Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Focusing large spectral bandwidths through scattering media

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a wavefront-shaped refocus through thin or forward-scattering media has a three-dimensional spectral memory, widening the usable range from 18 nm to 87 nm, and to 260 nm with broadband excitation.

desk verdict Solid demonstration of axial spatio-spectral memory in thin scattering media; the broadband 260 nm claim needs a spectral isolation check before it carries the paper's second conclusion. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01243 v1 pith:G4D7Y2KK submitted 2019-08-03 physics.optics

Arturo G. Vesga , Matthias Hofer , Naveen Kumar Balla , Hilton B. De Aguiar , Marc Guillon , Sophie Brasselet This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords wavefrontshapingspectralmemoryspecklecorrelationspatio-spectralcouplingscatteringmediaconfocalgeometrybroadbandtransmissionmatrixnonlinearbio-imaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Wavefront shaping can refocus light that has passed through a scattering medium, but the refocus was thought to survive only over the medium's speckle correlation bandwidth—about 18 nm in the thin diffuser studied here. This paper shows that the spectral memory is actually three-dimensional: when the wavelength is detuned, the best-focus plane moves axially along a predictable curve, so scanning the detection plane recovers the focus out to about 87 nm, almost five times farther. The axial spread is smallest in a confocal geometry, where the refocus plane sits at the geometric focus; there the usable bandwidth is limited only by the medium itself. Using a broadband femtosecond pulse and measuring the broadband transmission matrix extends the range further, to 260 nm, because the measurement acts as a coherent time gate. These results matter because multicolour nonlinear microscopies—CARS, sum-frequency, and four-wave-mixing—need to focus several wavelengths at once through scattering tissue.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the axial spatio-spectral coupling of speckle in convergent illumination, described by Eq. (1): a parabolic phase inside the Fresnel integral makes wavelength and axial distance interchangeable. This identity creates the 3D spectral memory; it is what allows axial translation $\delta z$ to compensate wavelength detuning $\delta\lambda$. The second mechanism is the broadband transmission matrix, whose self-referenced interferometric measurement acts as a coherent time gate, preserving short trajectories and thereby enlarging the refocus bandwidth beyond the intensity-speckle correlation bandwidth.

What would settle it

Take the same thin diffuser and vary the distance $z_1$ between the diffuser and the geometric focus from 1 mm to 5 mm while recording the axial shift needed to recover correlation at a fixed detuning; the shift should grow roughly in the way predicted by $\lambda z z_1/(z-z_1)=\text{const.}$ A curve independent of $z_1$, or a sample with thickness exceeding its transport mean free path that still shows 3D enhancement, would break the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' terms, the discovery is that a wavefront-shaped refocus through a thin or forward-scattering medium obeys a spatio-spectral memory: the complex field behind the medium retains the parabolic phase of the excitation objective, so changing the wavelength is equivalent, to first order, to moving the observation plane along the optical axis. The Fresnel model (Eq. 1) predicts correlation is conserved along surfaces $\lambda z z_1/(z-z_1)=\text{const.}$, and the experiments confirm this curve: with $z_1=5$ mm, the 3D speckle bandwidth $\Delta\lambda_{3D}=87$ nm versus $\Delta\lambda=18$ nm in 2D, with an axial extent of about 30 $\mu$m. The confocal arrangement, $z_2=0$, minimizes the axial expansion and makes the measured bandwidth an intrinsic property of the medium. In the broadband regime, a 150 fs, 8 nm pulse measured through the broadband transmission matrix gives $\Delta\lambda_{3D}=260$ nm, about three times the monochromatic 3D value and larger than the 80 nm intensity-speckle correlation, an effect the authors attribute to coherent time gating that selects short propagation paths.

Load-bearing premise

The effect assumes the sample is thin enough, or scatters mostly forward, that the lens's focusing curvature is not completely erased; in a thick sample that fully scrambles the wavefront, the effect is absent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single transmission matrix can refocus a range of wavelengths if the detection plane is translated axially along the predicted spatio-spectral curve, removing the need to re-measure the matrix at each colour.
  • In tissues that scatter mainly forward (anisotropy factor close to 1), millimetre-scale samples should support the same 5- to 10-fold bandwidth enhancement seen in diffusers, so multicolour nonlinear imaging in depth becomes feasible.
  • Broadband femtosecond excitation should yield refocus bandwidths several times the medium's speckle correlation bandwidth, up to 260 nm in the demonstrated geometry, because coherent gating favours short paths.
  • Spectral characterization of a scattering medium should report both 2D and 3D bandwidths; quoting only the 2D value underestimates usable bandwidth in thin media.
  • In non-confocal configurations, the axial shift can be compensated by adding a correction wavefront, potentially making sequential wavelength-by-wavelength optimization unnecessary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the slope $\Delta\lambda_{3D}/\Delta z$ in the model is governed by $z_1$, the predicted scaling with sample-to-focus distance is directly testable; verifying it across several $z_1$ values would separate the geometrical-phase effect from residual chromatic aberration.
  • The same spatio-spectral invariance may apply to spatial memory effects: if the medium preserves the parabolic phase, a lateral shift of the input beam might also be convertible into a wavelength shift, extending the result to multispectral wide-field imaging rather than point focusing.
  • The broadband transmission matrix's coherent gating suggests that the refocus bandwidth may be limited by the incident laser bandwidth rather than by the medium in sufficiently forward-scattering samples; if so, octave-spanning sources could push the usable range further.
  • The thick-TiO2 control implies a practical selection rule: the 3D bandwidth enhancement is available only when the transport mean free path exceeds the sample thickness; this could be used as a quick diagnostic to decide whether axial spectral scanning will help in an unknown tissue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments and a Fresnel-propagation model addressing how the spectral bandwidth of a wavefront-shaped focus through scattering media depends on axial geometry and on the excitation bandwidth. In the quasi-monochromatic regime, the authors show that when the detection plane is translated axially as the wavelength is detuned, speckle correlation and focus quality are recovered over a spectral range several times larger than the conventional 2D speckle correlation bandwidth (e.g., 87 nm versus 18 nm for a diffuser). They interpret this through an axial spatio-spectral coupling and show that the required axial translation is minimized in the confocal geometry. They extend the measurement to a mouse brain slice and to TiO2 samples, and report that the effect disappears in a thick multiply scattering control. In a second set of experiments with a 150 fs, 8 nm bandwidth source, they report a further enlarged 3D bandwidth of about 260 nm and attribute this to coherent time-gating in broadband transmission-matrix measurements.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper is significant for multispectral and nonlinear imaging through scattering media: it identifies a practically useful degree of freedom (axial refocusing) that is not captured by the usual 2D spectral correlation bandwidth, and it provides a simple parameter-free Fresnel model for the observed invariance. The experimental work includes valuable controls: the chromatic-aberration control (less than 30% of the observed axial shift) and the thick-TiO2 control showing loss of spatio-spectral memory. The model is not fitted to produce the main effect, and the 3D bandwidth is an empirical observable. The main weakness is that the broadband-enlargement claim, which is the second pillar of the abstract, rests on measurements that lack a direct spectral-isolation test. The reported 260 nm bandwidth therefore needs additional support before the claim can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Fig. 5] The central broadband claim, that a single broadband transmission matrix yields a refocus over a 260 nm range, is not supported by a spectral isolation measurement. The TM is measured with a source whose spectral width is about 8 nm at λ0 = 785 nm, yet the reported Δλ3D is 260 nm, roughly thirty times the source bandwidth. The manuscript does not show that a phase pattern measured at λ0 produces an actual enhancement at a detuned wavelength, e.g., 130 nm away, when the output is detected through a narrowband spectral filter. Without such a check, the 260 nm value could be inflated by wavelength-integrated intensity from the 8 nm pulse or by the particular correlation threshold used. I request a direct experiment in which the source is tuned to a detuned wavelength and the refocus enhancement is measured with spectral filtering at the output, or an explicit comparison with a multispectral TM measurement over the same range.
  2. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 5] The quantitative definition of the 3D bandwidth is under-specified. The text states that Δλ3D is the speckle spectral width obtained when correlations are measured at the planes of highest correlation for each wavelength, but no threshold criterion (e.g., 1/e of the maximum correlation), fit function, or uncertainty is given. The central numerical comparisons (18 nm vs 87 nm vs 260 nm, and the factor-of-3 and factor-of-5 claims) depend directly on this definition. Please state the exact criterion used to extract each bandwidth value, report error bars or confidence intervals, and specify how many independent measurements underlie each reported number.
  3. [Sec. 3, Fig. 3] The claim that the confocal geometry minimizes the axial extent of the 3D bandwidth is supported only by qualitative agreement with the model and by data shown without error bars. Figure 3c compares experimental points to the law λ z z1/(z−z1) = const but no quantitative measure of agreement is given. Since this is a central conclusion of the paper, please provide a statistical or quantitative assessment of the agreement, or at minimum report the measurement uncertainty on the δz values used to extract the Δz extents.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 7] The acknowledgment heading is numbered 7.1, duplicating the funding heading; it should be 7.2.
  2. [Author affiliations] The affiliation line '3Currently with the Department of Electronic Journals' appears to be erroneous and should be removed or corrected.
  3. [Sec. 2, Fig. 2] The 2D speckle correlation curve is fit by a Gaussian, but the fit function and the criterion for extracting the 18 nm and 87 nm widths are not given; please state them explicitly.
  4. [Sec. 5, Fig. 5] The text says the confocal geometry has z2 = z1 = 0, but Fig. 5a shows z1 being varied; please clarify the exact geometry used for the broadband experiments and for each panel of Fig. 5.
  5. [Sec. 4, Fig. 4] The biological tissue results are presented as a single point in Fig. 4 with no indication of the number of samples or repeat measurements; a sentence on sample size and reproducibility would strengthen the claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the 3D and broadband spectral-memory claims rest on independent measurements and a standard Fresnel model; only non-load-bearing self-citations are present.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. Eq. (1) is the standard Fresnel-Kirchhoff intensity formula for a thin diffuser under convergent illumination, taken from Ref. 21 rather than introduced ad hoc; the invariance lambda*z*z1/(z-z1)=const emerges directly from the parabolic phase term when the observation is on-axis, with no fitted parameter. The 3D bandwidth is defined operationally as the spectral width obtained when correlation is measured at the best axial plane for each wavelength; although this definition includes an axial search, the reported values (87 nm in the ps regime, 260 nm in the broadband regime) are measured observable widths, not outputs of a model whose inputs already contain those widths. The model is used only for qualitative comparison with the measured delta-z versus delta-lambda relation, not to predict the bandwidth from a fitted parameter. The broadband claim is attributed to the coherent time-gating effect of a broadband transmission matrix, citing Refs. 38 and 41; Ref. 38 includes a current co-author (H. B. de Aguiar), but it is an independent prior experimental demonstration and is corroborated by the non-overlapping Ref. 41. Other self-citations (Refs. 9, 23, 27, 40) support background and methods and are not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem is invoked, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no known result is merely renamed. Experimental concerns such as the absence of an explicit spectral-isolation check for the 260 nm broadband value are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no parameters to data. The central claims rest on standard Fresnel propagation, an explicit achromatic-diffuser approximation, prior literature on forward-scattering tissue parameters, and a prior broadband transmission-matrix time-gating mechanism.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The Fresnel propagation formula (Eq. 1) describes the speckle formed by a thin diffuser under convergent illumination.
    Used in Sec. 3 to derive the invariance law lambda z z1/(z-z1)=const and to interpret axial spatio-spectral coupling. This is standard diffraction theory.
  • domain assumption The scattering medium transmission coefficient G(x,y) is achromatic over the tested spectral range.
    Explicitly stated as an approximation near the end of Sec. 3: 'we assumed in the model that the transmission coefficient of the diffuser is achromatic, which is an approximation.' If false, the predicted invariance law would not hold.
  • domain assumption Biological tissue samples are forward-scattering with anisotropy factor g close to 1 and transport mean free path larger than the 1 mm thickness, preserving the geometrical phase memory of the excitation wavefront.
    In Sec. 4, the paper cites Jacques [28] for tissue parameters and argues that spatio-spectral coupling persists because the transport mean free path exceeds 1 mm. The thick TiO2 control shows the effect disappears when this assumption fails.
  • domain assumption A broadband transmission matrix measurement produces a coherent time-gating effect that favors short optical paths, as established in Ref. [38].
    In Sec. 5, the paper attributes the enlarged 3D bandwidth of 260 nm to this mechanism. If the effect were not real, the interpretation of the broadband enhancement would change, though the measured refocus bandwidth itself would remain an empirical result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Focusing large spectral bandwidths through scattering media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G4D7Y2KK

@misc{pith2026190801243,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Focusing large spectral bandwidths through scattering media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G4D7Y2KK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01243}
}
read the original abstract

Wavefront shaping is a powerful method to refocus light through a scattering medium. Its application to large spectral bandwidths or multiple wavelengths refocusing for nonlinear bio-imaging in-depth is however limited by spectral decorrelations. In this work, we demonstrate ways to access a large spectral memory of a refocus in thin scattering media and thick forward-scattering biological tissues. First, we show that the accessible spectral bandwidth through a scattering medium involves an axial spatio-spectral coupling, which can be minimized when working in a confocal geometry. Second, we show that this bandwidth can be further enlarged when working in a broadband excitation regime. These results open important prospects for multispectral nonlinear imaging through scattering media.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01243 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Experimental layout. O1, O2: objectives. SLM: spatial light modulator. L1,L2 (lenses) are used to image the SLM on the back focal plane of O1. L3 (lens) is used to image the refocus plane on the CCD camera. (b) Positioning of the sample and objectives. 𝑧1 = SF is the distance between the scattering medium (here a diffuser) and the geometrical focus (F). 𝑧2 = FR is the distance between F and the refocus plane R a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Broadband refocussing in the multispectral regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Direct wavefront sensing for high-resolution in vivo imaging in scattering tissue,

    K. Wang, W. Sun, C. T. Richie, B. K. Harvey, E. Betzig, and N. Ji, "Direct wavefront sensing for high-resolution in vivo imaging in scattering tissue," Nat. Commun. 6(1), 7276 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    High-resolution in vivo imaging of mouse brain through the intact skull.,

    J.-H. Park, W. Sun, and M. Cui, "High-resolution in vivo imaging of mouse brain through the intact skull.," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112(30), 9236–41 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    R. K. Tyson, Principles of Adaptive Optics (n.d.)

    work page

  4. [4]

    Adaptive optics in microscopy.,

    M. J. Booth, "Adaptive optics in microscopy.," Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1861), 2829–43 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    J. A. Kubby, Adaptive Optics for Biological Imaging (CRC Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media,

    I. M. Vellekoop and A. P. Mosk, "Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media," Opt. Lett. 32(16), 2309 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Measuring the Transmission Matrix in Optics: An Approach to the Study and Control of Light Propagation in Disordered Media,

    S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, "Measuring the Transmission Matrix in Optics: An Approach to the Study and Control of Light Propagation in Disordered Media," Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(10), 100601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Smart optical coherence tomography for ultra-deep imaging through highly scattering media,

    A. Badon, D. Li, G. Lerosey, A. C. Boccara, M. Fink, and A. Aubry, "Smart optical coherence tomography for ultra-deep imaging through highly scattering media," Sci. Adv. 2(11), e1600370 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Enhanced nonlinear imaging through scattering media using transmission-matrix-based wave-front shaping,

    H. B. De Aguiar, S. Gigan, and S. Brasselet, "Enhanced nonlinear imaging through scattering media using transmission-matrix-based wave-front shaping," Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 94(4), (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Multicolor two-photon imaging of endogenous fluorophores in living tissues by wavelength mixing,

    C. Stringari, L. Abdeladim, G. Malkinson, P. Mahou, X. Solinas, I. Lamarre, S. Brizion, J.-B. Galey, W. Supatto, R. Legouis, A.-M. Pena, and E. Beaurepaire, "Multicolor two-photon imaging of endogenous fluorophores in living tissues by wavelength mixing," Sci. Rep. 7(1), 3792 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    A technicolour approach to the connectome,

    J. W. Lichtman, J. Livet, and J. R. Sanes, "A technicolour approach to the connectome," Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9(6), 417–422 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: An emerging platform for biology and medicine.,

    J.-X. Cheng and X. S. Xie, "Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: An emerging platform for biology and medicine.," Science 350(6264), aaa8870 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Hyperspectral imaging with laser - scanning sum-frequency generation microscopy,

    A. Hanninen, M. W. Shu, and E. O. Potma, "Hyperspectral imaging with laser - scanning sum-frequency generation microscopy," Biomed. Opt. Express 8(9), 4230 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Frequency bandwidth of light focused through turbid media,

    F. van Beijnum, E. G. van Putten, A. Lagendijk, and A. P. Mosk, "Frequency bandwidth of light focused through turbid media," Opt. Lett. 36(3), 373 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Prospects of coherent control in turbid media: Bounds on focusing broadband laser pulses,

    E. A. Shapiro, T. M. Drane, and V. Milner, "Prospects of coherent control in turbid media: Bounds on focusing broadband laser pulses," Phys. Rev. A 84(5), 053807 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Direct determination of diffusion properties of random media from speckle contrast,

    N. Curry, P. Bondareff, M. Leclercq, N. F. van Hulst, R. Sapienza, S. Gigan, and S. Grésillon, "Direct determination of diffusion properties of random media from speckle contrast," Opt. Lett. 36(17), 3332 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Focusing polychromatic light through strongly scattering media,

    H. P. Paudel, C. Stockbridge, J. Mertz, and T. Bifano, "Focusing polychromatic light through strongly scattering media," Opt. Express 21(14), 17299 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Deterministic control of broadband light through a multiply scattering medium via the multispectral transmission matrix,

    D. Andreoli, G. Volpe, S. Popoff, O. Katz, S. Grésillon, and S. Gigan, "Deterministic control of broadband light through a multiply scattering medium via the multispectral transmission matrix," Sci. Rep. 5(1), 10347 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Non-invasive single-shot imaging through scattering layers and around corners via speckle correlations,

    O. Katz, P. Heidmann, M. Fink, and S. Gigan, "Non-invasive single-shot imaging through scattering layers and around corners via speckle correlations," Nat. Photo nics 8(10), 784–790 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    J. W. Goodman, Speckle Phenomena in Optics : Theory and Applications (Roberts & Co, 2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Information inferred from the observation of speckles,

    M. May, "Information inferred from the observation of speckles," J. Phys. E. 10(9), 849–864 (1977)

    1977

  14. [22]

    Spatio-temporal X-wave,

    E. Small, O. Katz, Y. Eshel, Y. Silberberg, and D. Oron, "Spatio-temporal X-wave," Opt. Express 17(21), 18659 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Manipulating the transmission matrix of scattering media for nonlinear imaging beyond the memory effect,

    M. Hofer and S. Brasselet, "Manipulating the transmission matrix of scattering media for nonlinear imaging beyond the memory effect," Opt. Lett. 44(9), 2137 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Imaging of objects through a thin scattering layer using a spectrally and spatially separated reference,

    X. Xu, X. Xie, A. Thendiyammal, H. Zhuang, J. Xie, Y. Liu, J. Zhou, and A. P. Mosk, "Imaging of objects through a thin scattering layer using a spectrally and spatially separated reference," Opt. Express 26(12), 15073 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Depth-resolved and auto-focus imaging through scattering layer with wavelength compensation,

    J. Liang, J. Cai, J. Xie, X. Xie, J. Zhou, and X. Yu, "Depth-resolved and auto-focus imaging through scattering layer with wavelength compensation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 36(6), 944 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Noninvasive nonlinear focusing and imaging through strongly scattering turbid layers,

    O. Katz, E. Small, Y. Guan, and Y. Silberberg, "Noninvasive nonlinear focusing and imaging through strongly scattering turbid layers," Optica 1(3), 170 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Wide field fluorescence epi - microscopy behind a scattering medium enabled by speckle correlations,

    M. Hofer, C. Soeller, S. Brasselet, and J. Bertolotti, "Wide field fluorescence epi - microscopy behind a scattering medium enabled by speckle correlations," Opt. Express 26(8), 9866 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Optical properties of biological tissues: a review,

    S. L. Jacques, "Optical properties of biological tissues: a review," Phys. Med. Biol. 58(11), R37–R61 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Characterization of the angular memory effect of scattered light in biological tissues,

    S. Schott, J. Bertolotti, J.-F. Léger, L. Bourdieu, and S. Gigan, "Characterization of the angular memory effect of scattered light in biological tissues," Opt. Express 23(10), 13505 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Generalized optical memory effect,

    G. Osnabrugge, R. Horstmeyer, I. N. Papadopoulos, B. Judkewitz, and I. M. Vellekoop, "Generalized optical memory effect," Optica 4(8), 886 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Memory Effects in Propagation of Optical Waves through Disordered Media,

    I. Freund, M. Rosenbluh, and S. Feng, "Memory Effects in Propagation of Optical Waves through Disordered Media," Phys. Rev. Lett. 61(20), 2328–2331 (1988)

    1988

  24. [32]

    Translation correlations in anisotropically scattering media,

    B. Judkewitz, R. Horstmeyer, I. M. Vellekoop, I. N. Papadopoulos, and C. Yang, "Translation correlations in anisotropically scattering media," Nat. Phys. 11(8), 684– 689 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Focusing and compression of ultrashort pulses through scattering media,

    O. Katz, E. Small, Y. Bromberg, and Y. Silberberg, "Focusing and compression of ultrashort pulses through scattering media," Nat. Photonics 5(6), 372–377 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Spatiotemporal focusing in opaque scattering media by wave front shaping with nonlinear feedback,

    J. Aulbach, B. Gjonaj, P. Johnson, and A. Lagendijk, "Spatiotemporal focusing in opaque scattering media by wave front shaping with nonlinear feedback," Opt. Express 20(28), 29237 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Spatio-temporal focusing of an ultrafast pulse through a multiply scattering medium,

    D. J. McCabe, A. Tajalli, D. R. Austin, P. Bondareff, I. A. Walmsley, S. Gigan, and B. Chatel, "Spatio-temporal focusing of an ultrafast pulse through a multiply scattering medium," Nat. Commun. 2(1), 447 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Deterministic light focusing in space and time through multiple scattering media with a time-resolved transmission matrix approach,

    M. Mounaix, H. Defienne, and S. Gigan, "Deterministic light focusing in space and time through multiple scattering media with a time-resolved transmission matrix approach," Phys. Rev. A 94(4), 041802 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Spatiotemporal Coherent Control of Light through a Multiple Scattering Medium with the Multispectral Transmission Matrix,

    M. Mounaix, D. Andreoli, H. Defienne, G. Volpe, O. Katz, S. Grésillon, and S. Gigan, "Spatiotemporal Coherent Control of Light through a Multiple Scattering Medium with the Multispectral Transmission Matrix," Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(25), 253901 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Temporal recompression through a scattering medium via a broadband transmission matrix,

    M. Mounaix, H. B. de Aguiar, and S. Gigan, "Temporal recompression through a scattering medium via a broadband transmission matrix," Optica 4(10), 1289 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Transmission matrix approaches for nonlinear fluorescence excitation through multiple scattering media,

    M. Mounaix, D. M. Ta, and S. Gigan, "Transmission matrix approaches for nonlinear fluorescence excitation through multiple scattering media," Opt. Lett. 43(12), 2831 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Polarization recovery through scattering media,

    H. B. de Aguiar, S. Gigan, and S. Brasselet, "Polarization recovery through scattering media," Sci. Adv. 3(9), e1600743 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Scattering correlations of time-gated light,

    M. Kadobianskyi, I. N. Papadopoulos, T. Chaigne, R. Horstmeyer, and B. Judkewitz, "Scattering correlations of time-gated light," Optica 5(4), 389 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.