A 9-Hr CV With One Outburst in 4 Years of Kepler Data

Andrew Mann; Andrew Vanderburg; Boris T. Gaensicke; Daniel Steeghs; Daryll LaCourse; Douglas N.C. Lin; John Thorstensen; Joshua Aiken; Lorne Nelson; Odette Toloza

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 97 references

A 9-Hr CV With One Outburst in 4 Years of Kepler Data

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single flaring star in Kepler data hosts the lowest-mass white dwarf yet weighed in a cataclysmic variable, at about 0.46 solar masses.

desk verdict A genuinely interesting CV whose headline low WD mass hinges on an ELV amplitude that starspots could contaminate. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01914 v1 pith:TV2PXMST submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.SR

Zhifei Yu , John Thorstensen , Saul Rappaport , Andrew Mann , Thomas Jacobs , Lorne Nelson , Boris T. Gaensicke , Daryll LaCourse

show 6 more authors

Tamás Borkovits Joshua Aiken Daniel Steeghs Odette Toloza Andrew Vanderburg Douglas N.C. Lin

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.SR

keywords cataclysmicvariablesdwarfnovaewhitemassesellipsoidallightvariationsAMCVnprogenitorsKeplerphotometryRoche-lobefillingbinarystellarevolution

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the discovery of KIC 5608384, a cataclysmic variable found in a visual sweep of Kepler main-field light curves. Over four years of nearly continuous photometry the system flared only once, a four-day outburst reaching three times its quiescent brightness, while its quiescent light was dominated by 8.7-hour ellipsoidal variations with a roughly 12% amplitude. Combining the radial-velocity mass function, that ellipsoidal amplitude, the Roche-lobe-filling condition, and a K-star radius from SED fitting with the Gaia distance, the authors derive a white dwarf mass of approximately $0.46 \pm 0.02\,M_\odot$, a K-star mass of approximately $0.41 \pm 0.03\,M_\odot$, and an inclination above about $70^\circ$. That white dwarf mass is the lowest reported for an accreting white dwarf in a cataclysmic variable. If correct, the system is a rare caught-in-the-act example of a binary that will evolve into an AM CVn system through the CV channel.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the amplitude of the ellipsoidal light variations, combined with the radial-velocity mass function, the Roche-lobe-filling condition, and the SED-based K-star radius. Ellipsoidal light variations are the double-wave brightness modulation produced when a Roche-lobe-filling star is tidally distorted; their amplitude satisfies approximately $A_{\rm ELV}\approx C(M_{\rm wd}/M_{\rm K})(R_{\rm K}/a)^3\sin^2 i$, and because the donor fills its Roche lobe, $(R_{\rm K}/a)$ becomes a function of the mass ratio alone. An MCMC fit of these constraints yields the masses and inclination, while independent binary-evolution tracks identify the initial conditions and future evolution.

What would settle it

Measure the rotational broadening of the K star's absorption lines: for a synchronously rotating Roche-lobe-filling donor at the quoted radius and mass, the predicted $v\sin i$ is fixed, and a measured value well below that would show the donor does not fill its Roche lobe, forcing a revision of $M_{\rm wd}\simeq0.46\,M_\odot$. Independently, a UV spectral fit to the roughly 16,500 K white dwarf can give a direct mass and check the MCMC result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that KIC 5608384 is a cataclysmic variable in which a white dwarf of only $M_{\rm wd}\simeq 0.46\pm 0.02\,M_\odot$ accretes from a K-type donor of $M_{\rm K}\simeq 0.41\pm 0.03\,M_\odot$ at an 8.74-hour orbital period and a line-of-sight inclination above about $70^\circ$. The system betrayed itself through a single four-day dwarf-nova-like outburst in four years of Kepler photometry, while its quiescent light curve showed ~12% ellipsoidal variations at twice the orbital frequency. The authors argue that the current mass-transfer rate places the disk below the critical stability threshold, so such rare outbursts are expected, and that the binary's position in the period-donor mass plane identifies it as a progenitor of AM CVn systems formed through the CV channel, with the white dwarf probably having passed through a hot subdwarf phase.

Load-bearing premise

The whole mass solution rests on the K star exactly filling its Roche lobe and on the ellipsoidal-variation model being calibrated to within about 15%; if either of those gives way, the derived white-dwarf mass could shift outside the quoted uncertainty.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The derived $0.46\pm0.02\,M_\odot$ is the lowest mass ever robustly reported for an accreting white dwarf in a cataclysmic variable, well below the roughly $0.83\,M_\odot$ average previously inferred for CV accretors.
Because the inferred mass-transfer rates, about $3\times10^{-10}\,M_\odot\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$ from the white-dwarf temperature and $6.5\times10^{-9}\,M_\odot\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$ from the evolutionary track, both lie below the critical rate for disk stability, the system should keep behaving as a dwarf nova, with rare outbursts like the single one seen.
The evolution models place KIC 5608384 close to the bifurcation boundary; within about 1 Gyr it should shrink to an orbital period near 20 minutes and become an AM CVn binary.
The white dwarf's mass matches the peak of the hot-subdwarf remnant mass distribution, which the authors take as evidence that the accretor descended from an sdB star formed in a common-envelope phase.
The donor should show measurably altered CNO isotope ratios, with C/N lower by a factor of 4, O/N lower by 2.5, and C/O at 60% of the primordial value, giving an observational test of the proposed history.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A four-year window catching just one outburst suggests that current CV catalogs, which are largely outburst-selected, may be systematically undercounting long-recurrence, low-mass-white-dwarf systems; the true fraction of AM CVn progenitors among CVs could be higher than recognized.
The same joint constraint, ELV amplitude plus Roche-lobe filling plus an SED radius, could be applied to other Kepler and TESS CVs and CV candidates to measure white-dwarf masses without needing deep eclipses or bright outbursts.
If an independent white-dwarf mass measurement, for example from UV atmosphere fitting or gravitational redshift, confirms $0.46\,M_\odot$, it would strengthen the case that a substantial fraction of CV accretors form through the hot-subdwarf channel rather than from standard red-giant common envelopes.
The predicted CNO depletion pattern in the donor is a clean falsifier: future ultraviolet spectroscopy finding primordial C/N, O/N, and C/O ratios would rule out the claimed evolutionary history through a thermally evolving donor.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a well-observed and interesting binary: a Kepler-discovered CV with one outburst in four years, a solid RV curve, and a multi-constraint MCMC that yields a 0.46 solar mass white dwarf. The paper is honest about what is measured versus what is modeled—the mass function, SED radius, and Roche geometry are empirical inputs, and the MESA tracks are clearly presented as an interpretation rather than used in the fit. Credit is due for the careful separation.

The soft spot is the ELV amplitude. The paper's own model saturates at about 0.109 sin^2 i at the best-fit q, while the observed amplitude is 0.118 ± 0.018. The fit survives only because of a 'somewhat arbitrary' 15% model uncertainty. The K star shows strong, evolving spots—the omega-term amplitude reaches 4%—and a spot distribution locked to the orbit can produce a constant 2-omega harmonic. The paper notes the 2-omega phase is constant but never shows it matches the ellipsoidal prediction. A 10% spot contribution to the 2-omega amplitude would lower the true inclination and raise the derived Mwd by roughly 15%, to about 0.53 solar masses, which is no longer the lowest known. That is a plausible systematic, not a mathematical error. The 2% Roche-lobe tolerance is also ad hoc, and the SED radius neglects a few percent light contribution from the white dwarf and disk, which biases in the same direction.

The factor-of-twenty mismatch between inferred and model mass transfer rates is acknowledged, and the AM CVn prediction is an extrapolation, but the paper labels it appropriately and offers testable isotope ratios. So the evolutionary story is fine as speculation. The load-bearing issue is the headline mass.

This paper is for CV astronomers, binary evolution modelers, and anyone mining Kepler light curves for rare objects. It deserves a serious referee. A referee should push for a quantitative spot-contamination test—model a spot distribution, compare the 2-omega phase to the ellipsoidal prediction, or use the outburst eclipse width to derive an independent inclination. If that passes, the record-low claim is compelling; if not, the paper still stands as a useful system study with a weaker central claim. Send it to review.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery and characterization of KIC 5608384, a cataclysmic variable in the Kepler main field that shows only one 4-day outburst in four years of photometry and 8.7-hour ellipsoidal light variations with ~12% amplitude. Using the radial-velocity mass function, the ELV amplitude, the assumption that the K star fills its Roche lobe, an SED+Gaia-derived K-star radius, and a partial-eclipse constraint, the authors run an MCMC fit and derive M_wd = 0.458 ± 0.019 M_sun, M_K = 0.406 ± 0.028 M_sun, and i ≳ 70°. They claim this is the lowest white-dwarf mass measured in any accreting CV. They supplement this with MESA evolutionary tracks to infer the pre-CV parameters, argue the white dwarf likely went through a hot-subdwarf phase, and predict that the system will evolve into an AM CVn binary in about 1 Gyr.

Significance. If the derived masses are correct, the paper would establish the lowest-mass accreting white dwarf in a CV, with implications for CV formation channels and the white-dwarf mass distribution. The work is also notable for combining independent observables (RV mass function, eclipse geometry, ELV amplitude, SED radius) in an MCMC without using the evolutionary tracks as priors, and for making falsifiable predictions (isotopic ratios, dwarf-nova behavior, AM CVn future). The MESA grid and the explicit list of initial-condition parameters are useful strengths. However, the headline mass rests heavily on the interpretation of the 2ω photometric amplitude as purely ellipsoidal, and the paper itself documents strong, evolving starspots on the same star. A spot-induced systematic in the 2ω term would directly change the inclination and hence the white-dwarf mass, so the central claim requires a quantitative spot-contamination analysis before it can be accepted at face value.

major comments (3)

[§2, §7(ii)] The assumption that the 2ω term is entirely ellipsoidal is load-bearing for the headline mass and is not robust against starspot contamination. The paper documents a strong, evolving spot component at the orbital frequency (ω-term amplitude up to 4%, phase wandering; Fig. 3, top and bottom panels) and explicitly interprets the ω term as spots, yet the MCMC treats the measured 2ω amplitude A_ELV = 0.118 ± 0.018 as the pure ellipsoidal signal. For the best-fit q ≃ 0.89 the LIGHTCURVEFACTORY polynomial in §7(ii) yields A_ELV ≈ 0.109 sin²i, so the observed value is only reconciled by the adopted 15% model uncertainty. Because M_wd ∝ f_M(1+q)²/sin³i and sin²i ∝ A_ELV at fixed q, a ~10% systematic inflation of the 2ω amplitude by a constant spot harmonic lowers the inferred M_wd by roughly 15% (0.46 → ~0.53 M_sun), which would erode the record-low claim. I request a quantitative spot-contamination analysis (e.g., modeling the spot distribution jointly with the ELV, or comparing the 2ω amplitude and phase in outburst versus quiescence) and an explicit systematic error term in the reported mass.
[§7(ii), §7(iii)] The 'somewhat arbitrary' 15% ELV model uncertainty and the 2% Roche-lobe matching tolerance are free parameters that enter the χ² calculation and therefore shape the posterior widths, but they are not calibrated by any external test. The paper should justify these values by, for example, varying the LIGHTCURVEFACTORY input effective temperature, limb-darkening parameters, and Roche geometry over a plausible range, and by verifying that the inferred masses shift by less than the quoted 1σ uncertainties. Without such a demonstration, the reported errors (M_wd = 0.458 ± 0.019, M_K = 0.406 ± 0.028) should be treated as formal rather than robust.
[§5, Table 4] The SED analysis neglects the white-dwarf and accretion-disk contribution, which the paper estimates at ~8% of the bolometric flux and ~3% in the Kepler band. The paper asserts that this affects the derived K-star radius by less than the quoted uncertainty, but the radius enters the Roche-lobe/ELV constraint chain and ultimately the mass determination, so the size of this systematic should be demonstrated rather than asserted. A straightforward check would be to repeat the SED fit with and without a blue excess component and report the change in R_K and in the final MCMC masses.

minor comments (5)

[§5] The text writes 'E(V−B)' where the intended quantity is E(B−V); the same symbol is later used in Table 4.
[§7(ii)] The mass ratio q is defined as q ≡ M_K/M_wd in the ELV discussion, but §8.4 defines q ≡ M_wd/M_donor in Eq. (5); the notation should be harmonized to avoid confusion.
[Table 4] The table lists two values for K_K (labeled 'c' and 'b') with different uncertainties and no clear explanation of which is used in the MCMC; please clarify and cross-reference the relevant sections.
[§8.5, Fig. 13] The text near Fig. 13 refers to 'KIC 508384' whereas the target is KIC 5608384; this typo should be corrected.
[§4] The Swift/GALEX UV analysis adopts a white-dwarf mass from the MCMC fit (0.47 M_sun) before the MCMC results are presented; a forward reference to §7 would help the reader follow the ordering.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central masses and inclination are obtained by inverting independent observational constraints, and the evolutionary extrapolations are model-dependent but do not feed back into the mass derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central mass/inclination solution is an inversion of five observationally independent constraints: the radial-velocity mass function (Sect. 3), the measured 2omega ellipsoidal amplitude (Sect. 2), the SED+Gaia K-star radius (Sect. 5), the Roche-lobe filling condition, and the eclipse lower bound (Sect. 7). The MCMC compares predicted values against these measured quantities; none of the constraints is constructed from the fitted Mwd, MK, or i. The ELV calibration polynomial from LIGHTCURVEFACTORY is a physical model taken from prior work by overlapping authors, but it is not derived from the target masses: it is a q-dependent amplitude formula multiplied by sin^2 i, so using the measured ELV amplitude to constrain q and i is a genuine inversion rather than a restatement of the answer. The MESA tracks in Sect. 8 are tuned to reproduce the currently observed P, Mwd, and MK, so their future AM CVn and mass-transfer-rate statements are model-dependent extrapolations rather than independent tests; however, the paper explicitly states that the inferred mass is 'based solely on the MC simulations using the observed properties and constraints (e.g., Roche geometry), and is not inferred using any information derived from the theoretical evolutionary tracks.' No equation in the paper reduces a headline prediction to an input by construction, and no load-bearing argument relies on an unverified self-citation. The starspot and ELV-model systematics identified in the skeptic summary are legitimate accuracy concerns, but they are not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mass measurement rests on several astrophysical modeling assumptions, the most fragile being the Roche-lobe-filling hypothesis, the ELV amplitude calibration with an ad hoc 15 percent uncertainty, and the SED radius that neglects a few percent of WD and disk light. The evolutionary conclusions rely on additional assumptions about magnetic braking, mass-loss geometry, and common-envelope physics. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)

E(B-V) extinction = 0.05 +/- 0.03
Fitted in the SED template matching (Sect. 5); affects the inferred K-star radius and hence the masses.
ELV model uncertainty = 15 percent (adopted)
Added 'somewhat arbitrarily' to the LIGHTCURVEFACTORY-based ELV amplitudes (Sect. 7ii); directly inflates the uncertainties on mass ratio and Mwd.
Roche lobe matching tolerance = 2 percent
Assigned when comparing RK to the Roche lobe radius (Sect. 7iii); affects which MCMC solutions are accepted.
Post-common-envelope orbital period = 3.4 +/- 0.2 days
Chosen in the MESA grid to reproduce the current orbital period and masses (Sect. 8.3); a free parameter for the evolutionary model.
Initial donor mass = 1.07 +/- 0.04 solar masses
Chosen in the MESA grid to reproduce the current donor mass and period (Sect. 8.3).
Magnetic braking index = 3
Set in the MESA calculations, following Kalomeni et al. (2016); the prescription is an extrapolation and is acknowledged to be uncertain (Sect. 8.3).
Mass-loss parameters alpha and beta = alpha = 0, beta = 1
Assumed for the MESA tracks; all transferred mass is ejected in nova explosions carrying the white dwarf's specific angular momentum (Sect. 8.3).

assumptions (9)

domain assumption The K star fills its Roche lobe
Sect. 7iii: required for the two-body masses to be constrained; standard for mass-transferring CV donors but not directly imaged.
domain assumption The ELV amplitude can be represented by the Kopal-style formula calibrated with LIGHTCURVEFACTORY at fixed Teff = 4400 K
Sect. 7ii: links the measured 11.8 percent modulation to mass ratio and inclination; the fixed Teff is justified as close to the final value.
domain assumption The UV flux is dominated by the white dwarf
Sect. 4: neglects disk and hot spot contributions to set Teff < 16500 K; appropriate as an upper limit.
domain assumption The compressional heating relation of Townsley and Bildsten applies
Sect. 6: used to convert the WD temperature to a long-term average mass transfer rate.
domain assumption The MESA tracks use the Verbunt-Zwaan magnetic braking law extrapolated to evolved and rapidly rotating donors
Sect. 8.3: acknowledged as problematic; affects the predicted Mdot and the timing of the AM CVn transition.
domain assumption The mass loss model alpha = 0, beta = 1 is appropriate
Sect. 8.3: all transferred mass is assumed lost from the binary in nova eruptions, carrying the WD's specific angular momentum.
domain assumption The Han et al. (2003) model set [2] parameters govern common-envelope ejection
Sect. 8.2: qcrit = 1.5 and alpha_CE = alpha_th = 0.75 are used to infer the hot subdwarf channel, the primordial period, and the mass.
ad hoc to paper The ELV model and MCMC uncertainty choices are arbitrary
Sect. 7ii-iii: 15 percent for model ELV amplitudes and 2 percent for Roche-lobe matching are selected by hand rather than measured.
domain assumption Solar metallicity is assumed in the MESA models
Sect. 8.3: based on the system's location in the Galaxy; no independent metallicity measurement is used.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A 9-Hr CV With One Outburst in 4 Years of Kepler Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TV2PXMST

@misc{pith2026190801914,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A 9-Hr CV With One Outburst in 4 Years of Kepler Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TV2PXMST}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01914}
}

abstract

During a visual search through the Kepler main-field lightcurves, we have discovered a cataclysmic variable (CV) that experienced only a single 4-day long outburst over four years, rising to three times the quiescent flux. During the four years of non-outburst data the Kepler photometry of KIC 5608384 exhibits ellipsoidal light variations (`ELV') with a $\sim$12% amplitude and period of 8.7 hours. Follow-up ground-based spectral observations have yielded a high-quality radial velocity curve and the associated mass function. Additionally, H$\alpha$ emission lines were present in the spectra even though these were taken while the source was presumably in quiescence. These emission lines are at least partially eclipsed by the companion K star. We utilize the available constraints of the mass function, the ELV amplitude, Roche-lobe filling condition, and inferred radius of the K star to derive the system masses and orbital inclination angle: $M_{\rm wd} \simeq 0.46 \pm 0.02 \, M_\odot$, $M_{\rm K} \simeq 0.41 \pm 0.03 \, M_\odot$, and $i \gtrsim 70^\circ$. The value of $M_{\rm wd}$ is the lowest reported for any accreting WD in a cataclysmic variable. We have also run binary evolution models using MESA to infer the most likely parameters of the pre-cataclysmic binary. Using the mass-transfer rates from the model evolution tracks we conclude that although the rates are close to the critical value for accretion disk stability, we expect KIC 5608384 to exhibit dwarf nova outbursts. We also conclude that the accreting white dwarf most likely descended from a hot subdwarf and, most notably, that this binary is one of the first bona fide examples of a progenitor of AM CVn binaries to have evolved through the CV channel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01914 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Kepler lightcurve of KIC 5608384. The top panel shows the entire 1500-day lightcurve from all four years of Kepler observations. Only a single large flaring event is seen near day 1100. The bottom panel is a zoom-in of 13 days around the time of the outburst. Now the characteristic shape of a CV outburst is evident as are the eclipses of at least a portion of the accretion disk. Also visible in the bottom panel are… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Folded lightcurve for KIC 5608384 based on the Kepler data set. The data are folded about the 8.7-hour orbital period, and then repeated for a second orbital cycle to better show the pattern. The top panel indicates how the lightcurve is dominated by ellipsoidal light variations with a ∼12% amplitude and two maxima and two minima per orbit. Here, all the Kepler data are used except for the 5 days around the time of … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Phase tracking the 8.7-hour modulations of KIC 5608384 (see Sect. 2 for details). Top panel: amplitude of the brightness variations at ω and at 2ω (ω is the orbital frequency). The 2ω term represents primarily the ellipsoidal light variations, while the ω term is sensitive to spots on the K star that are nearly corotating in synchronism with the orbit. Bottom panel: phase of the brightness variations at ω and at 2ω.… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (9 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Ground-based radial velocity data (see Sect. 3). Top panel: mean spectrum of KIC 5608384, shifted to the rest frame of the secondary star before averaging. The lower red curve results from subtracting the spectrum of Gliese 638. Middle panel: absorption-line velocitie…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Top panel: trailed spectrum of KIC 5608384 as a function of orbital phase, with a second cycle shown for continuity. The grey scale is set so that lighter and darker regions correspond to emission and absorption lines, respectively. Bottom panel: trailed spectra zoomed…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Ultraviolet fluxes from KIC 5608384 from the GALEX and Swift photometry ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Schematic sketch of the likely eclipse geometry. At least partial eclipses by the K star are observed of the Hα emission line region in quiescence and of the accretion disk, and possibly the white dwarf, in the Kepler band during the CV outburst. (ii) Amplitude of elli…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: MCMC correlation plots for the white dwarf mass, Mwd and K-star mass, MK, and radius, RK, in the KIC 5608384 system. These are deduced from the radial velocity curve (see Sect. 3), the inferred radius for the K star from SED fitting (see Sect. 5), the Roche-lobe fillin…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Monte Carlo probability density plot for the inclination angle of the KIC 5608384 system based on the same input information described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: 40,000 model CV evolution tracks in the orbital period, P, donor mass, MK plane (from Kalomeni et al. 2016). The heavy elongated purple marker indicates the location of KIC 5608384. The evolution tracks all start in the vertically striped region in the upper right wit…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Illustrative CV evolution tracks, starting from a ZACV, that roughly match the current status of KIC 5608384 (run with the MESA evolution code; Paxton et al. 2013, 2015; Kalomeni et al. 2016). Top panel shows the evolution of P and X (the surface hydrogen mass fractio…

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: White-dwarf mass vs. donor-star mass for all CVs listed in the Ritter & Kolb (2003) catalog with measured masses and 7 < Porb < 10 hr. Possible close cousins to KIC 5608384 are marked in blue (V1309 Ori, AE Aqr, HS0218, AT Ara, and NY Lup; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[1]

2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765

Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765

2012
[2]

2018, A&A, 619, 180

Apell\'aniz, J., & Weiler, M. 2018, A&A, 619, 180

2018
[3]

A., & van Paradijs, J.\ 1996, , 311, 889

Augusteijn, T., van der Hooft, F., de Jong, J. A., & van Paradijs, J.\ 1996, , 311, 889

1996
[4]

2015, MNRAS, 448, 429

Balaji, B., Croll, B., Levine, A., & Rappaport, S. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 429

2015
[5]

Batalha N. M. et al., 2011, ApJ, 729, 27

2011
[6]

F., Bryson, S

Batalha, N.M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24

2013
[7]

L., Kir\'aly, A., Forg\'acs-Dajka, E., B\' r\'o, I

Borkovits, T., Derekas, A., Kiss, L. L., Kir\'aly, A., Forg\'acs-Dajka, E., B\' r\'o, I. B., Bedding, T. R., Bryson, S. T., Huber, D., & Szab\'o, R., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1656

2013
[8]

Borkovits, T., Albrecht, S., Rappaport, S., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5135

2018

Show all 97 references

[9]

Borucki W. J. et al., 2010, Science, 327, 977

2010
[10]

T., Drake, A

Breedt, E., G \"a nsicke, B. T., Drake, A. J., et al.\ 2014, , 443, 3174

2014
[11]

Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., Babusiaux , C., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Biermann , M., Evans , D. W., Eyer , L., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, 1

2018
[12]

2002, ASPC, eds

Bruch, A. 2002, ASPC, eds. B.T. G\"ansicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch 261, 471

2002
[13]

1986, ApJ, 301, 634

Cannizzo, J.K., Wheeler, J.C., & Polidan, R.S. 1986, ApJ, 301, 634

1986
[14]

M., Skrutskie , M

Cutri , R. M., Skrutskie , M. F., van Dyk , S., et al. 2003, The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog, NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive

2003
[15]

2013, wise.rept, 1C

Cutri, R.M., Wright, E.L., Conrow, T., et al. 2013, wise.rept, 1C

2013
[16]

2006, A&A, 449, 1151

de Martino, D., Bonnet-Bidaud, J.-M., Mouchet, M., G\"ansicke, B.T., Haberl, F., & Motch, C. 2006, A&A, 449, 1151

2006
[17]

1996 Supersoft X-Ray Sources, ed

Di Stefano, R., & Nelson L.A. 1996 Supersoft X-Ray Sources, ed. J. Greiner, 472, 3

1996
[18]

1983, ApJ, 268, 368

Eggleton, P.P. 1983, ApJ, 268, 368

1983
[19]

T., et al., 2003, ApJ, 594, 443

G \"a nsicke B. T., et al., 2003, ApJ, 594, 443

2003
[20]

2005, AJ, 129 1706

Ford, E.B. 2005, AJ, 129 1706

2005
[21]

2003, ApJ, 594, 443

G\"ansicke, B.T., Szkody, P., de Marino, D., et al. 2003, ApJ, 594, 443

2003
[22]

Goliasch, J., & Nelson, L., 2015, ApJ, 809, 80

2015
[23]

2018, MNRAS, 478, 651

Green, G.M., Schlafly, E.F., Finkbeiner, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 651

2018
[24]

J., Marsh, T

Green, M. J., Marsh, T. R., Steeghs, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 1947

2019
[25]

P., Thorstensen, J

Halpern, J. P., Thorstensen, J. R., Cho, P., et al.\ 2018, AJ, 155, 247

2018
[26]

M., King, A

Hameury, J. M., King, A. R., Lasota, J. P., Ritter, H., 1988, ApJ, 327, L77

1988
[27]

Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, P., Maxted, P. F. L., & Marsh, T. R. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 669

2003
[28]

E., 2018, ApJ, 861, 102

Harrison T. E., 2018, ApJ, 861, 102

2018
[29]

2009, ARAA, 47, 211

Heber, U. 2009, ARAA, 47, 211

2009
[30]

2016, VizieR On-line Data Catalog, 2336

Henden, A.A., Templeton, M., Terrell, D., Smith, T.C., Levine, S., & Welch, D. 2016, VizieR On-line Data Catalog, 2336

2016
[31]

B., Bergeron P., 2006, AJ, 132, 1221

Holberg J. B., Bergeron P., 2006, AJ, 132, 1221

2006
[32]

B., Nelson, L

Howell, S. B., Nelson, L. A., Rappaport, S., 2001, ApJ, 550, 897

2001
[33]

Howell S.B., Harrison T.E., Szkody P., & Silvestri N.M., 2010, AJ, 139, 1771

2010
[34]

Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X. et al. 2013, AstrApRev. 21, 59

2013
[35]

2013, AJ, 145, 6

Jarrett, T.H., Masci, F., Tsai, C.W., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 6

2013
[36]

Kalomeni B., Nelson L., Rappaport S., Molnar M., Quintin J., Yakut K., 2016, ApJ, 833, 83

2016
[37]

C., & McNeil, R

Keenan, P. C., & McNeil, R. C.\ 1989, ApJS, 71, 245

1989
[38]

2011, ApJS, 194, 28

Knigge, C., Baraffe, I., & Patterson, J. 2011, ApJS, 194, 28

2011
[39]

2017, PASP, 129, 4502

Kochanek, C.S., Shappee, B.J., Stanek, K.Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 4502

2017
[40]

1959, Close Binary Systems (Wiley, New York)

Kopal, Z. 1959, Close Binary Systems (Wiley, New York)

1959
[41]

Kryachko, T., Samokhvalov, A., & Satovskiy, B.\ 2010, Peremennye Zvezdy Prilozhenie, 10, 24

2010
[42]

Kurtz, M. J. & Mink, D. J.\ 1998, PASP, 110, 934

1998
[43]

2001, NewAR, 45, 449

Lasota, J.-P. 2001, NewAR, 45, 449

2001
[44]

2008, A&A, 486, 523

Lasota, J.-P., Dubus, G., & Kruk, K. 2008, A&A, 486, 523

2008
[45]

1985, MNRAS, 212, 105

Lin, D.N.C., Papaloizou, J., & Faulkner, J. 1985, MNRAS, 212, 105

1985
[46]

2018, arXiv:1804.09366

Lindegren, L., Hernandez, J, Bombrun, A., et al. 2018, arXiv:1804.09366

2018 arXiv
[47]

2009, ApJ, 693, 784

Madhusudhan, N., & Winn, J.N. 2009, ApJ, 693, 784

2009
[48]

2015, PASP, 127, 102

Mann, A.W., & von Braun, K. 2015, PASP, 127, 102

2015
[49]

W., Newton, E

Mann, A. W., Newton, E. R., Rizzuto, A. C., et al. 2016, AJ, 152, 61

2016
[50]

A., Welsh, W

Matijevi c, G., Pr sa, A., Orosz, J. A., Welsh, W. F., Bloemen, S., Barclay, T., 2012, ApJ, 143, 123

2012
[51]

Meyer F., Meyer-Hofmeister E., 1981, A&A, 104, L10

1981
[52]

B.\ 1924, ApJ, 60, 22

McLaughlin, D. B.\ 1924, ApJ, 60, 22

1924
[53]

2014, The CMC15, the last issue of the series ``Carlsberg Meridian Catalogue, La Palma'', 335, 367

Mui\ nos, J., & Evans, D.W. 2014, The CMC15, the last issue of the series ``Carlsberg Meridian Catalogue, La Palma'', 335, 367

2014
[54]

2015, ApJL, 816, L9

Ohlmann S., Röpke, F., Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2015, ApJL, 816, L9

2015
[55]

E., Ch \'a vez M., Bertone E., Martin D

Olmedo M., Lloyd J., Mamajek E. E., Ch \'a vez M., Bertone E., Martin D. C., Neill J. D., 2015, ApJ, 813, 100

2015
[56]

Paczy \'n ski, B., 1976, IAUS, 73, 75

1976
[57]

Paczy \'n ski, B., 1981, AcA, 31, 13

1981
[58]

F., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2855

Pala A. F., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2855

2017
[59]

Patterson, J., 1984, ApJS, 54, 443

1984
[60]

Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al.\ 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

2013
[61]

Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al.\ 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

2015
[62]

2003, 597, 1036

Pfahl, E., Rappaport, S., & Podsiadlowski, Ph. 2003, 597, 1036

2003
[63]

Podsiadlowski P., Han Z., Rappaport S., 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1214

2003
[64]

W., et al

Pr sa, A., Batahla, N., Slawson, R. W., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 83

2011
[65]

& Savonije, G.-J

Pylyser, E. & Savonije, G.-J. 1988, A&A, 191, 57

1988
[66]

C., Webbink, R

Rappaport, S., Joss, P. C., Webbink, R. F., 1982, ApJ, 254, 616

1982
[67]

C., 1983, ApJ, 275, 713

Rappaport, S., Verbunt, F., Joss, P. C., 1983, ApJ, 275, 713

1983
[68]

2017, MNRAS, 467, 2160

Rappaport, S., Vanderburg, A., Borkovits, T., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2160

2017
[69]

2018, MNRAS, 474, 1453

Rappaport, S., Vanderburg, A., Jacobs, T., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 1453

2018
[70]

G., Copperwheat, C

Rebassa-Mansergas, A., Parsons, S. G., Copperwheat, C. M., et al.\ 2014, , 790, 28

2014
[71]

Ritter, H., Kolb, U., 2003, A&A, 404, 301 (update RKcat7.24, 2016)

2003
[72]

Rodr \' guez-Gil P., et al., 2009, A&A, 496, 805

2009
[73]

A.\ 1924, ApJ, 60,

Rossiter, R. A.\ 1924, ApJ, 60,

1924
[74]

R., Kolb U., Wynn G

Schenker K., King A. R., Kolb U., Wynn G. A., Zhang Z., 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1105

2002
[75]

and Young, P

Schneider, D. and Young, P. 1980, ApJ, 238, 946

1980
[76]

R., Zorotovic M., Wijnen T

Schreiber M. R., Zorotovic M., Wijnen T. P. G. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 16L

2016
[77]

2014, ApJ, 788, 48

Shappee, B.J., Prieto, J.L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

2014
[78]

2006, AJ, 131, 1163

Skrutskie, M.F., Cutri, R.M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

2006
[79]

2011, AJ, 142, 160

Slawson, R.W., Pr sa, A., Welsh, W.F., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 160

2011
[80]

2010, ARAA, 48, 581

Soderblom, D.R. 2010, ARAA, 48, 581

2010
[81]

1996, AJ,, 112, 289

Szkody, P., & Sliber, A. 1996, AJ,, 112, 289

1996
[82]

E., Bodenheimer, P., Ostriker, J

Taam, R. E., Bodenheimer, P., Ostriker, J. P., 1978, ApJ, 222, 269

1978
[83]

1992, in ``NATO Advanced Research Workshop on X-Ray Binaries and the Formation of Binary and Millisecond Radio Pulsars'', p

Taam, R.E., & Bodenheimer, P. 1992, in ``NATO Advanced Research Workshop on X-Ray Binaries and the Formation of Binary and Millisecond Radio Pulsars'', p. 281

1992
[84]

2006, Formation and Evolution of Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, ed

Tauris, T.M., & van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 2006, Formation and Evolution of Compact Stellar X-ray Sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, 623

2006
[85]

R., Fenton, W

Thorstensen, J. R., Fenton, W. H., Patterson, J., et al.\ 2002, , 114, 1117

2002
[86]

R., Fenton, W

Thorstensen, J. R., Fenton, W. H., Patterson, J. O., et al.\ 2002, , 567, L49

2002
[87]

R., Taylor, C

Thorstensen, J. R., Taylor, C. J., Peters, C. S., et al.\ 2015, , 149, 128

2015
[88]

2019, Astro2020 Science White Paper, Decadal Survey, `Understanding the Evolution of Close White Dwarf Binaries', arXiv: 1903.04612

Toloza, O., Breedt, E., De Martino, D., et al. 2019, Astro2020 Science White Paper, Decadal Survey, `Understanding the Evolution of Close White Dwarf Binaries', arXiv: 1903.04612

2019 arXiv
[89]

Tonry, J., & Davis, M.\ 1979, AJ, 84, 1511

1979
[90]

M., Bildsten L., 2003, ApJ, 596, L227

Townsley D. M., Bildsten L., 2003, ApJ, 596, L227

2003
[91]

M., G \"a nsicke B

Townsley D. M., G \"a nsicke B. T., 2009, ApJ, 693, 1007

2009
[92]

Warner B., 1976, IAUS, 73, 85

1976
[93]

Warner, B., 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars, Cambridge University Press, CAS, 28

1995
[94]

Webbink, R. F. 1984, ApJ, 277, 355

1984
[95]

2013, ApJS, 145, 44

Zacharias, N., Finch, C.T., Girard, T.M., Henden, A., Bartlett, J.L., Monet, D.G., & Zacharias, M.I. 2013, ApJS, 145, 44

2013
[96]

2018, ApJ, 854, 109

Zhou G., Rappaport S., Nelson L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 109

2018
[97]

2011, A&A, 536, 42

Zorotovic, M., Schreiber, M.R., & G\"ansicke, B.T. 2011, A&A, 536, 42

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765

Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765

2012

[2] [2]

2018, A&A, 619, 180

Apell\'aniz, J., & Weiler, M. 2018, A&A, 619, 180

2018

[3] [3]

A., & van Paradijs, J.\ 1996, , 311, 889

Augusteijn, T., van der Hooft, F., de Jong, J. A., & van Paradijs, J.\ 1996, , 311, 889

1996

[4] [4]

2015, MNRAS, 448, 429

Balaji, B., Croll, B., Levine, A., & Rappaport, S. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 429

2015

[5] [5]

Batalha N. M. et al., 2011, ApJ, 729, 27

2011

[6] [6]

F., Bryson, S

Batalha, N.M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24

2013

[7] [7]

L., Kir\'aly, A., Forg\'acs-Dajka, E., B\' r\'o, I

Borkovits, T., Derekas, A., Kiss, L. L., Kir\'aly, A., Forg\'acs-Dajka, E., B\' r\'o, I. B., Bedding, T. R., Bryson, S. T., Huber, D., & Szab\'o, R., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1656

2013

[8] [8]

Borkovits, T., Albrecht, S., Rappaport, S., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5135

2018