Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Real-Variable Characterizations of Local Hardy Spaces on Spaces of Homogeneous Type

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that on any space of homogeneous type, for p in the sharp range ω/(ω+η) < p ≤ 1, the local Hardy spaces defined by grand, radial, non-tangential, atomic, and Lusin-area Littlewood–Paley maximal functions all coincide…

desk verdict A serious extension of local Hardy space theory to general spaces of homogeneous type, but Section 5 has a real domain mismatch with the reproducing formula that needs fixing before the Littlewood-Paley characterizations are fully proven. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01911 v1 pith:VM5U6OHI submitted 2019-08-06 math.CA math.APmath.FA

Ziyi He , Dachun Yang , Wen Yuan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath.APmath.FA MSC 42B3042B3542B2030L99
keywords localHardyspaceofhomogeneoustypemaximalfunctionatomLittlewood–PaleydualinhomogeneousapproximationtheidentityCalderónreproducingformula
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

On any space of homogeneous type—a quasi-metric space whose balls satisfy a doubling condition—the paper proves that every natural real-variable definition of a local Hardy space yields the same space, for all exponents $p$ with $\omega/(\omega+\eta) < p \le 1$. The grand-maximal, radial-maximal, non-tangential-maximal, atomic, and Lusin-area Littlewood–Paley versions are shown to carry equivalent (quasi-)norms, and when the whole space has finite measure they also agree with the classical atomic Hardy space of Coifman and Weiss. The authors identify the duals of these spaces as local Campanato or Lipschitz spaces, extending the previously known $p=1$ case. The proof runs on inhomogeneous Calderón reproducing formulae with exponential decay, so no reverse-doubling condition is needed.

What carries the argument

The engine is the inhomogeneous approximation of the identity with exponential decay (exp-IAI): a sequence of operators whose kernels have exponential off-diagonal decay, Hölder regularity of order $\eta$, integral $1$ at the coarse scale, and zero integral at fine scales. From such a sequence, the inhomogeneous Calderón reproducing formulae (Theorems 2.6 and 2.7) express every distribution as a sum of coarse-scale averages and fine-scale kernel evaluations. The discrete version, built on a dyadic cube system, dictates the form of the local radial maximal function and the local Littlewood–Paley $g$-function, replacing function values on coarse cubes by local averages to compensate for the missing cancellation. The comparison lemmas (3.5 and 3.6) convert kernel differences at separated scales into a factor $\delta^{|k-l|\eta'}$, which turns the maximal-function equivalences into applications of the Hardy–Littlewood maximal theorem.

What would settle it

Take a compact space of homogeneous type with quasi-metric constant $A_0>1$ and no reverse doubling, set $p=1$, and compute the local radial and grand maximal norms of the constant function $f\equiv 1$ at points where coarse dyadic cubes meet; the paper predicts these norms are finite, comparable, and equal (up to constants independent of the cube partition) to the atomic norm of $f$, which is a bounded multiple of a local atom. If the ratio of the two norms depends on $A_0$ or on the particular dyadic cube system, the claimed equivalences fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the local Hardy space $h^p(X)$ is one object with five equivalent descriptions for $p \in (\omega/(\omega+\eta),1]$. As subspaces of the distribution space $(G^\eta_0(\beta,\gamma))'$, the local grand maximal space $h^{*,\,p}(X)$, the local radial maximal space $h^{+,\,p}(X)$, each non-tangential maximal space $h^p_\theta(X)$, each atomic space $h^{p,q}_{\mathrm{at}}(X)$, and the Lusin-area space $h^p(X)$ have equivalent (quasi-)norms; Theorem 5.7 adds equivalences with the local Littlewood–Paley $g$-function and $g^*_\lambda$-function. When $\mu(X)<\infty$, Proposition 6.5 identifies $h^p(X)$ with the Coifman–Weiss atomic Hardy space $H^p_{\mathrm{CW}}(X)$. When $\mu(X)=\infty$, $H^p_{\mathrm{CW}}(X)$ is a proper subspace, and every normalized test function with nonzero integral lies in $h^p(X)$ but not in $H^p_{\mathrm{CW}}(X)$. The dual statement, Theorem 7.4, is that for $q\in(1,\infty]$ the dual of $h^{p,q}_{\mathrm{at}}(X)$ is the local Campanato space $c_{1/p-1,q'}(X)$, with the local Lipschitz space $\ell_{1/p-1}(X)$ in the case $q=1$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an inhomogeneous approximation of the identity with exponential decay (with Hölder exponent $\eta$) exists on every space of homogeneous type, and that the associated inhomogeneous Calderón reproducing formulae hold without any reverse-doubling assumption; if this premise gives way, the maximal-function equivalences, the atomic decomposition, and the finite-measure identification with the Coifman–Weiss space would all fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $p$ in the range, a distribution can be certified in whichever local metric is easiest: maximal, atomic, or Littlewood–Paley norms are interchangeable with constants independent of the function.
  • For $p>1$, the maximal-function local Hardy spaces coincide with $L^p(X)$, so the spaces behave like Hardy spaces only at small scales and like Lebesgue spaces at large scales.
  • In the finite-measure case, the local Hardy spaces coincide with the Coifman–Weiss Hardy spaces, so radial maximal characterizations of $H^1_{\mathrm{CW}}(X)$ hold without any additional geometric condition.
  • In the infinite-measure case, the local Hardy space is strictly larger than the Coifman–Weiss space: nonzero-integral test functions belong to $h^p(X)$ but not to $H^p_{\mathrm{CW}}(X)$.
  • The dual spaces are explicitly described by local Campanato norms $c_{1/p-1,q'}$ for $q>1$ and by the local Lipschitz norm $\ell_{1/p-1}$ for $q=1$, giving a local counterpart of the classical $H^p$–Campanato duality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My extension: the finite atomic characterization of Section 7 should make endpoint estimates for commutators and singular integrals on local Hardy spaces immediate, since norm control reduces to finite atomic decompositions.
  • My extension: replacing the $L^p$ target norm by a Musielak–Orlicz or variable-exponent norm in the same exponential-decay argument should produce local versions of those generalized Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type.
  • My extension: in the finite-measure case, the equality $h^p=H^p_{\mathrm{CW}}$ suggests that Hardy spaces associated with operators whose heat kernels have good decay should also coincide with these local spaces whenever the operator's Calderón reproducing structure matches the exp-IAI.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a real-variable theory of local Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type, for p in the range (omega/(omega+eta), 1], with omega the upper dimension and eta the Holder regularity index of the underlying wavelet system. It introduces local Hardy spaces via grand, radial, and non-tangential maximal functions; proves their mutual equivalence; establishes atomic, Lusin-area, Littlewood-Paley g-function and g*-lambda-function characterizations; compares the local spaces with the Coifman--Weiss Hardy spaces, including the finite-measure case; and obtains finite atomic decompositions and dual spaces modeled on local Campanato and local Lipschitz spaces. The main tools are the inhomogeneous Calderon reproducing formulae from the authors' earlier work [28] and the global Hardy-space theory from [27].

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper gives a substantial and coherent extension of Goldberg's local Hardy-space theory to general spaces of homogeneous type without reverse-doubling assumptions, and it answers the finite-measure version of the Coifman--Weiss question about radial maximal characterizations. The finite atomic characterization and the dual-space result for the full range p in (omega/(omega+eta),1) go beyond earlier work of Dafni and Yue, which treated only p=1. The authors are explicit that the results depend on the existence of exp-IATIs and on the inhomogeneous Calderon reproducing formulae established in [28]; those are published upstream results, not circular assumptions of this paper. A weakness is that several central proofs are deferred to 'similar' arguments in [27], while the local maximal functions are deliberately modified, so the local adaptation is not a purely formal corollary.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 5.1 and Section 5] There is a domain mismatch in the use of the discrete reproducing formula. Theorem 2.7 is stated for f in (˚G_eta^0(beta,gamma))', the dual of test functions with zero integral. In the proof of Theorem 5.1, however, the formula is applied pointwise to write E_l f(x) = <f, E_l(x,.)> for f in (G_eta^0(beta,gamma))'. For l=0 the kernel E_0(x,.) has integral 1 by Definition 2.4(iii), so E_0(x,.) is not in ˚G_eta^0(beta,gamma), and the identity in (˚G_eta^0(beta,gamma))' cannot be evaluated at E_0(x,.). The same gap occurs in the proof of Theorem 5.7 when Q_l f(z) is expanded for l=0. The paper needs either a proof that Theorem 2.7 extends to (G_eta^0(beta,gamma))' with the first N terms absorbing constants, or a separate estimate for the low-frequency term E_0 f in terms of the Lusin-area function. Without this, the proof of the Lusin-area characterization is incomplete.
  2. [Theorems 3.8, 4.13, 5.6, 7.4; Proposition 7.1] Several load-bearing equivalences are stated without proof or with only a statement that the argument is 'similar' to [27]. In particular, Theorem 3.8 is obtained by combining propositions with the details omitted; Theorem 4.13 and Theorem 5.6 are stated with the details omitted; Proposition 7.1 is described as 'quite similar' to [27, Theorem 7.1] and only key points are given; and Theorem 7.4 explicitly proves only the case q=1, with the case q in (1,infty] deferred. Because the local radial and non-tangential maximal functions are not the same as in [27] (see Remark 3.2), these results are not formal restatements of the global theory. The manuscript should either include the local adaptations or state precisely which statements in [27] imply them, especially for the finite atomic characterization and the dual-space theorem.
  3. [Proposition 5.5, Eq. (5.16)] Proposition 5.5 relies on the reproducing identity f = sum_{k=0}^infty D_k D_k f in (G_eta^0(beta,gamma))', whose derivation is only described as 'a similar argument to that used in the proof of Theorem 2.6'. The operators D_k are asserted to be self-adjoint and orthogonal from [1], but the exp-IATI of Definition 2.4 is not itself orthogonal. If {D_k} are special orthogonal projections from [1], the proof needs to justify carefully that they form an exp-IATI and that the identity (5.16) holds for distributions in (G_eta^0(beta,gamma))', not only for ˚G. This identity is the bridge between the Lusin-area space and the molecular characterization, so the omission is not merely technical.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and title] The abstract and title contain typographical artifacts such as 'S paces'; 'Holder' should be 'Holder' with the umlaut throughout.
  2. [Remark 2.5] 'Calder´ om' should be 'Calderon'; this typo occurs in the remark and possibly elsewhere.
  3. [Proposition 5.2] In the first paragraph of the proof, the phrase 'which further implies that (5.25) holds true' appears to refer to equation (5.5), not (5.25), since (5.25) is the display in Theorem 5.7.
  4. [Proposition 6.3] After proving the cancellation of a-Pa, the text says this 'shows that a-Pa satisfies Definition 5.3(ii)'; the intended reference appears to be Definition 5.3(iii), the cancellation condition.
  5. [Theorem 7.4] The statement of the theorem mixes the cases q=1 and q in (1,infty]; the proof explicitly handles only q=1 and says the other case is similar. Since the dual-space theorem is a main application, at least a clear indication of the modifications for q>1 should be given.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central local-Hardy-space equivalences are derived from prior published Calderón-reproducing formulae and independent atomic/molecular arguments, not from the conclusions being proved.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense of a prediction reducing to a fitted input or an equality holding by definition. The local maximal-function, atomic, Littlewood–Paley, finite-measure, and dual-space results are proved from general estimates (Lemmas 3.5, 3.6, 4.2, 4.6–4.10, 5.2–5.5) together with the inhomogeneous discrete Calderón reproducing formula quoted in Theorem 2.7. That theorem, together with the existence of exp-IA TIs, is imported from [28] and [1]; these are upstream published results, not outputs of this paper, and none of them presuppose the equalities h^{+,p}=h^{*,p}=h^p_θ=h^p_{at}=h^p or the dual-space identification. The finite-measure equality h^p_{at}=H^p_{\mathrm{CW}} in Proposition 6.5 is a direct atomic argument using the Coifman–Weiss constant atom [μ(X)]^{-1/p}, not a renaming of a known result. The dual theorem 7.4 is proved from the finite atomic characterization and an explicit pairing with local Campanato/Lipschitz functions, analogous to but independent of the global case in [27]. The paper does rely heavily on the authors' own prior work, especially [27] and [28], but that reliance is on published, independently checkable theorems rather than on a self-citation that assumes the target conclusion. One non-circular mathematical concern should be noted separately: Theorem 2.7 is stated for f∈(˚G^η_0(β,γ))', while Theorem 5.1 and Theorem 5.7 apply it to f∈(G^η_0(β,γ))' when testing E_0(x,·) or Q_0(z,·), kernels with integral one; the low-frequency l=0 term is not separately justified. This is a possible gap in the proof of the Lusin-area characterization, but it is not an instance of the paper's conclusion being equivalent by construction to its input, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No data-fitting parameters appear. Constants such as delta, j0, and N are universal existence or scale constants from dyadic cubes and Calderon reproducing formulae; they are arbitrary in a range and do not affect the equivalence classes. All substantive inputs are prior theorems (mostly from [1], [28], [27], [11], [23]) and the stated Coifman-Weiss domain assumptions.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Quasi-metric space with doubling Borel regular measure mu, mu(B(x,r)) in (0,infinity), non-atomic (Coifman-Weiss assumptions)
    Section 1 after (1.1); the entire theory is built on these hypotheses.
  • standard math Existence of a dyadic cube system on X with properties (iii)-(v) of Lemma 2.3
    Lemma 2.3, from Hytonen-Kairema and Auscher-Hytonen; used in discrete reproducing formulae, atoms, and Littlewood-Paley characterizations.
  • domain assumption Existence of an exp-IA TI with Holder regularity eta (Auscher-Hytonen wavelet system)
    Remark 2.5 and Definition 2.4; the maximal-function and Littlewood-Paley definitions depend on such kernels.
  • domain assumption Inhomogeneous continuous and discrete Calderon reproducing formulae with kernels of exponential decay
    Theorems 2.6 and 2.7, from [28]; used to prove Proposition 3.4, Proposition 3.7, Theorem 5.1, and Theorem 5.7.
  • domain assumption Macias-Segovia snowflake: there is theta in (0,1) and a metric d' with d' ~ d^theta making modified level sets open
    Section 4 near (4.3); used so that Calderon-Zygmund decomposition can be applied to level sets of f_0^star.
  • standard math Fefferman-Stein vector-valued maximal inequality on spaces of homogeneous type
    Used in proofs of Theorem 5.1 and Theorem 5.7 via [23, (1.13)].
  • standard math Coifman-Weiss atomic Hardy spaces H_CW^p(X) are independent of q
    Section 6, Definition 6.1 and Proposition 6.5 rely on [11].
invented entities (2)
  • local Hardy spaces h^{*,p}(X), h^{+,p}(X), h_theta^p(X), h_{at}^{p,q}(X), h^p(X) independent evidence
    purpose: Define and interrelate local Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type for p in (omega/(omega+eta),1].
    Multiple independent characterizations (maximal, atomic, Littlewood-Paley) are proved equivalent, and special cases reduce to Goldberg's h^p(R^n), Dafni-Yue's h^1(X), and Coifman-Weiss H_CW^p when mu(X) is finite, giving external anchors.
  • local Campanato spaces c_{alpha,q}(X) and local Lipschitz spaces ell_alpha(X) independent evidence
    purpose: Serve as dual spaces of h^p(X).
    On R^n, ell_{1/p-1} coincides with lip_{n(1/p-1)} (Proposition 7.3), matching the known dual of Goldberg's h^p(R^n); c_{alpha,q} = ell_alpha (Corollary 7.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-Variable Characterizations of Local Hardy Spaces on Spaces of Homogeneous Type." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VM5U6OHI

@misc{pith2026190801911,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-Variable Characterizations of Local Hardy Spaces on Spaces of Homogeneous Type},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VM5U6OHI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01911}
}
abstract

Suppose that $(X,d,\mu)$ is a space of homogeneous type, with upper dimension $\mu$, in the sense of R. R. Coifman and G. Weiss. Let $\eta$ be the H\"{o}lder regularity index of wavelets constructed by P. Auscher and T. Hyt\"{o}nen. In this article, the authors introduce the local Hardy space $h^{*,p}(X)$ via local grand maximal functions and also characterize $h^{*,p}(X)$ via local radial maximal functions, local non-tangential maximal functions, locally atoms and local Littlewood--Paley functions. Furthermore, the authors establish the relationship between the global and the local Hardy spaces. Finally, the authors also obtain the finite atomic characterizations of $h^{*,p}(X)$. As an application, the authors give the dual spaces of $h^{*,p}(X)$ when $p\in(\omega/(\omega+\eta),1)$, which further completes the result of G. Dafni and H. Yue on the dual space of $h^{*,1}(X)$. This article also answers the question of R. R. Coifman and G. Weiss on the nonnecessity of any additional geometric assumptions except the doubling condition for the radial maximal function characterization of $H^1_{\mathrm{cw}}(X)$ when $\mu(X)<\infty$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Z. He, Y . Han, J. Li, L. Liu, D. Y ang and W. Y uan, A completereal-variable theory of Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. (2018), DOI: 10.1007/s00041- 018-09652-y

    doi:10.1007/s00041- 2018

  2. [28]

    Z. He, L. Liu, D. Y ang and W. Y uan, New Calder´ on reproducing formulae with exponential decay on spaces of homogeneous type, Sci. China Math. 62 (201 9), 283–350

    work page

  3. [1]

    Auscher and T

    P . Auscher and T. Hyt¨ onen, Orthonormal bases of regularwavelets in spaces of homogeneous type, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 34 (2013), 266–296

    work page 2013

  4. [2]

    J. J. Betancor and W. Dami´ an, Anisotropic local Hardy sp aces, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 16 (2010), 658–675

    work page 2010

  5. [3]

    H. Q. Bui, Weighted Hardy spaces, Math. Nachr. 103 (1981) , 45–62

    work page 1981

  6. [4]

    T. A. Bui and X. T. Duong, Hardy spaces associated to the di screte Laplacians on graphs and boundedness of singular integrals, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 3451–3485

    work page 2014

  7. [5]

    T. A. Bui, X. T. Duong and F. K. Ly, Maximal function charac terizations for new local Hardy-type spaces on spaces of homogeneous type, Trans. Ame r. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), 7229–7292

    work page 2018

  8. [6]

    T. A. Bui, X. T. Duong and F. K. Ly, Maximal function charac terizations for Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type with finite measure and applica tions, arXiv: 1804.01347

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 49 references
  1. [7]

    Chang, G

    D.-C. Chang, G. Dafni and H. Y ue, A div-curl decomposition for the local Hardy space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 3369–3377

    2009

  2. [8]

    Chang, S

    D.-C. Chang, S. Krantz and E. M. Stein, H p theory on a smooth domain in RN and elliptic boundary value problems, J. Funct. Anal. 114 (1993), 286–34 7

    1993

  3. [9]

    R. R. Coifman, A real variable characterization of H p, Studia Math. 51 (1974), 269–274

    1974

  4. [10]

    R. R. Coifman and G. Weiss, Analyse Harmonique Non-comm utative sur Certains Espaces Homog` enes, (French) ´Etude de certaines int´ egrales singuli` eres, Lecture Notes in Mathemat- ics 242, Springer-V erlag, Berlin-New Y ork, 1971

    1971

  5. [11]

    R. R. Coifman and G. Weiss, Extensions of Hardy spaces an d their use in analysis, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), 569–645. 60 Ziyi He, Dachun Yang and Wen Yuan

    1977

  6. [12]

    Dafni and H

    G. Dafni and H. Y ue, Some characterizations of local bmo and h1 on metric measure spaces, Anal. Math. Phys. 2 (2012), 285–318

    2012

  7. [13]

    Dafni, E

    G. Dafni, E. Mombourquette and H. Y ue, Some characteriz ations of local bmo and h1 on spaces of homogeneous type, in: Harmonic Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equa- tions, 187–215, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu B56, Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto, 2016

    2016

  8. [14]

    Fe fferman and E

    C. Fe fferman and E. M. Stein, H p spaces of several variables, Acta Math. 129 (1972), 137– 193

    1972

  9. [15]

    Fu, D.-C

    X. Fu, D.-C. Chang and D. Y ang, Recent progress in biline ar decompositions, Appl. Anal. Optim. 1 (2017), 153–210

    2017

  10. [16]

    Garc´ ıa-Cuerva and J

    J. Garc´ ıa-Cuerva and J. L. Rubio de Francia, Weighted Norm Inequalities and Related Topics, North-Holland Mathematics Studies 116, Notas de Matem´ ati ca [Mathematical Notes] 104, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1985

    1985

  11. [17]

    Goldberg, A local version of real Hardy spaces, Duke M ath

    D. Goldberg, A local version of real Hardy spaces, Duke M ath. J. 46 (1979), 27–42

    1979

  12. [18]

    Goldberg, Local Hardy spaces, in: Harmonic Analysis in Euclidean Spaces (Proc

    D. Goldberg, Local Hardy spaces, in: Harmonic Analysis in Euclidean Spaces (Proc. Sym- pos. Pure Math., Williams Coll., Williamstown, Mass., 1978 ), Part 1, pp. 245–248, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXV , Part, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1979

    1978

  13. [19]

    R. Gong, J. Li and L. Y an, A local version of Hardy spaces a ssociated with operators on metric spaces, Sci. China Math. 56 (2013), 315–330

    2013

  14. [20]

    Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, Third editio n, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 249, Springer, New Y ork, 2014

    L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, Third editio n, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 249, Springer, New Y ork, 2014

    2014

  15. [21]

    Grafakos, Modern Fourier Analysis, Third edition, G raduate Texts in Mathematics 250, Springer, New Y ork, 2014

    L. Grafakos, Modern Fourier Analysis, Third edition, G raduate Texts in Mathematics 250, Springer, New Y ork, 2014

    2014

  16. [22]

    Grafakos, L

    L. Grafakos, L. Liu, and D. Y ang, Maximal function chara cterizations of Hardy spaces on RD-spaces and their applications, Sci. China Ser. A 51 (2008 ), 2253–2284

    2008

  17. [23]

    Grafakos, L

    L. Grafakos, L. Liu and D. Y ang, V ector-valued singular integrals and maximal functions on spaces of homogeneous type, Math. Scand. 104 (2009), 296–31 0

    2009

  18. [24]

    Y . Han, D. M¨ uller and D. Y ang, Littlewood–Paley charac terizations for Hardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type, Math. Nachr. 279 (2006), 1505–1 537

    2006

  19. [25]

    Y . Han, D. M¨ uller and D. Y ang, A theory of Besov and Trieb el–Lizorkin spaces on metric measure spaces modeled on Carnot–Carath´ eodory spaces, Ab str. Appl. Anal. 2008, Art. ID 893409, 250 pp

    2008

  20. [26]

    Han and D

    Y . Han and D. Y ang, New characterizations and applicati ons of inhomogeneous Besov and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces on homogeneous type spaces and fra ctals, Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 403 (2002), 1–102

    2002

  21. [29]

    Hyt¨ onen and A

    T. Hyt¨ onen and A. Kairema, Systems of dyadic cubes in a d oubling metric space, Colloq. Math. 126 (2012), 1–33

    2012

  22. [30]

    Liu, D.-C

    L. Liu, D.-C. Chang, X. Fu and D. Y ang, Endpoint boundedn ess of commutators on spaces of homogeneous type, Appl. Anal. 96 (2017), 2408–2433

    2017

  23. [31]

    Liu, D.-C

    L. Liu, D.-C. Chang, X. Fu and D. Y ang, Endpoint estimate s of linear commutators on Hardy spaces over spaces of homogeneous type, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41 (2018), 5951–5984. Local Hardy Spaces on Spaces of Homogeneous Type 61

    2018

  24. [32]

    S. Z. Lu, Four Lectures on Real H p Spaces, World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 1995

    1995

  25. [33]

    R. H. Latter, A characterization of H p(Rn) in terms of atoms, Studia Math. 62 (1978), 93– 101

    1978

  26. [34]

    R. A. Mac´ ıas and C. Segovia, Lipschitz functions on spa ces of homogeneous type, Adv. Math. 33 (1979), 257–270

    1979

  27. [35]

    R. A. Mac´ ıas and C. Segovia, A decomposition into atoms of distributions on spaces of homogeneous type, Adv. Math. 33 (1979), 271–309

    1979

  28. [36]

    Nakai and Y

    E. Nakai and Y . Sawano, Hardy spaces with variable expon ents and generalized Campanato spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), 3665–3748

    2012

  29. [37]

    Nakai and K

    E. Nakai and K. Y abuta, Pointwise multipliers for funct ions of weighted bounded mean os- cillation on spaces of homogeneous type, Math. Japon. 46 (19 97), 15–28

  30. [38]

    M. M. Peloso and S. Secco, Local Riesz transforms charac terization of local Hardy spaces, Collect. Math. 59 (2008), 299–320

    2008

  31. [39]

    Rychkov, Littlewood–Paley theory and function spac es with Aloc p weights, Math

    V . Rychkov, Littlewood–Paley theory and function spac es with Aloc p weights, Math. Nachr. 224 (2001), 145–180

    2001

  32. [40]

    Sawano, K.-P

    Y . Sawano, K.-P . Ho, D. Y ang and S. Y ang, Hardy spaces for ball quasi-Banach function spaces, Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 525 (2017), 1 –102

    2017

  33. [41]

    E. M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis: Real-V ariable Methods , Orthogonality, and Oscillatory In- tegrals, Princeton Mathematical Series 43, Monographs in H armonic Analysis III, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    1993

  34. [42]

    E. M. Stein and G. Weiss, On the theory of harmonic functi ons of several variables. I. The theory of H p-spaces, Acta Math. 103 (1960), 25–62

    1960

  35. [43]

    Taylor, Hardy spaces and bmo on manifolds with bounde d geometry, J

    M. Taylor, Hardy spaces and bmo on manifolds with bounde d geometry, J. Geom. Anal. 19 (2009), 137–190

    2009

  36. [44]

    Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces, Monographs in Ma thematics 78, Birkh¨ auser V erlag, Basel, 1983

    H. Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces, Monographs in Ma thematics 78, Birkh¨ auser V erlag, Basel, 1983

    1983

  37. [45]

    Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces

    H. Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces. II, Monographs i n Mathematics 84, Birkh¨ auser V er- lag, Basel, 1992

    1992

  38. [46]

    Y ang, Y

    D. Y ang, Y . Liang and L. D. Ky, Real-V ariable Theory of Mu sielak–Orlicz Hardy Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2182, Springer, Cham, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    Y ang and S

    D. Y ang and S. Y ang, Local Hardy spaces of Musielak–Orli cz type and their applications, Sci. China Math. 55 (2012), 1677–1720

    2012

  40. [48]

    Y ang and Y

    D. Y ang and Y . Zhou, New properties of Besov and Triebel– Lizorkin spaces on RD-spaces, Manuscripta Math. 134 (2011), 59–90

    2011

  41. [49]

    C. Zhuo, Y . Sawano and D. Y ang, Hardy spaces with variabl e exponents on RD-spaces and applications, Dissertationes Math. 520 (2016), 1-74. Ziyi He, Dachun Y ang (Corresponding author) and Wen Y uan Laboratory of Mathematics and Complex Systems (Ministry of Education of Chin...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.