustering,

    V . V . Kumari and P. R. K. Varma, “A semi-supervised intrusion detec- tion system using active learning svm and fuzzy c-means clustering,” in 2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 481–485

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Automated machine learning for internet of things,

    C.-M. Chung, C.-C. Chen, W.-P. Shih, T.-E. Lin, R.-J. Yeh, and I. Wang, “Automated machine learning for internet of things,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Taiwan (ICCE-TW). IEEE, 2017, pp. 295–296

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    A novel learning method to classify data streams in the internet of things,

    M. A. Khan, A. Khan, M. N. Khan, and S. Anwar, “A novel learning method to classify data streams in the internet of things,” in 2014 National Software Engineering Conference . IEEE, 2014, pp. 61–66

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Survey,

    C. et al., “Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 1, pp. 1–43, March 2018

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Situation reasoning framework for the internet of things environments using deep learning results,

    S. Park, M. Sohn, H. Jin, and H. Lee, “Situation reasoning framework for the internet of things environments using deep learning results,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications (ICKEA). IEEE, 2016, pp. 133–138

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    A new deep-q-learning- based transmission scheduling mechanism for the cognitive internet of things,

    J. Zhu, Y . Song, D. Jiang, and H. Song, “A new deep-q-learning- based transmission scheduling mechanism for the cognitive internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , pp. 1–1, 2017

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    A comparison of re- inforcement learning based approaches to appliance scheduling,

    N. Chauhan, N. Choudhary, and K. George, “A comparison of re- inforcement learning based approaches to appliance scheduling,” in 2016 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), Dec 2016, pp. 253–258

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    Channel Selection for Network- As- sisted D2D Communication via No-Regret Bandit Learning with Cal- ibrated Forecasting,

    S. Maghsudi and S. Stanczak, “Channel Selection for Network- As- sisted D2D Communication via No-Regret Bandit Learning with Cal- ibrated Forecasting,” IEEE Transaction in Wireless Communications , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1309–1322, March 2015

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Cellular network traffic scheduling with deep reinforcement learning,

    S. Chinchali, P. Hu, T. Chu, M. Sharma, M. Bansal, R. Misra, M. Pavone, and S. Katti, “Cellular network traffic scheduling with deep reinforcement learning,” in AAAI, 2018

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Resource management with deep reinforcement learning,

    H. Mao, M. Alizadeh, I. Menache, and S. Kandula, “Resource management with deep reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks , ser. HotNets ’16. New York, NY , USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 50–56. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3005745.3005750

    work page doi:10.1145/3005745.3005750 2016

  71. [71]

    Cloud task scheduling based on swarm intelligence and machine learning,

    G. Rjoub and J. Bentahar, “Cloud task scheduling based on swarm intelligence and machine learning,” in 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) , Aug 2017, pp. 272–279

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Discrete- event simulation for efficient and stable resource allocation in collaborative mobile cloudlets,

    S. Bohez, T. Verbelen, P. Simoens, and B. Dhoedt, “Discrete- event simulation for efficient and stable resource allocation in collaborative mobile cloudlets,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory , vol. 50, pp. 109 – 129, 2015, special Issue on Resource Management in Mobile Clouds. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    A study on the optimization of the uplink period using machine learning in the future iot network,

    J. S. Jang, Y . L. Kim, and J. H. Park, “A study on the optimization of the uplink period using machine learning in the future iot network,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), March 2016, pp. 1– 3

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    Traffic prediction for dynamic traffic engineering,

    T. et al., “Traffic prediction for dynamic traffic engineering,” in in Elsevier,, vol. 85, July 2015, pp. 34–60

    work page 2015

  75. [75]

    A learning-based multimodel integrated framework for dynamic traffic flow forecasting,

    ——, “A learning-based multimodel integrated framework for dynamic traffic flow forecasting,” in in Springer,, vol. 85, March 2018, pp. 407– 430

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    A load balancing scheme based on deep- learning in iot,

    H.-Y . Kim1 and J.-M. Kim2, “A load balancing scheme based on deep- learning in iot,” in in Springer,, October 2016, p. 873878

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Learning the daily model of network traffic,

    C. Caruso, D. Malerba, and D. Papagni, “Learning the daily model of network traffic,” in in Springer,, 2005, p. 131141

    work page 2005

  78. [78]

    Power allocation in multi- user cellular networks: Deep reinforcement learning approaches,

    L. W. Fan Meng, Peng Chen and J. Cheng, “Power allocation in multi- user cellular networks: Deep reinforcement learning approaches,” in arXiv.org, January 2019, pp. 1–29

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    Poster abstract: Deeprt: A predictable deep learning inference framework for iot devices,

    W. Kang and D. Kim, “Poster abstract: Deeprt: A predictable deep learning inference framework for iot devices,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM Third International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Im- plementation (IoTDI), April 2018, pp. 279–280

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    A hierarchical framework of cloud resource allocation and power management using deep reinforcement learning,

    N. Liu, Z. Li, J. Xu, Z. Xu, S. Lin, Q. Qiu, J. Tang, and Y . Wang, “A hierarchical framework of cloud resource allocation and power management using deep reinforcement learning,” in 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) , June 2017, pp. 372–382

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.