Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Valence bond solid and possible deconfined quantum criticality in an extended kagome lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports conclusive numerical evidence for a stable diamond valence-bond solid (VBS) with a 12-site unit cell in an extended kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet with ferromagnetic further-neighbor couplings, located between the…

desk verdict Solid ED evidence for a diamond VBS in an extended kagome model, but the 'conclusive thermodynamic' claim outruns the finite-size data. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02762 v2 pith:JUVQMM2E submitted 2019-08-07 cond-mat.str-el

Alexander Wietek , Andreas M. Läuchli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords kagomelatticevalencebondsolidexactdiagonalizationdeconfinedquantumcriticalityspinnematicHeisenbergantiferromagnetfrustratedmagnetismdimercorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that adding ferromagnetic second- and third-neighbor couplings to the spin-1/2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet produces a stable valence bond solid (VBS) at zero temperature, even though geometric frustration normally suppresses ordering. Using exact diagonalization on a 36-site cluster (with checks on 48 sites), the authors identify a diamond pattern of resonating singlet dimers with a 12-site unit cell, occupying a band between two magnetic phases. The result matters because a direct, possibly continuous phase transition from the q=0 magnetic order into this VBS would be a candidate for deconfined quantum criticality, and because the VBS reaches close to the nearest-neighbor kagome point, itself a long-standing puzzle. A second symmetry-breaking phase, likely spin-nematic, appears near the ferromagnetic boundary.

What carries the argument

The central tools are (i) the connected dimer-dimer correlation function $D_{kl}$ and its predicted sign pattern for the diamond VBS, aggregated into an order parameter $O_{\mathrm{VBS}}$ with a sign mask $\theta_{\mathrm{VBS}}$; (ii) tower-of-states spectroscopy, comparing momentum and space-group quantum numbers of the first excited state against predictions for each candidate phase; and (iii) a 36-site cluster whose Brillouin zone contains both the $K$ and $M$ points needed to distinguish $\sqrt{3}\times\sqrt{3}$ and q=0 orders. The dimer sign structure fingerprints the VBS; the space-group quantum numbers (e.g., a low-lying $\Gamma.D6.E2$ singlet and the absence of a low-lying $\Gamma.D6.A2$ level) discriminate the resonant diamond VBS from the static pinwheel VBS.

What would settle it

Compute the diamond-VBS order parameter $O_{\mathrm{VBS}}$ and the low-lying spectrum on substantially larger clusters (e.g., N=72 or N=96) with the same shape and perform a finite-size scaling: if $O_{\mathrm{VBS}}$ extrapolates to zero or the characteristic $M.D2.A2$ and $\Gamma.D6.E2$ singlet levels cease to be the lowest excitations, the VBS phase is a finite-size artifact. Alternatively, a direct measurement of the energy gap at the q=0/VBS transition would settle whether it closes continuously (deconfined) or jumps (first order).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the model of Eq. (1) with $J_1>0$ and ferromagnetic $J_2,J_3<0$, exact diagonalization of the 36-site kagome cluster (and selected 48-site data) shows a parameter region where the ground state has a singlet first excitation in the $M.D2.A2$ sector and strong, sign-coherent dimer-dimer correlations matching a diamond VBS: a 12-site unit cell of resonating dimers arranged in diamond lozenges. The paper concludes that this VBS is a stable phase of the model, distinct from both adjacent magnetic orders and from the pinwheel VBS, and that the transition between q=0 order and the VBS is likely continuous, putting it forward as a possible deconfined quantum critical point. It also reports a separate lattice-symmetry-breaking phase, possibly spin-nematic with quadrupolar correlations, near the ferromagnetic region.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 36-site periodic cluster, with selected 48-site data, represents the thermodynamic limit: the low-lying quantum numbers and the dimer-correlation sign pattern identifying the diamond VBS are assumed not to reorder or vanish on larger or differently shaped clusters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The VBS is a stable zero-temperature phase of the extended kagome model, so the phase diagram of frustrated kagome magnets includes a spin-gapped, symmetry-breaking singlet phase alongside magnetic orders and spin liquids.
  • If the q=0-to-VBS transition is indeed continuous, this model becomes a concrete lattice example where deconfined quantum criticality, with emergent fractionalized excitations at the critical point, can be studied numerically.
  • The diamond VBS reaching close to the nearest-neighbor point provides a concrete competing scenario for interpreting the nature of the nearest-neighbor kagome Heisenberg ground state.
  • The likely spin-nematic phase near the ferromagnet shows that lattice-symmetry breaking without conventional magnetic order can appear in this model, with quadrupolar correlations as a fingerprint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the continuous q=0/VBS transition survives larger-scale study, the model becomes a rare lattice example where deconfined quantum criticality can be probed by exact numerics and possibly emulated on quantum simulators.
  • The diamond-lozenge resonance pattern suggests a natural connection to the Dirac spin liquid: the VBS can be viewed as a confinement of spinon excitations, and one testable extension is to compute the central charge or gap closure at the critical point on cylindrical clusters.
  • In kagome compounds with competing ferromagnetic couplings, the predicted 12-site superlattice should show up as a characteristic low-temperature lattice distortion or a structural signature in scattering experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the spin-1/2 kagome lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet with ferromagnetic second- and third-neighbor couplings (Eq. 1) by exact diagonalization on clusters up to N=48. It reports a diamond valence-bond solid with a 12-site unit cell in a parameter region between q=0 and sqrt(3)xsqrt(3) magnetic orders, identified through dimer correlations (Eqs. 5-7), an order parameter (Eq. 7), and low-energy spectrum quantum numbers. A second lattice-symmetry-breaking, possibly spin-nematic phase is reported near the ferromagnetic boundary. The authors also suggest that the q=0-to-VBS transition may be a continuous deconfined quantum critical point.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a new VBS phase in a well-studied frustrated magnet and provides a concrete candidate for deconfined quantum criticality. The strengths are the use of exact diagonalization, consistent quantum-number analysis across N=24, 36, and 48 clusters for the VBS spectral fingerprints, and the explicit dimer-correlation sign patterns. However, the thermodynamic-limit conclusion rests on a small number of cluster sizes with no systematic finite-size scaling, so the evidence as presented is suggestive rather than conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Diamond VBS phase] The central claim of a thermodynamic-limit VBS phase relies on the order parameter O_VBS in Eq. (7), but Fig. 2(c) and the main text present it only on the 36-site cluster; the N=48 results are limited to dimer correlations in Fig. 3. Because the 36-site cluster contains only three 12-site unit cells and is commensurate with the proposed diamond pattern, a finite-size artifact cannot be excluded without a scaling analysis of O_VBS (or of an equivalent correlation ratio) over several cluster sizes and shapes. The statement in the introduction that the paper presents 'conclusive numerical evidence' for the VBS phase is therefore overstated; the evidence is consistent with VBS order but does not yet establish it.
  2. [Diamond VBS phase] The distinction between the diamond and pinwheel VBS, which is load-bearing for the identification, is made through the presence of a singlet Γ.D6.E2 level and the absence of Γ.D6.A2, described qualitatively by 'close inspection' of Fig. 4(a)&(c). The paper does not report the numerical energies or gaps of these levels, nor their system-size dependence. Please provide a quantitative table or plot of these levels on the clusters used, so the reader can verify that the level ordering is robust.
  3. [Discussion and Outlook] The phase diagram in Fig. 1 and the 'apparent second-order nature' of the q=0–VBS transition are inferred from first-excitation quantum numbers and order parameters on a single 36-site cluster, with boundary lines explicitly marked as a guide to the eye. No finite-size crossing, gap scaling, or order-parameter extrapolation is presented that would support a continuous transition or deconfined quantum criticality. The 'possible deconfined quantum criticality' claim should be framed as a speculation, or the scaling evidence should be added.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'conclusive numerical evidence' in the abstract and introduction should be tempered given the finite-size limitations noted above.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The Fig. 2(d) caption calls Onem the 'plaquette-nematic phase' while the text calls it 'spin nematic'; unify the terminology.
  3. [Diamond VBS phase] Eq. (6) defines only the Sz component of the dimer correlation, whereas Eq. (5) is rotationally invariant; the text should state explicitly that Eq. (6) is used only to display the sign pattern.
  4. [Magnetic order] The structure factor in Eq. (2) uses the extended Brillouin zone without defining the reciprocal lattice vectors; a brief definition would help the reader.
  5. [Diamond VBS phase] The sign patterns theta_VBS and theta_nem are essential for reproducibility but are only cited to the supplementary material; they should be included in the main text or appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the VBS claim is a direct numerical ED result, corroborated by independent order parameters and spectral fingerprints.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central claim ('conclusive numerical evidence' for a diamond VBS phase) rests on exact-diagonalization data on N=36 and N=48 clusters: spin structure factors S(M') and S(K'), the dimer-correlation-based order parameter O_VBS, and tower-of-states quantum numbers. O_VBS is not equivalent to the conclusion by construction: it is a measured overlap of the ground-state dimer correlations with a hypothesized sign pattern, and its value could in principle be small or negative; the paper separately identifies the phase region using the first-excitation quantum numbers (pink region: S=0, M.D2.A2) and distinguishes diamond from pinwheel VBS by the presence of a low-lying singlet Γ.D6.E2 level rather than by the order parameter. No fitted parameter is later presented as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the choice. Self-citations ([25], [35], [36]) are either computational methodology or prior numerical observations cited as context, not as load-bearing justification for the new phase. The acknowledged limitations (approximate phase boundaries, 'guide to the eye', unresolved characterization of the nematic phase, no systematic extrapolation) are finite-size and completeness concerns, not circularity. The paper is self-contained against its external benchmarks (classical phase diagram and known spectral predictions), so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to the ED data. The model couplings J2/J1 and J3/J1 are scanned axes of the phase diagram, and the sign weights in the order parameters (Eqs. 7-8) are fixed by candidate VBS and nematic states rather than optimized. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced. The spin-nematic phase is a proposed phase of matter, not a separately invented entity, and the authors explicitly leave its detailed characterization to future work.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Finite-size clusters N=36 and 48 with periodic boundary conditions are representative of the thermodynamic limit for the phases identified.
    Used to draw the phase diagram in Figs. 1 and 2; 48-site data cover selected sectors only, and no systematic finite-size scaling is presented for phase boundaries or order parameters.
  • domain assumption Tower-of-states analysis, comparing the quantum numbers of low-lying ED eigenstates with theoretical predictions, identifies the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the thermodynamic ground state.
    Assigned the blue, green, pink, orange, and yellow regions in Fig. 1 based on such spectroscopy; standard but unproved for this frustrated model.
  • domain assumption The candidate diamond and pinwheel VBS model states, and their spectral decomposition in the supplementary material, provide a complete set of distinguishing low-energy quantum numbers.
    The text states dimer correlations alone cannot distinguish the two VBS states; the diamond VBS is identified by a characteristic Gamma.D6.E2 singlet level, relying on the model-state spectral decomposition.
  • domain assumption The order-parameter sign patterns theta_VBS and theta_nem are correct fingerprints of the respective orders.
    O_VBS and O_nem are defined via these signs in Eqs. (7)-(8), and the phase extents in Fig. 2 are read off from these order parameters.
  • domain assumption The apparent second-order character of the q=0 to VBS transition on finite clusters persists in the thermodynamic limit.
    The deconfined quantum criticality suggestion rests on this; Fig. 4(a) shows a narrow grey region with no finite-size scaling analysis, and the text hedges with 'possible' and 'contender role'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Valence bond solid and possible deconfined quantum criticality in an extended kagome lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JUVQMM2E

@misc{pith2026190802762,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Valence bond solid and possible deconfined quantum criticality in an extended kagome lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JUVQMM2E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02762}
}
abstract

We present numerical evidence for the emergence of an extended valence bond solid (VBS) phase at $T=0$ in the kagome $S=1/2$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet with ferromagnetic further-neighbor interactions. The VBS is located at the boundary between two magnetically ordered regions and extends close to the nearest-neighbor Heisenberg point. It exhibits a diamond-like singlet covering pattern with a $12$-site unit-cell. Our results suggest the possibility of a direct, possibly continuous, quantum phase transition from the neighboring $\mathbf{q}=0$ coplanar magnetically ordered phase into the VBS phase. Moreover, a second phase which breaks lattice symmetries, and is of likely spin-nematic type, is found close to the transition to the ferromagnetic phase. The results have been obtained using numerical Exact Diagonalization. We discuss implications of our results on the nature of nearest-neighbor Heisenberg antiferromagnet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02762 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Approximate phase diagram of the extended kagome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. ED results on a 36-site simulation cluster: (a) Spin structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Ground-state dimer correlations in the VBS phase for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Characterization of a possibly spin nematic phase. (a): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Spin liquids in frustrated magnets,

    Leon Balents, “Spin liquids in frustrated magnets,” Nature 464, 199–208 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Quantum spin liquids: a re- view,

    Lucile Savary and Leon Balents, “Quantum spin liquids: a re- view,” Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    for q = 0 order, (3) K′ = (8π/3, 0) for √ 3× √ 3 order, (4) in the extended Brillouin zone, cf. [30]. Hence, S(M′) and S(K′) shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b) identify both magnetic phases, respectively. The regions where these structure factors are peaked coincide with the blue and green regions in Fig. 1. The blue region in Fig. 1(a) is given by the points, wh...

    work page

  4. [4]

    On nextnearest- neighbor interaction in linear chain. i,

    Chanchal K. Majumdar and Dipan K. Ghosh, “On nextnearest- neighbor interaction in linear chain. i,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 10, 1388–1398 (1969)

    work page 1969

  5. [5]

    Planar pyrochlore: A valence-bond crystal,

    J.-B. Fouet, M. Mambrini, P. Sindzingre, and C. Lhuillier, “Planar pyrochlore: A valence-bond crystal,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 054411 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Plaquette valence-bond crystal in the frustrated heisenberg quantum antiferromagnet on the square lattice,

    Matthieu Mambrini, Andreas L ¨auchli, Didier Poilblanc, and Fr´ed´eric Mila, “Plaquette valence-bond crystal in the frustrated heisenberg quantum antiferromagnet on the square lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 144422 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Valence-bond crystal phase of a frustrated spin-1/2 square-lattice antiferromagnet,

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and Kazuo Ueda, “Valence-bond crystal phase of a frustrated spin-1/2 square-lattice antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B 54, 9007–9010 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Valence- bond crystal in the extended kagome spin- 1 2 quantum heisen- berg antiferromagnet: A variational monte carlo approach,

    Yasir Iqbal, Federico Becca, and Didier Poilblanc, “Valence- bond crystal in the extended kagome spin- 1 2 quantum heisen- berg antiferromagnet: A variational monte carlo approach,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 100404(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Pinwheel valence-bond solid and triplet excitations in the two-dimensional deformed kagome lattice,

    K. Matan, T. Ono, Y . Fukumoto, T. J. Sato, J. Yamaura, M. Yano, K. Morita, and H. Tanaka, “Pinwheel valence-bond solid and triplet excitations in the two-dimensional deformed kagome lattice,” Nature Physics6, 865–869 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    A pinwheel without wind,

    Christian R ¨uegg, “A pinwheel without wind,” Nature Physics 6, 837–838 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Possible valence-bond condensation in the frustrated cluster magnet LiZn2Mo3O8,

    J. P. Sheckelton, J. R. Neilson, D. G. Soltan, and T. M. Mc- Queen, “Possible valence-bond condensation in the frustrated cluster magnet LiZn2Mo3O8,” Nature Materials 11, 493 – 496 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Team of rivals in a kagome material: Quan- tum spin liquid, spin order, and valence bond crystal,

    Rebecca W. Smaha, Wei He, Jack Mingde Jiang, Charles J. Ti- tus, Jiajia Wen, Yi-Fan Jiang, John P. Sheckelton, Suyin Grass Wang, Yu-Sheng Chen, Simon J. Teat, Adam A. Aczel, Yang Zhao, Guangyong Xu, Jeffrey W. Lynn, Hong-Chen Jiang, and Young S. Lee, “Team of rivals in a kagom...

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Spinpeierls and spinliquid phases of kagom quantum antiferromagnets,

    J. B. Marston and C. Zeng, “Spinpeierls and spinliquid phases of kagom quantum antiferromagnets,” Journal of Applied Physics 69, 5962–5964 (1991)

    1991

  6. [14]

    Numerical studies of a 36-site kagome antiferromagnet,

    P. W. Leung and Veit Elser, “Numerical studies of a 36-site kagome antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B47, 5459–5462 (1993)

    1993

  7. [15]

    Physics of low-energy singlet states of the kagome lattice quantum heisenberg antiferromagnet,

    P. Nikolic and T. Senthil, “Physics of low-energy singlet states of the kagome lattice quantum heisenberg antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 214415 (2003)

    2003

  8. [16]

    Ground state of the spin- 1/2 kagome-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet,

    Rajiv R. P. Singh and David A. Huse, “Ground state of the spin- 1/2 kagome-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 180407(R) (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    p6 chiral resonating valence bonds in the kagome antiferromagnet,

    Sylvain Capponi, V . Ravi Chandra, Assa Auerbach, and Mar- vin Weinstein, “ p6 chiral resonating valence bonds in the kagome antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B87, 161118(R) (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Spin- Liquid Ground State of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg An- tiferromagnet,

    Simeng Yan, David A. Huse, and Steven R. White, “Spin- Liquid Ground State of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg An- tiferromagnet,” Science332, 1173–1176 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Nature of the Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1 /2 Heisenberg Model on the Kagome Lattice,

    Stefan Depenbrock, Ian P. McCulloch, and Ulrich Schollw ¨ock, “Nature of the Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S = 1 /2 Heisenberg Model on the Kagome Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 067201 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    Projected-wave-function study of the spin- 1/2 heisen- berg model on the kagom´e lattice,

    Ying Ran, Michael Hermele, Patrick A. Lee, and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Projected-wave-function study of the spin- 1/2 heisen- berg model on the kagom´e lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 117205 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Spin- 1 2 heisenberg J1−J2 antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice,

    Yasir Iqbal, Didier Poilblanc, and Federico Becca, “Spin- 1 2 heisenberg J1−J2 antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 020402(R) (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Projected wave function study ofZ2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice for the spin- 1 2 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet,

    Yasir Iqbal, Federico Becca, and Didier Poilblanc, “Projected wave function study ofZ2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice for the spin- 1 2 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 020407(R) (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Gapless spin-liquid phase in the kagome spin-1 2 heisen- berg antiferromagnet,

    Yasir Iqbal, Federico Becca, Sandro Sorella, and Didier Poil- blanc, “Gapless spin-liquid phase in the kagome spin-1 2 heisen- berg antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B87, 060405(R) (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Signatures of dirac cones in a dmrg study of the kagome heisenberg model,

    Yin-Chen He, Michael P. Zaletel, Masaki Oshikawa, and Frank Pollmann, “Signatures of dirac cones in a dmrg study of the kagome heisenberg model,” Phys. Rev. X7, 031020 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Gapless spin-liquid ground state in thes = 1/2 kagome antiferromagnet,

    H. J. Liao, Z. Y . Xie, J. Chen, Z. Y . Liu, H. D. Xie, R. Z. Huang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, “Gapless spin-liquid ground state in thes = 1/2 kagome antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 137202 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    S = 1 2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet revisited,

    Andreas M. L ¨auchli, Julien Sudan, and Roderich Moessner, “S = 1 2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet revisited,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 155142 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Chiral spin liquid and emergent anyons in a kagome lattice mott insulator,

    B. Bauer, L. Cincio, B. P. Keller, M. Dolfi, G. Vidal, S. Trebst, and A. W. W. Ludwig, “Chiral spin liquid and emergent anyons in a kagome lattice mott insulator,” Nature Communications 5, 5137 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Emergent chiral spin liquid: Fractional quantum hall effect in a kagome heisen- berg model,

    Shou-Shu Gong, Wei Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, “Emergent chiral spin liquid: Fractional quantum hall effect in a kagome heisen- berg model,” Sci. Reports4, 6317 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Nature of chiral spin liquids on the kagome lattice,

    Alexander Wietek, Antoine Sterdyniak, and Andreas M. L¨auchli, “Nature of chiral spin liquids on the kagome lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 125122 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Chiral spin liq- uid in a frustrated anisotropic kagome heisenberg model,

    Yin-Chen He, D. N. Sheng, and Yan Chen, “Chiral spin liq- uid in a frustrated anisotropic kagome heisenberg model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 137202 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Lattice symme- tries and regular magnetic orders in classical frustrated antifer- romagnets,

    L. Messio, C. Lhuillier, and G. Misguich, “Lattice symme- tries and regular magnetic orders in classical frustrated antifer- romagnets,” Phys. Rev. B83, 184401 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Kagome antiferromagnet: A chiral topological spin liquid?

    Laura Messio, Bernard Bernu, and Claire Lhuillier, “Kagome antiferromagnet: A chiral topological spin liquid?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 207204 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Kapell- asite: A kagome quantum spin liquid with competing interac- tions,

    B. F ˚ak, E. Kermarrec, L. Messio, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, F. Bert, P. Mendels, B. Koteswararao, F. Bouquet, J. Ollivier, A. D. Hillier, A. Amato, R. H. Colman, and A. S. Wills, “Kapell- asite: A kagome quantum spin liquid with competing interac- tions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 0...

    2012

  26. [34]

    Spin dynamics and disorder effects in thes = 1 2 kagome heisenberg spin-liquid phase of kapellasite,

    E. Kermarrec, A. Zorko, F. Bert, R. H. Colman, B. Koteswararao, F. Bouquet, P. Bonville, A. Hillier, A. Amato, J. van Tol, A. Ozarowski, A. S. Wills, and P. Mendels, “Spin dynamics and disorder effects in thes = 1 2 kagome heisenberg spin-liquid phase of kapellasite,” Phys. Re...

    2014

  27. [35]

    Intertwined nematic orders in a frustrated ferromagnet,

    Yasir Iqbal, Pratyay Ghosh, Rajesh Narayanan, Brijesh Kumar, Johannes Reuther, and Ronny Thomale, “Intertwined nematic orders in a frustrated ferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 224403 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Sublattice cod- ing algorithm and distributed memory parallelization for large- scale exact diagonalizations of quantum many-body systems,

    Alexander Wietek and Andreas M. L ¨auchli, “Sublattice cod- ing algorithm and distributed memory parallelization for large- scale exact diagonalizations of quantum many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. E 98, 033309 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Ground-state energy and spin gap of spin- 1 2 kagom´e- heisenberg antiferromagnetic clusters: Large-scale exact diag- 6 onalization results,

    Andreas M. L ¨auchli, Julien Sudan, and Erik S. Sørensen, “Ground-state energy and spin gap of spin- 1 2 kagom´e- heisenberg antiferromagnetic clusters: Large-scale exact diag- 6 onalization results,” Phys. Rev. B83, 212401 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    See the supplementary material for further information on the geometry of the lattice, its reciprocal lattice and the naming convention of the representations of the space group

  31. [39]

    Order versus disorder in the quantum heisenberg antifer- romagnet on the kagom ´e lattice using exact spectra analysis,

    P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, and P. Sindz- ingre, “Order versus disorder in the quantum heisenberg antifer- romagnet on the kagom ´e lattice using exact spectra analysis,” Phys. Rev. B 56, 2521–2529 (1997)

    1997

  32. [40]

    Competing valence bond crystals in the kagome quantum dimer model,

    Didier Poilblanc and Gr ´egoire Misguich, “Competing valence bond crystals in the kagome quantum dimer model,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 214401 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    Vison states and confinement transitions of Z2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice,

    Yejin Huh, Matthias Punk, and Subir Sachdev, “Vison states and confinement transitions of Z2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice,” Phys. Rev. B84, 094419 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    Z2 gauge theory for valence bond solids on the kagome lattice,

    Kyusung Hwang, Yejin Huh, and Yong Baek Kim, “ Z2 gauge theory for valence bond solids on the kagome lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 205131 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Spin nematic phases in quan- tum spin systems,

    K. Penc and A. M. L ¨auchli, “Spin nematic phases in quan- tum spin systems,” in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, V ol. 164, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2010) Chap. 13

    2010

  36. [44]

    Ne- matic order in square lattice frustrated ferromagnets,

    Nic Shannon, Tsutomu Momoi, and Philippe Sindzingre, “Ne- matic order in square lattice frustrated ferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 027213 (2006)

    2006

  37. [45]

    Oc- tupolar order in the multiple spin exchange model on a triangu- lar lattice,

    Tsutomu Momoi, Philippe Sindzingre, and Nic Shannon, “Oc- tupolar order in the multiple spin exchange model on a triangu- lar lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 257204 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    Vector chiral and multipolar orders in the spin- 1 2 frus- trated ferromagnetic chain in magnetic field,

    Toshiya Hikihara, Lars Kecke, Tsutomu Momoi, and Akira Fu- rusaki, “Vector chiral and multipolar orders in the spin- 1 2 frus- trated ferromagnetic chain in magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 144404 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Emergent multipolar spin correlations in a fluctuating spiral: The frustrated ferromagnetic spin-1 2 heisenberg chain in a mag- netic field,

    Julien Sudan, Andreas L ¨uscher, and Andreas M. L ¨auchli, “Emergent multipolar spin correlations in a fluctuating spiral: The frustrated ferromagnetic spin-1 2 heisenberg chain in a mag- netic field,” Phys. Rev. B80, 140402(R) (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Destroying a topological quantum bit by condensing ising vortices,

    Zhihao Hao, Stephen Inglis, and Roger Melko, “Destroying a topological quantum bit by condensing ising vortices,” Nature Communications 5, 5781 EP – (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Microscopic theory of the nearest-neighbor valence bond sec- tor of the spin- 1 2 kagome antiferromagnet,

    Arnaud Ralko, Fr ´ed´eric Mila, and Ioannis Rousochatzakis, “Microscopic theory of the nearest-neighbor valence bond sec- tor of the spin- 1 2 kagome antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 104401 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Deconfined quantum critical points,

    T. Senthil, Ashvin Vishwanath, Leon Balents, Subir Sachdev, and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Deconfined quantum critical points,” Science303, 1490–1494 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Deconfined quantum critical point on the trian- gular lattice,

    Chao-Ming Jian, Alex Thomson, Alex Rasmussen, Zhen Bi, and Cenke Xu, “Deconfined quantum critical point on the trian- gular lattice,” Phys. Rev. B97, 195115 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Unifying description of competing orders in two- dimensional quantum magnets,

    Xue-Yang Song, Chong Wang, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Yin- Chen He, “Unifying description of competing orders in two- dimensional quantum magnets,” Nature Communications 10, 4254 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.