Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Stochastic Fusion of Interacting Particle Systems and Duality Functions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stochastic fusion builds multi-occupancy versions of exclusion processes using only their stationary measures, and carries Markov duality over to the fused process.

desk verdict Original, honest, and mostly correct; the main risk is an under-proved import of q-exchangeability preservation on finite lattices. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02359 v4 pith:UVKWOEC4 submitted 2019-08-06 math.PR

Jeffrey Kuan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60K3582C2260J27
keywords stochasticfusioninteractingparticlesystemsMarkovdualityq-exchangeabilityASEP(qj)SSEP(m/2)hydrodynamiclimitdynamicASEP
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Stochastic fusion is a general recipe for converting an exclusion process—one in which each lattice site holds at most one particle—into a process in which sites may hold several particles. The recipe needs only the stationary measures of the original process on a finite lattice, together with a classical intertwining criterion for Markov functions. When the original process has a Markov duality, the fused process inherits a weighted duality, at least for the special initial measures the construction uses. The paper works this out for symmetric exclusion, asymmetric exclusion, and dynamic models, producing multi-occupancy versions of ASEP(q,j) and SSEP(m/2), new duality functions, and hydrodynamic limits for open-boundary versions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair (Φ,Λ) with ΛΦ=id. Φ is deterministic fusion: at each lattice site x it collapses m_x single-occupancy micro-sites into one site with occupancy vector (k_x^(1),...,k_x^(n)), total at most m_x. Λ is stochastic fission: it expands an occupancy vector back into a micro-configuration by placing the k_x^(i) particles of each species on the m_x micro-sites, choosing the placement with probability proportional to $q^{{sum of positions}}$ $q^{{inversions}}$ divided by a q-multinomial. These probabilities are exactly the q-exchangeable reversible measures of the original multi-species process. Because ΛΦ=id, the identity π̂ΛP_t=π̂ΛP_tΦΛ follows whenever π̂Λ is stationary, and then the projected process has semigroup Q_t=ΛP_tΦ and inherited duality functionals ΛD and ΛDΦ; this is the mechanism that carries the argument.

What would settle it

Take a two-site lattice with capacities (m_1,m_2)=(2,3), fix q∈(0,1), run the multi-species ASEP(q,⃗m) from the proposed stationary measure π, and compare the empirical occupation distribution at large time with π; any persistent discrepancy contradicts Theorem 4.2(iii). Alternatively, check the q-exchangeability identity (3) on a single two-site jump of the multi-species ASEP(q,⃗m): a violation there would break the construction's core premise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.1: given a Markov process X_t with semigroup P_t, a deterministic fusion map Φ, and a stochastic fission kernel Λ with ΛΦ=id, if some π̂Λ is stationary then φ(X_t) is Markov with semigroup Q_t=ΛP_tΦ, and every duality P_tD=D\tilde P_t^* of X_t yields the weighted duality π̂Q_t(ΛD)=π̂(ΛD)\tilde P_t^*. The paper applies this to the multi-species interchange process: the induced fused process is the inhomogeneous multi-species ASEP(q,⃗m) (Theorem 4.2), which has stationary measure π, preserves q-exchangeability, and admits duality functionals that specialize to previously known ones. The symmetric limit gives multi-species SSEP(⃗m), whose boundary reservoirs in the infinite-capacity limit lead to open-boundary SSEP with a duality, stationary measures, and hydrodynamic limit. In the asymmetric case the same mechanism yields open-boundary ASEP duality and its hydrodynamic limit, and fusing the dynamic ASEP produces an inhomogeneous dynamic ASEP(q,⃗m) that interpolates between ASEP(q,⃗m) and its space reversal.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on the prior theorem that multi-species ASEP preserves q-exchangeable measures; if that theorem were false, the stationarity of πΛ, the q-exchangeability of the fused process, and the duality outputs built on them would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For symmetric exclusion, the fusion produces the inhomogeneous SSEP(⃗m); taking some capacities to infinity yields an open-boundary SSEP whose duality gives the hydrodynamic limit (heat equation with Neumann boundary condition) and i.i.d. Bernoulli(α) stationary measures on the half-line.
  • For asymmetric exclusion, the fusion produces the inhomogeneous ASEP(q,⃗m), and as a by-product proves that multi-species ASEP(q,j) preserves q-exchangeable measures, yielding new duality functions for ASEP, ASEP(q,j), and the q-Boson.
  • The open-boundary ASEP obtained this way has a duality from which the hydrodynamic limit follows: the q-deformed particle count converges to the solution of the heat equation with convection and Neumann boundary.
  • Fusing the dynamic ASEP produces a dynamic inhomogeneous ASEP(q,⃗m) whose rates interpolate, as the dynamic parameter goes from 0 to ∞, between ASEP(q,⃗m) and its space reversal; all capacities equal to 1 recovers the dynamic ASEP.
  • Because the recipe only needs stationary measures rather than an underlying symmetry algebra, it can be applied to processes without a known algebraic structure, at the price that Markovity and duality are guaranteed only for the special initial measure π̂Λ.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same recipe should apply to any finite-state Markov process with an explicitly known stationary measure—zero-range and inclusion processes are natural test cases—and would yield fused multi-occupancy versions with dualities.
  • Beyond the paper: the hydrodynamic limits found here indicate that each fused process should lie in the same macroscopic universality class as its parent exclusion process (diffusive for symmetric, KPZ-type for asymmetric); the paper motivates but does not prove this.
  • Beyond the paper: since the intertwining criterion guarantees Markovity only for the special initial class π̂Λ, any claimed duality for arbitrary initial conditions would require extra work; the paper's Ansatze suggest this may be possible for specific models.
  • Beyond the paper: verifying whether the dynamic ASEP(q,⃗m) has the same weak-asymmetry limit as the dynamic ASEP—the question the paper poses—would test whether the dynamic structure survives fusion in the scaling limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'stochastic fusion,' a method for constructing higher-occupancy interacting particle systems from exclusion processes using stationary measures and the Rogers–Pitman intertwining. Theorem 3.1 gives conditions under which a projection of a Markov process is Markov and inherits a weighted duality. The method is applied to symmetric exclusion, ASEP(q,m), and dynamic ASEP, producing inhomogeneous fused processes, duality functions, stationary measures, and hydrodynamic limits for open boundaries. An appendix co-authored with Amol Aggarwal relates the construction to fusion of stochastic vertex models.

Significance. If the main construction holds, the paper provides a general mechanism for generating higher-spin exclusion processes and duality functions from stationary measures, generalizing results in [GKRV09], [CGRS16], and [CGR19] to inhomogeneous lattices and open boundaries. The paper includes explicit computations, honest disclosure of where the Ansatz fails (Remark 9, Section 5.4), and new duality and hydrodynamic-limit results. The main risk is the imported finite-lattice q-exchangeability result; additionally, the stationary measure conclusion in Theorem 4.12(b) is incorrect as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 4.6] Theorem 4.2(i),(iv) and Theorem 4.6(a) rest on the imported result (Kua19, Prop. 4.5) that multi-species ASEP preserves q-exchangeable measures. The finite-lattice, reflecting-boundary version of this statement is not proved in the manuscript, and the text does not specify whether the cited proposition covers the generator with boundary terms. Since stationarity of πΛ and the intertwining QL^(n)=L^(p)Q both use this import, please provide the precise statement of the cited result and either prove the finite-lattice version or give a reference that does.
  2. [Theorem 4.12(b)] The proof via duality determines only the factorial moments E[∏ s(x_i)/m] = α^d, which are those of a product of Binomial(m,α) measures. The theorem's claimed 'i.i.d. product of Bernoulli measures of parameter α' with P(s∞(x_1)=1,...,s∞(x_d)=1)=α^d is false for m>1; for a Bernoulli(α) product the displayed probability would be (α/m)^d. The stationarity statement should be corrected to the i.i.d. product of Binomial(m,α) distributions (the m=1 case being Bernoulli(α)).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Remarks 12 and 14] Remarks 12 and 14 contain '[ ?]' placeholders with no matching bibliography entries; these citations should be completed or removed.
  2. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The terms SEP and SSEP are used inconsistently across the abstract, Section 4.2, and Theorem 4.12; please standardize the nomenclature for the symmetric process.
  3. [Section 2.3.2] The comparison '... > 1 > ...' is unclear; the intended comparison between the two jump rates should be written explicitly.
  4. [Theorem 4.11 proof] The phrase 'identity equivalent to (21)' refers to an equation that is never labeled; the intended reference appears to be equation (13).
  5. [Theorem 4.12(a)] The phrase 'By direction computation' is a typo for 'By direct computation'.
  6. [Section 4.3, Lemma 4.16] The dual process in Lemma 4.16 is understood to have an absorbing empty state after a particle exits at -1; this convention should be stated explicitly when DSchP^{-1}(0,x(t)) is used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stochastic fusion construction is an algebraic consequence of Rogers–Pitman intertwining, and the cited q-exchangeability result is independent support.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the paper's central claims. Theorem 3.1 is a direct algebraic consequence of the stated Rogers–Pitman hypotheses: given ΛΦ = id and π̂SΛPt = π̂SΛPtΦΛ, the identities π̂SQtD̂ = π̂SΛPtD = π̂SΛDP̃t* = π̂SD̂P̃t* are proved by substitution, not assumed. The application to ASEP(q,⃗m) in Theorem 4.2(ii) verifies by explicit calculation that the jump rates of the newly defined process coincide with the matrix ΛPtΦ; the process is not defined to be ΛPtΦ, so the equality is a computed check rather than a definitional tautology. The stationarity of πΛ in Theorem 4.2(i) invokes the author's earlier result from [Kua19] that multi-species ASEP preserves q-exchangeability; that cited theorem is an independent published statement with its own proof, and it is not a restatement of any claim in this paper, nor does any equation here reduce to a quantity fitted or defined in terms of the conclusion. The duality outputs in Theorem 4.6 and the hydrodynamic limits in Theorems 4.12 and 4.17 are derived by the stated intertwining/duality relations plus direct boundary checks, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The finite-lattice applicability of the imported q-exchangeability preservation, and any concern about whether [Kua19] covers reflecting boundaries, is a correctness or assumption-verification issue, not a circularity; the manuscript itself flags the relevant limitation through its reliance on the cited proposition, but no self-referential equation or renamed input was found. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction is a theorem built on Rogers-Pitman intertwining and on q-exchangeability results, mainly Kua19. No free parameters are fitted to data; model parameters such as m_x, q, and alpha are part of the model definition, not fitted constants. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math q-binomial theorem and q-Pascal identities (Andrews 1998, eq (1))
    Used to normalize the fission map Lambda and to derive the jump rates in Theorems 4.2 and 5.4.
  • standard math Rogers-Pitman Markov function theorem (RP81, Theorem 2.1)
    Basis of the stochastic fusion construction in Theorem 3.1.
  • domain assumption n-species ASEP preserves q-exchangeable measures (Kua19, Proposition 4.5)
    Imported from the author's prior work; used in Theorem 4.2(i)-(iv) and Theorem 4.6(a) to prove stationarity and duality.
  • domain assumption Known duality functionals for ASEP, SEP, ASEP(q,m/2), and q-Boson (Sch97, GKRV09, CGRS16, BCS14, Kua17)
    Input dualities D that are transformed by the construction; the paper does not re-derive these base dualities.
  • domain assumption Slow-bond random walk converges to Brownian motion with snapping-out boundary (EFd19)
    Load-bearing for the hydrodynamic limit in Theorem 4.12(a).
  • domain assumption Absorption of dual SSEP particles at the boundary in one dimension
    Used in Theorem 4.12(b) to identify the stationary measure as a product of Bernoulli-type measures.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic Fusion of Interacting Particle Systems and Duality Functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UVKWOEC4

@misc{pith2026190802359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic Fusion of Interacting Particle Systems and Duality Functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UVKWOEC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02359}
}
abstract

We introduce a new method, which we call stochastic fusion, which takes an exclusion process and constructs an interacting particle systems in which more than one particle may occupy a lattice site. The construction only requires the existence of stationary measures of the original exclusion process on a finite lattice. If the original exclusion process satisfies Markov duality on a finite lattice, then the construction produces Markov duality functions (for some initial conditions) for the fused exclusion process. The stochastic fusion construction is based off of the Rogers-Pitman intertwining. In particular, we have results for three types of models: 1. For symmetric exclusion processes, the fused process and duality functions are inhomogeneous generalizations of those in \cite{GKRV}. The construction also allows a general class of open boundary conditions: as an application of the duality, we find the hydrodynamic limit and stationary measures of the generalized symmetric simple exclusion process SSEP$(m/2)$ on $\mathbb{Z}_+$ for open boundary conditions. 2. For the asymmetric simple exclusion process, the fused process and duality functions are inhomogeneous generalizations of those found in \cite{CGRS} for the ASEP$(q,j)$. As a by-product of the construction, we show that the multi-species ASEP$(q,j)$ preserves $q$-exchangeable measures, and use this to find new duality functions for the ASEP, ASEP$(q,j)$ and $q$-Boson. Additionally, the construction leads to duality for ASEP with open boundary conditions. As an application of the latter duality, we find the hydrodynamic limit. 3. For dynamic models, we fuse the dynamic ASEP from \cite{BorodinDyn}, and produce a dynamic and inhomogeneous version of ASEP$(q,j)$. We also apply stochastic fusion to IRF models and compare them to previously found models. We include an appendix co-authored with Amol Aggarwal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02359 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The fusion map Φ and the fission map Λ. Red particles are species 1 and black particles are species [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. In this example, x3 = 1, x2 = 2, x1 = 5. s(0) = 2 s(1) = 3 s(3) = 1 s(5) = 3 s(6) = 2 s(7) = 3 x3 x2 x1 There are also natural projection maps between S (n) for different values of n. Let Π be a partition of {0, 1, . . . , n} into p + 1 parts of consecutive integers. In other words, Π = {{0, . . . , N0}, {N0 + 1, . . . , N1}, {Np−1 + 1, . . . , Np}}, where Np = n. There is a corresponding map S (n) to S (p) defined … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Red particles are species 1 (lighter) and black particles are species 2 (heavier). The first line shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The particle configuration referenced in Example 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: On the left, φ −1 (y) has 2!·3! elements, whereas on the right, φ −1 (y) only has 3 elements. However, if there is only one particle of each species, then φ −1 (y) always has 2! · 3! elements. Proof. Starting with PtD = DP∗ t and using V −1Pt = P ∗ t V −1 , we obtain π…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In this example, there are open boundary conditions. Particles enter at rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The left image shows N0.5(τ, χ) for τ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, . . . , 0.9. The right image shows Nα(0.5, χ) for α = 0.2, 0.5, 0.9. In both images, the variable χ is plotted on the x–axis. The γ/m coefficient occurs because the jump rates of SSEP(m/2) are slower than for SSEP …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For q = 0.1, the image shows h(ζ, τ ) for τ = 1, 2, 3. Proof. Note that Ez[DSchP −1 (0, x(t))] = P0  sup 0≤s≤t Ss ≥ |z|  , where St is a continuous–time random walk with right jump rates 1 and left jump rates q. In the hydrodynamic limit t = τL and |z| = ξL, we have …
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Figure 5.3: 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_5_3.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Here, (m(0), m(1), . . . , m(6)) = (1, 3, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1) and (k(0), . . . , k(6)) = (0, 2, 1, 1, 0, 3, 0). s(0) = 2 s(1) = 3 s(3) = 1 s(5) = 3 s(6) = 0 s(7) = 1 The jump rates will depend on the dynamic parameter α. If s, s0 are two states such that s(y) = s 0 (y) for …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: State space and jumps of a multi–species dynamic ASEP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Possible Jumps ←→ where we have used the usual spin chain notation, in which the subscripts Rˆij indicate that Rˆ is acting on the ith and jth components of the tensor product. Moreover, R(z) satisfies R0m(z)R0,m−1 (zq)· · · R01 zq m−1  sm = smR0m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Stochasticization of Solutions to the Yang-Baxter Equation

    Amol Aggarwal , Alexei Borodin , and Alexey Bufetov . Stochasticization of Solutions to the Yang-Baxter Equation . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1810.04299, Oct 2018

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Dynamical stochastic higher spin vertex models

    Amol Aggarwal. Dynamical stochastic higher spin vertex models. Selecta Mathematica , Mar 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    G.E. Andrews. The Theory of Partitions . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Color-position symmetry in interacting particle systems

    Alexei Borodin and Alexey Bufetov . Color-position symmetry in interacting particle systems . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1905.04692, May 2019

    arXiv 1905

  5. [5]

    Dynamic asep, duality, and continuous q?1-hermite polynomials

    Alexei Borodin and Ivan Corwin. Dynamic asep, duality, and continuous q?1-hermite polynomials. International Mathematics Research Notices , page rnx299, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    From duality to determinants for q - TASEP and ASEP

    Alexei Borodin, Ivan Corwin, and Tomohiro Sasamoto. From duality to determinants for q - TASEP and ASEP . Ann. Probab. , 42(6):2314--2382, 11 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    A. Borodin . Symmetric elliptic functions, IRF models, and dynamic exclusion processes . ArXiv e-prints , January 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Higher spin six vertex model and symmetric rational functions

    Alexei Borodin and Leonid Petrov. Higher spin six vertex model and symmetric rational functions. Selecta Mathematica , pages 1--124, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum algebra symmetry and reversible measures for the ASEP with second-class particles

    Vladimir Belitsky and Gunter M Sch \"u tz. Quantum algebra symmetry and reversible measures for the ASEP with second-class particles. Journal of Statistical Physics , 161(4):821--842, 2015

    2015

  2. [10]

    Self-duality for the two-component asymmetric simple exclusion process

    Vladimir Belitsky and Gunter M Sch \"u tz. Self-duality for the two-component asymmetric simple exclusion process. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 56(8), 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Belitsky and G.M

    V. Belitsky and G.M. Schütz. Self-duality and shock dynamics in the n-species priority ASEP . Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 128(4):1165 -- 1207, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    Coloured stochastic vertex models and their spectral theory

    Alexei Borodin and Michael Wheeler . Coloured stochastic vertex models and their spectral theory . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1808.01866, Aug 2018

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    R. Carter. Finite Groups of Lie Type: Conjugacy Classes and Complex Characters . John Wiley and Sons, 1985

    1985

  6. [14]

    Stochastic PDE limit of the dynamic ASEP

    Ivan Corwin , Promit Ghosal , and Konstantin Matetski . Stochastic PDE limit of the dynamic ASEP . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1906.04069, Jun 2019

    1906 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Consistent particle systems and duality

    Gioia Carinci , Cristian Giardin \`a , and Frank Redig . Consistent particle systems and duality . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1907.10583, Jul 2019

    1907 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A generalized asymmetric exclusion process with U _q( sl _2) stochastic duality

    Gioia Carinci, Cristian Giardin \`a , Frank Redig, and Tomohiro Sasamoto. A generalized asymmetric exclusion process with U _q( sl _2) stochastic duality. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 166(3):887--933, Dec 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Stochastic higher spin vertex models on the line

    Ivan Corwin and Leonid Petrov. Stochastic higher spin vertex models on the line. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 343(2):651--700, 2016

    2016

  10. [18]

    Corwin , H

    I. Corwin , H. Shen , and L.-C. Tsai . ASEP(q,j) converges to the KPZ equation . ArXiv e-prints , February 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    da Silva

    Dirk Erhard , Tertuliano Franco , and Diogo S. da Silva . The Slow Bond Random Walk and the Snapping Out Brownian Motion . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1905.08084, May 2019

    1905 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Duality and hidden symmetries in interacting particle systems

    Cristian Giardin\' a , Jorge Kurchan, Frank Redig, and Kiamars Vafayi. Duality and hidden symmetries in interacting particle systems. J. Stat. Phys , 135:25--55, 2009

    2009

  13. [21]

    A q-analogue of de finetti's theorem

    Alexander Gnedin and Grigori Olshanski. A q-analogue of de finetti's theorem. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics , 16(1), 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    q -exchangeability via quasi-invariance

    Alexander Gnedin and Grigori Olshanski. q -exchangeability via quasi-invariance. Ann. Probab. , 38(6):2103--2135, 11 2010

    2010

  15. [23]

    Current moments of 1 D ASEP by duality

    Takashi Imamura and Tomohiro Sasamoto. Current moments of 1 D ASEP by duality. Journal of Statistical Physics , 142(5):919--930, Mar 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    A q -analogue of U (gl( N +1)) , H ecke algebra, and the Y ang- B axter equation

    Michio Jimbo. A q -analogue of U (gl( N +1)) , H ecke algebra, and the Y ang- B axter equation. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 11(3):247--252, Apr 1986

    1986

  17. [25]

    Mangazeev, Shouya Maruyama, and Masato Okado

    Atsuo Kuniba, Vladimir V. Mangazeev, Shouya Maruyama, and Masato Okado. Stochastic R matrix for U _q( A _n^ (1) ) . Nuclear Physics B , 913:248--277, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    Kemeny and J

    John G. Kemeny and J. Laurie Snell. Finite Markov Chains . Springer, 1960

    1960

  19. [27]

    Stochastic duality of ASEP with two particle types via symmetry of quantum groups of rank two

    Jeffrey Kuan. Stochastic duality of ASEP with two particle types via symmetry of quantum groups of rank two. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 49(11):29, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    A multi-species ASEP (q,j) and q - TAZRP with stochastic duality

    Jeffrey Kuan. A multi-species ASEP (q,j) and q - TAZRP with stochastic duality. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2018(17):5378--5416, 2017

    2018

  21. [29]

    An algebraic construction of duality functions for the stochastic U _q( A _n^ (1) ) vertex model and its degenerations

    Jeffrey Kuan. An algebraic construction of duality functions for the stochastic U _q( A _n^ (1) ) vertex model and its degenerations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 359(1):121--187, Apr 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Probability distributions of multi-species q-tazrp and asep as double cosets of parabolic subgroups

    Jeffrey Kuan. Probability distributions of multi-species q-tazrp and asep as double cosets of parabolic subgroups. Annales Henri Poincar\' e , 20(4):1149--1173, April 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Thomas M. Liggett. Coupling the simple exclusion process. Annals of Probability , 4(3):339--356, 1976

    1976

  24. [32]

    Markov duality for stochastic six vertex model

    Yier Lin. Markov duality for stochastic six vertex model. arXiv e-prints

  25. [33]

    KPZ equation limit of stochastic higher spin six vertex model

    Yier Lin . KPZ equation limit of stochastic higher spin six vertex model . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1905.11155, May 2019

    1905 arXiv

  26. [34]

    James B. Martin. Stationary distributions of the multi-type asep. ArXiv e-prints , 10 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Multi-state asymmetric simple exclusion processes

    Chihiro Matsui. Multi-state asymmetric simple exclusion processes. Journal of Statistical Physics , 158(1):158--191, Jan 2015

    2015

  28. [36]

    MacDonald, Julian H

    Carolyn T. MacDonald, Julian H. Gibbs, and Allen C. Pipkin. Kinetics of biopolymerization on nucleic acid templates. Biopolymers , 6(1):1--25, 1968

    1968

  29. [37]

    Ferromagnetic ordering of energy levels

    Bruno Nachtergaele, Wolfgang Spitzer, and Shannon Starr. Ferromagnetic ordering of energy levels. Journal of Statistical Physics , 116(1):719--738, Aug 2004

    2004

  30. [38]

    On dualities for SSEP and ASEP with open boundary conditions

    J Ohkubo. On dualities for SSEP and ASEP with open boundary conditions. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 50(9):095004, jan 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    L. C. G. Rogers and J. W. Pitman. Markov functions. Ann. Probab. , 9(4):573--582, 1981

    1981

  32. [40]

    Duality relations for asymmetric exclusion processes

    Gunter M Sch \"u tz. Duality relations for asymmetric exclusion processes. Journal of Statistical Physics , 86(5/6):1265--1287, 1997

    1997

  33. [41]

    Interaction of M arkov processes

    Frank Spitzer. Interaction of M arkov processes. Advances in Mathematics , 5(2):246--290, 1970

    1970

  34. [42]

    Exact results for one--dimensional totally asymmetric diffusion models

    Tomohiro Sasamoto and Miki Wadati. Exact results for one--dimensional totally asymmetric diffusion models. Journal of Physics A , 31(28):6057--6071, 1998

    1998

  35. [43]

    Algebraic construction of multi--species q -- B oson system

    Yoshihiro Takeyama. Algebraic construction of multi--species q -- B oson system

  36. [44]

    <tex-math> ( log \ t)^ 2/3 </tex-math> law of the two dimensional asymmetric simple exclusion process

    Horng-Tzer Yau. <tex-math> ( log \ t)^ 2/3 </tex-math> law of the two dimensional asymmetric simple exclusion process. Annals of Mathematics , 159(1):377--405, 2004

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.