Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 30 references

Photonic Crystal Spatial Filters Fabricated by Femtosecond Pulsed Bessel Beam

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bessel-beam writing inscribes millimeter-long glass photonic crystals that pass a ~1° angular band and block the rest.

desk verdict A credible and useful experimental advance: Bessel-beam writing produces millimeter-long 2D photonic-crystal spatial filters with clear angular filtering, though the headline transmission numbers are not quantitatively supported. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02842 v1 pith:NY5HV2TF submitted 2019-08-07 physics.app-ph physics.optics

Darius Gailevičius , Vytautas Purlys , Kestutis Staliunas This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords photoniccrystalspatialfiltersBesselbeamfemtoseconddirectlaserwritingfilteringchirpedcrystalsglassmicrofabricationintracavitybroad-areasemiconductorlasers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a way to write photonic-crystal spatial filters deep inside glass with femtosecond Bessel beams, rather than with the tightly focused Gaussian beams normally used for point-by-point inscription. The inscribed millimeter-length structures transmit a narrow angular range, about one degree wide, at nearly full intensity, while blocking light arriving over much broader angles, up to roughly ten degrees. That combination matters because compact, mechanically stable, intracavity filters of this kind could clean the beam of mini- and micro-lasers, especially the slow-axis divergence of broad-area semiconductor lasers, where conventional confocal lens-and-diaphragm filters cannot fit. The authors show that chirping the crystal's period widens the filtering band and that longer chirped crystals saturate at near-100% energy removal.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is Bessel-beam direct laser writing: an axicon converts a femtosecond Gaussian beam into a non-diffracting Bessel beam whose long, narrow focal line inscribes high-aspect-ratio refractive-index modifications in glass in a single pass. Scanning the sample horizontally leaves a 2D periodic lattice of modified planes, and the spatial filtering arises from selective diffraction, in which angular components satisfying the resonance condition are diffracted out of the zero-order transmitted beam. The resonance angle is set by the transverse and longitudinal periods $d_\perp$ and $d_\parallel$ through $\sin(\alpha_c)=\lambda(Q-1)/(2d_\perp)$ with $Q=2d_\perp^2/(\lambda d_\parallel)$; chirping the structure means sweeping $Q$ along the crystal to move the narrow resonance across a wider angular range. The same low index contrast that keeps the filtering line narrow also sets the length needed for full extinction, and the paper uses a beam-propagation scattering parameter to fit the measured saturation and to infer $\Delta n \approx 5\times10^{-3}$ for the inscribed lines.

What would settle it

Take a fabricated chirped filter designed for 970 nm and measure the transmitted angular spectrum with the probe beam clipped to the top, middle, and bottom thirds of the 600 µm vertical aperture; if the observed stop-band position or depth changes by more than the experimental uncertainty across those positions, the axicon-tip distortion reaches the usable aperture and the crystal is not the uniform periodic structure assumed by the design.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Bessel-beam direct laser writing can produce sufficiently long and defect-free photonic crystal spatial filters in glass, with filtering behaviour that matches the designed double-periodic structure. A Bessel beam generated by a shallow axicon and demagnified by a telescope creates a ~600 µm long high-intensity focal line, so scanning the sample writes long parallel index-modified planes; the resulting 2D photonic crystals have 3 µm transverse period and longitudinal periods chosen by the target filtering angle. Measured angular transmission spectra at 633 nm show filtering dips that deepen with length up to about eight periods and then revive at roughly fourteen periods, the Laue-Rabi oscillation expected for this geometry. Chirped crystals, with the Q parameter swept from 1.2 to 2.0 along the structure, give broad filtering bands of about 4° at 633 nm and 2.2° to 8.05° at 970 nm, and the fraction of removed energy saturates toward 100% as the number of periods grows. The paper concludes that this is a practical route to millimeter-scale, one-dimensional spatial filters for intracavity use in mini- and micro-lasers.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Bessel focal zone writes straight, uniform, low-loss index-modified lines across the full 600 µm depth, so the glass behaves as the designed low-contrast periodic crystal; the paper itself notes oscillatory index modifications at the bottom of the facet view from axicon-tip distortion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Millimeter-long spatial filters become feasible in glass: the Bessel focal line removes the working-distance and spherical-aberration limits that cap Gaussian-beam-written crystals at roughly 0.3 mm.
  • A single non-chirped filter can be set to a chosen angle by selecting the longitudinal period, demonstrated at design angles 0.8°, 2.4° and 4° with measured values 1.08°, 3.2° and 5.5° at 633 nm.
  • Chirping broadens the filtered angular band to about 4° at 633 nm and to 5.8° at 970 nm, so the technique covers the 3–10° slow-axis divergence range typical of broad-area semiconductor lasers.
  • Writing time drops by roughly an order of magnitude compared with point-by-point Gaussian writing: about 3 minutes versus about 30 minutes for the same aperture and period in the paper's example.
  • Because the filters are small, mechanically stable, and do not need far-field access, they can be placed inside microchip and diode laser resonators where conventional confocal spatial filters cannot be used.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Vertical stitching, which the authors propose as a future step, could multiply the usable aperture by 2–5×; if it preserves the measured angular contrast, the same filters could handle larger-diameter and higher-power beams.
  • The demonstrated tuning from 633 nm to 970 nm by rescaling the longitudinal period suggests the design rule is wavelength-scalable; one testable extension would be a mid-infrared filter built from the same glass with a correspondingly scaled lattice.
  • The Laue-Rabi revival implies that for non-chirped filters longer is not better: maximum extinction occurs near the first optimum length, whereas chirping removes this constraint by saturating instead of reviving.
  • Because performance saturates at full extinction only past a certain number of periods, a practical design would trade angular bandwidth against crystal length; the paper's scaling relation provides the explicit trade-off for other wavelengths or index contrasts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and demonstrates the use of femtosecond pulsed Bessel beams for direct laser writing of two-dimensional photonic-crystal spatial filters in glass. The authors fabricate unchirped and chirped structures with transverse period 3 µm and lengths up to a few millimeters, characterize them at 633 nm and 970 nm, and observe angular filtering bands whose position, width, and depth depend on the geometry parameter Q and the number of longitudinal periods N. They report Laue-Rabi oscillations for overlong unchirped structures, a broadening of the filtering band in chirped structures, saturation of the removed-energy ratio with length, and comparison with beam-propagation simulations from which they infer an index contrast Δn ≈ 5×10^-3. The central claim is that this fabrication route is fast, scalable, and suitable for compact intracavity spatial filters.

Significance. If the quantitative performance claims are correct, this is a practically important step toward compact intracavity spatial filtering for microlasers and broad-area semiconductor lasers, whose slow-axis divergence is otherwise difficult to control. The experimental work includes several useful cross-checks: length-dependent filtering with revival behavior, comparison of chirped and unchirped geometries, operation at two wavelengths, and quantitative comparison with a beam-propagation model. The claimed fabrication speed advantage over Gaussian-beam point-by-point writing is also significant. The main limitation is that the headline pass-band transmission and stop-band depth are not established in absolute terms, which is essential for judging the practical value of the device.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Section 3, Figs. 3 and 4] The central claims of a 'nearly 100%-transmission pass-band' and 'nearly 0%-transmission stop-bands' are not quantitatively supported by the reported measurements. The angular transmission spectra in Figs. 3 and 4 appear normalized to their own maxima, so the pass-band is 100% by construction and the stop-band depth is only relative. No reference measurement through an unmodified region of the same substrate is reported, and the 'removed energy' ratio in Fig. 4(b) is not a measure of forward pass-band insertion loss: it can saturate to 100% even when the useful transmitted beam is strongly attenuated. Because the proposed intracavity application depends on low insertion loss, this missing absolute calibration is load-bearing. Please provide absolute angular transmission referenced to an unmodified glass region, or at least report pass-band and stop-band throughput with uncertainties.
  2. [Section 2, facet-view discussion] The authors acknowledge 'oscillatory refractive index modifications seen at the bottom of the facet view' caused by axicon-tip distortion and state that the usable aperture is smaller than the estimated Bessel zone length, but no quantitative information is given about the spatial extent of this distorted region. If this region extends into the probed area, the measured filtering spectra and the inferred Δn ≈ 5×10^-3 could be affected. Please show a full facet image with a scale bar, characterize the depth of the distorted zone, and confirm that the characterization beam passes only through the supposedly uniform region.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 3(b)] The measured central filtering angles for Q = 1.2, 1.6, and 2.0 are 1.08°, 3.2°, and 5.5°, deviating from the estimated values 0.8°, 2.4°, and 4.0° by 25-37%. The manuscript attributes this to the paraxial approximation; please state the non-paraxial resonance condition or provide a numerical check so that the residual discrepancy is quantified rather than only described qualitatively.
  2. [Section 3, Fig. 4(b)] The fit of the scattering efficiency parameter s = 0.14 and the resulting Δn ≈ 5×10^-3 are presented without uncertainty analysis. Please describe the fitting procedure, the fitted range, and the sensitivity of Δn to the choice of s.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption 'without (a,b) and with chirp (b,c)' is confusing because panel (b) appears in both groupings. Please clarify which panels correspond to chirped and unchirped structures and which parameters vary in each row.
  4. [Throughout] The angular spectra and energy-ratio data are shown without error bars or statements about the number of repeated measurements; adding this information would strengthen the quantitative claims.
  5. [Abstract] There are minor typographical errors, for example 'intr acavity' in the abstract, which should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: fabrication demonstration with parameter extraction, not a prediction forced by its inputs.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration whose central claim is a fabrication capability, not a derived prediction. The filtering-angle formula sin(α_c)=λ(Q−1)/(2d⊥) is quoted from prior theory, with Q defined geometrically, and is used to design structures; the measured angles are then compared with estimates and the discrepancies are attributed to the paraxial approximation, so the comparison is not forced by construction. The refractive-index contrast Δn≈5×10⁻³ is obtained by fitting the scattering parameter s to the measured removed-energy-versus-length data; this is parameter extraction/characterization, not a circular prediction of the same data dressed as independent confirmation. Self-citations (Refs. 2, 6, 10, 11, 30) provide background theory, the chirping concept, and a simulation tool, but the new experimental results—Bessel-beam fabrication of long chirped photonic-crystal filters and the measured angular spectra—are not derived from those citations. The 'nearly 100%-transmission pass-band' wording is not quantitatively anchored by an absolute transmission reference, and the 'removed energy ratio' in Fig. 4(b) is not the same as pass-band throughput; however, this is an experimental substantiation gap, not a circular reduction, because nothing in the paper defines the pass-band transmission to be 100% by normalization or by the model. No step in the claimed derivation chain is equivalent to its input, so no circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on design formulas from prior work and standard diffraction theory, plus the assumption that Bessel-written lines form uniform index modulations. The only fitted parameter is the scattering efficiency s used to match simulation to experiment; it does not feed into the design formula but is used to infer delta n.

free parameters (1)
  • s (scattering efficiency parameter) = 0.14
    Chosen to make BPM simulations match experimental transmitted energy data in Fig. 4(b); then used to infer delta n ≈ 5e-3.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Photonic crystal spatial filtering is governed by selective diffraction described by sin(αc)=λ(Q−1)/(2 d⊥).
    Used in Section 2 to design periods for targeted filtering angles.
  • domain assumption Paraxial approximation applies to the small filter angles (up to ~10 degrees).
    Used to derive the angle-Q relation; discrepancies between estimated and measured angles are attributed to this approximation.
  • domain assumption Femtosecond Bessel beam exposure induces positive refractive index changes in glass (per refs [28,29]).
    Assumed in Section 2 to interpret the fabricated structures as index-modulated PhCs.
  • domain assumption Chirped photonic crystals can be approximated as locally periodic structures with linearly varying longitudinal period.
    Used in Section 3 to design broad filtering bands and interpret the measured spectra.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photonic Crystal Spatial Filters Fabricated by Femtosecond Pulsed Bessel Beam." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NY5HV2TF

@misc{pith2026190802842,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photonic Crystal Spatial Filters Fabricated by Femtosecond Pulsed Bessel Beam},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NY5HV2TF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02842}
}
read the original abstract

We propose and experimentally demonstrate femtosecond direct laser writing with Bessel beams for the fabrication of photonic crystals with spatial filtering functionality. Such filters are mechanically stable, of small (of order of millimeter) size, do not require direct access to the far-field domain, and therefore are excellent candidates for intracavity spatial filtering applications in mini- and micro-lasers. The technique allows the fabrication of efficient photonic crystal spatial filters in glass, with a narrow angle (~1 degree) nearly 100%-transmission pass-band between broad angle (up to 10 degrees) nearly 0%-transmission angular stop-bands. We show, that this technique can not only significantly shorten the fabrication time, but also allows the fabrication of large-scale defect-free photonic crystal spatial filters with a wide filtering band.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02842 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of broad band spatial filtering in chirped PhCs. (b) Principle scheme of direct laser writing using Bessel beams, illuminated in vertical Y-direction, whereas the filtering follows along the horizontal Z-direction. For some applications the filtering along one direction is sufficient. For example, it is especially suitable for broad edge emitting semiconductor lasers, where only the slow-axis filter… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the fabrication arrangement (a), microscope-photos of the sample (b), and the 2D light transmission picture, showing the central beam region, from which radiation is filtered out (c). Arrows indicate resonant energy transfer between two coupled angular bands: outward and, also, inward to the central region. The described fabrication scheme allowed us to achieve a minimum transverse period of 3 µm, ac… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Laser beam brightness improvement with high power spatial filtering,

    A. Bettinger, C. Charles, J. Osmalin, and J. G. Giraud, "Laser beam brightness improvement with high power spatial filtering," Opt. Commun. 18, 176–177 (1976)

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Spatial filtering of light by chirped photonic crystals,

    K. Staliunas and V. J. Sánchez-Morcillo, "Spatial filtering of light by chirped photonic crystals," Phys. Rev. A 79, 053807 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Spatial filtering using dielectric photonic crystals at beam-type excitation,

    E. Colak, A. O. Cakmak, A. E. Serebryannikov, and E. Ozbay, "Spatial filtering using dielectric photonic crystals at beam-type excitation," J. Appl. Phys. 108, 113106 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Polarization-independent low-pass spatial filters based on one-dimensional photonic crystals containing negative-index materials,

    Z. Luo, Z. Tang, Y. Xiang, H. Luo, and S. Wen, "Polarization-independent low-pass spatial filters based on one-dimensional photonic crystals containing negative-index materials," Appl. Phys. B 94, 641–646 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Signatures of light-beam spatial filtering in a three-dimensional photonic crystal,

    L. Maigyte, T. Gertus, M. Peckus, J. Trull, C. Cojocaru, V. Sirutkaitis, and K. Staliunas, "Signatures of light-beam spatial filtering in a three-dimensional photonic crystal," Phys. Rev. A 82, 043819 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Spatial filtering by chirped photonic crystals,

    V. Purlys, L. Maigyte, D. Gailevičius, M. Peckus, M. Malinauskas, and K. Staliunas, "Spatial filtering by chirped photonic crystals," Phys. Rev. A 87, 033805 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Super-collimation by axisymmetric photonic crystals,

    V. Purlys, L. Maigyte, D. Gailevičius, M. Peckus, R. Gadonas, and K. Staliunas, "Super-collimation by axisymmetric photonic crystals," Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 221108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Photonic Crystal Microchip Laser,

    D. Gailevicius, V. Koliadenko, V. Purlys, M. Peckus, V. Taranenko, and K. Staliunas, "Photonic Crystal Microchip Laser," Sci. Rep. 6, 34173 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Chirped photonic crystal for spatially filtered optical feedback to a broad-area laser,

    C. Brée, D. Gailevičius, V. Purlys, G. G. Werner, K. Staliunas, A. Rathsfeld, G. Schmidt, and M. Radziunas, "Chirped photonic crystal for spatially filtered optical feedback to a broad-area laser," J. Opt. 20, 095804 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Spatial filtering with photonic crystals,

    L. Maigyte and K. Staliunas, "Spatial filtering with photonic crystals," Appl. Phys. Rev. 2, 011102 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Chirped axisymmetric photonic microstructures for spatial filtering,

    D. Gailevicius, V. Purlys, L. Maigyte, M. Peckus, and K. Staliunas, "Chirped axisymmetric photonic microstructures for spatial filtering," J. Nanophotonics 8, 084094 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser,

    K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, and K. Hirao, "Writing waveguides in glass with a femtosecond laser," Opt. Lett. 21, 1729 (1996)

    1996

  5. [13]

    Laser written waveguide photonic quantum circuits,

    G. D. Marshall, A. Politi, J. C. F. Matthews, P. Dekker, M. Ams, M. J. Withford, and J. L. O’Brien, "Laser written waveguide photonic quantum circuits," Opt. Express 17, 12546 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Low-loss waveguides written with a femtosecond laser for flexible interconnection in a planar light-wave circuit,

    Y. Nasu, M. Kohtoku, and Y. Hibino, "Low-loss waveguides written with a femtosecond laser for flexible interconnection in a planar light-wave circuit," Opt. Lett. 30, 723 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry,

    M. Malinauskas, A. Žukauskas, S. Hasegawa, Y. Hayasaki, V. Mizeikis, R. Buividas, and S. Juodkazis, "Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry," Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16133–e16133 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    High-brightness semiconductor laser sources for materials processing: stacking, beam shaping, and bars,

    H.-G. Treusch, A. Ovtchinnikov, X. He, M. Kanskar, J. Mott, and S. Yang, "High-brightness semiconductor laser sources for materials processing: stacking, beam shaping, and bars," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 601–614 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    Understanding laser beam brightness: A review and new prospective in material processing,

    P. Shukla, J. Lawrence, and Y. Zhang, "Understanding laser beam brightness: A review and new prospective in material processing," Opt. Laser Technol. 75, 40–51 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Diffraction-free beams,

    J. Durnin, J. J. Miceli, and J. H. Eberly, "Diffraction-free beams," Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987)

    1987

  11. [19]

    Application of Bessel Beams for Microfabrication of Dielectrics by Femtosecond Laser,

    A. Marcinkevicius, S. Juodkazis, S. Matsuo, V. Mizeikis, and H. Misawa, "Application of Bessel Beams for Microfabrication of Dielectrics by Femtosecond Laser," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, L1197–L1199 (2001)

    2001

  12. [20]

    Microstructuring transparent materials by use of nondiffracting ultrashort pulse beams generated by diffractive optics,

    J. Amako, D. Sawaki, and E. Fujii, "Microstructuring transparent materials by use of nondiffracting ultrashort pulse beams generated by diffractive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 2562 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Ultrafast Bessel beams: Advanced tools for laser materials processing,

    R. Stoian, M. K. Bhuyan, G. Zhang, G. Cheng, R. Meyer, and F. Courvoisier, "Ultrafast Bessel beams: Advanced tools for laser materials processing," Adv. Opt. Technol. 7, 165–174 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    High 90% efficiency Bragg gratings formed in fused silica by femtosecond Gauss-Bessel laser beams,

    M. Mikutis, T. Kudrius, G. Šlekys, D. Paipulas, and S. Juodkazis, "High 90% efficiency Bragg gratings formed in fused silica by femtosecond Gauss-Bessel laser beams," Opt. Mater. Express 3, 1862 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Formation of Photonic Structures in Photorefractive Lithium Niobate by 1D and 2D Bessel-like Optical Fields,

    A. Inyushov, P. Safronova, I. Trushnikov, A. Sarkyt, and V. Shandarov, "Formation of Photonic Structures in Photorefractive Lithium Niobate by 1D and 2D Bessel-like Optical Fields," J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 867, 012023 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    An analytical model to predict the sizes of modified layer in glass with femtosecond Bessel beam,

    K. Liao, W. Wang, X. Mei, J. Cui, M. Li, and X. Li, "An analytical model to predict the sizes of modified layer in glass with femtosecond Bessel beam," Optik (Stuttg). 185, 232–241 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    High quality quasi-Bessel beam generated by round-tip axicon,

    O. Brzobohatý, T. Cižmár, and P. Zemánek, "High quality quasi-Bessel beam generated by round-tip axicon," Opt. Express 16, 12688 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Non-ideal axicon-generated Bessel beam application for intra- volume glass modification,

    J. Dudutis, P. Gečys, and G. Račiukaitis, "Non-ideal axicon-generated Bessel beam application for intra- volume glass modification," Opt. Express 24, 28433 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Aberration-controlled Bessel beam processing of glass,

    J. Dudutis, R. Stonys, G. Račiukaitis, and P. Gečys, "Aberration-controlled Bessel beam processing of glass," Opt. Express 26, 3627 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Spatio-temporal dynamics in nondiffractive Bessel ultrafast laser nanoscale volume structuring,

    P. K. Velpula, M. K. Bhuyan, F. Courvoisier, H. Zhang, J. P. Colombier, and R. Stoian, "Spatio-temporal dynamics in nondiffractive Bessel ultrafast laser nanoscale volume structuring," Laser Photon. Rev. 10, 230–244 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Optimization of laser energy deposition for single-shot high aspect-ratio microstructuring of thick BK7 glass,

    V. Garzillo, V. Jukna, A. Couairon, R. Grigutis, P. Di Trapani, and O. Jedrkiewicz, "Optimization of laser energy deposition for single-shot high aspect-ratio microstructuring of thick BK7 glass," J. Appl. Phys. 120, 013102 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Spatial Filters on Demand Based on Aperiodic Photonic Crystals,

    D. Gailevičius, V. Purlys, M. Peckus, R. Gadonas, and K. Staliunas, "Spatial Filters on Demand Based on Aperiodic Photonic Crystals," Ann. Phys. 529, 1700165 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.