Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Learned Clause Minimization in Parallel SAT Solvers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.01624 v1 pith:7BYSWDW2 submitted 2019-08-05 cs.DS cs.LO

classification cs.DScs.LO
keywords solversparallelperformanceapproachesclauseinstanceslearnedminimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learned clauses minimization (LCM) let to performance improvements of modern SAT solvers especially in solving hard SAT instances. Despite the success of LCM approaches in sequential solvers, they are not widely incorporated in parallel SAT solvers. In this paper we explore the potential of LCM for parallel SAT solvers by defining multiple LCM approaches based on clause vivification, comparing their runtime in different SAT solvers and discussing reasons for performance gains and losses. Results show that LCM only boosts performance of parallel SAT solvers on a fraction of SAT instances. More commonly applying LCM decreases performance. Only certain LCM approaches are able to improve the overall performance of parallel SAT solvers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools