Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Perturbations of elliptic operators in 1-sided chord-arc domains. Part II: Non-symmetric operators and Carleson measure estimates

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In 1-sided chord-arc domains, Carleson estimates are equivalent to A∞ elliptic measure, even for non-symmetric coefficients.

desk verdict Serious and genuinely new results in non-symmetric elliptic measure theory, but the load-bearing estimates live in an unpublished companion; accept conditionally on their release. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02268 v1 pith:L7XIKO63 submitted 2019-08-06 math.CA math.AP

Juan Cavero , Steve Hofmann , José María Martell , Tatiana Toro This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath.AP MSC 31B0535J0835J2542B9942B2542B37
keywords ellipticmeasurePoissonkernelCarlesonmeasuresA-infinityweights1-sidedchord-arcdomainsnon-symmetricoperatorsperturbationofuniformrectifiability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that, in a 1-sided chord-arc domain, a real elliptic operator $Lu=-{\rm div}(A\nabla u)$ with possibly non-symmetric coefficients has elliptic measure in the Muckenhoupt class $A_\infty(\partial\Omega)$ exactly when every bounded weak solution satisfies a Carleson measure estimate for $|\nabla u|^2\delta(X)$. The result extends a previous square-function criterion from bounded Lipschitz domains and graphs to the rougher 1-sided chord-arc setting, and removes the symmetry assumption on the coefficient matrix. On this equivalence the paper builds two applications: a perturbation theorem showing that the $A_\infty$ property is stable under coefficient disagreements that are Carleson in a quadratic sense, and a theorem identifying when an operator and its transpose (or its symmetric part) have $A_\infty$ elliptic measure simultaneously. A corollary removes an auxiliary hypothesis in an earlier result: under a slightly stronger Carleson condition, $A_\infty$ ellipticity for the operator already forces the domain to be a genuine chord-arc domain.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the passage between a continuum Carleson estimate and dyadic sawtooth combinatorics. The paper uses dyadic grids on the Ahlfors-regular boundary, Carleson boxes $T_Q$, sawtooth domains $\Omega_{\mathcal{F},Q}$, and a "good $\varepsilon_0$-cover"—a nested chain of level sets defined through the dyadic maximal operator, in which each next level loses a fixed fraction of the previous elliptic measure. Lemma 3.10 converts a small elliptic-measure set into a bounded solution whose conical square function is large on that set, which is exactly what forces the surface measure to be small. In the converse direction, the Green function $G_{L_0}$ replaces $\delta(X)$ as the weight, and an integration-by-parts identity for antisymmetric matrices, involving the column-wise divergence ${\rm div}_C D$, is what lets the perturbation terms be absorbed as Carleson-measure contributions.

What would settle it

Exhibit a 1-sided chord-arc domain $\Omega$ and a real uniformly elliptic matrix $A$ (not necessarily symmetric) such that every bounded weak solution satisfies (1.2) but $\omega_L\notin A_\infty(\partial\Omega)$, or vice versa; because the two properties are claimed equivalent for all such operators, a single counterexample would decide against the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.1: for any real uniformly elliptic divergence-form operator $L$ in a 1-sided chord-arc domain, condition (a)—every bounded weak solution satisfies the Carleson measure estimate (1.2)—is equivalent to condition (b)—$\omega_L\in A_\infty(\partial\Omega)$. The forward direction is proved by constructing, for any small elliptic-measure set $F$, a good $\varepsilon_0$-cover whose nested levels are turned into a harmonic function $u=\omega_L^X(S)$ with large conical square function on $F$, forcing $F$ to have small surface measure. The reverse direction replaces the distance-to-boundary weight $\delta$ by the Green function $G_{L_0}$ on sawtooth subdomains and uses integration by parts with adapted cutoffs. The same reversal, run with $L_0$ in place of $L$, yields the general perturbation statement Theorem 4.13, from which Theorems 1.3 and 1.6 follow.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on a suite of boundary estimates for elliptic measure and Green functions in 1-sided chord-arc domains—doubling, boundary Harnack, and comparison—quoted from an unpublished manuscript [HMT1]; the main equivalence would collapse if those estimates are not available with the stated quantitative control.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any real (not necessarily symmetric) elliptic operator in a 1-sided chord-arc domain, the Carleson measure estimate (1.2) and $\omega_L\in A_\infty(\partial\Omega)$ are interchangeable criteria.
  • If $\omega_{L_0}\in A_\infty$ and the disagreement $\varrho(A_1,A_0)^2/\delta$ is a Carleson measure, then $\omega_{L_1}\in A_\infty$; the perturbation need not be small.
  • When the antisymmetric part is locally Lipschitz and its column divergence satisfies (1.8), the three properties $\omega_L\in A_\infty$, $\omega_{L^\top}\in A_\infty$, and $\omega_{L_{\rm sym}}\in A_\infty$ are equivalent.
  • Under the stronger gradient-Carleson hypothesis (1.11), $\omega_L\in A_\infty$ alone implies the domain is a chord-arc domain; the transpose condition previously assumed is redundant.
  • Small antisymmetric perturbations with locally Lipschitz entries and Carleson-controlled divergence preserve the $A_\infty$ property of elliptic measure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the proof of Theorem 1.1 is quantitative, the $A_\infty$ constants and the Carleson constant should depend only on the ellipticity, the 1-sided chord-arc domain constants, and the Carleson norm; comparing these constants across the perturbation theorem may give effective stability bounds.
  • The Green-function substitution suggests a template for nonlinear divergence-form operators, such as the $p$-Laplacian, wherever a Green function and boundary Harnack estimates are available.
  • Theorem 1.6 indicates that the antisymmetric part of the matrix is visible to elliptic measure only through its column-wise divergence; one could test whether matrices with the same antisymmetric divergence produce the same $A_\infty$ behaviour.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies real (not necessarily symmetric) uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators in 1-sided chord-arc domains. Theorem 1.1 asserts the equivalence between (a) Carleson measure estimates for the gradients of all bounded weak solutions and (b) membership of the associated elliptic measure in the Muckenhoupt class A∞ with respect to surface measure. The forward direction is proved by a new dyadic good-cover argument; the reverse direction is proved by a reduction to discrete Carleson measures using sawtooths and published lemmas from [HMT2]. Theorems 1.3 and 1.6 are derived as consequences of a more general perturbation result, Theorem 4.13, which gives the preservation of A∞ under Carleson perturbations of the coefficients and under transposition when the divergence of the antisymmetric part satisfies a Carleson condition. Corollary 1.9 then removes an assumption in [HMT2].

Significance. If Theorem 1.1 is fully justified, this is a substantial extension of the Kenig-Kirchheim-Pipher-Toro result to 1-sided chord-arc domains and to non-symmetric operators, with the equivalence of Carleson estimates and A∞ as the central tool. The proof strategy is genuinely novel: the dyadic good-cover construction in Lemma 3.10 and the sawtooth-based reduction in Section 3.2 are interesting in their own right, and Theorem 4.13 gives a unified and conceptually simpler route to the perturbation results. There are no fitted parameters and no circularity: the new implications reduce to previously established estimates, and the Carleson-from-A∞ argument is an actual proof. The main caveat is that the foundational boundary estimates are cited to the unpublished manuscript [HMT1], so the significance of the theorem is currently conditional on the validity and availability of that manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.4 and Theorem 1.1] The central equivalence depends on Lemmas 2.16, 2.17, and 2.24, all of which are either entirely cited to, or in the non-symmetric 1-sided CAD case attributed to, the unpublished manuscript [HMT1] ('work in progress, 2014'). These lemmas are used essentially at (3.18), (3.21), (3.15), and (3.55), so the proofs of both directions of Theorem 1.1 cannot be completed without them. The paper does not reproduce their proofs, and I found no published reference that covers the non-symmetric 1-sided CAD case. This is a load-bearing external dependency, not a circularity, but it blocks unconditional acceptance. The authors should either include proofs of these lemmas in the paper, cite a published or otherwise available version of [HMT1], or explicitly state Theorem 1.1 as conditional on [HMT1].
  2. [Section 3.1, Lemma 3.5] In the proof that Q_i^k ∩ Q_j^{k+1} ≠ ∅ forces Q_i^k ⊂ Q_j^{k+1}, the displayed inequality a^{-k} μ(Q_i^k) < μ( ~F ∩ Q_i^k) ≤ a^{-k-1} μ(Q_i^k) has an upper bound that does not follow from (3.7) or (3.8). The valid argument is that (3.7) for Q_i^k gives μ( ~F ∩ Q_i^k) > a^{-k} μ(Q_i^k) > a^{-(k+1)} μ(Q_i^k), so Q_i^k itself satisfies the density property used to define F_{k+1}, contradicting maximality of Q_j^{k+1} when Q_j^{k+1} ⊊ Q_i^k. The displayed inequality should be corrected. Since Lemma 3.5 supplies the good cover used in Lemma 3.10, the proof of (a) ⇒ (b) in Theorem 1.1 depends on this repair.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1, text before (3.12)] The heading reads 'Proof of Proof of Theorem 1.1'; the duplicated 'Proof of' should be removed.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.55)] The chain G0(X_I)/ℓ(I) ≈ G0(X_I)/δ(X_I) ≈ ω0(Δ_Q)/σ(Q) ≈ 1 compresses several nontrivial steps: Lemma 2.24(b) is stated with X_Δ (the corkscrew point of Δ) rather than with X_I, so one also needs Harnack's inequality and the symmetry identity (2.22) to justify replacing X_Δ by X_I. This should be expanded for readability and verifiability.
  3. [Section 3.2, Lemma 3.24, Case 2] In (3.36) the lower bound is labelled u(X_{~Q_i^ℓ}), but in the context of Case 2 the lower bound is for u(X_{~P_i^ℓ}) = u(X_{~Q_i^ℓ}); the label is confusing and should be corrected.
  4. [Section 2.3, Eq. (2.11)] The chain T_Q ⊂ T_Q^* ⊂ T_Q^{**} ⊂ T_Q^{**} ⊂ κ0 B_Q ∩ Ω repeats T_Q^{**}; the intended second inclusion is likely T_Q^{**} ⊂ T_Q^{***} or the intermediate region should be named consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the A∞-vs-Carleson equivalence is proved from external boundary-regularity lemmas, with no fitted parameter or conclusion assumed.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.1 is proved in two independent directions. In (a)=>(b), the Carleson estimate is applied only to the bounded solution u(X)=ω_X^L(S) constructed from a good epsilon-cover of a small-elliptic-measure set; the proof then converts the resulting lower square-function bound into a dyadic A∞ condition and uses Lemma 2.24(c)-(d) to pass to the continuous definition of A∞. No step assumes ω_L∈A∞. In (b)=>(a), the hypothesis ω_L∈A∞ is used to obtain a density in L^q via the scale-invariant form (2.15) and to normalize the Green function, after which Proposition 3.58 gives the discrete Carleson estimate through an integration by parts with a sawtooth cutoff. Again the conclusion (1.2) is derived rather than assumed. Theorems 1.3 and 1.6 reduce to Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 4.18, and the latter is proved from the same external lemmas, not from its conclusion. The only load-bearing citations to the authors' own work are Lemmas 2.16, 2.17, and 2.24 from [HMT1], and Lemmas 3.5, 3.12, and 4.44 from [HMT2]. These are parameter-free quantitative estimates whose stated hypotheses do not include Theorem 1.1; consequently, under the review rule for self-citations they constitute independent support rather than circularity. The fact that [HMT1] is listed as work in progress is a real verification and reproducibility concern, but it is not a circularity: no equation in the paper is equal to its input by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new objects or free parameters. It relies on the standard theory of Muckenhoupt weights and Ahlfors regular sets, and on the partly unpublished HMT1 theory of elliptic measure in 1-sided NTA domains.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ω is a 1-sided CAD: interior Corkscrew, Harnack Chain, and Ahlfors regular boundary.
    This is the standing hypothesis of Theorems 1.1, 1.3, and 1.6 (Definitions 2.1-2.4).
  • domain assumption Existence of elliptic measure and Green function for non-symmetric real uniformly elliptic operators on domains with AR boundary, with doubling, boundary Harnack, and comparison estimates (Lemmas 2.16, 2.17, 2.24).
    The paper cites [HMT1], listed as work in progress (2014), for these foundational facts; the main results depend on them.
  • standard math Dyadic grid decomposition of Ahlfors regular sets (Lemma 2.5).
    Proved by David-Semmes and Christ; used throughout for sawtooth constructions.
  • standard math Equivalence of the A∞ condition with reverse Holder weights and the scale-invariant estimate (2.15).
    Standard weight theory, as in Garcia-Cuerva and Rubio de Francia, and Coifman and Fefferman.
  • standard math Standard interior estimates for weak solutions of divergence form elliptic equations: Caccioppoli, Moser boundedness, Poincare, and Harnack.
    Used throughout, for example in the proofs of Lemma 3.10 and Proposition 3.58.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbations of elliptic operators in 1-sided chord-arc domains. Part II: Non-symmetric operators and Carleson measure estimates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L7XIKO63

@misc{pith2026190802268,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbations of elliptic operators in 1-sided chord-arc domains. Part II: Non-symmetric operators and Carleson measure estimates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L7XIKO63}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02268}
}
abstract

We generalize to the setting of 1-sided chord-arc domains, that is, to domains satisfying the interior Corkscrew and Harnack Chain conditions (these are respectively scale-invariant/quantitative versions of the openness and path-connectedness) and which have an Ahlfors regular boundary, a result of Kenig-Kirchheim-Pipher-Toro, in which Carleson measure estimates for bounded solutions of the equation $Lu=-{\rm div}(A\nabla u) = 0$ with $A$ being a real (not necessarily symmetric) uniformly elliptic matrix, imply that the corresponding elliptic measure belongs to the Muckenhoupt $A_\infty$ class with respect to surface measure on the boundary. We present two applications of this result. In the first one we extend a perturbation result recently proved by Cavero-Hofmann-Martell presenting a simpler proof and allowing non-symmetric coefficients. Second, we prove that if an operator $L$ as above has locally Lipschitz coefficients satisfying certain Carleson measure condition then $\omega_L\in A_\infty$ if and only if $\omega_{L^\top}\in A_\infty$. As a consequence, we can remove one of the main assumptions in the non-symmetric case of a result of Hofmann-Martell-Toro and show that if the coefficients satisfy a slightly stronger Carleson measure condition the membership of the elliptic measure associated with $L$ to the class $A_\infty$ yields that the domain is indeed a chord-arc domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uniform rectifiability and elliptic operators satisfying a Carleson measure condition. Part II: The large constant case

    math.AP 2019-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    For uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators with DKP coefficients on uniform Ahlfors regular domains, A∞ absolute continuity of elliptic measure is equivalent to uniform rectifiability of the boundary and to bein...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Lewis, and Philippe Tchamitchian

    Pascal Auscher, Steve Hofmann, John L. Lewis, and Philippe Tchamitchian. Extrapolation of C arleson measures and the analyticity of K ato's square-root operators. Acta Math. , 187 (2):161--190, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Carleson measures, trees, extrapolation, and T(b) theorems

    Pascal Auscher, Steve Hofmann, Camil Muscalu, Terence Tao, and Christoph Thiele. Carleson measures, trees, extrapolation, and T(b) theorems. Publ. Mat. , 46 (2):257--325, 2002

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Martell, Kaj Nystr \"o m, and Tatiana Toro

    Jonas Azzam, Steve Hofmann, Jos \'e M. Martell, Kaj Nystr \"o m, and Tatiana Toro. A new characterization of chord-arc domains. J. Eur. Math. Soc , 19 (4), 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Bishop and Peter W

    Christopher J. Bishop and Peter W. Jones. Harmonic measure and arclength. Ann. of Math. , 132 (3):511--547, 1990

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    On the H ausdorff dimension of harmonic measure in higher dimension

    Jean Bourgain. On the H ausdorff dimension of harmonic measure in higher dimension. Invent. Math. , 87 (3):477--483, 1987

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Interpolations by bounded analytic functions and the corona problem

    Lennart Carleson. Interpolations by bounded analytic functions and the corona problem. Ann. of Math. , 76 (3):547--559, 1962

    work page 1962

  7. [7]

    Coifman and Charles L

    Ronald R. Coifman and Charles L. Fefferman. Weighted norm inequalities for maximal functions and singular integrals. Stud. Math. , 51 (3):241--250, 1974

    work page 1974

  8. [8]

    Interpolating sequences and separation properties

    Lennart Carleson and John Garnett. Interpolating sequences and separation properties. J. Analyse Math. , 28 (1):273--299, 1975

    work page 1975

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Juan Cavero, Steve Hofmann, and Jos\'e M. Martell. Perturbations of elliptic operators in 1-sided chord-arc domains. P art I : Small and large perturbation for symmetric operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 371 (4):2797--2835, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    A T(b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the C auchy integral

    Michael Christ. A T(b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the C auchy integral. Colloq. Math. , 60/61 (2):601--628, 1990

    1990

  3. [11]

    Bj \"o rn E. J. Dahlberg. Estimates of harmonic measure. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 65 (3):275--288, 1977

    1977

  4. [12]

    Guy David and David S. Jerison. Lipschitz approximation to hypersurfaces, harmonic measure, and singular integrals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 39 (3):831--845, 1990

    1990

  5. [13]

    Singular integrals and rectifiable sets in R ^n : B eyond L ipschitz graphs

    Guy David and Stephen Semmes. Singular integrals and rectifiable sets in R ^n : B eyond L ipschitz graphs. Ast\'erisque , 193 :152, 1991

    1991

  6. [14]

    Analysis of and on uniformly rectifiable sets , volume 38 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs

    Guy David and Stephen Semmes. Analysis of and on uniformly rectifiable sets , volume 38 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993

    1993

  7. [15]

    Fefferman, Carlos E

    Robert A. Fefferman, Carlos E. Kenig, and Jill Pipher. The theory of weights and the D irichlet problem for elliptic equations. Ann. of Math. (2) , 134 (1):65--124, 1991

    1991

  8. [16]

    Rubio de Francia

    Jos\'e Garc \' a-Cuerva and Jos\'e L. Rubio de Francia . Weighted norm inequalities and related topics , volume 116 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies . North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1985. Mathematical Notes, 104

    1985

  9. [17]

    Nonlinear potential theory of degenerate elliptic equations

    Juha Heinonen, Tero Kilpel\"ainen, and Olli Martio. Nonlinear potential theory of degenerate elliptic equations . Oxford University Press, New York, 1993

    1993

  10. [18]

    Steve Hofmann and John L. Lewis. The Dirichlet Problem for Parabolic Operators with Singular Drift Terms . Number 719 in American Mathematical Society: Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, 2001

    2001

  11. [19]

    Martell, and Kaj Nystr \"o m

    Steve Hofmann, Phi Le, Jos \'e M. Martell, and Kaj Nystr \"o m. The weak- A _ property of harmonic and p -harmonic measures implies uniform rectifiability. Anal. PDE , 10 (3):513--558, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Steve Hofmann and Jos\'e M. Martell. A note on A_ estimates via extrapolation of C arleson measures. In The AMSI - ANU W orkshop on S pectral T heory and H armonic A nalysis , volume 44 of Proc. Centre Math. Appl. Austral. Nat. Univ. , pages 143--166. Austral. Nat. Univ., Canb...

    2010

  13. [21]

    Steve Hofmann and Jos\'e M. Martell. A_ estimates via extrapolation of C arleson measures and applications to divergence form elliptic operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 364 (1):65--101, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Steve Hofmann and Jos\'e M. Martell. Uniform rectifiability and harmonic measure I : Uniform rectifiability implies P oisson kernels in L ^p . Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. , 47 (3):577--654, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Steve Hofmann, Dorina Mitrea, Marius Mitrea, and Andrew J. Morris. L ^p -Square Function Estimates on Spaces of Homogeneous Type and on Uniformly Rectifiable Sets . Number 1159 in Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    Martell, and Tatiana Toro

    Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e M. Martell, and Tatiana Toro. General operators on 1-sided NTA domains. work in progress , 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Martell, and Tatiana Toro

    Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e M. Martell, and Tatiana Toro. A _ implies NTA for variable coefficients. J. Differential Equations , 263 (10):6147--6188, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Martell, and Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero

    Steve Hofmann, Jos \'e M. Martell, and Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero. Uniform rectifiability and harmonic measure, II : P oisson kernels in L^p imply uniform rectifiability. Duke Math. J. , 163 (8):1601--1654, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Jerison and Carlos E

    David S. Jerison and Carlos E. Kenig. Boundary behavior of harmonic functions in nontangentially accessible domains. Adv. in Math. , 46 (1):80--147, 1982

    1982

  20. [28]

    Kenig, Bernd Kirchheim, Jill Pipher, and Tatiana Toro

    Carlos E. Kenig, Bernd Kirchheim, Jill Pipher, and Tatiana Toro. Square functions and the A_ property of elliptic measures. J. Geom. Anal. , 26 (3):2383--2410, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Lavrentiev

    Mikhail A. Lavrentiev. Boundary problems in the theory of univalent functions ( R ussian). Math Sb. , 43 :815--846, 1936

    1936

  22. [30]

    Lewis and Margaret A

    John L. Lewis and Margaret A. M. Murray. Regularity properties of commutators and layer potentials associated to the heat equation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 328 (2):815--842, 1991

    1991

  23. [31]

    Harmonic analysis on chord arc domains

    Emmanouil Milakis, Jill Pipher, and Tatiana Toro. Harmonic analysis on chord arc domains. J. Geom. Anal. , 23 (4):2091--2157, 2013

    2013

  24. [32]

    Perturbations of elliptic operators in chord arc domains

    Emmanouil Milakis, Jill Pipher, and Tatiana Toro. Perturbations of elliptic operators in chord arc domains. Harmonic analysis and partial differential equations, Contemp. Math. , 612 :143--161, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Uber die randwerte einer analytischen funktion

    Frigyes Riesz and Marcel Riesz. Uber die randwerte einer analytischen funktion. Comptes Rendus du Quatri\`eme Congr\`es des Math\'ematiciens Scandinaves , pages 27--44, 1916

    1916

  26. [34]

    Analysis vs

    Stephen Semmes. Analysis vs. geometry on a class of rectifiable hypersurfaces in R ^n . Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 39 (4):1005--1035, 1990

    1990

  27. [35]

    BMO solvability and A _ condition of the elliptic measures in uniform domains

    Zihui Zhao. BMO solvability and A _ condition of the elliptic measures in uniform domains. J. Geom. Anal. , 28 (2):866--908, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.