Construction of projective special K\"ahler manifolds

Mauro Mantegazza

Construction of projective special K\"ahler manifolds

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A projective special Kähler structure is exactly a symmetric cubic tensor satisfying one curvature equation and one differential equation.

desk verdict A sound intrinsic characterization of projective special Kähler manifolds; the 4D classification is solid but inherits two external classification assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01319 v3 pith:IBJIBIYP submitted 2019-08-04 math.DG

Mauro Mantegazza This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 53C5553C2622E2553C80

keywords projectivespecialKählermanifoldsconicdeviancetensorLiegroupscomplexhyperbolicspacescalarcurvaturelowerboundr-mapc-map

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves an intrinsic characterization: on a fixed Kähler manifold, a projective special Kähler structure is exactly the data of an $S^1$-bundle with connection of prescribed curvature plus a bundle map into the symmetric cubic tensors, subject to a curvature equation and a differential equation for the local tensor, called the deviance. The deviance measures how far the manifold is from being complex hyperbolic space, and it vanishes precisely on models locally isomorphic to $\mathrm{SU}(n,1)/\mathrm{S}(\mathrm{U}(n)\mathrm{U}(1))$. The characterization turns a construction problem into a system of two local PDEs on the manifold, and it yields a sharp scalar-curvature lower bound. As an application, the paper classifies all four-dimensional projective special Kähler Lie groups, finding only two up to isomorphism of the geometric structure.

What carries the argument

The deviance tensor $\eta$ is a local section of $\sharp^2 S^{3,0}M$, that is, a symmetric cubic tensor with one index raised. It is obtained by restricting to the base manifold the difference between the flat connection $\tilde\nabla$ and the Levi-Civita connection $\tilde\nabla_{\mathrm{LC}}$ on the conic bundle. The flatness of the conic bundle becomes the two conditions D1 and D2, while the bundle map $\gamma$ packages how the local tensor changes under changes of section. This one object carries the whole argument and also controls the scalar curvature bound.

What would settle it

Enumerate four-dimensional Kähler Lie algebras independently, write the deviance as $\sigma=c_1(\theta^1)^3+c_2(\theta^1)^2\theta^2+c_3\theta^1(\theta^2)^2+c_4(\theta^2)^3$, and solve the curvature equation together with $d_{\mathrm{LC}}\sigma=-4i\lambda\wedge\sigma$ for some $\lambda$ with $d\lambda=\omega$; any solution not isomorphic to the two cases in Theorem 10.2 would falsify the classification. For the main equivalence, take a Kähler manifold with a chosen cubic tensor, build the $S^1$-bundle and $\widetilde M=S\times\mathbb{R}^+$ as in Theorem 7.6, and check directly whether the constructed connection is flat.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 7.6 states that, on a $2n$-dimensional Kähler manifold $(M,g,I,\omega)$, giving a projective special Kähler structure is equivalent to giving an $S^1$-bundle $\pi_S:S\to M$ with connection form $\phi$, a bundle map $\gamma:S\to\sharp^2 S^{3,0}M$ satisfying $\gamma(ua)=a^2\gamma(u)$, and local sections $s_\alpha$ such that $d\phi=-2\pi_S^*\omega$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{LC}}+\Omega_{\mathbb{P}^n_{\mathbb{C}}}+[\eta_\alpha\wedge\bar\eta_\alpha]=0$, and $d_{\mathrm{LC}}\eta_\alpha=2i s_\alpha^*\phi\wedge\eta_\alpha$. The proof constructs the conic bundle $\widetilde M=S\times\mathbb{R}^+$, the pseudo-Kähler metric $\tilde g=t^2\pi^*g-t^2\tilde\phi^2-dt^2$, and the flat connection $\tilde\nabla=\tilde\nabla_{\mathrm{LC}}+\tilde\eta$. The same two equations then drive the classification: solving them against the known classification list of four-dimensional Kähler Lie algebras leaves exactly $\mathbb{H}_{\sqrt{2}}\times\mathbb{H}_2$ and the complex hyperbolic plane up to projective special Kähler isomorphism.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of four-dimensional Lie groups assumes the external list of four-dimensional pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras is complete and that every such Kähler Lie group is solvable; if either input misses a family, the “only two” conclusion could be missing a case.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any solution of D1–D2 on a Kähler manifold produces an actual projective special Kähler structure, not merely formal data, because Theorem 7.6 explicitly constructs the $\mathbb{C}^*$-bundle, metric, and flat connection.
Every $2n$-dimensional projective special Kähler manifold has scalar curvature at least $-2(n+1)$, with equality exactly where the deviance vanishes; zero deviance forces the local geometry to be complex hyperbolic.
The only complete, connected, simply connected projective special Kähler manifold with zero deviance is $\mathbb{H}^n_{\mathbb{C}}=\mathrm{SU}(n,1)/\mathrm{S}(\mathrm{U}(n)\mathrm{U}(1))$.
When $H^2(M,\mathbb{Z})=0$, existence of a projective special Kähler structure is equivalent to finding a global section $\eta$ of $\sharp^2 S^{3,0}M$ satisfying the curvature equation and $d_{\mathrm{LC}}\eta=-4i\lambda\wedge\eta$ for any $\lambda$ with $d\lambda=\omega$.
In dimension four, the only connected simply connected projective special Kähler Lie groups, up to isomorphism of the projective special Kähler structure, are $\mathbb{H}_{\sqrt{2}}\times\mathbb{H}_2$ and $\mathbb{H}^2_{\mathbb{C}}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the deviance is a cubic form, the characterization suggests a construction inverse to the r-map: read the cubic polynomial off the deviance and use it to reconstruct the homogeneous cubic that generated the projective special Kähler structure.
The proof of Theorem 7.6 only uses the structure equations of the conic metric, so the same two-equation characterization should extend to conic special Kähler metrics of arbitrary signature, with the same $S^1$-bundle construction.
Reading the $\mathrm{U}(1)$-valued gauge freedom in Proposition 8.1 cohomologically suggests that the moduli of projective special Kähler structures on a fixed manifold is controlled by $H^1(M,\mathbb{Z}_2)$; when $H^1_{\mathrm{dR}}(M)=0$, the structure is unique.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know: Theorem 7.6 is the real content, and it holds up. The paper gives an intrinsic characterization of projective special Kähler manifolds via a symmetric deviance tensor satisfying a curvature equation and a first-order differential equation. This is genuinely more general than the independent work by Macia and Swann, which assumes left-invariance for Lie groups. The proof goes in both directions: necessity comes from the difference of the flat and Levi-Civita connections on the conic cover, and sufficiency explicitly builds the flat connection from the two deviance equations. I checked the construction of the metric on S×R+ and the curvature computation; nothing circular.

The paper also earns its keep with a scalar curvature lower bound, equality exactly when deviance vanishes, and a rigidity statement for complex hyperbolic space. The four-dimensional classification of projective special Kähler Lie groups is a lot of honest algebra: the author starts from Ovando's list, computes Levi-Civita connections and curvature for all nine non-abelian families, solves for the deviance, and then checks the differential condition case by case. The result—only H√2×H2 and the complex hyperbolic plane as PSK manifolds—looks correct.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: the classification conclusion is conditional on two external results. The proof assumes Ovando's Table 5.1 is complete and that every simply connected four-dimensional Kähler Lie group is contractible, citing Chu's theorem. If either input has a missing family, the list could be incomplete. That does not undermine Theorem 7.6, but it means the classification is not self-contained. The author is transparent about the reliance, which I appreciate. This is a minor caveat for most readers, not a fatal one.

One more thing: the paper cites its own thesis for context, and the overlap with Macia–Swann is handled fairly. I saw no citation red flags.

Who should read this: anyone working on special Kähler geometry, c-map constructions, or quaternionic Kähler manifolds from the differential-geometric side. It is a solid construction paper that gives a practical tool. I would send it to a serious referee; the main theorem deserves careful checking, and the classification is worth a detailed look despite the external-input caveat. Recommendation: accept, with a request for a note on the completeness caveat in the classification section.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents an intrinsic characterization of projective special Kähler manifolds. The main result, Theorem 7.6, states that on a 2n-dimensional Kähler manifold (M,g,I,ω), a projective special Kähler structure is equivalent to the data of an S¹-bundle π_S:S→M with connection form φ, a bundle map γ:S→♯²S^{3,0}M satisfying γ(ua)=a²γ(u), and the conditions dφ=-2π_S^*ω together with, locally, the curvature equation D1 (Ω_LC+Ω_{P^n_C}+[η∧η]=0) and the differential equation D2 (d_LC η=2i s^*φ∧η) for the deviance η. The paper also derives a scalar curvature lower bound (Corollary 7.4), shows that equality holds exactly when the deviance vanishes, identifies zero-deviance complete simply connected manifolds with complex hyperbolic space (Proposition 9.5), and classifies connected simply connected 4-dimensional projective special Kähler Lie groups up to isomorphism (Theorem 10.2 and Corollary 10.5).

Significance. If correct, Theorem 7.6 is a substantial simplification: a projective special Kähler structure on a fixed Kähler manifold is encoded by one algebraic curvature equation and one first-order differential equation for a symmetric tensor, together with topological data of an S¹-bundle. The proof of the theorem is self-contained and proves both directions, including an explicit construction of the flat connection and verification of all axioms of a conic special Kähler structure. The scalar curvature bound and the rigidity statement for complex hyperbolic space are natural and clearly derived. The 4-dimensional classification is a valuable application and is carried out by a systematic case-by-case solution starting from Ovando's classification; its completeness is contingent on that external list and on Chu's solvability theorem, a caveat that should be kept in mind. The paper also acknowledges the independent work of Macia and Swann.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract and Section 9] The abstract states that vanishing of the deviance characterizes local isomorphism to the complex hyperbolic space, but the explicit theorem (Proposition 9.5) is global, requiring completeness, connectedness, and simple connectivity; the local version follows from Proposition 9.4 and standard local isometry theorems, but it would be helpful to state this local consequence explicitly in Section 9 to match the abstract.
[Proposition 6.3] The displayed formula for ~η = R(z²π*η) contains a likely typo: the expression 'r2 cos(2ϑ)2 Reπ∗η + r2 sin(2ϑ)2 Imπ∗η' should presumably read r²(2 cos 2ϑ Re π*η − 2 sin 2ϑ Im π*η) or an equivalent correct form; the sign of the second term and the placement of the factor 2 should be corrected.
[Remark 5.3 and Proposition 7.3] The quantity denoted 'scal' is the normalized scalar curvature, that is, the trace of the Ricci tensor divided by the real dimension 2n, rather than the usual trace convention in Riemannian geometry; this normalization should be stated explicitly at the first occurrence to avoid confusion.
[Section 10, proof of Theorem 10.2] The classification proof starts from Ovando's list [28, Table 5.1] and uses Chu's theorem [11, Theorem 9] to conclude solvability and contractibility; these are external classification inputs whose completeness is not re-derived in the paper, and the text should state clearly that the completeness of Theorem 10.2 is contingent on them.
[Theorem 7.6, condition 3] The phrase 'for a certain choice of an open covering' is potentially confusing, since the following sentence says the condition is satisfied by every such family of sections; rephrasing as 'for some (equivalently, any) choice of an open covering and sections' would improve clarity.
[Section 5] The notation θ^⋆ is used starting in Proposition 5.2 and Remark 5.3 but is never defined; it should be defined as the conjugate transpose of the coframe, or equivalently the image of θ under the Hermitian metric.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 7.6 is proven in both directions from the definitions; the 4D classification rests on external classification inputs, not on self-citation.

full rationale

The central characterization (Theorem 7.6) is self-contained. The forward direction constructs the S1-bundle, connection form, and deviance from a given projective special Kähler structure, then derives D1 and D2 from the flatness of the conic connection (Propositions 3.2 and 7.1, equation (11)). The converse direction explicitly builds the C*-bundle, metric, complex structure, symplectic form, and flat torsion-free connection from the bundle data, and verifies each axiom of Definition 2.1; no step assumes the target result. The proof uses standard geometric facts (Levi-Civita uniqueness, curvature computations in Proposition 5.2) that do not presuppose a projective special Kähler structure. The only external inputs are the classification of pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras by Ovando [28, Table 5.1] and the theorem that 4-dimensional Kähler Lie groups are solvable [11, Theorem 9]; these are independent published results, not self-citations, and they only affect Theorem 10.2, not the main characterization. The author's own PhD thesis [27] is cited only in the acknowledgements and is not load-bearing. Consequently there is no circular step: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no self-citation chain supports the central claim, and the deviance equations are necessary and sufficient conditions derived rather than assumed.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central theorem is a mathematical equivalence; its assumptions are standard background results in special Kähler geometry and Lie group classification. No free parameters are fitted to data, and the only new object is the deviance tensor, which is defined and proven equivalent to the structure rather than postulated.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption In a conic special Kähler manifold, the difference tensor ~η is a section of ♯2[[S^{3,0}~M]] and is symmetric (Lemma 3.1, via Freed [20], Baues-Cortés [5], and Hessian theory [30,31]).
This identifies the algebraic type of the deviance and is used throughout Sections 3 and 6.
standard math Flatness of ∇ is equivalent to the two conditions of Proposition 3.2: Ω_LC + 1/2[η∧η]=0 and d_LC η=0.
Derived from the curvature of the connection form ω∇=ω_LC+η; standard in special Kähler geometry.
domain assumption For a principal S1-bundle with connection form ϕ, the curvature relation dϕ=-2π_S^*ω links the Kähler form of M to the bundle curvature (Remark 4.4).
This is the prequantum condition for the S1-bundle used in the characterization theorem.
domain assumption Every four-dimensional Kähler Lie group is solvable [11, Theorem 9], and simply connected solvable Lie groups are diffeomorphic to Euclidean space [10].
Used in Section 10 to reduce the classification to simply connected contractible groups and apply Corollary 7.9.
domain assumption The classification of four-dimensional pseudo-Kähler Lie algebras by Ovando [28, Table 5.1] is complete.
The Lie group classification in Theorem 10.2 starts from this list; any omission would propagate.
standard math The Cartan-Ambrose-Hicks theorem extends local isometries between complete, simply connected, real analytic Kähler manifolds with parallel curvature (used in Proposition 9.5).
Used to conclude that zero deviance implies the manifold is the complex hyperbolic space.

invented entities (1)

Deviance tensor η and intrinsic deviance γ independent evidence
purpose: Local symmetric (3,0) tensor and degree-2 bundle map encoding the difference between flat and Levi-Civita connections, used to characterize projective special Kähler structures.
The object is defined directly from the geometry and its existence is proven equivalent to a projective special Kähler structure via Theorem 7.6, so it is not a postulated entity without mathematical support.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Construction of projective special K\"ahler manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IBJIBIYP

@misc{pith2026190801319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Construction of projective special K\"ahler manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IBJIBIYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01319}
}

abstract

In this paper we present an intrinsic characterisation of projective special K\"ahler manifolds in terms of a symmetric tensor satisfying certain differential and algebraic conditions. We show that this tensor vanishes precisely when the structure is locally isomorphic to a standard projective special K\"ahler structure on $\mathrm{SU}(n,1)/\mathrm{S}(\mathrm{U}(n)\mathrm{U}(1))$. We use this characterisation to classify 4-dimensional projective special K\"ahler Lie groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

D. V. Alekseevsky and V. Cort´ es. Classiﬁcation of stationary c ompact homogeneous special pseudo-K¨ ahler manifolds of semisimple groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , 81(1):211–230, 2000

work page 2000
[2]

D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cort´ es, and C. Devchand. Special complex manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. , 42(1-2):85–105, 2002

work page 2002
[3]

D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cort´ es, M. Dyckmanns, and T. Mohaupt . Quater- nionic K¨ ahler metrics associated with special K¨ ahler manifolds. J. Geom. Phys., 92:271–287, 2015

work page 2015
[4]

D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cort´ es, and T. Mohaupt. Coniﬁcation of K¨ ahler and hyper-K¨ ahler manifolds.Comm. Math. Phys. , 324(2):637–655, 2013

work page 2013
[5]

Baues and V

O. Baues and V. Cort´ es. Abelian simply transitive aﬃne groups of sym- plectic type. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 52(6):1729–1751, 2002

work page 2002
[6]

Baues and V

O. Baues and V. Cort´ es. Proper aﬃne hyperspheres which ﬁbe r over pro- jective special K¨ ahler manifolds. Asian J. Math. , 7(1):115–132, 2003

work page 2003
[7]

M. Berger. Sur les groupes d’holonomie homog` ene des vari´ et´es ` a connexion aﬃne et des vari´ et´ es riemanniennes.Bull. Soc. Math. France , 83:279–330, 1955

work page 1955
[8]

Candelas and X

P. Candelas and X. C. de la Ossa. Moduli space of Calabi-Yau manifo lds. Nuclear Phys. B , 355(2):455–481, 1991

work page 1991

Show all 33 references

[9]

Cecotti, S

S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara, and L. Girardello. Geometry of type II s uperstrings and the moduli of superconformal ﬁeld theories. Internat. J. Modern Phys. A, 4(10):2475–2529, 1989

1989
[10]

Chevalley

C. Chevalley. On the topological structure of solvable groups. Ann. of Math. (2) , 42:668–675, 1941

1941
[11]

B. Y. Chu. Symplectic homogeneous spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 197:145–159, 1974. 44

1974
[12]

Cort´ es

V. Cort´ es. On hyper-K¨ ahler manifolds associated to Lagran gian K¨ ahler submanifolds of T ∗Cn. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 350(8):3193–3205, 1998

1998
[13]

Cort´ es, M

V. Cort´ es, M. Dyckmanns, and D. Lindemann. Classiﬁcation of complete projective special real surfaces. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 109(2):423–445, 2014

2014
[14]

Cort´ es, M

V. Cort´ es, M. Dyckmanns, and S. Suhr. Completeness of pro jective special K¨ ahler and quaternionic K¨ ahler manifolds. In Special metrics and group actions in geometry , volume 23 of Springer INdAM Ser. , pages 81–106. Springer, Cham, 2017

2017
[15]

Cort´ es, X

V. Cort´ es, X. Han, and T. Mohaupt. Completeness in supergr avity con- structions. Comm. Math. Phys. , 311(1):191–213, 2012

2012
[16]

Cort´ es, M

V. Cort´ es, M. Dyckmanns, M. J¨ ungling, and D. Lindemann. A c lass of cubic hypersurfaces and quaternionic K¨ ahler manifolds of co-hom ogeneity one. arXiv:1701.7882, 2018

2018
[17]

Dorfmeister and K

J. Dorfmeister and K. Nakajima. The fundamental conjectur e for homoge- neous K¨ ahler manifolds.Acta Math. , 161(1-2):23–70, 1988

1988
[18]

Ferrara and S

S. Ferrara and S. Sabharwal. Quaternionic manifolds for type I I superstring vacua of Calabi-Yau spaces. Nuclear Phys. B , 332(2):317–332, 1990

1990
[19]

P. Fr´ e. Lectures on special K¨ ahler geometry and electric-magnetic duality rotations. Nuclear Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , 45BC:59–114, 1996

1996
[20]

D. S. Freed. Special K¨ ahler manifolds. Comm. Math. Phys. , 203(1):31–52, 1999

1999
[21]

W. M. Goldman. Complex hyperbolic geometry . Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York,
[22]

Helgason

S. Helgason. Diﬀerential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces , vol- ume 34 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical So- ciety, Providence, RI, 2001. Corrected reprint of the 1978 origin al

2001
[23]

N. Hitchin. On the hyperk¨ ahler/quaternion K¨ ahler correspondence. Comm. Math. Phys. , 324(1):77–106, 2013

2013
[24]

Kobayashi and K

S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu. Foundations of Diﬀerential Geometry . In- tersciences Publishers, New York. Springer-Verlag, 1963,1969

1963
[25]

Macia and A

O. Macia and A. Swann. Twist geometry of the c-map. Comm. Math. Phys., 336(3):1329–1357, 2015

2015
[26]

Macia and A

O. Macia and A. Swann. The c-map on groups. Classical Quantum Gravity, 37(1):015015, 17, 2020. 45

2020
[27]

Mantegazza

M. Mantegazza. An intrinsic approach to the c-map . PhD thesis, Joint PhD program in mathematics, Universit` a degli studi di Pavia, Unive rsit` a degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Indam, 12 2019

2019
[28]

G. Ovando. Complex, symplectic and K¨ ahler structures on four dimensional Lie groups. Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina , 45(2):55–67 (2005), 2004

2005
[29]

S. Salamon. Riemannian geometry and holonomy groups , volume 201 of Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series . Longman Scientiﬁc & Tech- nical, Harlow; copublished in the United States with John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1989

1989
[30]

H. Shima. Vanishing theorems for compact Hessian manifolds. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 36(3):183–205, 1986

1986
[31]

H. Shima. Hessian manifolds of constant Hessian sectional curv ature. J. Math. Soc. Japan , 47(4):735–753, 1995

1995
[32]

L. W. Tu. Diﬀerential geometry , volume 275 of Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics. Springer, Cham, 2017. Connections, curvature, and characte ristic classes. 46

2017
[1999]

Oxford Science Publications

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

D. V. Alekseevsky and V. Cort´ es. Classiﬁcation of stationary c ompact homogeneous special pseudo-K¨ ahler manifolds of semisimple groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , 81(1):211–230, 2000

work page 2000

[2] [2]

D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cort´ es, and C. Devchand. Special complex manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. , 42(1-2):85–105, 2002

work page 2002

[3] [3]

D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cort´ es, M. Dyckmanns, and T. Mohaupt . Quater- nionic K¨ ahler metrics associated with special K¨ ahler manifolds. J. Geom. Phys., 92:271–287, 2015

work page 2015

[4] [4]

D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cort´ es, and T. Mohaupt. Coniﬁcation of K¨ ahler and hyper-K¨ ahler manifolds.Comm. Math. Phys. , 324(2):637–655, 2013

work page 2013

[5] [5]

Baues and V

O. Baues and V. Cort´ es. Abelian simply transitive aﬃne groups of sym- plectic type. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 52(6):1729–1751, 2002

work page 2002

[6] [6]

Baues and V

O. Baues and V. Cort´ es. Proper aﬃne hyperspheres which ﬁbe r over pro- jective special K¨ ahler manifolds. Asian J. Math. , 7(1):115–132, 2003

work page 2003

[7] [7]

M. Berger. Sur les groupes d’holonomie homog` ene des vari´ et´es ` a connexion aﬃne et des vari´ et´ es riemanniennes.Bull. Soc. Math. France , 83:279–330, 1955

work page 1955

[8] [8]

Candelas and X

P. Candelas and X. C. de la Ossa. Moduli space of Calabi-Yau manifo lds. Nuclear Phys. B , 355(2):455–481, 1991

work page 1991