Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 106 references

A multi-wavelength study of a massive, active galaxy at $z\sim 2$: coupling the kinematics of the ionized and molecular gas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read GMASS 0953, a massive galaxy at $z\simeq2.2$, is a multi-phase rotating disc: ionized gas rotates at $203$ km/s at 13 kpc, molecular gas rotates faster in the centre, and the baryonic mass sits within the local Tully-Fisher scatter.

desk verdict A careful, transparent single-object study; the two-phase comparison is real, but the rotation-curve-peak and Tully-Fisher claims rest on a wind-vs-rotation degeneracy the authors test only qualitatively. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01358 v1 pith:IOIN4XNY submitted 2019-08-04 astro-ph.GA

Federica Loiacono , Margherita Talia , Filippo Fraternali , Andrea Cimatti , Enrico Maria Di Teodoro , Gabriel Bartosch Caminha This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies:activeevolutionkinematicsanddynamicshigh-redshiftAGN-drivenoutflowsmulti-phasegalaxydiscsbaryonicTully-Fisherrelationintegralfieldspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that GMASS 0953, a massive star-forming galaxy at $z\simeq2.226$ that harbours an obscured active galactic nucleus, is a rotation-dominated system rather than a chaotic merger or a wind-dominated outflow. Combining near-infrared measurements of [O III] and H$\alpha$ with existing CO(6-5) data, it builds a kinematic picture in which the ionized gas rotates at $V_{\rm ion}=203^{+17}_{-20}\,{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ at $R\simeq13$ kpc while the molecular gas rotates at $V_{\rm CO}=320^{+92}_{-53}\,{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ on the $\sim1$ kpc scale, so the rotation curve peaks in the central region. If true, this matters because it would show that at least some massive galaxies were already dynamically settled at the peak epoch of galaxy growth, and that their baryonic content already matches the local Tully-Fisher relation. The paper also reports a kpc-scale AGN-driven ionized outflow, seen as a broad blueshifted [O III] wing at $\Delta v=-535\pm152$ km/s, and argues that the combined gas depletion timescale is about $10^8$ yr, so the galaxy could soon become passive.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the tilted-ring disc model applied to integral-field data cubes through three-dimensional fitting, which compares an artificial rotating-disc cube with the observed cube and thereby corrects for beam smearing. Its kinematic backbone is the comparison of three emission-line tracers: [O III] $\lambda5007$ and H$\alpha$ trace the outer ionized disc out to 13 kpc, while CO(J=6-5) traces the unresolved molecular disc near 1 kpc, with all three gradients sharing a position angle aligned with the stellar major axis. The outflow-rate estimate rests on a simple conical-wind model that converts the luminosity of the blueshifted [O III] component into an expelled ionized-gas mass and divides it by a flow timescale set by the outflow radius and velocity.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be sub-kpc-resolution integral-field or ALMA observations of the inner few kiloparsecs: a rotating disc should show the classic spider-diagram velocity field, with line-of-sight velocities following $V_{\rm rot}\,\sin i\,\cos\theta$ around the fixed major axis, whereas an outflow cone should show a biconical pattern with the highest velocities along the minor axis and no matching high-velocity signature in the CO disc.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that GMASS 0953 hosts a multi-phase rotating disc whose rotation curve rises toward the centre. The ionized gas, traced independently by [O III] $\lambda5007$ and H$\alpha$, shows a large-scale velocity gradient aligned with the stellar major axis; tilted-ring modelling gives a representative rotation velocity of $V_{\rm ion}=203^{+17}_{-20}\,{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$ at $R\simeq13$ kpc. The molecular gas, traced by CO(J=6-5), shows the same spatial orientation but on a scale of $R\simeq1$ kpc, with a higher central velocity $V_{\rm CO}=320^{+92}_{-53}\,{\rm km\,s}^{-1}$. The paper interprets this as evidence that the ionized and molecular phases belong to one disc, that the rotation curve peaks in the very central region, and that the dynamical mass within 13 kpc exceeds $1.3\times10^{11}\,M_{\odot}$, consistent with the stellar mass. With baryonic mass $M_{\rm b}\simeq(1.47\pm0.12)\times10^{11}\,M_{\odot}$, the galaxy falls within the 0.11 dex scatter of the local baryonic Tully-Fisher relation, and a broad blueshifted [O III] wing at $\Delta v=-535\pm152$ km/s is presented as evidence of an AGN-driven outflow. The paper explicitly cautions that a galactic-scale wind could mimic the ionized velocity gradients and is not fully separable at the current spatial resolution, but argues that rotation is the more likely reading because the gradient follows the stellar major axis.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the observed [O III] and H$\alpha$ velocity gradients come from circular rotation in a tilted disc with inclination fixed to 75 degrees and position angle 94 degrees, rather than from a galactic-scale wind; at the available spatial resolution the two interpretations are not fully separable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Massive galaxies at $z\simeq2$ can already be dynamically relaxed rotating discs, so disc settling does not have to wait until low redshift.
  • A rotation curve that peaks near 1 kpc and then declines implies a centrally concentrated mass distribution, consistent with the compact stellar structure of GMASS 0953.
  • Molecular and ionized gas trace the same disc, so high-resolution CO observations can recover central rotation velocities where seeing-limited ionized-gas measurements are unreliable.
  • With a total depletion timescale near $10^8$ yr, the galaxy would rapidly become passive if fresh gas accretion is shut off.
  • The kpc-scale blueshifted [O III] feature shows that AGN-driven gas ejection is operating in this source, even though its efficiency relative to star formation remains uncertain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the multi-phase disc is real, the combination of a high inner CO velocity and a lower outer ionized velocity implies a steeply falling rotation curve; a higher-resolution CO rotation curve would directly probe the bulge-to-disc transition and test the inferred central mass concentration.
  • The M82 comparison suggests that low-resolution, single-tracer kinematics of high-redshift galaxies may systematically misclassify outflow cones as discs, making multi-phase position-angle agreement a cheap discriminator for future surveys.
  • Because the outflow rate swings by about an order of magnitude depending on the dust-extinction correction, the prediction that GMASS 0953 quenches within about $10^8$ yr is not strongly tied to AGN feedback; if the unextincted estimate is correct, star formation alone would dominate the gas depletion.
  • If confirmed, the position of GMASS 0953 on the local baryonic Tully-Fisher relation would make it a useful benchmark for testing whether high-redshift kinematic samples suffer from selection biases toward the most settled galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. GMASS 0953 is a massive (M* ~ 1.15e11 Msun), z = 2.226 star-forming galaxy with an obscured AGN. The paper combines GNIRS slit spectroscopy, SINFONI and KMOS integral-field data, and published ALMA CO(6-5) measurements to study the kinematics of the ionized and molecular gas. The [O III] and Halpha velocity gradients are modelled as a rotating disc with 3DBarolo, yielding a consistent outer rotation velocity V_ion = 203+17/-20 km/s at R ~ 13 kpc. Combined with V_CO = 320+92/-53 km/s at R ~ 1 kpc from Talia et al. (2018), the authors infer a multi-phase disc with a rotation curve that peaks in the centre, a dynamical mass lower limit of 1.3e11 Msun, and consistency with the z = 0 baryonic Tully-Fisher relation. They also identify an AGN-driven ionized outflow from a broad blueshifted [O III] component and evaluate outflow rates and depletion timescales, concluding that total gas depletion occurs on ~1e8 yr timescales while emphasizing the uncertainties in the AGN's role.

Significance. If the rotation interpretation is correct, this is one of the few multi-phase kinematic studies of a massive z ~ 2 galaxy, and it supports the existence of kinematically settled systems at early epochs. Strengths include independent 3DBarolo fits to two emission lines that give consistent outer rotation curves, a robust outflow detection in two independent datasets, and a generally transparent discussion of limitations, including the wind degeneracy and the unreliable inner rings. The principal weakness is that the strongest conclusions - the central rotation-curve peak, the dynamical mass, and the Tully-Fisher placement - depend on the rotation assumption, which is not uniquely constrained by the data, and on a V_CO-to-V_ion comparison whose significance is not quantified against the authors' own caveats. The paper is therefore a solid measurement and case study, but its headline claims are provisional.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3, §5] The wind-versus-rotation degeneracy is acknowledged but never quantitatively tested. The only test offered is the qualitative M82 comparison in Fig. 8, which the authors state 'appears roughly similar' after smoothing, and the wind interpretation is then rejected because the wind would move perpendicular to the disc. With a PSF of 0.59-0.70 arcsec and a ring width of 0.35 arcsec, the inner few kpc are resolved with less than one PSF element, and wide-angle or inclined biconical outflows can project velocity gradients along the major axis. Because V_ion, the dynamical mass lower limit, and the Tully-Fisher placement in §5 all assume rotation, the authors should add a quantitative test (e.g., mock biconical-wind cubes observed with the same PSF, inclination, and velocity binning) or present the rotation-derived quantities explicitly as conditional on the assumed geometry.
  2. [§4.2, §5] The claim that the rotation curve peaks in the central regions rests on comparing V_CO = 320+92/-53 km/s (Talia et al. 2018) with V_ion = 203+17/-20 km/s at R ~ 13 kpc, a difference of roughly 1.2-2.1 sigma depending on how the asymmetric error bars are propagated. The authors themselves state in §4.2 that the first two rings of the ionized rotation curve are not constrained by the pv diagrams and that their errors are underestimated. The paper should provide an explicit significance estimate that includes the systematic uncertainties (fixed inclination, unresolved CO core, and ring correlation) and, if the significance remains low, present the centrally peaked rotation curve as tentative rather than a firm result.
  3. [§5] The baryonic Tully-Fisher placement uses V_ion as the circular velocity without an asymmetric-drift correction, even though the velocity dispersion upper limits from the 3DBarolo fits are large (sigma < 160 km/s for [O III] and sigma < 90 km/s for Halpha; §4.2). If the true circular velocity is higher than V_ion, the galaxy's position on the z = 0 relation would shift substantially. The authors should show how the BTFR conclusion depends on V_c by considering the range of asymmetric-drift corrections allowed by the data, or restrict the claim to the measured rotation velocity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains several typos that should be corrected: 'hypotesis' (§4), 'phoenomena' (§4.3), 'changelling' and 'blushifted' (Conclusions), and 'espress' and 'abudance' (Appendix D).
  2. [Fig. 8] Please specify how the M82 data were smoothed to 4.65 kpc (kernel shape and width) and whether the velocity binning was matched to the [O III]/Halpha data, so that the comparison is reproducible.
  3. [Abstract/Conclusions] The abstract uses 'may host an ionized disc' while the conclusions state 'we found evidence of a multi-phase disc'; the confidence level should be harmonized, especially if the wind degeneracy remains unresolved.
  4. [§5] In the sentence comparing V_CO with the Halpha inner value, give the radius and uncertainty of the Halpha inner value explicitly, since the reader would otherwise need to reconstruct it from Fig. 7.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ionized-gas rotation curve, CO comparison, and baryonic Tully-Fisher placement are independent measurements combined with published external data.

full rationale

The paper's central kinematic result, Vion=203 km/s at 13 kpc, is derived by fitting the SINFONI/KMOS [O III] and H-alpha data cubes with the 3DBarolo tilted-ring model; it is a measurement from the data, not a prediction obtained from an input. The comparison to VCO=320 km/s from Talia et al. (2018) cites independently published ALMA observations; although a co-author overlaps, the CO rotation curve is not fit in this paper and is externally falsifiable, so the citation is real evidence rather than a circular chain. The dynamical-mass lower limit and the baryonic Tully-Fisher placement follow from measured Vion, Mstar, MH2, and standard scaling relations, with no parameter fitted to make GMASS 0953 land on the relation. The M82 wind comparison is explicitly presented as a degeneracy and caveat, not as a fitted alternative, and the paper does not claim its rotation interpretation as a forced or unique result. Outflow rates and depletion timescales are derived from measured line fluxes and standard assumptions, with the authors acknowledging the strong model-dependence. No derivation in the paper reduces to its own inputs by the paper's equations, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The kinematic model depends mainly on modeling choices (inclination, PA, center) and on prior published values (CO rotation, stellar mass, molecular mass). The outflow rate depends on several astrophysical assumptions about ionization, metallicity, geometry, and extinction. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Disc inclination angle i = 75 degrees
    Fixed for all rings based on by-eye comparison of the Hα flux map with synthetic maps (Appendix C). Directly sets deprojected rotation velocities via V_rot = V_los/sin(i).
  • Position angle of the major axis phi = 94 degrees
    Chosen by inspecting pv diagrams for different position angles and selecting the most extended emission (Section 4.2). Affects the rotation velocity derivation.
  • Dynamical center = HST/H-band emission peak
    Used to center the tilted-ring model (Section 4.2).
  • Disc scale height z0 = 150 pc (default)
    Unresolved, set to 3DBarolo default; thickness has negligible effect (Section 4.2).
  • Gas surface density normalization = locally averaged flux matching
    Adopted so the model flux equals the data flux per pixel; affects the pv diagram shape but not the derived rotation velocities directly (Section 4.2).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The velocity gradients in [O III] and Hα are produced by a rotating disc with constant inclination and position angle across the tilted rings.
    The 3DBarolo model (Section 4.2) assumes rotation; the wind alternative is discussed in Section 4.3 but cannot be fully excluded at the available resolution.
  • domain assumption The CO(6-5) line traces a rotating molecular disc with V_CO = 320 km/s at R~1 kpc, as published in Talia et al. (2018).
    This is an input from a companion paper used to construct the multi-phase disc claim.
  • domain assumption The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation at z=0 (Lelli et al. 2016b) is valid for testing this z~2 galaxy, i.e., no significant evolution in the relation.
    The galaxy is compared to the local relation; any evolution would change the conclusion that it is already kinematically relaxed.
  • domain assumption The outflow mass and rate derivations assume a conical geometry, a temperature of 10^4 K, fully ionized oxygen, solar relative abundances scaled by the mass-metallicity relation, and electron density from [S II].
    Appendix D; these assumptions set M_of and the outflow rate, which drive the depletion timescale discussion.
  • domain assumption Standard ΛCDM cosmology and Chabrier IMF are adopted.
    Used for distance, mass, and SFR conversions throughout the paper (Section 1 and Table 1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A multi-wavelength study of a massive, active galaxy at $z\sim 2$: coupling the kinematics of the ionized and molecular gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IOIN4XNY

@misc{pith2026190801358,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A multi-wavelength study of a massive, active galaxy at $z\sim 2$: coupling the kinematics of the ionized and molecular gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IOIN4XNY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01358}
}
abstract

We report a multi-wavelength study of the massive ($M_{\star} \gtrsim 10^{11} \rm{M}_{\odot}$), $z\sim 2$ star-forming galaxy GMASS 0953, which hosts an obscured AGN. We combined near-infrared observations of the GNIRS, SINFONI and KMOS spectrographs to study the kinematics of the [O III]$\lambda 5007$ and H$\alpha$ emission lines. Our analysis shows that GMASS 0953 may host an ionized disc extending up to 13 kpc, which rotates at a velocity of $V_{\rm{ion}} = 203^{+17}_{-20} {\ \rm kms}^{-1}$ at the outermost radius. Evidence of rotation on a smaller scale ($R \sim 1$ kpc) arises from the CO(J=6-5) line. The central velocity $V_{\rm{CO}} = 320^{+ 92}_{-53} {\ \rm kms}^{-1}$ traced by the molecular gas is higher than $V_{\rm{ion}}$, suggesting that the galaxy harbors a multi-phase disc with a rotation curve that peaks in the very central regions. The galaxy appears well located on the $z = 0$ baryonic Tully-Fisher relation. We also discuss the possibility that the [O III]$\lambda 5007$ and H$\alpha$ velocity gradients are due to a galactic-scale wind. Besides, we found evidence of an AGN-driven outflow traced by a broad blueshifted wing affecting the [O III]$\lambda 5007$ line, which presents a velocity offset $\Delta v = -535 \pm 152 {\ \rm kms}^{-1}$ from the systemic velocity. Because of the short depletion timescale ($\tau_{\rm{dep}}\sim 10^8$ yr) due to gas ejection and gas consumption by star formation activity, GMASS 0953 may likely evolve into a passive galaxy. However, the role of the AGN in depleting the gas reservoir of the galaxy is quite unclear because of the uncertainties affecting the outflow rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01358 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. H-band (1.6 µm, upper panel) and z -band (0.85 µm, bottom panel) images of GMASS 0953 (HST/WFC3 and ACS). The lowest contour is at 5σ. The blue crosses show the emission peak, which we take as the photometric and dynamical center of the galaxy. The central region appears extremely bright and compact with an effective radius Re ∼ 2.5 kpc, estimated from the H-band image (van der Wel et al. 2014). The dashed line indi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top panel: GNIRS one-dimensional spectrum. Middle panel: line fits of Hβ and [O III] λλ4959, 5007. Bottom panels: line fits of [NII] λλ6548,6584 and Hα (left) and [S II] λλ6716,6731 (right, fit (b) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Emission line maps extracted from the SINFONI and KMOS data-cubes. Top panels: narrow and broad component of [O III] λ5007 (black contours and colors). Flux contour levels are at 3, 6, 12, 24σ for the [O III] λ5007 narrow line and at 2, 4, 6σ for the [O III] λ5007 broad component. The red contour shows the continuum emission stacked on the entire spectrum (left panel) and on N = 18 channels (right panel), i.e. the s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hα and [N II] λλ6548, 6584 emission lines (KMOS data). Left panel: line fit of Hα and [N II] λλ6548, 6584 superimposed on the data (black line) in one pixel. The fitted Gaussians are shown in colored lines with the total model in red. The purple line indicates the cont…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Position-velocity (pv) diagrams of [O III] λ5007 and Hα roughly along the major axis of GMASS 0953 extracted from the GNIRS two-dimensional spectrum (left), SINFONI (middle) and KMOS (right) data-cubes. Flux contour levels are at ±2, ±4, 8, 16σ. Both the [O III] λ5007 …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Rotation curve of [O III] λ5007 (blue diamonds) and Hα (green circles). The rotation velocity decreases between the first two rings and increases going outwards. The V(R) values are in agreement within the errors for both the lines in all the rings. sion that makes it …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Position-velocity diagrams of the [O III] λ5007 narrow line (top panel) and Hα (bottom panel) extracted along the major axis (φ = 94◦ ) of GMASS 0953. Blue contour and colors refer to the data while the 3DBarolo disc model is marked in red. Flux contour levels are at ±…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Position-velocity diagrams along the HI wind in the local starburst M82 (Very Large Array and Green Bank Telescope data; Martini et al. 2018). Left panel: original data with a spatial resolution of 0.4 kpc. Right panel: smoothed data with a spatial resolution of 4.65 k…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The multi-phase gas emission of GMASS 0953 overimposed on the HST/WFC3 (H-band) image. The contours refer to the [O III] λ5007 narrow line (cyan), Hα (green) and CO(J=6-5) (orange, ALMA data; Talia et al. 2018). The lowest contour level is at 3σ. The cross indicates th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the [O III] λ5007 blueshifted line (cyan) and the dust continuum (red, ALMA data; Talia et al. 2018). The two emissions are both concentrated near the center of GMASS 0953, marked with a cross. MNRAS 000, 1–19 (2019) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Barro G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0d , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851L..40B 851, L40

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0d 2017

  3. [3]

    G., 1987, PhD thesis, , Kapteyn Institute, (1987)

    Begeman K. G., 1987, PhD thesis, , Kapteyn Institute, (1987)

    1987

  4. [4]

    Berta S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220859 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220859 2013

  5. [5]

    Princeton University Press

    Binney J., Tremaine S., 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition . Princeton University Press

    2008

  6. [6]

    Brusa M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2117 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446.2394B 446, 2394

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2117 2015

  7. [7]

    Brusa M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731641 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731641 2018

  8. [8]

    C., Kinney A

    Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R. C., Kinney A. L., Koornneef J., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308692 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C 533, 682

    doi:10.1086/308692 2000

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    Cano-D \' az M., Maiolino R., Marconi A., Netzer H., Shemmer O., Cresci G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118358 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    Carniani S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526557 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Cassata P., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809881 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    2003 doi

  5. [13]

    Chen C.-C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa863a , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846..108C 846, 108

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Cicone C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322464 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Cimatti A., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature02668 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.430..184C 430, 184

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Cimatti A., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078739 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A

    2008 doi

  9. [17]

    Cimatti A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/779/1/L13 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...779L..13C 779, L13

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Cresci G., Maiolino R., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0404-5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..179C 2, 179

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Cresci G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...82C 799, 82

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Daddi E., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381020 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...600L.127D 600, L127

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    Daddi E., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521818 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670..156D 670, 156

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    Dekel A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature07648 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Natur.457..451D 457, 451

    2009 doi

  15. [23]

    Delvecchio I., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu130 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.2736D 439, 2736

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Di Matteo T., Springel V., Hernquist L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03335 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.433..604D 433, 604

    2005 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Fraternali F., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1213 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3021D 451, 3021

    Di Teodoro E. M., Fraternali F., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1213 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3021D 451, 3021

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Fraternali F., Miller S

    Di Teodoro E. M., Fraternali F., Miller S. H., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3088 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..861D 466, 861

    Dunlop J. S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3088 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..861D 466, 861

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Eisenhauer F., et al., 2003, in Iye M., Moorwood A. F. M., eds, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes. pp 1548--1561 ( @eprint astro-ph/0306191 ), @doi 10.1117/12.459468

    2003 arXiv

  21. [29]

    H., Joyce R

    Elias J. H., Joyce R. R., Liang M., Muller G. P., Hileman E. A., George J. R., 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. p. 62694C, @doi 10.1117/12.671817

    2006 doi

  22. [30]

    C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA

    Fabian A. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    Feltre A., Charlot S., Gutkin J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2794 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.3354F 456, 3354

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Ferrero I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2691 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.4736F 464, 4736

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    Fiore F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629478 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1364 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...706.1364F 706, 1364

    F \"o rster Schreiber N. M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1364 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...706.1364F 706, 1364

    2009 doi

  27. [35]

    M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787...38F 787, 38

    F \"o rster Schreiber N. M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787...38F 787, 38

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    Franco M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    Genzel R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/68 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...68G 773, 68

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    Genzel R., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796....7G 796, 7

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    Genzel R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature21685 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.543..397G 543, 397

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Giacconi R., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJS..139..369G 139, 369

    2002 doi

  33. [41]

    Glazebrook K., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature02667 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.430..181G 430, 181

    2004 doi

  34. [42]

    Grazian A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053979 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A

    2006 doi

  35. [43]

    M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21723.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.1073H 426, 1073

    Harrison C. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21723.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.1073H 426, 1073

    2012

  36. [44]

    M., Alexander D

    Harrison C. M., Alexander D. M., Mullaney J. R., Swinbank A. M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu515 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.3306H 441, 3306

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Costa T., Tadhunter C

    Harrison C. M., Costa T., Tadhunter C. N., Fl \"u tsch A., Kakkad D., Perna M., Vietri G., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0403-6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..198H 2, 198

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Thompson T

    Heckman T. M., Thompson T. A., 2017, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170109062H

    2017

  39. [47]

    M., Armus L., Miley G

    Heckman T. M., Armus L., Miley G. K., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191522 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJS...74..833H 74, 833

    1990 doi

  40. [48]

    Herrera-Camus R., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6a7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...37H 871, 37

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    F., Torrey P., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw289 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..816H 458, 816

    Hopkins P. F., Torrey P., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw289 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..816H 458, 816

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    I., Battaglia G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3285 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4159I 466, 4159

    Iorio G., Fraternali F., Nipoti C., Di Teodoro E., Read J. I., Battaglia G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3285 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4159I 466, 4159

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA

    1998 doi

  44. [52]

    H., Dav \'e R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363....2K 363, 2

    Kere s D., Katz N., Weinberg D. H., Dav \'e R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363....2K 363, 2

    2005

  45. [53]

    King A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499430 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...635L.121K 635, L121

    2005 doi

  46. [54]

    Kriek M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/528945 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...677..219K 677, 219

    2008 doi

  47. [55]

    R., Hanisch R

    Kriss G., 1994, in Crabtree D. R., Hanisch R. J., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 61, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III. p. 437

    1994

  48. [56]

    Kurk J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117847 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    S., Schombert J

    Lelli F., McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..157L 152, 157

    doi

  50. [58]

    S., Schombert J

    Lelli F., McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...816L..14L 816, L14

    doi

  51. [59]

    Lelli F., De Breuck C., Falkendal T., Fraternali F., Man A. W. S., Nesvadba N. P. H., Lehnert M. D., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1795 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.tmp.1721L

    2018 doi

  52. [60]

    K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/83 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814...83L 814, 83

    Leroy A. K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/83 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814...83L 814, 83

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    Luo B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/228/1/2 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..228....2L 228, 2

    2017 doi

  54. [62]

    Madau P., Dickinson M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    R., Dickinson M., Le Borgne D., Frayer D

    Magnelli B., Elbaz D., Chary R. R., Dickinson M., Le Borgne D., Frayer D. T., Willmer C. N. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913941 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    Magnelli B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321371 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  57. [65]

    Maiolino R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1194 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452...54M 452, 54

    2015 doi

  58. [66]

    K., Mangum J

    Martini P., Leroy A. K., Mangum J. G., Bolatto A., Keating K. M., Sandstrom K., Walter F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab08e , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...61M 856, 61

    2018 doi

  59. [67]

    S., Schombert J

    McGaugh S. S., Schombert J. M., Bothun G. D., de Blok W. J. G., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312628 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533L..99M 533, L99

    2000 doi

  60. [68]

    Nelson D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3040 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..624N 475, 624

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    F., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/21 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...21N 781, 21

    Newman S. F., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/21 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...21N 781, 21

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    M., Sancisi R., Swaters R

    Noordermeer E., van der Hulst J. M., Sancisi R., Swaters R. S., van Albada T. S., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11533.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.376.1513N 376, 1513

    2007

  63. [71]

    Norman C., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383487 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...607..721N 607, 721

    2004 doi

  64. [72]

    Onodera M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/161 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..161O 808, 161

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    E., Ferland G

    Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  66. [74]

    Popping G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730391 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    H., Lockhart I

    Rogstad D. H., Lockhart I. A., Wright M. C. H., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/153164 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...193..309R 193, 309

    1974 doi

  68. [76]

    G., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17634.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.409...48R 409, 48

    Roseboom I. G., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17634.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.409...48R 409, 48

    2010

  69. [77]

    Rupke D. S. N., Veilleux S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/729/2/L27 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...729L..27R 729, L27

    2011 doi

  70. [78]

    S., Veilleux S., Sanders D

    Rupke D. S., Veilleux S., Sanders D. B., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/444451 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632..751R 632, 751

    2005 doi

  71. [79]

    L., Kronberg P

    Schaaf R., Pietsch W., Biermann P. L., Kronberg P. P., Schmutzler T., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167045 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...336..722S 336, 722

    1989 doi

  72. [80]

    Scoville N., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/83 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820...83S 820, 83

    2016 doi

  73. [81]

    E., Steidel C

    Shapley A. E., Steidel C. C., Pettini M., Adelberger K. L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/373922 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...588...65S 588, 65

    2003 doi

  74. [82]

    Sharples R., et al., 2013, The Messenger, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Msngr.151...21S 151, 21

    2013

  75. [83]

    L., Bland-Hawthorn J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305108 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...493..129S 493, 129

    Shopbell P. L., Bland-Hawthorn J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305108 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...493..129S 493, 129

    1998 doi

  76. [84]

    Spekkens K., Giovanelli R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506177 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....132.1426S 132, 1426

    2006 doi

  77. [85]

    S., Bezanson R., Marrone D

    Spilker J. S., Bezanson R., Marrone D. P., Weiner B. J., Whitaker K. E., Williams C. C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/19 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...19S 832, 19

    2016 doi

  78. [86]

    Springel V., Di Matteo T., Hernquist L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428772 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...620L..79S 620, L79

    2005 doi

  79. [87]

    C., Erb D

    Steidel C. C., Erb D. K., Shapley A. E., Pettini M., Reddy N., Bogosavljevi \'c M., Rudie G. C., Rakic O., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/289 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...717..289S 717, 289

    2010 doi

  80. [88]

    A., Sancisi R., van Albada T

    Swaters R. A., Sancisi R., van Albada T. S., van der Hulst J. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810516 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A

    2009 doi

  81. [89]

    J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa4b4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853..179T 853, 179

    Tacconi L. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa4b4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853..179T 853, 179

    2018 doi

  82. [90]

    Tadaki K.-i., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7338 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841L..25T 841, L25

    2017 doi

  83. [91]

    Talia M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117683 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  84. [92]

    Talia M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty481 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.3956T 476, 3956

    2018 doi

  85. [93]

    B., Fisher J

    Tully R. B., Fisher J. R., 1977, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A

    1977

  86. [94]

    \"U bler H., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaacfa , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854L..24U 854, L24

    2018 doi

  87. [95]

    Ueda Y., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9f10 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853...24U 853, 24

    2018 doi

  88. [96]

    Weinberger R., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2944 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3291W 465, 3291

    2017 doi

  89. [97]

    Wisnioski E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/209 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..209W 799, 209

    2015 doi

  90. [98]

    Wisnioski E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab097 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855...97W 855, 97

    2018 doi

  91. [99]

    Wuyts E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/74 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...74W 827, 74

    2016 doi

  92. [100]

    da Cunha E., Charlot S., Elbaz D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388.1595D 388, 1595

    2008

  93. [101]

    de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., Brinks E., Trachternach C., Oh S.-H., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2648D 136, 2648

    2008 doi

  94. [102]

    G., Kriek M., Rodgers B., Franx M., Puxley P., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429376 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...622L..13V 622, L13

    van Dokkum P. G., Kriek M., Rodgers B., Franx M., Puxley P., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429376 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...622L..13V 622, L13

    2005 doi

  95. [103]

    G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/23 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...23V 813, 23

    van Dokkum P. G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/23 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...23V 813, 23

    2015 doi

  96. [104]

    M., Terlouw J

    van der Hulst J. M., Terlouw J. P., Begeman K. G., Zwitser W., Roelfsema P. R., 1992, in Worrall D. M., Biemesderfer C., Barnes J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 25, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I. p. 131

    1992

  97. [105]

    van der Wel A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...28V 788, 28

    2014 doi

  98. [106]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.