Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Convection-Induced Singularity Suppression in the Keller-Segel and Other Non-linear PDEs

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a single quantitative property of a stirring flow—its dissipation time—can be made small enough to prevent blow-up in nonlinear parabolic equations, including Keller-Segel chemotaxis and ignition-type reactions.

desk verdict Solid abstract criterion for blow-up suppression via small dissipation time, but the construction of explicit cellular flows rests on an unproved and likely false uniform heat-kernel lower bound. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01941 v2 pith:K54NUQY7 submitted 2019-08-06 math.AP

Gautam Iyer , Xiaoqian Xu , Andrej Zlatoš This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B4435B2735Q3576R05
keywords blow-upsuppressiondissipationtimeconvection-enhancedKeller-SegelchemotaxisreactionquenchingcellularflowseffectivediffusivitynonlinearparabolicPDEs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a general mechanism by which convection can prevent blow-up in nonlinear parabolic equations. It shows that for any nonlinearity satisfying two structural hypotheses—roughly, that energy production is controlled by a small fraction of the dissipation plus a bounded function of the $L^2$ norm—the $L^2$ norm of every mean-zero solution stays bounded for all time, provided the added divergence-free drift has a dissipation time below a threshold set by the initial data and the nonlinearity. Under an extra small-mass condition the norm decays exponentially. The paper then builds simple stationary cellular flows whose dissipation times can be made arbitrarily small by rescaling, and uses them to prove that chemotactic collapse in the Keller-Segel model can always be prevented, and that ignition-type reactions with sub-threshold average temperature can always be quenched. The interest is that the convection needs no special mixing geometry; only its dissipation time matters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dissipation time $\tau_*(u)$, defined as the earliest time by which every mean-zero initial datum is halved in $L^2$ by the advection-diffusion semigroup, uniformly over all starting times. The proof of Theorem 1.2 compares the nonlinear evolution on successive intervals of length $\tau_*$: an energy estimate using the $1-\varepsilon_0$ dissipation margin in (H1) shows the norm cannot grow too much on each interval, and the Duhamel formula together with the halving property of $S_{s,s+t}$ prevents the accumulated nonlinear forcing from pushing the norm above $2B+1$. For the flow construction, the key object is the effective diffusivity $D(u)=\min_e D_e(u)$ of the stochastic process associated with the drift; Theorem 1.3 rescales symmetric cellular flows so that their cells shrink and their effective diffusivity grows, converting large diffusivity into short dissipation time.

What would settle it

Fix $l$ and take the family of two-dimensional cellular drifts $u_A=A\nabla^\perp(\sin(2\pi x/l)\sin(2\pi y/l))$; a numerical or rigorous computation showing that $\inf_{x,y}h_{l^2}(x,y)$ can be made smaller than $c l^{-2}$ for a sequence of constants $c\to0$ by choosing $A$ appropriately would refute the uniform lower bound invoked in Theorem 5.3, and with it the paper's explicit cellular-flow examples in Theorems 1.4 and 4.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the growth of solutions to the convection-diffusion-nonlinearity equation $\partial_t\theta+u\cdot\nabla\theta=\Delta\theta+N(\theta)$ on the torus is controlled entirely through the dissipation time of the drift. Theorem 1.2 states that if $N$ satisfies hypotheses (H1)--(H2), then for every mean-zero $\theta_0$ there is a threshold $\tau_0=\tau_0(\|\theta_0\|_{L^2},N)$ such that any divergence-free Lipschitz drift with $\tau_*(u)\le\tau_0$ forces the mild solution to obey $\sup_{t\in[0,T)}\|\theta_t\|_{L^2}\le 2\|\theta_0\|_{L^2}+1$; if condition (1.4) holds and $T=\infty$, the norm decays exponentially. Theorem 1.3 supplies the flows: any sequence of symmetric cellular flows whose effective diffusivity diverges can be rescaled in cell size and amplitude to make $\tau_*(v_n)\to0$, with the explicit bound $\tau_*(v_n)\le C D(u_n)^{-\alpha}\ln(1+D(u_n))$. The Keller-Segel and combustion applications follow by checking (H1)--(H2) for the chemotaxis nonlinearity and by using the $L^1_0\to L^\infty_0$ semigroup estimate for quenching.

Load-bearing premise

The construction of the explicit cellular flows rests on a stated-but-not-proved uniform lower bound, $h_{l^2}(x,y)\ge c l^{-d}$ for the advection-diffusion density on an $l$-torus, asserted to hold for every $l$-periodic divergence-free Lipschitz drift with $c$ independent of the drift; if this bound fails, Lemma 5.4, Theorem 5.5, and the cellular-flow conclusions of Theorems 1.4 and 4.1 are not justified by the given proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any nonlinearity obeying (H1)--(H2), adding a divergence-free drift with $\tau_*(u)\le\tau_0$ keeps every mean-zero solution uniformly bounded in $L^2$ on its entire interval of existence, and under condition (1.4) the solution decays exponentially to zero.
  • Simple time-independent cellular flows, including the standard two-dimensional sine-sine eddy flow, can be rescaled to have arbitrarily small dissipation times in both two and three dimensions.
  • In the Keller-Segel chemotaxis model on $\mathbb{T}^2$ and $\mathbb{T}^3$, every nonnegative smooth initial density can be kept globally regular and driven to the uniform steady state by a suitable steady cellular flow.
  • For ignition-type reaction-diffusion equations with mean initial temperature below the ignition threshold $\alpha_0$, a drift with sufficiently small dissipation time always quenches the reaction.
  • The same proof extends to equations with fractional dissipation $-(-\Delta)^\gamma$ in place of $\Delta$, after adjusting the hypotheses and the energy norm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the blow-up-prevention condition depends only on $\tau_*(u)$, one can measure or estimate the dissipation time of a candidate stirrer numerically by evolving the linear advection-diffusion equation, yielding a computable sufficient condition for whether that stirrer will suppress singularities in the nonlinear model.
  • Editorial inference: the structure of (H1)--(H2) suggests that the same small-dissipation-time criterion should apply to other aggregation or active-scalar models whose nonlinear energy production can be absorbed by a fraction of the dissipation; checking those inequalities for a given model would be a direct extension of Theorem 1.2.
  • Editorial inference: the quenching proof identifies an explicit quench time $t_0$ set by the reaction rate $\lambda$ and the margin $\alpha_0-\bar\theta_0$; this could be tested experimentally or numerically by comparing the required stirring strength with predictions from the $L^1_0\to L^\infty_0$ estimate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the PDE ∂_t θ + u·∇θ = Δθ + N(θ) on the torus, where u is a prescribed divergence-free drift and N obeys two structural hypotheses (H1)-(H2). It introduces the dissipation time τ*(u) of the drift and proves that if τ*(u) is sufficiently small, then the L^2 norm of any mild solution remains uniformly bounded; under an additional small-growth condition (1.4), the norm decays exponentially. The paper then aims to construct simple incompressible flows with arbitrarily small dissipation times by rescaling symmetric cellular flows with large effective diffusivity (Theorem 1.3). These flows are used to prove that blow-up in the Jäger-Luckhaus Keller-Segel system can always be prevented by a suitable ambient drift (Theorem 1.4), and that ignition-type reaction-diffusion equations can always be quenched when the average initial temperature is below the ignition threshold (Theorem 4.1).

Significance. If the results hold as stated, the paper provides a clean and general mechanism for convection-induced singularity suppression: the conditions on the nonlinearity enter only through (H1)-(H2), and the thresholds in Propositions 2.1 and 2.2 are explicit functions of F, G, C0, ε0, with no fitted parameters. The verification of (H1)-(H2) for the Keller-Segel model in Lemma 3.1 is careful and direct, and the exponential decay statement is quantitative. The advertised advantage over prior work is the simplicity of the stabilizing flows: fast cellular flows, which are not mixing, are claimed to have arbitrarily small dissipation times. This is a substantial and attractive claim. However, the proof of the cellular-flow construction rests on an unproved and arguably false uniform heat-kernel lower bound, so the main advertised examples are not established by the submitted version.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 5.3] The assertion that the probability density h_{l^2}(x,y) of the advection-diffusion process modulo lT^d satisfies h_{l^2}(x,y) ∈ [c l^{-d}, c^{-1} l^{-d}] for every l-periodic divergence-free Lipschitz drift u, with c independent of u and l, is stated without proof or citation. Rescaling to the unit torus shows that this is equivalent to a uniform-in-drift lower bound for the heat kernel of ∂_s - Δ + w·∇ at time 1 for every 1-periodic divergence-free Lipschitz drift w. This is not a consequence of the L^1-L^∞ estimates cited from [CKRZ08] or [Zla10], whose constants may depend on the drift. The claimed uniformity is in fact false for the family w_A = A∇⊥ψ with A→∞: at time 1 the fundamental solution is concentrated near the deterministic flow trajectory and is exponentially small in cells not reached by time 1. Since this lower bound is the only mechanism in the proof that converts the one-point conclusion of Lemma 5.2 into a statement valid for every starting point, and since Lemma 5.4, Theorem 5.5, Theorem 1.3, and the cellular-flow applications in Theorems 1.4 and 4.1 all depend on Theorem 5.3, the construction of flows with arbitrarily small dissipation times is not established by the proof as written.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Definition 1.1] The phrase "the L^2-norm of solutions to (1.2) is non-decreasing" should read "non-increasing", since the L^2 norm of an advection-diffusion solution decays in time.
  2. [Introduction, last paragraph] The text says that Theorem 1.3 is proved in Section 6, but the paper has no Section 6; the proof appears in Section 5.
  3. [Equation (2.1a)] There is a typo with an extra closing parenthesis: ‖θ_{t0+nτ*(u))}‖ should be ‖θ_{t0+nτ*(u)}‖.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 1.4] The choice τ0(y,χ)=τ1(y,y,χ) should explicitly state that y=‖ρ0‖_{L2}; the monotonicity of τ1 then justifies the threshold for arbitrary ρ0, using arρ≤‖ρ0‖_{L2} and ‖ρ0-arρ‖_{L2}≤‖ρ0‖_{L2}.
  5. [Proof of Theorem 5.3] With a = √2Ψ^{-1}(α), the probability P(|√2B_1·e| > a) equals 2α, not 2Cα; the extra C is subsequently absorbed into the final constant, so this is only a notational imprecision.
  6. [Propositions 2.1 and 2.2] The quantities T0(B) and T1(B) contain integrals of y/F(y), which are not defined if F vanishes on a subinterval of the integration range. Since (H1) only assumes F is increasing and continuous, this case should be addressed explicitly, e.g., by a convention or by treating the case F≡0 on the relevant interval separately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main results are derived from explicit dissipation-time hypotheses and externally supported lemmas; the uncited density bound in Theorem 5.3 is a support gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the claims. Theorem 1.2 and Propositions 2.1 and 2.2 use only the defining property of the dissipation time (the L2-to-L2 operator norm of the advection-diffusion semigroup being at most 1/2 at time tau*), the energy inequalities following from hypotheses (H1)-(H2), and explicitly constructed thresholds T0 and T1; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Theorem 1.3 is a genuine construction: from the independent hypothesis lim_n D(u_n)=infinity, the proof chooses explicit alpha_n, mu_n, and nu_n so that the right-hand side of (5.12) tends to zero, using Lemma 5.1 from [Zla11] and known effective-diffusivity asymptotics from [FP94, Kor04, RZ07]. The Keller-Segel application verifies (H1)-(H2) by explicit inequalities, and although Lemma 3.2 is attributed to [KX16], the paper supplies its proof; the cited result is thus real evidence rather than an unverified self-citation. The quenching result is proved from Proposition 4.2, whose proof is given using heat-kernel estimates from [Zla10] and [CKRZ08]. The self-citations that appear are load-bearing but are either proved in the text or are external results with stated hypotheses, and none reduces to the paper's conclusions. The one flagged gap is an uncited 'well known' two-sided heat-kernel bound h_{l^2}(x,y) in [cl^{-d}, c^{-1}l^{-d}] asserted in the proof of Theorem 5.3; this is a missing-proof or correctness concern, not a circularity, because the bound is not an input fitted to the dissipation-time conclusion and is not claimed to follow from it. Accordingly, no circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numerical parameters and no new entities. The main assumptions are structural hypotheses on the nonlinearity and the drift. The only notable unproved input is the uniform heat-kernel lower bound in Section 5.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hypotheses (H1) and (H2) on the nonlinearity N
    Used in Propositions 2.1 and 2.2; verified for Keller-Segel in Lemma 3.1 but not for arbitrary N.
  • domain assumption Uniform lower bound h_{l^2}(x,y) ≥ c l^{-d} for the advection-diffusion heat kernel on an l-torus over all divergence-free Lipschitz drifts of arbitrary amplitude
    Stated as 'well known' in the proof of Theorem 5.3 and used to prove Lemma 5.4 and Theorem 5.5; not proved or cited.
  • standard math Effective diffusivity asymptotics D(Au) ~ A^{1/2} in 2D and D(u_n) → ∞ for the specific 3D cellular flow
    Imported from FP94, Kor04, RZ07; these are external published results.
  • standard math Standard functional inequalities (Gagliardo-Nirenberg, Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev, Poincare) and parabolic smoothing estimates
    Used throughout Sections 2 to 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Convection-Induced Singularity Suppression in the Keller-Segel and Other Non-linear PDEs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K54NUQY7

@misc{pith2026190801941,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Convection-Induced Singularity Suppression in the Keller-Segel and Other Non-linear PDEs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K54NUQY7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01941}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper we study the effect of the addition of a convective term, and of the resulting increased dissipation rate, on the growth of solutions to a general class of non-linear parabolic PDEs. In particular, we show that blow-up in these models can always be prevented if the added drift has a small enough dissipation time. We also prove a general result relating the dissipation time and the effective diffusivity of stationary cellular flows, which allows us to obtain examples of simple incompressible flows with arbitrarily small dissipation times. As an application, we show that blow-up in the Keller-Segel model of chemotaxis can always be prevented if the velocity field of the ambient fluid has a sufficiently small dissipation time. We also study reaction-diffusion equations with ignition-type nonlinearities, and show that the reaction can always be quenched by the addition of a convective term with a small enough dissipation time, provided the average initial temperature is initially below the ignition threshold.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alberti, G

    G. Alberti, G. Crippa, and A. L. Mazzucato. Exponential self-similar mixing by incompressible flows. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 32(2):445--490, 2019. doi:10.1090/jams/913

    doi:10.1090/jams/913 2019

  2. [2]

    Berestycki

    H. Berestycki. The Influence of Advection on the Propagation of Fronts in Reaction-Diffusion Equations , pages 11--48. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2002. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0307-0_2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0307-0_2 2002

  3. [3]

    Bedrossian and S

    J. Bedrossian and S. He. Suppression of blow-up in P atlak- K eller- S egel via shear flows. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 49(6):4722--4766, 2017. doi:10.1137/16M1093380

    doi:10.1137/16m1093380 2017

  4. [4]

    Berestycki, F

    H. Berestycki, F. Hamel, and N. Nadirashvili. Elliptic eigenvalue problems with large drift and applications to nonlinear propagation phenomena. Comm. Math. Phys. , 253(2):451--480, 2005. doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1201-9

    doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1201-9 2005

  5. [5]

    Berestycki, A

    H. Berestycki, A. Kiselev, A. Novikov, and L. Ryzhik. The explosion problem in a flow. J. Anal. Math. , 110:31--65, 2010. doi:10.1007/s11854-010-0002-7

    doi:10.1007/s11854-010-0002-7 2010

  6. [6]

    Constantin, A

    P. Constantin, A. Kiselev, L. Ryzhik, and A. Zlato s . Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow. Ann. of Math. (2) , 168(2):643--674, 2008. doi:10.4007/annals.2008.168.643

    doi:10.4007/annals.2008.168.643 2008

  7. [7]

    Childress and A

    S. Childress and A. M. Soward. Scalar transport and alpha-effect for a family of cat's-eye flows. J. Fluid Mech. , 205:99--133, 1989. doi:10.1017/S0022112089001965

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112089001965 1989

  8. [8]

    Coti Zelati, M

    M. Coti Zelati, M. G. Delgadino, and T. M. Elgindi. On the relation between enhanced dissipation time-scales and mixing rates. ArXiv e-prints , June 2018, 1806.03258 http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03258

    arXiv 2018

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    L. C. Evans. Partial differential equations , volume 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998

    1998

  2. [10]

    T. M. Elgindi and A. Zlato s . Universal mixers in all dimensions. Adv. Math. , 356:106807, 33, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2019.106807

    2019

  3. [11]

    Feng and G

    Y. Feng and G. Iyer. Dissipation enhancement by mixing. Nonlinearity , 32(5):1810--1851, 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ab0e56

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Fannjiang, A

    A. Fannjiang, A. Kiselev, and L. Ryzhik. Quenching of reaction by cellular flows. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 16(1):40--69, 2006. doi:10.1007/s00039-006-0554-y

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    Fannjiang and G

    A. Fannjiang and G. Papanicolaou. Convection enhanced diffusion for periodic flows. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 54(2):333--408, 1994. doi:10.1137/S0036139992236785

    1994 doi

  6. [14]

    Fannjiang and L

    A. Fannjiang and L. Wo owski . Noise induced dissipation in L ebesgue-measure preserving maps on d -dimensional torus. J. Statist. Phys. , 113(1-2):335--378, 2003. doi:10.1023/A:1025787124437

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    S. He. Suppression of blow-up in parabolic-parabolic P atlak- K eller- S egel via strictly monotone shear flows. Nonlinearity , 31(8):3651--3688, 2018. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aac1ce

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    M. A. Herrero. Asymptotic properties of reaction-diffusion systems modeling chemotaxis. In Applied and industrial mathematics, V enice--2, 1998 , pages 89--108. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2000

    1998

  9. [17]

    M. A. Herrero, E. Medina, and J. J. L. Vel\' a zquez. Finite-time aggregation into a single point in a reaction-diffusion system. Nonlinearity , 10(6):1739--1754, 1997. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/10/6/016

    1997 doi

  10. [18]

    M. A. Herrero, E. Medina, and J. J. L. Vel\' a zquez. Self-similar blow-up for a reaction-diffusion system. J. Comput. Appl. Math. , 97(1-2):99--119, 1998. doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(98)00104-6

    1998 doi

  11. [19]

    Horstmann

    D. Horstmann. From 1970 until present: the K eller- S egel model in chemotaxis and its consequences. I . Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. , 105(3):103--165, 2003. ://www.mis.mpg.de/preprints/2003/preprint2003_3.pdf

    1970

  12. [20]

    Horstmann

    D. Horstmann. From 1970 until present: the K eller- S egel model in chemotaxis and its consequences. II . Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. , 106(2):51--69, 2004

    1970

  13. [21]

    He and E

    S. He and E. Tadmor. Suppressing chemotactic blow-up through a fast splitting scenario on the plane. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 232(2):951--986, 2019. doi:10.1007/s00205-018-01336-7

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    J\" a ger and S

    W. J\" a ger and S. Luckhaus. On explosions of solutions to a system of partial differential equations modelling chemotaxis. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 329(2):819--824, 1992. doi:10.2307/2153966

    1992 doi

  15. [23]

    L. Koralov. Random perturbations of 2-dimensional H amiltonian flows. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 129(1):37--62, 2004. doi:10.1007/s00440-003-0320-0

    2004 doi

  16. [24]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J. Theor. Biol. , 26(3):399 -- 415, 1970. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(70)90092-5

    1970 doi

  17. [25]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel. Model for chemotaxis. J. Theor. Biol. , 30(2):225 -- 234, 1971. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90050-6

    1971 doi

  18. [26]

    Kiselev, R

    A. Kiselev, R. Shterenberg, and A. Zlato s . Relaxation enhancement by time-periodic flows. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 57(5):2137--2152, 2008. doi:10.1512/iumj.2008.57.3349

    2008 doi

  19. [27]

    Kiselev and X

    A. Kiselev and X. Xu. Suppression of chemotactic explosion by mixing. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 222(2):1077--1112, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00205-016-1017-8

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    Kiselev and A

    A. Kiselev and A. Zlato s . Quenching of combustion by shear flows. Duke Math. J. , 132(1):49--72, 2006. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-06-13212-X

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    V. G. Maz'ja. Sobolev spaces . Springer Series in Soviet Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09922-3. Translated from the Russian by T. O. Shaposhnikova

    1985 doi

  22. [30]

    B. ksendal. Stochastic differential equations . Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, sixth edition, 2003. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14394-6. An introduction with applications

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    C. S. Patlak. Random walk with persistence and external bias. Bull. Math. Biophys , 15(3):311--338, Sep 1953. doi:10.1007/BF02476407

    1953 doi

  24. [32]

    Perthame

    B. Perthame. Transport equations in biology . Frontiers in Mathematics. Birkh\" a user Verlag, Basel, 2007. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7842-4

    2007 doi

  25. [33]

    Ryzhik and A

    L. Ryzhik and A. Zlato s . K PP pulsating front speed-up by flows. Commun. Math. Sci. , 5(3):575--593, 2007. ://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cms/1188405669

    2007

  26. [34]

    J. Xin. Front propagation in heterogeneous media. SIAM Rev. , 42(2):161--230, 2000. doi:10.1137/S0036144599364296

    2000 doi

  27. [35]

    J. Xin. An introduction to fronts in random media , volume 5 of Surveys and Tutorials in the Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer, New York, 2009. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87683-2

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    Yao and A

    Y. Yao and A. Zlato s . Mixing and un-mixing by incompressible flows. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 19(7):1911--1948, 2017. doi:10.4171/JEMS/709

    1911 doi

  29. [37]

    A. Zlato s . Diffusion in fluid flow: dissipation enhancement by flows in 2 D . Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 35(3):496--534, 2010. doi:10.1080/03605300903362546

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    A. Zlato s . Reaction-diffusion front speed enhancement by flows. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\' e Anal. Non Lin\' e aire , 28(5):711--726, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2011.05.004

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.