Contractibility results for certain spaces of Riemannian metrics on the disc

Alessandro Carlotto; Damin Wu

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Contractibility results for certain spaces of Riemannian metrics on the disc

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A non-empty space of Riemannian metrics on the disk is contractible if it is diffeomorphism-invariant and intersects each conformal class in a convex set; the curvature sign spaces are contractible or empty.

desk verdict A short, correct, and genuinely useful criterion for contractibility of disk metric spaces; the only real soft spot is a tersely cited continuity result, which looks standard. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02475 v2 pith:36Y6L7XY submitted 2019-08-07 math.DG

Alessandro Carlotto , Damin Wu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 58D1758D0553C21

keywords contractibilityRiemannianmetricsonthediskconformalclassesuniformizationBeltramiequationGausscurvaturegeodesicspaceof

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

On the two-dimensional disk, this paper establishes a broad structural reason why many natural spaces of Riemannian metrics are topologically trivial. The main theorem states that any non-empty space of metrics that is invariant under pullback by diffeomorphisms and that intersects each conformal class in a convex set must be contractible: there is a continuous deformation carrying every metric in the space to one fixed metric. The proof shows that any such space is homotopy equivalent to the space of conformal classes on the disk, and that this space is contractible because it is homeomorphic to the convex space of Beltrami coefficients. Consequently the spaces of metrics with nonnegative, positive, or zero Gauss curvature, with nonnegative, positive, or zero geodesic curvature of the boundary, and any non-empty intersection of one interior and one boundary condition, are contractible when non-empty. The same conclusion is not known in dimensions $n\ge 3$ and, by analogy with closed manifolds, is expected to fail for many $n\ge 4$.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is a homeomorphism $\Phi$ from the space $\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{D})$ of conformal classes to the space $\mathrm{Diff}_\bullet^+(\mathbb{D})$ of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms of the disk that fix three prescribed boundary points. The map is built from the Beltrami equation: a conformal class is written as $|dz+\mu d\bar z|^2$ with $|\mu|<1$, and the unique solution of the Beltrami equation normalized to fix those boundary points gives the uniformizing diffeomorphism. This homeomorphism does two jobs at once: it makes $\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{D})$ contractible, because $\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{D})$ is identified with the convex open set of allowable Beltrami coefficients $\mu$, and it supplies a continuous way to pull back a fixed metric to every conformal class. The convexity hypothesis then guarantees that the straight-line homotopy inside each conformal fiber stays inside the space.

What would settle it

Take a sequence of conformal classes on the disk converging smoothly to a limit, compute their Beltrami coefficients, solve the normalized Beltrami equation for each, and check whether the resulting uniformizing diffeomorphisms converge smoothly; a failure of convergence would falsify the homeomorphism that carries the proof. More directly, exhibiting any non-empty diffeomorphism-invariant, fiberwise-convex family of disk metrics containing a non-contractible loop would contradict Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: if $\mathcal{M}_+(\mathbb{D})\subset \mathcal{R}(\mathbb{D})$ is non-empty, invariant under pullback by all diffeomorphisms of the disk, and has the property that inside every conformal class the intersection with $\mathcal{M}_+(\mathbb{D})$ is convex in the conformal factor, then $\mathcal{M}_+(\mathbb{D})$ is contractible. The construction is explicit. Fix a metric $g_{\mathbb{D}}$ in $\mathcal{M}_+(\mathbb{D})$; by uniformization, every conformal class $[g]$ is represented by a unique normalized diffeomorphism $\varphi$ such that $[g]=[\varphi^*g_0]$, and the map $[g]\mapsto \varphi^*g_{\mathbb{D}}$ is a continuous section of the projection to the conformal-class space. Each metric $g=e^{2u}\varphi^*g_{\mathbb{D}}$ in its fiber is joined to $\varphi^*g_{\mathbb{D}}$ by the straight line $t\mapsto e^{2(1-t)u}\varphi^*g_{\mathbb{D}}$, which stays in the space by convexity. Hence $\mathcal{M}_+(\mathbb{D})$ deformation-retracts onto the image of the section, and since the conformal-class space is contractible, so is $\mathcal{M}_+(\mathbb{D})$. Corollary 1.2 then records the curvature examples: the spaces with $K_g\ge 0$, $K_g>0$, $K_g=0$, with $k_g\ge 0$, $k_g>0$, $k_g=0$, and any non-empty intersection of one interior and one boundary condition, are all contractible.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the claim that conformal classes of disk metrics correspond continuously, with continuous inverse, to the normalized diffeomorphisms that uniformize them; the paper imports the nontrivial continuity step from a cited classical result, and if that step failed the continuous section transporting a fixed metric to every conformal class would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every non-empty space of disk metrics satisfying the two hypotheses is homotopy equivalent to a point, so all of its homotopy groups vanish.
The specific curvature spaces in Corollary 1.2 — nonnegative, positive, or zero Gauss curvature, and nonnegative, positive, or zero boundary geodesic curvature — are contractible, and any non-empty intersection of one interior and one boundary condition is contractible.
Full convexity of every fiber is not necessary: it suffices that one fiber is star-shaped around a fixed metric, as stated in Remark 2.6.
In dimensions $n\ge 3$ the analogous statement is not known, and by analogy with closed manifolds it is expected to be false for many $n\ge 4$, so the two-dimensional phenomenon is special.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The proof never uses anything about curvature beyond convexity and diffeomorphism invariance, so any non-empty condition that is convex under pointwise conformal rescaling — for example finite linear inequalities in $K_g$ and $k_g$ — should give a contractible space of metrics.
If the same reduction were attempted on a surface with boundary that is not a disk, the metric space would be compared with the corresponding conformal-class space, whose topology is nontrivial in higher genus; contractibility would then fail for reasons controlled by the moduli of conformal structures rather than by curvature.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a correct and surprisingly simple proof that any diffeomorphism-invariant, fiberwise-convex space of Riemannian metrics on the 2-disc is contractible. The applications, including positive Gauss curvature with convex or geodesic boundary, follow immediately. The proof does what it claims.

The main innovation is the criterion in Theorem 1.1, not the individual steps. The authors correctly fold uniformization, the Earle-Schatz homeomorphism, and a convexity argument into a short lemma. The key observation is that for any such space M_+(D), the map sigma([g]) = Phi([g])^*g_D gives a continuous section of the projection to conformal classes, and the convexity assumption lets you slide any metric to that section through the space. The geometric applications are then just linearity of the Gauss curvature and geodesic curvature equations under conformal change. I checked the fiber-convexity claims; they are correct.

The soft spot flagged by the stress test is the continuity of Phi: Proposition 2.4 asserts that the normalized isothermal diffeomorphism depends continuously on the conformal class, citing Earle-Schatz [11, 2B] without detailing the hypotheses. The section sigma and hence the homotopy equivalence depend on that. I don't think this is a real flaw; the Earle-Schatz theorem is the standard source for exactly this type of continuity for smooth Beltrami coefficients up to the boundary, and the authors' cited reference is the right one. But the paper would be easier to referee if they spelled out the statement. This is a presentational issue, not a mathematical gap.

A more structural limitation is that everything is two-dimensional; the authors are upfront that the analogous questions in n>=3 are expected to fail, and they cite the known non-connectedness results. So the significance is contained, but for the subfield it is a satisfying result.

The citation pattern is clean: they credit Rosenberg-Stolz, Smale, and the relevant higher-dimensional work. No code or data, obviously. I am comfortable with the theorem.

My view: this deserves a serious referee. The result is new and the proof is short, so a referee can check it in an afternoon. If I were the editor, I'd send it to review and expect a quick acceptance, with a request to expand the Earle-Schatz citation slightly.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a general contractibility criterion for spaces of Riemannian metrics on the unit disc. Theorem 1.1 states that any non-empty, diffeomorphism-invariant set M+(D) that is convex in each conformal class is contractible. The proof has two components: first, the space C(D) of conformal classes is shown to be contractible via a homeomorphism with the convex space C∞(D,D) of smooth maps into the open unit disc; second, Lemma 2.5 constructs a homotopy equivalence between M+(D) and C(D) using a section σ defined by the uniformization map Φ: C(D) → Diff_•^+(D). The applications in Corollary 1.2 cover spaces defined by conditions on the Gauss curvature and boundary geodesic curvature, including positivity, non-negativity, and vanishing, and intersections of such conditions. The argument is short and conceptually transparent, and the curvature-condition checks are correct because the relevant conformal-change inequalities are linear in the conformal factor.

Significance. If the proof is made fully correct, the result is significant and elegant: it gives a broad contractibility theorem for natural spaces of metrics on the disc from two very simple hypotheses, with applications to spaces not previously known to be contractible. The paper also clearly explains the higher-dimensional contrast. The use of a homeomorphism between conformal classes and normalized diffeomorphisms is a clean device, and the verification of the hypotheses in the geometric applications is explicit and correct. The main concerns are local but load-bearing: an incorrect displayed formula in the proof of Proposition 2.4, and an imprecise citation for the continuity of Φ. Both appear repairable without changing the statement of the theorem.

major comments (2)

[Proposition 2.4, displayed formula after (2.2)] The displayed formula for η^*g0 in the proof of Proposition 2.4 is algebraically incorrect under the paper's own convention g0=|dz|^2=(dz⊗d\bar z+d\bar z⊗dz)/2. Expanding dη=η_z dz+η_\bar z d\bar z gives the dz⊗dz coefficient η_z \overline{η_\bar z} and the d\bar z⊗d\bar z coefficient \overline{η_z} η_\bar z, not η_z^2 and η_\bar z^2; for instance, a rotation η(z)=e^{iθ}z would be reported to have a nonzero e^{2iθ}dz⊗dz term. The desired conclusion η_\bar z=0 still follows from the correct expansion (vanishing of η_z\overline{η_\bar z} together with the positive Jacobian rules out η_z=0), so the argument is repairable, but as written this load-bearing step in the bijectivity proof is not valid.
[Proposition 2.4, first paragraph] The forward continuity of Φ is delegated to [11, 2B] without stating the hypotheses of that result. The application needs continuity, in the C∞ topology on the closed upper half-plane H∪{∞}, of the normalized solution w of w_\bar z=μ w_z as μ ranges over Beltrami coefficients that are smooth up to the boundary and satisfy sup|μ|<1. Since Lemma 2.5 and hence Theorem 1.1 depend on this continuity, please state the precise result being cited and confirm that its hypotheses cover this setting; if [11, 2B] does not, the section σ may fail to be continuous.

minor comments (4)

[Proposition 2.4, diagram] In the commutative diagram, the middle object should be C∞(H,C) rather than C∞(D,C), because the Beltrami coefficient μ is transferred to the upper half-plane before applying the Earle-Schatz theorem; the current notation is confusing.
[Lemma 2.5] The assertion that the conformal factor u is 'continuously depending on g' is justified but not demonstrated; a one-line argument using the determinant ratio u=(1/2)log(g/σ([g])) and the continuity of σ would remove the gap.
[Proposition 2.4, notation] The space Diff_•^+(H) is used without defining the three fixed points; these should be specified as the preimages under the Cayley map of the points 1,i,-1 in D.
[Section 2, definition of |ϑ|^2] The text reads 'Re(ϑ ⊗ ϑ)' where the second factor should be \barϑ, as is clear from the formula for g0; this appears to be a typographical error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is proved from the independent uniformization homeomorphism Φ, cited to Earle-Schatz, and from the paper's own convexity and diffeomorphism-invariance hypotheses.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. Theorem 1.1 assumes two structural properties: convexity in each conformal fiber and diffeomorphism invariance. The proof constructs an explicit homotopy equivalence M+(D) ≃ C(D). The section σ is defined by composing the homeomorphism Φ: C(D) → Diff_•^+(D) with pullback of a fixed metric g_D, and the homotopy H(t,g)=e^{2(1-t)u}Φ([g])^*g_D uses the convexity hypothesis literally: both endpoints g and σ(π(g)) lie in the same conformal class and in M+(D), so their convex combination is in M+(D) by assumption (1). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; no conclusion is built into the hypotheses. The applications to curvature inequalities verify the hypotheses through the explicit conformal-change formulas e^{2u}K_{e^{2u}g}=K_g−Δu and e^u k = k_g+ν(u), and these checks are not equivalent to the contractibility conclusion. The only external inputs are uniformization and the continuity of the Beltrami-solution correspondence, cited to Ahlfors-Bers and Earle-Schatz; those are independent prior results, not self-citations, so the paper's reliance on them is normal mathematical support rather than circularity. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear in this pure proof. The theorem's hypotheses are listed as domain assumptions, and the standard geometric analysis results used are listed as axioms.

assumptions (6)

standard math Uniformization theorem for the disk: every smooth metric g on D can be written g = phi^*(e^{2u}g0) with phi in Diff_+(D) and u in C^inf(D).
Used in Theorem 2.1 and Lemma 2.5; proved via the Beltrami equation and Ahlfors-Bers [1].
standard math Earle-Schatz theorem: the normalized solution w of the Beltrami equation w_bar{z} = mu w_z depends continuously on mu in the smooth topology.
Underpins Proposition 2.4, the homeomorphism Phi: C(D) -> Diff_*^+(D) used to define the section sigma.
standard math A conformal automorphism of the unit disk that fixes three boundary points is the identity.
Used in Proposition 2.4 to prove bijectivity of Phi; cited to [23].
standard math Convex subsets of topological vector spaces are contractible; C^inf(D,D) is convex.
Gives contractibility of C(D) in Proposition 2.2.
domain assumption M+(D) is non-empty and fiberwise log-convex, satisfying condition (1) of Theorem 1.1.
Hypothesis of Theorem 1.1; verified for the curvature and boundary-curvature spaces in Corollary 1.2 using linearity of the Gauss and geodesic curvature transformation.
domain assumption M+(D) is invariant under Diff(D), satisfying condition (2) of Theorem 1.1.
Hypothesis of Theorem 1.1; for curvature conditions this follows because curvature is natural under pullback.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Contractibility results for certain spaces of Riemannian metrics on the disc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/36Y6L7XY

@misc{pith2026190802475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Contractibility results for certain spaces of Riemannian metrics on the disc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/36Y6L7XY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02475}
}

abstract

We provide a general contractibility criterion for subsets of Riemannian metrics on the disc. For instance, this result applies to the space of metrics that have positive Gauss curvature and make the boundary circle convex (or geodesic). The same conclusion is not known in any dimension $n\geq 3$, and (by analogy with the closed case) is actually expected to be false for many values of $n\geq 4$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Ahlfors, L

L. Ahlfors, L. Bers, Riemann ’s mapping theorem for variable metrics , Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 385-404

work page 1960
[2]

Bamler, B

R. Bamler, B. Kleiner, Ricci ﬂow and contractibility of spaces of metrics , preprint (arXiv: 1909.08710)

arXiv 1909
[3]

Botvinnik, J

B. Botvinnik, J. Ebert, O. Randal-Williams, Inﬁnite loop spaces and positive scalar curvature , Invent. Math. 209 (2017), no. 3, 749-835

work page 2017
[4]

Botvinnik, P

B. Botvinnik, P. Gilkey, Metrics of positive scalar curvature on spherical space for ms, Canad. J. Math. 48 (1996), no. 1, 64-80

work page 1996
[5]

Botvinnik, B

B. Botvinnik, B. Hanke, T. Schick, M. Walsh, Homotopy groups of the moduli space of metrics of positive sc alar curvature, Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), no. 4, 2047-2076

work page 2010
[6]

Botvinnik, D

B. Botvinnik, D. Kazaras, Minimal hypersurfaces and bordism of positive scalar curva ture metrics , Math. Ann. 371 (2018), no. 1-2, 189-224

work page 2018
[7]

Carlotto, C

A. Carlotto, C. Li, Constrained deformations of positive scalar curvature met rics, preprint (arXiv: 1903.11772)

arXiv 1903
[8]

Carr, Construction of manifolds of positive scalar curvature , Trans

R. Carr, Construction of manifolds of positive scalar curvature , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 307 (1988), no. 1, 63-74

work page 1988

Show all 38 references

[9]

Donaldson, Riemann surfaces , Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 22

S. Donaldson, Riemann surfaces , Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 22. Oxford Universi ty Press, Oxford, 2011. xiv+286 pp

2011
[10]

Earle, J

C. Earle, J. Eells, A ﬁbre bundle description of Teichm¨ uller theory , J. Diﬀerential Geometry 3 (1969), 19-43

1969
[11]

Earle, A

C. Earle, A. Schatz, Teichm¨ uller theory for surfaces with boundary, J. Diﬀerential Geometry 4 (1970), 169-185

1970
[12]

Riemannian

A. Fischer, A. Tromba, On a purely “Riemannian” proof of the structure and dimensio n of the unramiﬁed moduli space of a compact Riemann surface , Math. Ann. 267 (1984), no. 3, 311-345

1984
[13]

Griﬃths, Introduction to algebraic curves, Translated from the Chinese by Kuniko Weltin

P. Griﬃths, Introduction to algebraic curves, Translated from the Chinese by Kuniko Weltin. Translation s of Mathematical Monographs, 76. American Mathematical Society, Providenc e, RI, 1989. x+221 pp

1989
[14]

Gromov, Stable mappings of foliations into manifolds , (Russian) Izv

M. Gromov, Stable mappings of foliations into manifolds , (Russian) Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 33 (1969) 707-734

1969
[15]

Gromov, H

M. Gromov, H. Lawson, Positive scalar curvature and the Dirac operator on complet e Riemannian manifolds , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 58 (1983), 83-196

1983
[16]

Gromov, H

M. Gromov, H. Lawson, Spin and scalar curvature in the presence of a fundamental gr oup. I , Ann. of Math. (2) 111 (1980), no. 2, 209-230

1980
[17]

Gromov, H

M. Gromov, H. Lawson, The classiﬁcation of simply connected manifolds of positiv e scalar curvature Ann. of Math. (2) 111 (1980), no. 3, 423-434

1980
[18]

Hanke, T

B. Hanke, T. Schick, W. Steimle, The space of metrics of positive scalar curvature , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 120 (2014), 335-367

2014
[19]

Hitchin, Harmonic spinors , Advances in Math

N. Hitchin, Harmonic spinors , Advances in Math. 14 (1974), 1-55

1974
[20]

Kazdan, F

J. Kazdan, F. Warner, Existence and conformal deformation of metrics with prescr ibed Gaussian and scalar curvatures , Ann. of Math. (2) 101 (1975), 317-331

1975
[21]

Kazdan, F

J. Kazdan, F. Warner, Scalar curvature and conformal deformation of Riemannian s tructure, J. Diﬀerential Geometry 10 (1975), 113-134. 8 ALESSANDRO CARLOTTO AND DAMIN WU

1975
[22]

Kreck, S

M. Kreck, S. Stolz, Nonconnected moduli spaces of positive sectional curvatur e metrics , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1993), no. 4, 825-850

1993
[23]

Lang, Complex analysis , Fourth edition

S. Lang, Complex analysis , Fourth edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 103. Sprin ger-Verlag, New York, 1999. xiv+485 pp

1999
[24]

Marques, Deforming three-manifolds with positive scalar curvature , Ann

F. Marques, Deforming three-manifolds with positive scalar curvature , Ann. of Math. (2) 176 (2012), no. 2, 815-863

2012
[25]

Nirenberg, The Weyl and Minkowski problems in diﬀerential geometry in th e large, Comm

L. Nirenberg, The Weyl and Minkowski problems in diﬀerential geometry in th e large, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 6 (1953), 337-394

1953
[26]

Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci ﬂow and its geometric appli cations, preprint (arXiv: 0211159)

G. Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci ﬂow and its geometric appli cations, preprint (arXiv: 0211159)
[27]

Perelman, Finite extinction time for the solution to the Ricci ﬂow on ce rtain three-manifolds, preprint (arXiv: 0307245)

G. Perelman, Finite extinction time for the solution to the Ricci ﬂow on ce rtain three-manifolds, preprint (arXiv: 0307245)
[28]

Perelman, Ricci ﬂow with surgery on three-manifolds , preprint (arXiv: 0303109)

G. Perelman, Ricci ﬂow with surgery on three-manifolds , preprint (arXiv: 0303109)
[29]

Rosenberg, S

J. Rosenberg, S. Stolz, Metrics of positive scalar curvature and connections with s urgery, Surveys on surgery theory, Vol. 2, 353-386, Ann. of Math. Stud., 149, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001

2001
[30]

Ruberman, Positive scalar curvature, diﬀeomorphisms and the Seiberg- Witten invariants , Geom

D. Ruberman, Positive scalar curvature, diﬀeomorphisms and the Seiberg- Witten invariants , Geom. Topol. 5 (2001), 895-924

2001
[31]

Schoen, S.-T

R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, Complete three-dimensional manifolds with positive Ricci curvature and scalar curvature , Seminar on Diﬀerential Geometry, pp. 209-228, Ann. of Math. Stud., 1 02, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1982

1982
[32]

Schoen, S.-T

R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, Existence of incompressible minimal surfaces and the topol ogy of three-dimensional manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature , Ann. of Math. (2) 110 (1979), no. 1, 127-142

1979
[33]

Schoen, S.-T

R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, On the structure of manifolds with positive scalar curvatur e, Manuscripta Math. 28 (1979), no. 1-3, 159-183

1979
[34]

Schoen, S.-T

R. Schoen, S.-T. Yau, Positive scalar curvature and minimal hypersurface singul arities, preprint (arXiv: 1704.05490)

arXiv
[35]

Smale, Diﬀeomorphisms of the 2-sphere , Proc

S. Smale, Diﬀeomorphisms of the 2-sphere , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1959), 621-626

1959
[36]

Stolz, Simply connected manifolds of positive scalar curvature , Ann

S. Stolz, Simply connected manifolds of positive scalar curvature , Ann. of Math. (2) 136 (1992), no. 3, 511-540

1992
[37]

Walsh, The Space of Positive Scalar Curvature Metrics on a Manifold with Boundary , preprint (arXiv: 1411.2423)

M. Walsh, The Space of Positive Scalar Curvature Metrics on a Manifold with Boundary , preprint (arXiv: 1411.2423)

arXiv
[38]

Weyl, ¨Uber die Bestimmung einer geschlossenen konvexen Fl¨ ache durch ihr Linienelement, Vierteljahrschr, Naturforsch

H. Weyl, ¨Uber die Bestimmung einer geschlossenen konvexen Fl¨ ache durch ihr Linienelement, Vierteljahrschr, Naturforsch. Ges. Z¨ ur61 (1916), 40-72. Alessandro Carlotto: ETH D-Math, R ¨amistrasse 101, 8092 Z ¨urich, Switzerland IAS, 1 Einstein drive, 08540 Princeton, United ...

1916

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Ahlfors, L

L. Ahlfors, L. Bers, Riemann ’s mapping theorem for variable metrics , Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 385-404

work page 1960

[2] [2]

Bamler, B

R. Bamler, B. Kleiner, Ricci ﬂow and contractibility of spaces of metrics , preprint (arXiv: 1909.08710)

arXiv 1909

[3] [3]

Botvinnik, J

B. Botvinnik, J. Ebert, O. Randal-Williams, Inﬁnite loop spaces and positive scalar curvature , Invent. Math. 209 (2017), no. 3, 749-835

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Botvinnik, P

B. Botvinnik, P. Gilkey, Metrics of positive scalar curvature on spherical space for ms, Canad. J. Math. 48 (1996), no. 1, 64-80

work page 1996

[5] [5]

Botvinnik, B

B. Botvinnik, B. Hanke, T. Schick, M. Walsh, Homotopy groups of the moduli space of metrics of positive sc alar curvature, Geom. Topol. 14 (2010), no. 4, 2047-2076

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Botvinnik, D

B. Botvinnik, D. Kazaras, Minimal hypersurfaces and bordism of positive scalar curva ture metrics , Math. Ann. 371 (2018), no. 1-2, 189-224

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Carlotto, C

A. Carlotto, C. Li, Constrained deformations of positive scalar curvature met rics, preprint (arXiv: 1903.11772)

arXiv 1903

[8] [8]

Carr, Construction of manifolds of positive scalar curvature , Trans

R. Carr, Construction of manifolds of positive scalar curvature , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 307 (1988), no. 1, 63-74

work page 1988