pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11460 · v1 · pith:Z4H2IT6Anew · submitted 2019-07-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.str-el

Classification of topological ladder models

Carlos G. Velasco , Bel\'en Paredes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.str-el
keywords topological ladder modelsWilson fermionsBDI symmetry classAIII symmetry classtopological insulatorsedge modesmomentum distributionbowtie ladder
0
0 comments X

The pith

Topological ladder models reduce to six distinct types via Wilson fermion configurations in BDI and AIII classes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to classify all topological ladder models into six varieties, three belonging to the BDI symmetry class and three to the AIII class. Each variety maps to a distinct arrangement of Wilson fermions whose number, chirality, and mass appear directly in the peaks of the edge-mode momentum distribution. A single canonical geometry, the bowtie ladder, generates every other model through unitary transformations that leave the topological properties unchanged. The classification supplies the full list of ladder geometries and the parameter windows in which each of the six edge-mode signatures can be realized.

Core claim

All topological ladder models fall into six types that correspond to six distinct configurations of Wilson fermions, three in the BDI symmetry class and three in the AIII symmetry class. These configurations are revealed by the number, momentum location, and height of peaks in the momentum distribution of the topological edge modes. The bowtie ladder is identified as the canonical geometry; every other topological ladder is obtained from it by a unitary transformation that preserves the topological character. The work enumerates all possible topological ladder geometries and determines the regimes of parameters that realize each of the six types.

What carries the argument

The bowtie ladder, serving as the canonical geometry from which all other topological ladders are reached by unitary transformations that preserve topology; the direct mapping of each type to a unique Wilson-fermion configuration whose properties dictate the edge-mode momentum peaks.

If this is right

  • The momentum distribution of edge modes directly encodes the number, chirality, and mass of the underlying Wilson fermions.
  • Three topological types exist in the BDI class and three in the AIII class, each with its own signature peak pattern.
  • All topological ladder geometries are generated from the single bowtie geometry by unitary transformations.
  • Each of the six types can be realized only inside specific, listed intervals of the model parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unitary equivalence between geometries implies that experimentalists can choose the ladder shape most convenient for their setup without changing the topological class.
  • The direct link between Wilson-fermion properties and observable momentum peaks offers a practical detection route in ultracold-atom experiments.
  • The classification supplies a finite checklist that future work can use to decide whether a newly proposed ladder model is topologically novel or already covered.

Load-bearing premise

That every topological ladder model can be reached from the bowtie ladder by a unitary transformation that keeps the topological character intact and that the momentum-distribution peaks are produced solely by the number, chirality, and mass of the Wilson fermions.

What would settle it

Discovery of a topological ladder whose edge-mode momentum distribution cannot be reproduced by any of the six predicted Wilson-fermion configurations, or a ladder geometry that cannot be obtained from the bowtie ladder by a topology-preserving unitary map.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11460 by Bel\'en Paredes, Carlos G. Velasco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: , where we show the symmetries of the bowtie lad￾der Hamiltonian and their dependence on its parameters. 2. Hamiltonian matrix structure Alternatively, we can obtain the symmetries of the canonical ladder by analasyng its Hamiltonian matrix. There are two ways in which the Hamiltonian matrix of a ladder with chiral symmetry can be written. On one hand, using two anticommuting Pauli matrices, σ1 and σ2, an… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: (b) and Fig.31(b), respectively. 2. Imposing time reversal symmetry In order to find all ladder models in the BDI class and in the AIII class we need to impose the two time rever￾sal symmetry conditions, Eq. (139) and Eq. (140), to the topological ladder geometries we have obtained before￾hand. When they are fulfilled we have a realization of the BDI class, whereas it corresponds to the AIII class FIG. 31… view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: FIG. 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: FIG. 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: FIG. 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_34.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ladder architectures are fruitful systems to realize topological phases of matter. Here we present a classification of ladder models giving rise to topological insulators. We identify six different types of topological ladder models, three in the BDI symmetry class, and three in the AIII symmetry class. They correspond to six distinct configurations of Wilson fermions. The six types are manifested in distinctive momentum distributions of the corresponding topological edge modes. The number of Wilson fermions, their chirality and mass, are directly manifested in the number, momentum and height of the peaks of the momentum distribution of the corresponding topological edge modes. We identify a canonical ladder geometry, the {\em bowtie ladder}, from which any other topological ladder model can be obtained by a unitary transformation. We identify, classify and list all possible topological ladder geometries, determining the parameter regimes in which each of the six types of topological edge modes can be realized. Our results open a route for the experimental realization and detection of topological insulators in novel symmetry classes with ladder architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper classifies topological ladder models into six types (three in BDI, three in AIII), each corresponding to a distinct configuration of Wilson fermions. It identifies the bowtie ladder as a canonical geometry from which all other topological ladder models can be reached by unitary transformation, determines the parameter regimes realizing each type, and shows that the number, chirality, and mass of the Wilson fermions are directly encoded in the number, location, and height of peaks in the momentum distribution of the topological edge modes.

Significance. If the classification and the one-to-one mapping to Wilson-fermion content hold, the work supplies a systematic enumeration of all topological ladder geometries together with an experimentally accessible momentum-space diagnostic. This would be useful for realizing and detecting topological phases in BDI and AIII classes on ladder architectures.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (canonical bowtie ladder): the claim that every topological ladder geometry is reachable from the bowtie ladder by a unitary transformation that leaves the topological invariant unchanged is load-bearing for the completeness of the six-type enumeration; an explicit check that the relevant topological index (e.g., winding number or Zak phase) is preserved under the full set of allowed unitaries is required.
  2. [§4] §4 (momentum distribution of edge modes): the assertion that the peaks are determined solely by Wilson-fermion number, chirality and mass, with no residual dependence on the original ladder parameters, must be demonstrated by showing that the momentum distribution remains invariant under the unitary maps used to reach the six types; otherwise the diagnostic is not guaranteed to be one-to-one.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the six types (BDI-1, BDI-2, …) should be introduced once and used consistently; the current alternation between “type” and “configuration” is occasionally ambiguous.
  2. Figure captions for the momentum-distribution plots should explicitly state the parameter values at which each panel is computed so that the claimed peak-height correspondence can be verified by the reader.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (canonical bowtie ladder): the claim that every topological ladder geometry is reachable from the bowtie ladder by a unitary transformation that leaves the topological invariant unchanged is load-bearing for the completeness of the six-type enumeration; an explicit check that the relevant topological index (e.g., winding number or Zak phase) is preserved under the full set of allowed unitaries is required.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of topological-index preservation is required to fully substantiate the claim that the bowtie ladder is canonical. The manuscript states that the allowed unitaries preserve the symmetry class (BDI or AIII) and therefore the invariant, but does not compute the index explicitly before and after each map. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that evaluates the winding number (or Zak phase) for representative transformations connecting the six types, confirming invariance in each case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (momentum distribution of edge modes): the assertion that the peaks are determined solely by Wilson-fermion number, chirality and mass, with no residual dependence on the original ladder parameters, must be demonstrated by showing that the momentum distribution remains invariant under the unitary maps used to reach the six types; otherwise the diagnostic is not guaranteed to be one-to-one.

    Authors: We acknowledge that invariance of the momentum distribution under the unitary maps must be shown explicitly if the diagnostic is to be independent of the original ladder geometry. The manuscript demonstrates the correspondence for the bowtie ladder and states that the unitary transformations map the edge-mode wave-functions accordingly, but does not recompute the momentum distribution after each transformation. In the revision we will add explicit calculations confirming that the number, locations, and relative heights of the peaks are unchanged under the maps, thereby establishing the one-to-one character of the diagnostic. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: classification follows from symmetry classes and unitary equivalence without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The derivation identifies six ladder types (3 BDI, 3 AIII) via Wilson-fermion configurations whose signatures appear in edge-mode momentum distributions, starting from a canonical bowtie geometry reachable by unitary maps. No quoted step equates a claimed prediction or invariant to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The enumeration rests on symmetry analysis external to the fitted values of any single model, rendering the chain self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract alone; full paper may contain additional parameters or assumptions. Relies on standard symmetry classification of topological insulators and the concept of Wilson fermions.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard BDI and AIII symmetry classes from the tenfold way classification of topological insulators
    Invoked to define the six types in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Bowtie ladder as canonical geometry no independent evidence
    purpose: Starting point from which all other topological ladder models are obtained via unitary transformation
    Introduced in abstract without independent evidence or derivation shown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5698 in / 1309 out tokens · 30121 ms · 2026-05-24T15:27:31.147590+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    There are two ways in which the Hamiltonian matrix of a ladder with chiral symmetry can be written

    Hamiltonian matrix structure Alternatively, we can obtain the symmetries of the canonical ladder by analasyng its Hamiltonian matrix. There are two ways in which the Hamiltonian matrix of a ladder with chiral symmetry can be written. On one hand, using two anticommuting Pauli matrices, σ1 and σ2, and two functions of the momentum f1(k) and f2(k). This rep...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the presence of this phase δ the Hamiltonian matrix has a different form and breaks time reversal and charge con- jugation symmetries

    Shift in the momentum-isospin correspondence Any model in the BDI symmetry class with Hamilto- nian matrix M(k) can be taken to the AIII symmetry class by adding a shift δ in the momentum-isospin rela- tion; that is, transforming M(k) into M(k− δ). In the presence of this phase δ the Hamiltonian matrix has a different form and breaks time reversal and char...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Effective magnetic flux per plaquette We know that if we add a phaseδ̸= 0, π to a particular bowtie ladder parameter configuration in the BDI class, we obtain a model in the AIII class. The Hamiltonian matrix of the new model will be equal to the Hamilto- nian matrix of the BDI model to which the phase δ has been added, but with a shift of δ with respect to ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We consider the bowtie ladder and define the unitary transformation W as: W : { ˆa† n−→ ˆb† N+1−n ˆb† n−→ ˆa† N+1−n

    Inversion-reflection-conjugation symmetry The bowtie ladder model has an inversion-reflection- conjugation (IRC) symmetry, which can be used in order to obtain important information about the wave function of the edge modes. We consider the bowtie ladder and define the unitary transformation W as: W : { ˆa† n−→ ˆb† N+1−n ˆb† n−→ ˆa† N+1−n. (74) It is clearly...

    work page

  5. [5]

    That is, being the edge mode|e⟩ in Eq.(84) an eigenstate of the bowtie ladder Hamiltonian with some energy E, then the state US|e⟩ is another eigenstate with energy −E

    Chiral symmetry and edge modes polarization The presence of chiral symmetry makes all eigenstates come in pairs of opposite energy, being the two eigen- states of each pair connected by the chiral operator US. That is, being the edge mode|e⟩ in Eq.(84) an eigenstate of the bowtie ladder Hamiltonian with some energy E, then the state US|e⟩ is another eigen...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Zero energy approximation A very good approximation of the edge modes wave function can be obtained by considering them to be zero energy eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. We start by separating the bowtie ladder Hamiltonian for periodic boundary conditions, Hprdc, into two parts: the bowtie ladder Hamiltonian for open boundary con- ditions, Hopen, and an e...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Both states have the same mo- mentum density distribution: ⟨ˆnk⟩ = 1 κ ρ2(k) , (109) where ˆnk = ˆa† kˆak+ˆb† k ˆbk

    Edge modes in momentum space The momentum density distribution of the edge states can be easily obtained from their wave functions, Eq.(107) and Eq.(108). Both states have the same mo- mentum density distribution: ⟨ˆnk⟩ = 1 κ ρ2(k) , (109) where ˆnk = ˆa† kˆak+ˆb† k ˆbk. Due to the polarization property of the edge states we know that, in the particular c...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Edge modes in position space In the case of the position space, each edge sate shows a different density distribution. However, they are not independent from each other, as the wave function of the edge state |r⟩ can be obtained by complex conjugating and reflecting the wave function of the edge state |l⟩, see Eq. (92) and Eq. (93). We have: ⟨l| ˆnx|l⟩ =|ψ(...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (114), Eq

    Simultaneous momentum-position localization From the approximated momentum and spatial density distributions of the edge states, Eq. (114), Eq. (124) and Eq. (127), and their corresponding localization lengths, δkj = 2ξj √√ 2− 1 and δxj = log 2/(2ξj), we know that the larger an energy gap is, the better defined the posi- tion of the corresponding edge stat...

    work page

  10. [10]

    In this context, if a Hamiltonian H presents timer re- versal symmetry there is a global unitary transformation UT such that: UT H U† T = H

    Symmetry class correspondence There exists a relation between the symmetry class of the Hamiltonian and the momentum of the symmetry protected edge modes that the system exhibits when it is found to be in its topologically non-trivial phase. In this context, if a Hamiltonian H presents timer re- versal symmetry there is a global unitary transformation UT ...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Imposing chiral symetry In order to obtain all ladder geometries realizing a model for a topological insulator we first remark on two ingredients which are needed for a ladder geometry to be chiral symmetric:

    work page

  12. [12]

    The chiral symmetry implies that the Hamiltonian ma- trix has no component proportional to the identity

    Opposite horizontal couplings. The chiral symmetry implies that the Hamiltonian ma- trix has no component proportional to the identity. As a consequence, the two horizontal tunneling am- plitudes must have the same modulus and opposite sing. That is, either both terms appear in the ladder configuration or none of them does

    work page

  13. [13]

    If a model has no diagonal couplings, that is t = t′ = 0, the condition for chiral symmetry (138) is fulfilled independently of the rest of the parameters

    Non-vanishing diagonal couplings. If a model has no diagonal couplings, that is t = t′ = 0, the condition for chiral symmetry (138) is fulfilled independently of the rest of the parameters. However, such a model will always be in a trivial phase. To see this we consider the most general lad- der model with no diagonal couplings, see Fig. 27, whose correspo...

    work page

  14. [14]

    (138), vanishes and, thus, the on-site energy can take any value

    If the two diagonal couplings are the same, t = t′, the first term in the chiral condition, Eq. (138), vanishes and, thus, the on-site energy can take any value. The chiral condition is then fulfilled if FIG. 29. Ladder geometries with chiral symmetry (ii). Topological ladder geometries with one diagonal coupling and constrained on-site energy. 30 FIG. 30. ...

    work page

  15. [15]

    This corresponds to the last model [Fig

    If the two diagonal couplings are different, t̸= t′, the chiral condition implies a constraint to the on- site energy ϵ = 2J J′ (t cos φ1− t′ cos φ2) /(t2− t′2). This corresponds to the last model [Fig. 31(b)]. In this way we have obtained twelve topological ladder geometries, Fig. 28, Fig. 29, Fig. 30 and Fig. 31. How- ever, some of them correspond to a H...

    work page

  16. [16]

    (139) and Eq

    Imposing time reversal symmetry In order to find all ladder models in the BDI class and in the AIII class we need to impose the two time rever- sal symmetry conditions, Eq. (139) and Eq. (140), to the topological ladder geometries we have obtained before- hand. When they are fulfilled we have a realization of the BDI class, whereas it corresponds to the AII...

    work page

  17. [17]

    H¨ ugel and B

    D. H¨ ugel and B. Paredes, Phys. Rev. A 89, 023619 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, S. Nascimb` ene, S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 255301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes and I. Bloch, Nat. Phys. 10, 588 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Boada, A

    O. Boada, A. Celi, J. I. Latorre and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 133001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N Goldman, I. B. Spielman, G. Juzeli¯ unas and M. Lewenstein, Phys. 34 Rev. Lett. 112, 043001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Mancini, G

    M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte and L. Fallani, Science 349, 1510 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    B. K. Stuhl, H.-I. Lu, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina and I. B. Spielman, Science 349, 1514 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    L. F. Livi, G. Cappellini, M. Diem, L. Franchi, C. Clivati, M. Frittelli, F. Levi, D. Calonico, J. Catani, M. Inguscio and L. Fallani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 220401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Kolkowitz, S

    S. Kolkowitz, S. L. Bromley, T. Bothwell, M. L. Wall, G. E. Marti, A. P. Koller, X. Zhang, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Nature 542, 66 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    F. A. An, E. J. Maier and B. Gadway Sci. Adv. 3, e1602685 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    J. H. Kang, J. H. Han, and Y. Shin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 150403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    J. H. Han, J. H. Kang, and Y. Shin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 065303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    J. H. Kang, J. H. Han, and Y. il Shin, preprint arXiv:1902.10304 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1902

  31. [31]

    Anisimovas, M

    E. Anisimovas, M. Raˇ ci¯ unas, C. Str¨ ater, A. Eckardt, I. B. Spielman and G. Juzeli¯ unas, Phys. Rev. A 94, 063632 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    J¨ unemann, A

    J. J¨ unemann, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Lewenstein, M. Rizzi and A. Bermudez, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031057 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, P. Massig- nan, T. L. Hughes, B. Gadway, Science 362, 929 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, preprint arXiv:1810.13286

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Gholizadeh, M

    S. Gholizadeh, M. Yahyavi and B. Het´ enyi, EPL, 122, 27001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki and A. W. W. Lud- wig, New J. Phys. 12, 065010 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142 (1997)

    work page 1997

  39. [39]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    work page 1979

  40. [40]

    A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer and W. P. Su, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988)

    work page 1988

  41. [41]

    Sierra, J

    G. Sierra, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 325204 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreire, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler and I. Bloch, Nat. Phys. 9, 795 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, B. Gadway, Nat Commun.7, 13986 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Leder, C

    M. Leder, C. Grossert, L. Sitta, M. Genske, A. Rosch, and M. Weitz, Nat Commun. 7, 13112 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Wilson, in New Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics , edited by A

    K. Wilson, in New Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics , edited by A. Zichichi (Plenum, New York, 1977)

    work page 1977

  46. [46]

    Creutz and I

    M. Creutz and I. Horv´ ath, Phys. Rev. D50, 2297 (1994)

    work page 1994

  47. [47]

    Creutz, Rev

    M. Creutz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 119 (2001)

    work page 2001