Observational Properties of Thermonuclear Supernovae

Kate Maguire; Mark Sullivan; Saurabh W. Jha

Observational Properties of Thermonuclear Supernovae

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Observations of thermonuclear supernovae rule out a single progenitor or explosion channel but do not yet identify one consistent scenario.

desk verdict A solid, honest invited review of thermonuclear SN observations; no new results, but a dependable synthesis that deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02303 v1 pith:NHSXIVNC submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

Saurabh W. Jha , Kate Maguire , Mark Sullivan This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

keywords thermonuclearsupernovaetypeIawhitedwarfprogenitorslight-curvestandardizationsupernovadiversitycircumstellarmaterialdelay-timedistributiondarkenergymeasurements

topics Dark Energy

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review gathers the observational evidence on thermonuclear supernovae—exploding white dwarfs in close binary systems, best known as type Ia supernovae—and makes the case that the data constrain how these explosions happen without settling on one clean story. The authors report that simple single-channel models, such as a white dwarf accreting from a red-giant companion, are largely excluded for most normal SN Ia, while rates, environments, and light curves point toward multiple channels including double white-dwarf systems. They also show that the class extends well beyond normal SN Ia, encompassing subluminous, super-luminous, calcium-rich, and other peculiar transients that together look like a family or continuum rather than a single uniform explosion. Because the same objects are the standard candles used to measure cosmic expansion, the review matters directly for cosmology: if its picture is right, distance estimates must cope with a diverse, environment-sensitive population.

What carries the argument

The organising device is the empirical luminosity–decline-rate relation for SN Ia—often called the Phillips relation—which links how bright a supernova is at peak to how fast its light curve fades, and which is the basis for standardising SN Ia as distance indicators. Around this axis the review builds the 'thermonuclear supernova zoo', a luminosity-versus-decline-rate plane on which normal and peculiar subclasses are located. The other load-bearing tools are early-time light-curve bumps (possible companion-shock interaction or an alternative like nickel distribution), maximum-light and nebular-phase spectroscopy (element identities, velocities, and inner-ejecta asymmetries), radio, X-ray and sodium-line tracers of circumstellar material, and rate measurements summarised by a delay-time distribution (the rate of explosions as a function of time after a burst of star formation) that declines roughly as $t^{-1}$, favouring double-degenerate progenitors.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a large, volume-limited search for surviving companions in supernova remnants and pre-explosion images that finds a single clear non-degenerate donor star, or a high-signal detection of hydrogen in the nebular spectra of an unbiased sample of normal SN Ia; either result would overturn the conclusion that simple single-degenerate progenitors are largely excluded.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the observational record of thermonuclear supernovae places real constraints on white-dwarf progenitor systems and explosion mechanisms, but the constraints do not all point the same way. Most normal SN Ia show no surviving non-degenerate companion, no stripped hydrogen in late-time spectra, and no prompt radio or X-ray emission, yet a minority show circumstellar material, early light-curve bumps, and occasionally hydrogen emission; the authors read this as evidence that no single progenitor route can account for the class. On the explosion side, the presence of carbon in early spectra, ubiquitous high-velocity features, and late-time velocity shifts and line asymmetries argue against pure spherical deflagration and point toward layered or asymmetric explosions, possibly involving a range of white-dwarf masses. The review also claims that the diversity is not a set of isolated freaks: fast-declining and slow-declining normal SN Ia may form one continuous sequence, while type Iax, 02es-like, super-Chandrasekhar, Ia-CSM, and calcium-rich transients occupy distinct territory in the luminosity-versus-decline-rate plane. The authors are candid that direct proof that these are thermonuclear white-dwarf explosions is limited and not simply interpretable, so the synthesis rests on converging indirect evidence.

Load-bearing premise

The whole synthesis assumes the published objects are correctly classified as thermonuclear explosions of white dwarfs and that the photometric and spectroscopic calibrations behind them are sound; as the authors admit, direct evidence connecting SN Ia to white-dwarf thermonuclear explosions is limited and not necessarily simply interpretable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Cosmological distance estimates from SN Ia will need to incorporate environment dependence—host-galaxy mass and local star-formation rate—and may lean more heavily on near-infrared observations, where SN Ia scatter is smaller.
Searches for surviving companions can be narrowed: luminous red-giant or main-sequence donors are excluded for most normal SN Ia, so future pre-explosion imaging should concentrate on faint or degenerate companions.
Early-time light-curve bumps should not be assumed to be companion interaction; the same observations can be produced by nickel distribution or helium-shell detonation, so fast-cadence surveys will be most useful if they capture spectra as well as photometry.
If the thermonuclear supernova class is genuinely a continuum, the mix of subclasses seen in magnitude-limited samples will change with redshift, and large future surveys should be able to measure per-subclass rates.
The host-environment dependence of light-curve width implies that the mean stretch or colour of SN Ia populations should evolve with look-back time, a prediction that current and future cosmological samples can test directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension of the review's 'constraints, not always consistent' framing is to replace the one-parameter Phillips family with a two- or three-parameter model—for example nickel mass and an asymmetry parameter—and ask whether the scatter in Hubble residuals drops below current levels; if it does, the one-dimensional standardisation is hiding a physically meaningful axis.
The old, far-from-host environments of calcium-rich transients suggest dynamically ejected binary white dwarfs; if so, their volumetric rate and spatial distribution could serve as a prior for compact-object mergers relevant to gravitational-wave follow-up, a connection the review does not draw.
Because near-infrared SN Ia appear more nearly standard, the environmental step in Hubble residuals should shrink in a large NIR-selected sample if the step is dominated by dust; if the step persists in NIR, the cause would be astrophysical variation in the explosions themselves, and that distinction can be made with existing survey data.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a review, so judge it as one. It delivers exactly what it promises: a clearly scoped, observationally biased synthesis of thermonuclear supernova observations, with explicit caveats about incompleteness. Nothing fundamentally new—no data, no models—but it does a real service by organizing current constraints and flagging where observations conflict (companion searches vs CSM hints, early light-curve bumps, the apparent continuum between 91bg and normal events).

What it does well: the writing is careful and honestly hedged—'not always in consistent ways,' 'may alternatively result from,' 'may also result from ionization effects.' The authors admit the reference list is limited and theory-light, and point to other reviews. The environmental-dependence section is a useful reminder that standardisable candles carry astrophysical baggage, and the zoo section is a concise map of Iax, 02es-like, super-Chandra, and calcium-rich objects.

Soft spots: the stress-test concern is real but minor. Fractions like C II in >40% of pre-max spectra, high-velocity features in ~80%, blueshifted Na I D in ~20%, and double-peaked nebular lines in ~15% come from heterogeneous surveys with different selection functions, and the paper doesn't unpack those biases. For an invited review, that is acceptable—the authors already caution that volumetric rates are uncertain and that normal SN Ia still dominate. Classification of some transients as thermonuclear also rests on indirect evidence, but the paper says so itself. A volume-limited synthesis would be a nice future step, not a required fix.

This deserves a serious referee and publication. It is not a landmark, but it is a trustworthy, well-written reference for graduate students and non-specialists. I'd bring it to reading group and would cite it if writing a SNe review. Recommend accept.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is an invited review of the observational properties of thermonuclear supernovae, with a focus on normal type Ia supernovae and the growing class of related peculiar objects. The authors synthesize the current understanding of SN Ia light curves, spectra, standardization for cosmology, progenitor-system constraints from direct imaging, radio/X-ray limits, CSM diagnostics, early-time light curves, late-time nebular spectroscopy, host-galaxy environments, rates, and the various peculiar subclasses (SN Iax, 02es-like, super-Chandrasekhar, calcium-rich, Ia-CSM, and other outliers). The central thesis, stated explicitly in the abstract and repeated throughout, is that the observations provide constraints on progenitor models and explosion mechanisms, but not always in consistent ways, and that the thermonuclear supernova class is more diverse than normal SN Ia alone. The paper is a literature synthesis and presents no new observations, derivations, or simulations.

Significance. If judged as a review article, the manuscript is highly successful. It is written by leading researchers in the field, covers a broad and current literature, and is carefully hedged where the observational evidence is ambiguous, for example in the discussion of early-time light-curve bumps, high-velocity features, and the classification of calcium-rich transients. The explicit admission that direct evidence for white-dwarf thermonuclear explosions is limited and not simply interpretable is a strength, not a weakness, because it sets an honest tone for the synthesis. The figures are informative and well chosen, and the reference list, while intentionally incomplete, is representative. The review's qualitative conclusions, such as the existence of a continuum of thermonuclear objects and the lack of a single consistent progenitor channel, are well supported by the cited literature and are likely to be useful to both specialists and newcomers. The main limitation, discussed below, is that some quantitative incidence fractions are quoted without explicit discussion of selection effects in the heterogeneous follow-up samples, but this does not undermine the central message.

minor comments (5)

[References] References 6 and 52 are the same paper (Piro & Nakar 2013) and should be merged to avoid a duplicate citation.
[Section 1] The sentence 'the direct evidence for thermonuclear supernova explosions of white dwarfs is limited 4, 5 and not necessarily simply interpretable 6, 7' is vague; consider expanding briefly on what this direct evidence is, for example the SN 2011fe progenitor constraint and the 56Ni gamma-ray detection from SN 2014J, so that non-specialist readers understand what is being referred to.
[Section 3] The quoted fractions of peculiar classes, such as 'not more than a few percent of the SN Ia rate' and 'subluminous peculiar objects are more common', are drawn from heterogeneous discovery and follow-up samples with different cadences and spectroscopic targeting; adding a sentence acknowledging possible selection biases would prevent over-interpretation of these particular numbers.
[Figure 5] In the right panel, the axis label 'Si II expansion velocity at max' should specify 'at B-band maximum' for consistency with the text and standard usage.
[Section 2] The footnote marker following 'delay-time distribution' in the sentence 'with a “delay-time distribution” (DTD 1) that decreases sharply' is placed awkwardly; consider moving the footnote marker to the end of the clause or defining the acronym in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a review that synthesizes external observational results, with author self-citations used only as ordinary literature references.

full rationale

The paper is an invited review article, not a derivation or prediction paper. Its central claim, that observations of thermonuclear supernovae provide constraints on models but not always in consistent ways, is a synthesis of external published measurements rather than a result derived from its own inputs. The author self-citations that appear (e.g., Jha et al. 2007 for MLCS2k2, Maguire et al. 2018 for nebular spectroscopy, Sullivan et al. 2006 for rates) are standard references to peer-reviewed, externally anchored observational work; none is used as a load-bearing premise that makes the conclusion true by construction. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work to force a choice, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. The paper explicitly acknowledges the limits of its evidence, stating that 'the direct evidence for thermonuclear supernova explosions of white dwarfs is limited and not necessarily simply interpretable,' which is a caveat about the field rather than a circular step. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the honest finding is a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a synthesis of the literature. The only load-bearing upstream assumptions are that the cited observations are accurately reported and that the 'thermonuclear supernova' category corresponds to white-dwarf explosions. The paper itself highlights the second assumption as not fully proven, so it is listed explicitly. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The published observational results cited in the review are accurately reported by their original authors.
The review does not re-analyze data; all numerical statements (light curve properties, rates, detection fractions) are taken from the literature. If any of these underpinning measurements are wrong, the synthesis would inherit the error.
domain assumption The transients classified as thermonuclear supernovae are indeed explosions of white dwarfs primarily powered by thermonuclear fusion.
The paper uses this classification throughout and notes in the first section that direct evidence for white-dwarf progenitors is limited and not necessarily simply interpretable, citing gamma-ray and early light curve observations that are debated.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observational Properties of Thermonuclear Supernovae." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NHSXIVNC

@misc{pith2026190802303,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observational Properties of Thermonuclear Supernovae},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NHSXIVNC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02303}
}

read the original abstract

The explosive death of a star as a supernova is one of the most dramatic events in the Universe. Supernovae have an outsized impact on many areas of astrophysics: they are major contributors to the chemical enrichment of the cosmos and significantly influence the formation of subsequent generations of stars and the evolution of galaxies. Here we review the observational properties of thermonuclear supernovae, exploding white dwarf stars resulting from the stellar evolution of low-mass stars in close binary systems. The best known objects in this class are type Ia supernovae (SN Ia), astrophysically important in their application as standardisable candles to measure cosmological distances and the primary source of iron group elements in the Universe. Surprisingly, given their prominent role, SN Ia progenitor systems and explosion mechanisms are not fully understood; the observations we describe here provide constraints on models, not always in consistent ways. Recent advances in supernova discovery and follow-up have shown that the class of thermonuclear supernovae includes more than just SN Ia, and we characterise that diversity in this review.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

phoptic -- a Python package for reducing astronomical images
astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

phoptic provides a single open-source Python pipeline that reduces images from OPTICAM, ULTRACAM, HiPERCAM, and MEXMAN into photometric light curves.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

199 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Spectra of Supernovae

Minkowski, R. Spectra of Supernovae. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.53, 224 (1941)

1941
[2]

Filippenko, A. V . Optical Spectra of Supernovae. Annu. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys. 35, 309–355 (1997)

1997
[3]

Observational and physical classiﬁcation of supernovae

Gal-Yam, A. Observational and physical classiﬁcation of supernovae. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae , 1–43 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09353

arXiv 2017
[4]

delay-time distribution

but these are not uniquely interpretable as companion shock interaction52–56. Observations have generally shown greater va- riety in SN Ia light curves at early times compared to near or after maximum light57, 58. The presence of circumstellar material (CSM), more likely to arise in the single-degenerate scenario, can be investigated 2 Absolute magnitude ...

2017
[5]

Bloom, J. S. et al. A Compact Degenerate Primary-star Progenitor of SN 2011fe. Astrophys. J. 744, L17 (2012)

2012
[6]

Churazov, E. et al. Cobalt-56γ-ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J. Nature 512, 406–408 (2014)

2014
[8]

Diehl, R. et al. Early 56Ni decay gamma rays from SN2014J suggest an unusual explosion. Science 345, 1162–1165 (2014)

2014
[9]

Phillips, M. M. The absolute magnitudes of Type Ia supernovae. As- trophys. J. 413, L105–L108 (1993)

1993

Show all 199 references

[10]

Riess, A. G. et al. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009–1038 (1998)

1998
[11]

Perlmutter, S. et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565–586 (1999)

1999
[12]

Riess, A. G. et al. A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 826, 56 (2016)

2016
[13]

& Tominaga, N

Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C. & Tominaga, N. Nucleosynthesis in Stars and the Chemical Enrichment of Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys. 51, 457–509 (2013)

2013
[14]

Hillebrandt, W., Kromer, M., R ¨opke, F. K. & Ruiter, A. J. Towards an understanding of Type Ia supernovae from a synthesis of theory and observations. Frontiers of Physics 8, 116–143 (2013)

2013
[15]

Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. Handbook of Supernovae (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2017)

2017
[16]

& Wheeler, J

Branch, D. & Wheeler, J. C. Supernova Explosions (Springer, Berlin, 2017)

2017
[17]

Possible Thermonuclear Activities in Natural Terrestrial Minerals

Pankey, T., Jr. Possible Thermonuclear Activities in Natural Terrestrial Minerals. Ph.D. thesis, Howard University (1962)

1962
[18]

Colgate, S. A. & McKee, C. Early Supernova Luminosity. Astro- phys. J. 157, 623 (1969)

1969
[19]

Arnett, W. D. Type I supernovae. I - Analytic solutions for the early part of the light curve. Astrophys. J. 253, 785–797 (1982)

1982
[20]

& Dong, S

Katz, B., Kushnir, D. & Dong, S. An exact integral relation between the Ni56 mass and the bolometric light curve of a type Ia supernova. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6766 (2013)

2013 arXiv
[21]

Khatami, D. K. & Kasen, D. N. Physics of Luminous Transient Light Curves: A New Relation between Peak Time and Luminosity. Astro- phys. J. 878, 56 (2019)

2019
[22]

Secondary Maximum in the Near-Infrared Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae

Kasen, D. Secondary Maximum in the Near-Infrared Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 649, 939–953 (2006)

2006
[23]

Kromer, M. et al. Double-detonation Sub-Chandrasekhar Supernovae: Synthetic Observables for Minimum Helium Shell Mass Models. As- trophys. J. 719, 1067–1082 (2010)

2010
[24]

Cartier, R. et al. Early observations of the nearby Type Ia supernova SN 2015F. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 4476–4494 (2017)

2017
[25]

Li, W. et al. Photometric and Spectroscopic Properties of Type Ia Supernova 2018oh with Early Excess Emission from the Kepler 2 Ob- servations. Astrophys. J. 870, 12 (2019)

2019
[26]

Nugent, P. E. et al. Supernova SN 2011fe from an exploding carbon- oxygen white dwarf star. Nature 480, 344–347 (2011)

2011
[27]

& Hauschildt, P

Nugent, P., Phillips, M., Baron, E., Branch, D. & Hauschildt, P. Evi- dence for a Spectroscopic Sequence among Type 1a Supernovae. As- trophys. J. 455, L147+ (1995)

1995
[28]

A., Tanaka, M., Hillebrandt, W

Hachinger, S., Mazzali, P. A., Tanaka, M., Hillebrandt, W. & Benetti, S. Spectral luminosity indicators in Type Ia supernovae. Understand- ing the (SiII) line-strength ratio and beyond. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 389, 1087–1096 (2008)

2008
[29]

M., Ganeshalingam, M

Silverman, J. M., Ganeshalingam, M. & Filippenko, A. V . Berkeley Supernova Ia Program - V . Late-time spectra of Type Ia Supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 1030–1041 (2013)

2013
[30]

Graham, M. L. et al. Nebular-phase spectra of nearby Type Ia Super- novae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, 3437–3454 (2017)

2017
[31]

Taubenberger, S. et al. Spectroscopy of the Type Ia supernova 2011fe past 1000 d. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 448, L48–L52 (2015)

2015
[32]

& Jerkstrand, A

Fransson, C. & Jerkstrand, A. Reconciling the Infrared Catastrophe and Observations of SN 2011fe. Astrophys. J. 814, L2 (2015)

2015
[33]

Hamuy, M. et al. The Absolute Luminosities of the Calan/Tololo Type IA Supernovae. Astron. J. 112, 2391 (1996)

1996
[34]

Guy, J. et al. SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of type Ia supernovae as distance indicators. Astron. Astrophys. 466, 11–21 (2007)

2007
[35]

Jha, S., Riess, A. G. & Kirshner, R. P. Improved Distances to Type Ia Supernovae with Multicolor Light-Curve Shapes: MLCS2k2. Astro- phys. J. 659, 122–148 (2007)

2007
[36]

Burns, C. R. et al. The Carnegie Supernova Project: Light-curve Fit- ting with SNooPy. Astron. J. 141, 19 (2011)

2011
[37]

Krisciunas, K., Phillips, M. M. & Suntzeff, N. B. Hubble Diagrams of Type Ia Supernovae in the Near-Infrared. Astrophys. J. 602, L81–L84 (2004)

2004
[38]

Barone-Nugent, R. L. et al. Near-infrared observations of Type Ia supernovae: the best known standard candle for cosmology. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 1007–1012 (2012)

2012
[39]

Dhawan, S., Jha, S. W. & Leibundgut, B. Measuring the Hubble con- stant with Type Ia supernovae as near-infrared standard candles. As- tron. Astrophys. 609, A72 (2018)

2018
[40]

Burns, C. R. et al. The Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibra- tion and the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 869, 56 (2018)

2018
[41]

Burns, C. R. et al. The Carnegie Supernova Project: Intrinsic Colors of Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 789, 32 (2014)

2014
[42]

Li, W. et al. Exclusion of a luminous red giant as a companion star to the progenitor of supernova SN 2011fe. Nature 480, 348–350 (2011)

2011
[43]

Schaefer, B. E. & Pagnotta, A. An absence of ex-companion stars in the type Ia supernova remnant SNR 0509-67.5. Nature 481, 164–166 (2012)

2012
[44]

Kerzendorf, W. E. et al. A High-resolution Spectroscopic Search for the Remaining Donor for Tycho’s Supernova. Astrophys. J. 774, 99 (2013)

2013
[45]

Kerzendorf, W. E. et al. A search for a surviving companion in SN
[46]

Shen, K. J. et al. Three Hypervelocity White Dwarfs in Gaia DR2: Ev- idence for Dynamically Driven Double-degenerate Double-detonation Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 865, 15 (2018)

2018
[47]

Ruiz-Lapuente, P. et al. No Surviving Companion in Kepler’s Super- nova. Astrophys. J. 862, 124 (2018)

2018
[48]

Olling, R. P. et al. No signature of ejecta interaction with a stellar companion in three type Ia supernovae. Nature 521, 332–335 (2015)

2015
[49]

Hosseinzadeh, G. et al. Early Blue Excess from the Type Ia Supernova 2017cbv and Implications for Its Progenitor. Astrophys. J. 845, L11 (2017)

2017
[50]

Shappee, B. J. et al. Seeing Double: ASASSN-18bt Exhibits a Two- component Rise in the Early-time K2 Light Curve. Astrophys. J. 870, 13 (2019)

2019
[51]

Dimitriadis, G. et al. K2 Observations of SN 2018oh Reveal a Two- component Rising Light Curve for a Type Ia Supernova. Astrophys. J. 870, L1 (2019)

2019
[52]

Piro, A. L. & Nakar, E. What can we Learn from the Rising Light Curves of Radioactively Powered Supernovae? Astrophys. J. 769, 67 (2013)

2013
[53]

Fausnaugh, M. M. et al. Early Time Light Curves of 18 Bright Type Ia Supernovae Observed with TESS. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.02171 (2019). 10

2019 arXiv
[54]

R., Sim, S

Magee, M. R., Sim, S. A., Kotak, R. & Kerzendorf, W. E. Modelling the early time behaviour of type Ia supernovae: effects of the 56Ni distribution. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A115 (2018)

2018
[55]

& Doi, M

Maeda, K., Jiang, J.-a., Shigeyama, T. & Doi, M. Type Ia Supernovae in the First Few Days: Signatures of Helium Detonation versus Inter- action. Astrophys. J. 861, 78 (2018)

2018
[56]

& Kasen, D

Polin, A., Nugent, P. & Kasen, D. Observational Predictions for Sub- Chandrasekhar Mass Explosions: Further Evidence for Multiple Pro- genitor Systems for Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 873, 84 (2019)

2019
[57]

Stritzinger, M. D. et al. Red versus Blue: Early Observations of Thermonuclear Supernovae Reveal Two Distinct Populations? As- trophys. J. 864, L35 (2018)

2018
[58]

Firth, R. E. et al. The rising light curves of Type Ia supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 3895–3910 (2015)

2015
[59]

Hayden, B. T. et al. The Rise and Fall of Type Ia Supernova Light Curves in the SDSS-II Supernova Survey. Astrophys. J. 712, 350–366 (2010)

2010
[60]

Russell, B. R. & Immler, S. Swift X-Ray Upper Limits on Type Ia Supernova Environments. Astrophys. J. 748, L29 (2012)

2012
[61]

Chomiuk, L. et al. A Deep Search for Prompt Radio Emission from Thermonuclear Supernovae with the Very Large Array. Astrophys. J. 821, 119 (2016)

2016
[62]

Margutti, R. et al. No X-Rays from the Very Nearby Type Ia SN 2014J: Constraints on Its Environment. Astrophys. J. 790, 52 (2014)

2014
[63]

Horesh, A. et al. Early Radio and X-Ray Observations of the Youngest nearby Type Ia Supernova PTF 11kly (SN 2011fe). Astrophys. J. 746, 21 (2012)

2012
[64]

Ferretti, R. et al. Time-varying sodium absorption in the Type Ia su- pernova 2013gh. Astron. Astrophys. 592, A40 (2016)

2016
[65]

Patat, F. et al. Detection of Circumstellar Material in a Normal Type Ia Supernova. Science 317, 924– (2007)

2007
[66]

Maguire, K. et al. A statistical analysis of circumstellar material in Type Ia supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 222–240 (2013)

2013
[67]

Sternberg, A. et al. Circumstellar Material in Type Ia Supernovae via Sodium Absorption Features. Science 333, 856– (2011)

2011
[68]

Mazzali, P. A. et al. High-Velocity Features: A Ubiquitous Property of Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 623, L37–L40 (2005)

2005
[69]

Phillips, M. M. et al. On the Source of the Dust Extinction in Type Ia Supernovae and the Discovery of Anomalously Strong Na I Absorp- tion. Astrophys. J. 779, 38 (2013)

2013
[70]

Blondin, S., Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J. & Khokhlov, A. M. One- dimensional delayed-detonation models of Type Ia supernovae: con- frontation to observations at bolometric maximum. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 429, 2127–2142 (2013)

2013
[71]

Zhao, X. et al. The Silicon and Calcium High-velocity Features in Type Ia Supernovae from Early to Maximum Phases. Astro- phys. J. Suppl. Ser.220, 20 (2015)

2015
[72]

Dilday, B. et al. PTF 11kx: A Type Ia Supernova with a Symbiotic Nova Progenitor. Science 337, 942 (2012)

2012
[73]

Hamuy, M. et al. An asymptotic-giant-branch star in the progenitor system of a type Ia supernova. Nature 424, 651–654 (2003)

2003
[74]

Graham, M. L. et al. Delayed Circumstellar Interaction for Type Ia SN 2015cp Revealed by an HST Ultraviolet Imaging Survey.Astrophys. J. 871, 62 (2019)

2019
[75]

Silverman, J. M. et al. Type Ia Supernovae Strongly Interacting with Their Circumstellar Medium. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.207, 3 (2013)

2013
[76]

Leonard, D. C. Constraining the Type Ia Supernova Progenitor: The Search for Hydrogen in Nebular Spectra.Astrophys. J.670, 1275–1282 (2007)

2007
[77]

Mattila, S. et al. Early and late time VLT spectroscopy of SN 2001el - progenitor constraints for a type Ia supernova. Astron. Astrophys. 443, 649–662 (2005)

2005
[78]

J., Stanek, K

Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., Pogge, R. W. & Garnavich, P. M. No Stripped Hydrogen in the Nebular Spectra of Nearby Type Ia Super- nova 2011fe. Astrophys. J. 762, L5 (2013)

2013
[79]

Lundqvist, P. et al. Hydrogen and helium in the spectra of Type Ia supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 329–345 (2013)

2013
[80]

Type ia supernovae

Maguire, K. Type ia supernovae. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae, 1–24 (Springer International Publish- ing, Cham, 2016)

2016
[81]

Lundqvist, P. et al. No trace of a single-degenerate companion in late spectra of supernovae 2011fe and 2014J. Astron. Astrophys. 577, A39 (2015)

2015
[82]

Blue Bump

Sand, D. J. et al. Nebular Spectroscopy of the “Blue Bump” Type Ia Supernova 2017cbv. Astrophys. J. 863, 24 (2018)

2018
[83]

Shappee, B. J. et al. Strong Evidence against a Non-degenerate Com- panion in SN 2012cg. Astrophys. J. 855, 6 (2018)

2018
[84]

Sand, D. J. et al. Nebular Hα Limits for Fast Declining SNe Ia. Astro- phys. J. 877, L4 (2019)

2019
[85]

Two-Component

Tucker, M. A., Shappee, B. J. & Wisniewski, J. P. No Stripped Com- panion Material in the Nebular Spectrum of the “Two-Component” Type Ia Supernova ASASSN-18bt. Astrophys. J. 872, L22 (2019)

2019
[86]

Vallely, P. J. et al. ASASSN-18tb: a most unusual Type Ia supernova observed by TESS and SALT. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 2372– 2384 (2019)

2019
[87]

Kollmeier, J. A. et al. Hα emission in the nebular spectrum of the Type Ia supernova ASASSN-18tb. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 3041– 3046 (2019)

2019
[88]

Thomas, R. C. et al. Type Ia Supernova Carbon Footprints. Astro- phys. J. 743, 27 (2011)

2011
[89]

Parrent, J. T. et al. A Study of Carbon Features in Type Ia Supernova Spectra. Astrophys. J. 732, 30 (2011)

2011
[90]

Folatelli, G. et al. Unburned Material in the Ejecta of Type Ia Super- novae. Astrophys. J. 745, 74 (2012)

2012
[91]

Blondin, S. et al. The Spectroscopic Diversity of Type Ia Supernovae. Astron. J. 143, 126 (2012)

2012
[92]

Maguire, K. et al. Exploring the spectral diversity of low-redshift Type Ia supernovae using the Palomar Transient Factory. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 444, 3258–3274 (2014)

2014
[93]

Silverman, J. M. & Filippenko, A. V . Berkeley Supernova Ia Program - IV . Carbon detection in early-time optical spectra of Type Ia super- novae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 1917–1933 (2012)

2012
[94]

Zhao, X. et al. The Oxygen Features in Type Ia Supernovae and Im- plications for the Nature of Thermonuclear Explosions. Astrophys. J. 826, 211 (2016)

2016
[95]

H., Sim, S

Heringer, E., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Sim, S. A., Kerzendorf, W. E. & Graham, M. L. Spectral Sequences of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Carbon as a Diagnostic Tool for Explosion Mechanisms. Astrophys. J. 871, 250 (2019)

2019
[96]

E., Malone, C

Ma, H., Woosley, S. E., Malone, C. M., Almgren, A. & Bell, J. Car- bon Deﬂagration in Type Ia Supernova. I. Centrally Ignited Models. Astrophys. J. 771, 58 (2013)

2013
[97]

Ashall, C. et al. Photometric and spectroscopic observations, and abundance tomography modelling of the Type Ia supernova SN 2014J located in M82. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 4427–4437 (2014)

2014
[98]

Foley, R. J. et al. Ultraviolet diversity of Type Ia Supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1308–1316 (2016)

2016
[99]

J., Baron, E., Milne, P., Roming, P

Brown, P. J., Baron, E., Milne, P., Roming, P. W. A. & Wang, L. The- oretical Clues to the Ultraviolet Diversity of Type Ia Supernovae. As- trophys. J. 809, 37 (2015)

2015
[100]

Seitenzahl, I. R. & Townsley, D. M. Nucleosynthesis in thermonuclear supernovae. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.)Handbook of Super- novae, 1–24 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.00415

2017 arXiv
[101]

Maguire, K. et al. Using late-time optical and near-infrared spectra to constrain Type Ia supernova explosion properties. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 477, 3567–3582 (2018)

2018
[102]

C., Li, W., Filippenko, A

Leonard, D. C., Li, W., Filippenko, A. V ., Foley, R. J. & Chornock, R. Evidence for Spectropolarimetric Diversity in Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 632, 450–475 (2005)

2005
[103]

Maeda, K. et al. An asymmetric explosion as the origin of spectral evolution diversity in type Ia supernovae. Nature 466, 82–85 (2010). 11

2010
[104]

Patat, F. et al. VLT spectropolarimetry of the fast expanding type Ia SN 2006X. Astron. Astrophys. 508, 229–246 (2009)

2009
[105]

Wang, L. et al. Premaximum Spectropolarimetry of the Type Ia SN 2004dt. Astrophys. J. 653, 490–502 (2006)

2006
[106]

Vallely, P. J. et al. Signatures of Bimodality in Nebular Phase Type Ia Supernova Spectra: Indications of White Dwarf Collision Progenitors. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00037 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[107]

& Prieto, J

Dong, S., Katz, B., Kushnir, D. & Prieto, J. L. Type Ia supernovae with bimodal explosions are common - possible smoking gun for direct collisions of white dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, L61–L65 (2015)

2015
[108]

Mannucci, F. et al. The supernova rate per unit mass. Astron. Astro- phys. 433, 807–814 (2005)

2005
[109]

The frequency of SN Ia in galaxies of different Hubble type

van den Bergh, S. The frequency of SN Ia in galaxies of different Hubble type. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.102, 1318–1320 (1990)

1990
[110]

Brown, J. S. et al. The relative speciﬁc Type Ia supernovae rate from three years of ASAS-SN. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 3785–3796 (2019)

2019
[111]

Sullivan, M. et al. Rates and Properties of Type Ia Supernovae as a Function of Mass and Star Formation in Their Host Galaxies. Astro- phys. J. 648, 868–883 (2006)

2006
[112]

D., Stanek, K

Kistler, M. D., Stanek, K. Z., Kochanek, C. S., Prieto, J. L. & Thomp- son, T. A. The Impact of Metallicity on the Rate of Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 770, 88 (2013)

2013
[113]

Smith, M. et al. The SDSS-II Supernova Survey: Parameterizing the Type Ia Supernova Rate as a Function of Host Galaxy Properties. As- trophys. J. 755, 61 (2012)

2012
[114]

& Nelemans, G

Maoz, D., Mannucci, F. & Nelemans, G. Observational Clues to the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 107–170 (2014)

2014
[115]

Graur, O., Bianco, F. B. & Modjaz, M. A uniﬁed explanation for the supernova rate-galaxy mass dependence based on supernovae de- tected in Sloan galaxy spectra.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.450, 905–925 (2015)

2015
[116]

Frohmaier, C. et al. The volumetric rate of normal type Ia super- novae in the local universe discovered by the Palomar Transient Fac- tory. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (2019)

2019
[117]

Graur, O. et al. Type-Ia Supernova Rates to Redshift 2.4 from CLASH: The Cluster Lensing And Supernova Survey with Hubble.Astrophys. J. 783, 28 (2014)

2014
[118]

Hamuy, M. et al. A Search for Environmental Effects on Type Ia Su- pernovae. Astron. J. 120, 1479–1486 (2000)

2000
[119]

& Baron, E

Branch, D., Romanishin, W. & Baron, E. Statistical Connections be- tween the Properties of Type IA Supernovae and the B-V Colors of Their Parent Galaxies, and the Value of H0. Astrophys. J. 465, 73 (1996)

1996
[120]

A., Sullivan, M., Conley, A

Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Conley, A. & Carlberg, R. Predicted and Observed Evolution in the Mean Properties of Type Ia Supernovae with Redshift. Astrophys. J. 667, L37–L40 (2007)

2007
[121]

Johansson, J. et al. SN Ia host galaxy properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II spectroscopy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435, 1680– 1700 (2013)

2013
[122]

L., Hicken, M., Burke, D

Kelly, P. L., Hicken, M., Burke, D. L., Mandel, K. S. & Kirshner, R. P. Hubble Residuals of Nearby Type Ia Supernovae are Correlated with Host Galaxy Masses. Astrophys. J. 715, 743–756 (2010)

2010
[123]

J., Toonen, S

Shen, K. J., Toonen, S. & Graur, O. The Evolution of the Type Ia Supernova Luminosity Function. Astrophys. J. 851, L50 (2017)

2017
[124]

Lampeitl, H. et al. The Effect of Host Galaxies on Type Ia Supernovae in the SDSS-II Supernova Survey. Astrophys. J. 722, 566–576 (2010)

2010
[125]

Sullivan, M. et al. The dependence of Type Ia Supernovae luminosities on their host galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.406, 782–802 (2010)

2010
[126]

Scolnic, D. M. et al. The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectro- scopically Conﬁrmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample. Astrophys. J. 859, 101 (2018)

2018
[127]

Childress, M. et al. Host Galaxy Properties and Hubble Residuals of Type Ia Supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory.Astrophys. J. 770, 108 (2013)

2013
[128]

Rigault, M. et al. Strong Dependence of Type Ia Supernova Stan- dardization on the Local Speciﬁc Star Formation Rate. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03849 (2018)

2018 arXiv
[129]

Brout, D. et al. First Cosmology Results Using SNe Ia from the Dark Energy Survey: Analysis, Systematic Uncertainties, and Validation. Astrophys. J. 874, 150 (2019)

2019
[130]

Rigault, M. et al. Evidence of environmental dependencies of Type Ia supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory indicated by local Hα. Astron. Astrophys. 560, A66 (2013)

2013
[131]

Jones, D. O. et al. Should Type Ia Supernova Distances Be Corrected for Their Local Environments? Astrophys. J. 867, 108 (2018)

2018
[132]

Roman, M. et al. Dependence of Type Ia supernova luminosities on their local environment. Astron. Astrophys. 615, A68 (2018)

2018
[133]

M., Garnavich, P

Rose, B. M., Garnavich, P. M. & Berg, M. A. Think Global, Act Local: The Inﬂuence of Environment Age and Host Mass on Type Ia Supernova Light Curves. Astrophys. J. 874, 32 (2019)

2019
[134]

J., Wolf, C

Childress, M. J., Wolf, C. & Zahid, H. J. Ages of Type Ia supernovae over cosmic time. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 1898–1911 (2014)

2014
[135]

Kelly, P. L. et al. Distances with<4% precision from type Ia super- novae in young star-forming environments. Science 347, 1459–1462 (2015)

2015
[136]

Silverman, J. M. et al. Berkeley Supernova Ia Program - I. Obser- vations, data reduction and spectroscopic sample of 582 low-redshift Type Ia supernovae.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.425, 1789–1818 (2012)

2012
[137]

The extremes of thermonuclear supernovae

Taubenberger, S. The extremes of thermonuclear supernovae. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae , 1– 57 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00528

2017 arXiv
[138]

C., Sahu, D

Srivastav, S., Anupama, G. C., Sahu, D. K. & Ravikumar, C. D. SN 2015bp: adding to the growing population of transitional Type Ia su- pernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 2436–2449 (2017)

2017
[139]

Panther, F. H. et al. SN1991bg-like supernovae are associated with old stellar populations. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1904.10139 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[140]

Hsiao, E. Y . et al. Carnegie Supernova Project-II: The Near-infrared Spectroscopy Program. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.131, 014002 (2019)

2019
[141]

Peculiar

Garnavich, P. M. et al. The Luminosity of SN 1999by in NGC 2841 and the Nature of “Peculiar” Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 613, 1120–1132 (2004)

2004
[142]

Jha, S. W. Type Iax Supernovae. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae, 375 (Springer International Publish- ing, Cham, 2017). Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01110

2017 arXiv
[143]

Foley, R. J. et al. Type Iax Supernovae: A New Class of Stellar Explo- sion. Astrophys. J. 767, 57 (2013)

2013
[144]

Jha, S. et al. Late-Time Spectroscopy of SN 2002cx: The Prototype of a New Subclass of Type Ia Supernovae. Astron. J. 132, 189–196 (2006)

2006
[145]

Li, W. et al. SN 2002cx: The Most Peculiar Known Type Ia Supernova. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.115, 453–473 (2003)

2003
[146]

Tomasella, L. et al. Optical and near-infrared observations of SN 2014ck: an outlier among the Type Iax supernovae. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 459, 1018–1038 (2016)

2016
[147]

Stritzinger, M. D. et al. Comprehensive observations of the bright and energetic Type Iax SN 2012Z: Interpretation as a Chandrasekhar mass white dwarf explosion. Astron. Astrophys. 573, A2 (2015)

2015
[148]

McCully, C. et al. A luminous, blue progenitor system for the type Iax supernova 2012Z. Nature 512, 54–56 (2014)

2014
[149]

McCully, C. et al. Hubble Space Telescope and Ground-based Obser- vations of the Type Iax Supernovae SN 2005hk and SN 2008A.Astro- phys. J. 786, 134 (2014)

2014
[150]

Vennes, S. et al. An unusual white dwarf star may be a surviving remnant of a subluminous Type Ia supernova. Science 357, 680–683 (2017)

2017
[151]

Kromer, M. et al. 3D deﬂagration simulations leaving bound remnants: a model for 2002cx-like Type Ia supernovae.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429, 2287–2297 (2013). 12

2013
[152]

White, C. J. et al. Slow-speed Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory: Two Channels. Astrophys. J. 799, 52 (2015)

2015
[153]

Raddi, R. et al. Partly burnt runaway stellar remnants from peculiar thermonuclear supernovae. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05061 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[154]

Taubenberger, S. et al. [O I]λλ6300, 6364 in the Nebular Spectrum of a Subluminous Type Ia Supernova. Astrophys. J. 775, L43 (2013)

2013
[155]

Cao, Y . et al. A strong ultraviolet pulse from a newborn type Ia super- nova. Nature 521, 328–331 (2015)

2015
[156]

Howell, D. A. et al. The type Ia supernova SNLS-03D3bb from a super-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf star. Nature 443, 308–311 (2006)

2006
[157]

Kromer, M. et al. The peculiar Type Ia supernova iPTF14atg: Chandrasekhar-mass explosion or violent merger? Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 459, 4428–4439 (2016)

2016
[158]

Taubenberger, S. et al. ‘Super-Chandrasekhar’ Type Ia Supernovae at nebular epochs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 3117–3130 (2013)

2013
[159]

Taubenberger, S. et al. High luminosity, slow ejecta and persistent car- bon lines: SN 2009dc challenges thermonuclear explosion scenarios. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 2735–2762 (2011)

2011
[160]

Chen, P. et al. ASASSN-15pz: Revealing Signiﬁcant Photometric Di- versity Among 2009dc-like, Peculiar Type Ia Supernovae. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03198 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[161]

Scalzo, R. A. et al. Probing type Ia supernova properties using bolo- metric light curves from the Carnegie Supernova Project and the CfA Supernova Group. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, 628–647 (2019)

2019
[162]

Perets, H. B. et al. The Old Environment of the Faint Calcium-rich Supernova SN 2005cz. Astrophys. J. 728, L36 (2011)

2011
[163]

Z., Stoll, R

Khan, R., Stanek, K. Z., Stoll, R. & Prieto, J. L. Super-Chandrasekhar SNe Ia Strongly Prefer Metal-poor Environments. Astrophys. J. 737, L24 (2011)

2011
[164]

Lyman, J. D. et al. Environment-derived constraints on the progenitors of low-luminosity Type I supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 527–541 (2013)

2013
[165]

Kasliwal, M. M. et al. Calcium-rich Gap Transients in the Remote Outskirts of Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 755, 161 (2012)

2012
[166]

Perets, H. B. et al. A faint type of supernova from a white dwarf with a helium-rich companion. Nature 465, 322–325 (2010)

2010
[167]

Lunnan, R. et al. Two New Calcium-rich Gap Transients in Group and Cluster Environments. Astrophys. J. 836, 60 (2017)

2017
[168]

Milisavljevic, D. et al. iPTF15eqv: Multiwavelength Expos ´e of a Pe- culiar Calcium-rich Transient. Astrophys. J. 846, 50 (2017)

2017
[169]

Foley, R. J. Kinematics and host-galaxy properties suggest a nu- clear origin for calcium-rich supernova progenitors. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 452, 2463–2478 (2015)

2015
[170]

Li, W. et al. The Unique Type Ia Supernova 2000cx in NGC 524. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.113, 1178–1204 (2001)

2001
[171]

De, K. et al. iPTF 16hgs: A Double-peaked Ca-rich Gap Transient in a Metal-poor, Star-forming Dwarf Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 866, 72 (2018)

2018
[172]

Silverman, J. M. et al. SN 2000cx and SN 2013bh: extremely rare, nearly twin Type Ia supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 1225– 1237 (2013)

2013
[173]

Candia, P. et al. Optical and Infrared Photometry of the Unusual Type Ia Supernova 2000cx. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.115, 277–294 (2003)

2003
[174]

Sullivan, M. et al. The Subluminous and Peculiar Type Ia Supernova PTF 09dav. Astrophys. J. 732, 118 (2011)

2011
[175]

Drout, M. R. et al. The Fast and Furious Decay of the Peculiar Type Ic Supernova 2005ek. Astrophys. J. 774, 58 (2013)

2013
[176]

A., Weil, K

Fesen, R. A., Weil, K. E., Hamilton, A. J. S. & H ¨oﬂich, P. A. Optical and UV Spectra of the Remnant of SN 1885 (S And) in M31. Astro- phys. J. 848, 130 (2017)

2017
[177]

Kasliwal, M. M. et al. Rapidly Decaying Supernova 2010X: A Candi- date “.Ia” Explosion. Astrophys. J. 723, L98–L102 (2010)

2010
[178]

B., Badenes, C., Arcavi, I., Simon, J

Perets, H. B., Badenes, C., Arcavi, I., Simon, J. D. & Gal-yam, A. An Emerging Class of Bright, Fast-evolving Supernovae with Low-mass Ejecta. Astrophys. J. 730, 89 (2011)

2011
[179]

Maguire, K. et al. PTF10ops - a subluminous, normal-width light curve Type Ia supernova in the middle of nowhere. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 418, 747–758 (2011)

2011
[180]

Burke, J. et al. FLOYDS Classiﬁcation of AT 2019ein / ATLAS19ieo as a Young and Peculiar SN Ia. The Astronomer’s Telegram 12719 (2019)

2019
[181]

Poznanski, D. et al. An Unusually Fast-Evolving Supernova. Science 327, 58 (2010)

2010
[182]

De, K. et al. ZTF 18aaqeasu (SN2018byg): A Massive Helium-shell Double Detonation on a Sub-Chandrasekhar-mass White Dwarf. As- trophys. J. 873, L18 (2019)

2019
[183]

Jiang, J.-A. et al. A hybrid type Ia supernova with an early ﬂash trig- gered by helium-shell detonation. Nature 550, 80–83 (2017)

2017
[184]

& Nugent, P

Frohmaier, C., Sullivan, M., Maguire, K. & Nugent, P. The V olumetric Rate of Calcium-rich Transients in the Local Universe. Astrophys. J. 858, 50 (2018)

2018
[185]

Miller, A. A. et al. Color Me Intrigued: The Discovery of iPTF 16fnm, an SN 2002cx-like Object. Astrophys. J. 848, 59 (2017)

2017
[186]

Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.130, 064505 (2018)

2018
[187]

Holoien, T. W.-S. et al. The ASAS-SN bright supernova catalogue - I. 2013-2014. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, 2672–2686 (2017)

2017
[188]

& Wyatt, S

Sand, D., Valenti, S., Tartaglia, L., Yang, S. & Wyatt, S. An Overview of the D< 40 Mpc One Day Cadence Supernova Search, DLT40. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #231 , vol. 231 of American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 245.11 (2018)

2018
[189]

Drake, A. J. et al. First Results from the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey. Astrophys. J. 696, 870–884 (2009)

2009
[190]

V ., Li, W

Filippenko, A. V ., Li, W. D., Treffers, R. R. & Modjaz, M. The Lick Observatory Supernova Search with the Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope. In Paczynski, B., Chen, W.-P. & Lemme, C. (eds.) IAU Colloq. 183: Small Telescope Astronomy on Global Scales, vol. 246 of Astronomica...

2001
[191]

T., Wyrzykowski, L., Blagorodnova, N

Hodgkin, S. T., Wyrzykowski, L., Blagorodnova, N. & Koposov, S. Transient astronomy with the Gaia satellite. Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society of London Series A 371, 20120239– 20120239 (2013)

2013
[192]

Lipunov, V . et al. Master Robotic Net. Advances in Astronomy 2010, 349171 (2010)

2010
[193]

Walker, E. S. et al. First Results from the La Silla-QUEST Supernova Survey and the Carnegie Supernova Project. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 219, 13 (2015)

2015
[194]

Huber, M. et al. The Pan-STARRS Survey for Transients (PSST) - ﬁrst announcement and public release. The Astronomer’s Telegram 7153 (2015)

2015
[195]

Wyrzykowski, Ł. et al. OGLE-IV Real-Time Transient Search. Acta Astronomica 64, 197–232 (2014)

2014
[196]

Yang, Z. et al. PTSS: Discovery of a Probable Supernova in SDSS J150350.43+482250.7. The Astronomer’s Telegram8757, 1 (2016)

2016
[197]

Law, N. M. et al. The Palomar Transient Factory: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 121, 1395 (2009)

2009
[198]

Ivezi ´c, ˇZ. et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J. 873, 111 (2019). 13 Correspondence Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.W.J. (saurabh@physics.rutgers.edu). Acknowledgements We thank ...

2019
[199]

Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 018002 (2019)

2019
[1006]

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 192–199 (2018)

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Spectra of Supernovae

Minkowski, R. Spectra of Supernovae. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.53, 224 (1941)

1941

[2] [2]

Filippenko, A. V . Optical Spectra of Supernovae. Annu. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys. 35, 309–355 (1997)

1997

[3] [3]

Observational and physical classiﬁcation of supernovae

Gal-Yam, A. Observational and physical classiﬁcation of supernovae. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae , 1–43 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017). Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09353

arXiv 2017

[4] [4]

delay-time distribution

but these are not uniquely interpretable as companion shock interaction52–56. Observations have generally shown greater va- riety in SN Ia light curves at early times compared to near or after maximum light57, 58. The presence of circumstellar material (CSM), more likely to arise in the single-degenerate scenario, can be investigated 2 Absolute magnitude ...

2017

[5] [5]

Bloom, J. S. et al. A Compact Degenerate Primary-star Progenitor of SN 2011fe. Astrophys. J. 744, L17 (2012)

2012

[6] [6]

Churazov, E. et al. Cobalt-56γ-ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J. Nature 512, 406–408 (2014)

2014

[7] [8]

Diehl, R. et al. Early 56Ni decay gamma rays from SN2014J suggest an unusual explosion. Science 345, 1162–1165 (2014)

2014

[8] [9]

Phillips, M. M. The absolute magnitudes of Type Ia supernovae. As- trophys. J. 413, L105–L108 (1993)

1993