Pith. sign in

REVIEW 24 references

The order of convergence of an optimal quadrature formula with derivative in the space $W_2^{(2,1)}$

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper claims an optimal endpoint-corrected trapezoidal rule in the Sobolev space W_2^{(2,1)} with an O(h^4) error, but the proof of the error formula is algebraically inconsistent.

arxiv 1908.00450 v1 pith:5OHJ2H7E submitted 2019-08-01 math.NA cs.NA

classification math.NAcs.NA
keywords formulaquadratureerrorobtainedoptimalspacecoefficientsderivative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

When approximating an integral, the trapezoidal rule uses function values at evenly spaced points. This paper adds corrections using the derivative of the function at the two endpoints. The authors work in a space of functions whose second derivative plus first derivative is square-integrable, called W_2^{(2,1)}. They use a technique from Sergei Sobolev to find the best possible endpoint correction coefficients. Their formula looks like the trapezoidal rule plus a small term proportional to the derivative difference at the endpoints, with the proportionality constant depending on the step size h.

The authors claim the error of this rule decreases like h^4, and they provide an explicit asymptotic expansion. They also say the error is smaller than the Euler-Maclaurin rule on a different function space.

The problems are in the proof. The paper prints an expression for the square of the error that includes terms like 1/(2h) and 1/(12h^2) that blow up as h shrinks, which cannot match the claimed h^4 expansion. The intermediate formulas for A1, A2, A3, and A4 do not add up to the claimed final value. For example, with h=1, the printed A values give a large negative number, while the claimed norm is small and positive. There is also a sign inconsistency between the error functional and the condition for exactness for e^{-x}. Finally, comparing the error in W_2^{(2,1)} with the Euler-Maclaurin error in L_2^{(2)} compares norms in different spaces, so the comparison does not mean what the abstract says.

Because of these issues, the central error-order claim is not supported by the derivation as written.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4: the square of the norm of the error functional for the optimal quadrature formula with coefficients (2) and (33) is ||l||^2 = 1/720 h^4 - 1/30240 h^6 + O(h^8), giving an O(h^4) order of convergence and, per Remark 2, an error smaller than the Euler-Maclaurin formula on L_2^{(2)}.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the algebra in the minimization and norm computation is correct, specifically that the Lagrange system (20)-(21) has the stated unique solution and that the expressions A1-A4 in Theorem 4 evaluate to the printed values. As printed, equation (7) has the wrong sign for the C1 terms relative to error functional (5), and the A1-A4 values for h=1 do not combine to the claimed norm. If these are not mere typos, the central error-order claim does not follow.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or fitted constants are introduced. The central claim rests on prior results about extremal functions and discrete analogs, plus an unproved uniqueness assertion for the Lagrange system.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption W_2^{(2,1)}(0,1) with pseudo-inner product <phi,psi>=∫(phi''+phi')(psi''+psi')dx is a Hilbert space after identifying functions differing by span{1,e^{-x}}.
    Stated at the start of Section 1 with citation to [1]; all norm computations depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption Theorem 1 of [16] gives the extremal function form and norm identity for the error functional in W_2^{(m,m-1)}.
    Quoted in Section 2 and used to obtain (15) and (17); the present paper does not prove it.
  • domain assumption Theorem 2 of [14] provides the discrete analog D1 of d^2/dx^2-1 with properties (24)-(25).
    Used in Section 3.1 to solve the coefficient system; no proof is repeated.
  • domain assumption The system (20)-(21) has a unique solution for every N that gives the minimum of (17).
    Explicitly stated as omitted in Section 3: 'Here we omit the proof of the existence and uniqueness.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The order of convergence of an optimal quadrature formula with derivative in the space $W_2^{(2,1)}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5OHJ2H7E

@misc{pith2026190800450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The order of convergence of an optimal quadrature formula with derivative in the space $W_2^(2,1)$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5OHJ2H7E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00450}
}
abstract

The present work is devoted to extension of the trapezoidal rule in the space $W_2^{(2,1)}$. The optimal quadrature formula is obtained by minimizing the error of the formula by coefficients at values of the first derivative of a integrand. Using the discrete analog of the operator $\frac{d^2}{dx^{2}}-1$ the explicit formulas for the coefficients of the optimal quadrature formula are obtained. Furthermore, it is proved that the obtained quadrature formula is exact for any function of the set $\mathbf{F}=\mathrm{span}\{1,x,e^{x},e^{-x}\}$. Finally, in the space $W_2^{(2,1)}$ the square of the norm of the error functional of the constructed quadrature formula is calculated. It is shown that the error of the obtained optimal quadrature formula is less than the error of the Euler-Maclaurin quadrature formula on the space $L_2^{(2)}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahlberg, E.N

    J.H. Ahlberg, E.N. Nilson, J.L. W alsh, The Theory of Splin es and Their Applications, Academic Press, New York – London, 1967

  2. [2]

    Babuˇ ska, Optimal quadrature formulas (Russian), Dokladi Akad

    I. Babuˇ ska, Optimal quadrature formulas (Russian), Dokladi Akad. Nauk SSSR. 149 (1963) 227–229

  3. [3]

    Blaga, Gh

    P. Blaga, Gh. Coman, Some problems on optimal quadrature, Stud. Univ. Babe¸ s-Bolyai Math. 52, no. 4 (2007) 21–44

  4. [4]

    Catina¸ s, Gh

    T. Catina¸ s, Gh. Coman, Optimal quadrature formulas base d on the φ -function method, Stud. Univ. Babe¸ s-Bolyai Math. 51, no. 1 (2006) 49–64

  5. [5]

    Hayotov, G.V

    A.R. Hayotov, G.V. Milovanovi´ c, Kh.M. Shadimetov, On an optimal quadrature formula in the sense of Sard. Numerical Algorithms, v.57, no. 4, (201 1) 487-510

  6. [6]

    Hayotov, G.V

    A.R. Hayotov, G.V. Milovanovi´ c, Kh.M. Shadimetov, Opti mal quadratures in the sense of Sard in a Hilbert space. Applied Mathematics and Computatio n, 259 (2015) 637-653

  7. [7]

    K¨ ohler, On the weights of Sard’s quadrature formulas, Calcolo, 25 (1988) 169–186

    P. K¨ ohler, On the weights of Sard’s quadrature formulas, Calcolo, 25 (1988) 169–186

  8. [8]

    Lanzara, On optimal quadrature formulae, J

    F. Lanzara, On optimal quadrature formulae, J. Ineq. Appl . 5 (2000) 201–225

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    Micchelli, Best quadrature formulas at equally spac ed nodes, J

    C.A. Micchelli, Best quadrature formulas at equally spac ed nodes, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 47 (1974) 232-249

  2. [10]

    Nikolskii, Quadrature Formulas, Nauka, Moscow, 19 88.(in Russian)

    S.M. Nikolskii, Quadrature Formulas, Nauka, Moscow, 19 88.(in Russian)

  3. [11]

    Sard, Best approximate integration formulas; best ap proximation formulas, Amer

    A. Sard, Best approximate integration formulas; best ap proximation formulas, Amer. J. Math. 71 (1949) 80–91

  4. [12]

    Schoenberg, On monosplines of least deviation and b est quadrature formulae, J

    I.J. Schoenberg, On monosplines of least deviation and b est quadrature formulae, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. Ser. B Numer. Anal. 2 (1965) 144-170

  5. [13]

    Schoenberg, S.D

    I.J. Schoenberg, S.D. Silliman, On semicardinal quadra ture formulae. Math. Comp. 28 (1974) 483–497

  6. [14]

    Shadimetov, A.R

    Kh.M. Shadimetov, A.R. Hayotov, Construction of the dis crete analogue of the differential operator d2m dx2m − d2m− 2 dx2m− 2 , Uzbek mathematical journal, 2004, no.2, pp. 85-95

  7. [15]

    Shadimetov, A.R

    Kh.M. Shadimetov, A.R. Hayotov, Optimal quadrature for mulas with positive coefficients in L(m) 2 (0, 1) space, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235 (2011) 1114–1128

  8. [16]

    Shadimetov, A.R

    Kh.M. Shadimetov, A.R. Hayotov, Optimal quadrature for mulas in the sense of Sard in W (m,m− 1) 2 space, Calcolo 51 (2014) 211–243

  9. [17]

    Shadimetov, A.R

    Kh.M. Shadimetov, A.R. Hayotov, F.A. Nuraliev, On an opt imal quadrature formula in Sobolev space L(m) 2 (0, 1), J. Comput. Appl. Math. 243 (2013) 91–112

  10. [18]

    Shadimetov, A.R

    Kh.M. Shadimetov, A.R. Hayotov, F.A. Nuraliev, Optimal quadrature formulas of Euler- Maclaurin type, Applied Mathematics and Computation 276 (2 016) 340–355. 12 Abdullo R. Hayotov ∗ , Rashidjon G. Rasulov

  11. [19]

    Shadimetov, F.A

    Kh.M. Shadimetov, F.A. Nuraliev, Optimal formulas of nu merical integration with deriva- tives in Sobolev space, Journal of Siberian Federal Univers ity. Math. and Phys. 2018, 11 (6) 764-775

  12. [20]

    Sobolev, The coefficients of optimal quadrature form ulas, Selected W orks of S.L

    S.L. Sobolev, The coefficients of optimal quadrature form ulas, Selected W orks of S.L. Sobolev, Springer, (2006) 561–566

  13. [21]

    Sobolev, Introduction to the Theory of Cubature For mulas (Russian), Nauka, Moscow, 1974

    S.L. Sobolev, Introduction to the Theory of Cubature For mulas (Russian), Nauka, Moscow, 1974

  14. [22]

    Sobolev, V.L

    S.L. Sobolev, V.L. Vaskevich, The Theory of Cubature For mulas, Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers Group, Dordrecht, 1997

  15. [23]

    Zagirova, On construction of optimal quadrature f ormulas with equal spaced nodes (Russian)

    F.Ya. Zagirova, On construction of optimal quadrature f ormulas with equal spaced nodes (Russian). Novosibirsk (1982), 28 p. (Preprint No. 25, Inst itute of Mathematics SD of AS of USSR)

  16. [24]

    Zhensikbaev, Monosplines of minimal norm and the be st quadrature formulas, Us- pekhi Mat

    A.A. Zhensikbaev, Monosplines of minimal norm and the be st quadrature formulas, Us- pekhi Mat. Nauk. 1981, 36, 107–159

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.