pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.10293 · v1 · pith:KBEVUU5Jnew · submitted 2019-07-24 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Stochastic Optimal Power Flow in Distribution Grids under Uncertainty from State Estimation

Miguel Picallo , Adolfo Anta , Bart De Schutter This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 17:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords optimal power flowstate estimationdistribution gridsstochastic constraintsvoltage regulationlinear approximationuncertainty
0
0 comments X

The pith

Optimal power flow in distribution grids incorporates state estimation uncertainty by turning voltage constraints stochastic while remaining tractable via linear models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Distribution grids face voltage regulation challenges from rising controllable loads and generation paired with sparse sensors that force reliance on state estimation. The paper formulates the joint problem of optimal power flow and state estimation, converting the resulting estimation errors into stochastic voltage magnitude constraints rather than fixed deterministic ones. A linear approximation of the power flow equations is applied to bypass missing load measurements, and a further transformation renders the stochastic constraints solvable without excessive conservatism. A case study demonstrates that this keeps voltages inside limits, whereas ignoring estimation uncertainty produces violations.

Core claim

The combined optimal power flow and state estimation problem is solved by converting estimation-induced voltage uncertainty into stochastic constraints, then applying a linear power flow approximation together with a constraint transformation that keeps the problem tractable without unacceptable conservatism.

What carries the argument

Linear approximation of the power flow equations plus a transformation that converts stochastic voltage constraints into tractable deterministic equivalents.

If this is right

  • Voltage magnitudes stay inside admissible ranges despite state estimation errors.
  • Ignoring the uncertainty from state estimation produces voltage limit violations.
  • The formulation works without requiring direct load measurements at every bus.
  • Distributed generation can be regulated in real time under the derived stochastic limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same linear-plus-transformation approach could be tested on grids that also contain storage or electric-vehicle chargers.
  • Replacing the linear model with a higher-order approximation might tighten the voltage bounds further while preserving tractability.
  • Online deployment would require checking how often the stochastic constraints must be recomputed as new measurements arrive.

Load-bearing premise

The linear approximation of the power flow equations remains accurate enough under normal distribution-grid conditions, and the constraint transformation does not introduce unacceptable conservatism.

What would settle it

A distribution-grid scenario in which the nonlinear power flow equations, when simulated with the computed setpoints, produce voltage violations even though the transformed stochastic constraints were satisfied under the linear model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.10293 by Adolfo Anta, Bart De Schutter, Miguel Picallo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Annulus non-convex region in light grey, with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 123-bus test feeder with location of measurements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Voltage magnitude |V | profiles for all nodes along the day for case 1 and 2: with and without taking into account the covariance of the SE estimate for the OPF respectively. The red dashed lines represent the limits. grid. Furthermore, we can also observe in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Values of the tap changers at the transformers for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Profile of available energy at every node (thick red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The increasing amount of controllable generation and consumption in distribution grids poses a severe challenge in keeping voltage values within admissible ranges. Existing approaches have considered different optimal power flow formulations to regulate distributed generation and other controllable elements. Nevertheless, distribution grids are characterized by an insufficient number of sensors, and state estimation algorithms are required to monitor the grid status. We consider in this paper the combined problem of optimal power flow under state estimation, where the estimation uncertainty results into stochastic constraints for the voltage magnitude levels instead of deterministic ones. To solve the given problem efficiently and to bypass the lack of load measurements, we use a linear approximation of the power flow equations. Moreover, we derive a transformation of the stochastic constraints to make them tractable without being too conservative. A case study shows the success of our approach at keeping voltage within limits, and also shows how ignoring the uncertainty in the estimation can lead to voltage level violations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper formulates a stochastic optimal power flow problem for distribution grids that incorporates uncertainty arising from state estimation, converting deterministic voltage limits into stochastic constraints. A linear approximation of the power flow equations is used to enable tractability and bypass missing load measurements, and a transformation is derived to render the stochastic constraints computationally manageable without excessive conservatism. A case study is presented showing that the resulting setpoints maintain voltages within limits, whereas ignoring estimation uncertainty leads to violations.

Significance. If the linear approximation and constraint transformation hold with acceptable accuracy, the work offers a computationally efficient method for voltage regulation in sensor-sparse distribution grids with high DER penetration. It directly addresses the practical gap between state estimation outputs and OPF decision-making by treating estimation error as a source of stochasticity rather than a deterministic input.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, Case Study] Abstract and Case Study: the reported success of the approach (voltage limits maintained) is demonstrated exclusively inside the linear power-flow model; no comparison against the nonlinear AC power-flow equations is provided to confirm that approximation errors remain smaller than the uncertainty margins handled by the derived transformation.
  2. [Linear approximation of the power flow equations] Linear approximation section: the central claim that the stochastic OPF keeps voltages within admissible ranges rests on the assumption that linearization errors do not push the true voltages outside the stochastic limits; this assumption is load-bearing yet unsupported by any nonlinear validation or error-bound analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, Case Study] Abstract and Case Study: the reported success of the approach (voltage limits maintained) is demonstrated exclusively inside the linear power-flow model; no comparison against the nonlinear AC power flow equations is provided to confirm that approximation errors remain smaller than the uncertainty margins handled by the derived transformation.

    Authors: We agree that the case study results are obtained exclusively within the linear power flow model employed by the formulation. The linear approximation is central to achieving tractability when load measurements are unavailable. We will revise the abstract and case study to explicitly note that voltage compliance is demonstrated under the linear model and add a short discussion referencing literature on the accuracy of linear power flow approximations in distribution networks. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Linear approximation of the power flow equations] Linear approximation section: the central claim that the stochastic OPF keeps voltages within admissible ranges rests on the assumption that linearization errors do not push the true voltages outside the stochastic limits; this assumption is load-bearing yet unsupported by any nonlinear validation or error-bound analysis.

    Authors: The manuscript does not contain nonlinear validation or explicit error-bound analysis for the linearization. This is a fair observation. We will add a paragraph in the linear approximation section that discusses the magnitude of linearization errors typical for distribution grids and how the stochastic margins may provide some buffer, supported by citations to relevant studies on linear power flow accuracy. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation uses standard linear approximations and explicit transformations

full rationale

The paper explicitly adopts a linear power flow approximation to bypass missing load measurements and derives a transformation to render stochastic voltage constraints tractable. These are presented as modeling choices with stated assumptions, not as outputs derived from the method itself. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The case study validates performance inside the linear model without reducing the central claim to its inputs by construction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as standard LinDistFlow models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The work implicitly relies on the standard assumption that linear power flow approximations are valid for the grids considered.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5686 in / 929 out tokens · 51179 ms · 2026-05-24T17:01:12.811838+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. B. Ekanayake, N. Jenkins, K. Liyanage, J. Wu, and A. Yokoyama, Smart grid: technology and applications . John Wiley & Sons, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Fast decoupled load flow,

    B. Stott and O. Alsac ¸, “Fast decoupled load flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , no. 3, pp. 859–869, 1974

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem,

    J. Lavaei and S. H. Low, “Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 27, pp. 92–107, Feb 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Optimal power flow pursuit,

    E. Dall’Anese and A. Simonetto, “Optimal power flow pursuit,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 9, pp. 942–952, March 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Projected gradient descent on riemannian manifolds with applications to online power system optimization,

    A. Hauswirth, S. Bolognani, G. Hug, and F. D ¨orfler, “Projected gradient descent on riemannian manifolds with applications to online power system optimization,” in 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) , pp. 225–232, Sept 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Distributed optimal power flow for smart microgrids,

    E. Dall’Anese, H. Zhu, and G. B. Giannakis, “Distributed optimal power flow for smart microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 4, pp. 1464–1475, Sept 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Abur and A

    A. Abur and A. G. Exposito, Power System State Estimation: Theory and Implementation. CRC Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Electric power system state estimation,

    A. Monticelli, “Electric power system state estimation,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 262–282, 2000

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    Bayesian linear state estimation using smart meters and pmus measurements in distribution grids,

    L. Schenato, G. Barchi, D. Macii, R. Arghandeh, K. Poolla, and A. V . Meier, “Bayesian linear state estimation using smart meters and pmus measurements in distribution grids,” in IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications , pp. 572–577, Nov 2014

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    A two-step distribution system state estimator with grid constraints and mixed measurements,

    M. Picallo, A. Anta, A. Panosyan, and B. De Schutter, “A two-step distribution system state estimator with grid constraints and mixed measurements,” in IEEE Power Systems Computation Conference , June 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Stochastic optimal power flow based on conditional value at risk and distribu- tional robustness,

    T. Summers, J. Warrington, M. Morari, and J. Lygeros, “Stochastic optimal power flow based on conditional value at risk and distribu- tional robustness,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 72, pp. 116 – 125, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Chance-constrained AC optimal power flow for distribution systems with renewables,

    E. Dall’Anese, K. Baker, and T. Summers, “Chance-constrained AC optimal power flow for distribution systems with renewables,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 32, pp. 3427–3438, Sept 2017

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    A fast method for real-time chance-constrained decision with application to power systems,

    S. Bolognani, E. Arcari, and F. D ¨orfler, “A fast method for real-time chance-constrained decision with application to power systems,” IEEE Control Systems Letters , vol. 1, pp. 152–157, July 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Optimal tap setting of voltage regulation transformers in unbalanced distribution systems,

    B. A. Robbins, H. Zhu, and A. D. Domnguez-Garca, “Optimal tap setting of voltage regulation transformers in unbalanced distribution systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, pp. 256–267, Jan 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization . Cambridge University Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Radial distribution test feeders,

    W. Kersting, “Radial distribution test feeders,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 975–985, 1991

    work page 1991

  17. [17]

    Radial distribution test feeders,

    W. H. Kersting, “Radial distribution test feeders,” in IEEE/PES Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 908–912 vol.2, 2001

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    HelioClim-3 Database of Solar Irradiance

    HelioClim-3, “HelioClim-3 Database of Solar Irradiance.” http://www.soda-pro.com/web-services/radiation/ helioclim-3-archives-for-free . [Online]. Accessed: 2017-12-01

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    The Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) Web service

    MERRA-2, “The Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) Web service.” http://www. soda-pro.com/web-services/meteo-data/merra . [On- line]. Accessed: 2017-12-01

    work page 2017