Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Hyperluminous starburst gives up its secrets

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Black hole in a dusty starburst rivals the starburst's power

desk verdict The broad-line AGN detection in HATLAS J084933-W is solid and worth reporting; the bolometric-luminosity comparison with the starburst is a scaling-relation estimate that the SED does not independently anchor. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03199 v1 pith:H2MWVEWO submitted 2019-08-08 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HEhep-ex

R. J. Ivison (ESO , IfA , Edinburgh) , M. J. Page (MSSL) , M. Cirasuolo (ESO) , C. M. Harrison (ESO) , V. Mainieri (ESO) , V. Arumugam (ESO
show 2 more authors
IRAM) U. Dudzeviciute (Durham)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEhep-ex
keywords hyperluminousinfraredgalaxiesactivegalacticnucleibroad-lineregionsupermassiveblackholesX-rayspectroscopyprotoclusterssubmillimetreHATLASJ084933
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At redshift 2.41, the hyperluminous infrared galaxy HATLAS J084933-W has long looked like a pure starburst across its ultraviolet-to-radio spectral energy distribution. This paper reports near-infrared spectroscopy and X-ray observations that reveal a broad Hα line and a luminous, lightly absorbed X-ray source, which together show that the galaxy hosts a Type-1 active galactic nucleus (AGN), meaning its broad-line region is directly visible. The authors estimate a black hole mass of about $2\times10^9$ solar masses and an AGN bolometric luminosity of about $1.6\times10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$, comparable to the starburst's infrared luminosity. The puzzle is that this powerful accretion engine is invisible in the rest-frame ultraviolet, optical, and mid-infrared; the paper outlines three scenarios to explain where the AGN light is emerging.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing diagnostic is the broad Hα emission line, whose width and flux yield the black hole mass through the virial scaling relation, combined with the X-ray power-law spectrum, whose normalisation and slope feed the $\alpha_{\rm OX}$ relation (the correlation between rest-frame 250 nm and 2 keV luminosity) and a bolometric correction that turns the 2--10 keV luminosity into a total accretion luminosity. The panchromatic SED comparison against median submillimetre galaxies and two dusty Type-1 quasars provides the contradiction: the inferred AGN power has no obvious rest-frame ultraviolet, optical, or mid-infrared counterpart.

What would settle it

Measure the broad Balmer decrement by detecting Hβ in deeper rest-frame optical spectroscopy; if the extinction implied by Hα/Hβ is much larger than the X-ray column density of about 5×$10^{21}$ $cm^{-2}$, the AGN is seen through dusty gas and the clear-cavity picture fails, and if broad Hβ is absent entirely, the interpretation of the broad Hα as a Type-1 AGN would need re-examination.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, from the profile of the Hα emission line and from the X-ray spectrum, that component W of the HATLAS J084933 protocluster contains a broad-line Type-1 AGN. The broad Hα line has a FWHM of roughly 9,700 km s$^{-1}$ and implies $M_{\rm bh}\approx 2\times10^9\ M_\odot$; the X-ray spectrum is an absorbed power law with photon index $\alpha=0.8\pm0.1$, intrinsic column $N_{\rm H}\approx 5\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$, and a 2--10 keV luminosity $L_X=1.4\times10^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Using the $\alpha_{\rm OX}$ relation and a bolometric correction, the authors derive a bolometric AGN luminosity of $1.6\times10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$ ($\log L_{\rm bol}/L_\odot\approx13.62$), matching the starburst's $\log L_{\rm IR}/L_\odot=13.52$. Yet the panchromatic SED shows at most a mild blue excess relative to typical submillimetre galaxies and is orders of magnitude fainter than known dusty Type-1 quasars across rest-frame 0.15--30 $\mu$m. The paper argues that the accretion power must be emerging somewhere that is not obvious, and proposes three scenarios: a central cavity excavated by the AGN giving a clear line of sight; a second, unseen AGN in a companion galaxy; or a supermassive black hole ejected by asymmetric gravitational radiation, with the resulting lack of feedback explaining the extreme starburst.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the AGN's accretion power rivals the starburst rests on converting the measured X-ray luminosity to a bolometric luminosity through average quasar SED scaling relations, rather than on direct detection of the AGN's ultraviolet or optical light; the paper itself notes that using the observed optical magnitude would give a lower bolometric luminosity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the conclusion holds, AGN are ubiquitous among hyperluminous infrared galaxies, not merely present in X-ray-selected examples.
  • A roughly $2\times10^9\ M_\odot$ black hole in a galaxy forming stars at thousands of solar masses per year implies that supermassive black hole growth and extreme starburst activity can proceed simultaneously.
  • The mismatch between inferred AGN power and the SED calls for a revision of how bolometric AGN luminosity is estimated in dust-rich systems, or for a geometric explanation that hides the accretion light.
  • The newly confirmed fifth protocluster member shows that HATLAS J084933 is a structure spanning roughly 120 kpc, so its extreme luminosity is a group property rather than that of a single monolithic galaxy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $\alpha_{\rm OX}$-based bolometric luminosity is too high by even the factor-of-two scatter, the AGN would still be luminous but would no longer rival the starburst, weakening the central tension.
  • A direct test of the cavity scenario would be spatially resolved spectroscopy of the ionised gas: a northeast ionisation cone and a deficit of molecular gas along the line of sight would support it.
  • The ejected-AGN scenario predicts that the X-ray source and the broad Hα centroid should be measurably offset from the CO dynamical centre; current data cannot resolve this, but sharper X-ray or near-infrared integral-field observations could.
  • Because the X-ray emission is unresolved in the existing data, a small contribution from a second, buried AGN in the starburst cannot be excluded; deeper hard X-ray imaging would settle whether the accretion power is really single or dual.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports new ALMA, XMM-Newton, and VLT/KMOS observations of the z=2.41 hyperluminous infrared galaxy HATLAS J084933.4+021443. The ALMA data confirm a fifth dusty, gas-rich protocluster member, component E. The KMOS rest-frame optical spectroscopy of the brightest component, W, reveals a very broad H-alpha line (9700 km/s FWHM), and the XMM-Newton data reveal a point-like X-ray source coincident with W. The authors conclude that W hosts a Type-1 AGN with a black hole mass of about 2e9 solar masses, a modest intrinsic column of NH ~5e21 cm^-2, and a 2-10 keV luminosity of 1.4e45 erg/s. Using standard alpha_OX and bolometric-correction scaling relations, they estimate a bolometric AGN luminosity of 1.6e47 erg/s, comparable to the starburst's L_IR, despite the absence of obvious AGN signatures in the rest-frame UV-optical-mid-IR SED. Three scenarios are proposed to explain this configuration: an AGN viewed through a cavity in the host disk, an unseen companion AGN, or an ejected supermassive black hole.

Significance. The detection of a broad-line Type-1 AGN in an unlensed, intrinsically hyperluminous starburst is an important observational result, and the paper makes a strong case for it using independent rest-frame optical and X-ray diagnostics. The measurement of an approximately 2e9 solar mass black hole and the apparent absence of strong X-ray absorption in such a gas-rich system are notable. The data and analysis are generally careful, and the authors are explicit about the statistical weakness of the intrinsic column density detection. The value of the paper would be increased if the bolometric-luminosity claim, which underpins the central 'conundrum', were presented with fuller treatment of the systematic uncertainties in the adopted scaling relations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3, bolometric luminosity estimate] The statement that the intrinsic absorption is 'little' is based on NH = (5 +/- 3) x 10^21 cm^-2, which is only a 2-sigma detection (Delta chi^2 = 5.9 for NH = 0). The 3-sigma upper limit is 1.2e22 cm^-2. The authors do note in Section 3 that the absorption is only marginally significant, but the abstract and later discussion use the low absorption as a key part of the interpretation. The paper should consistently state that the column is poorly constrained and that the comparison with typical SMGs should be read as an order-of-magnitude statement rather than a precise measurement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] The observing programme identifier appears as '094. A - 0214(A)'; the spacing around the dash should be corrected.
  2. [Table 1] The row 'FWHM CO J=1-0 7.3 +/- 1.8 kpc' is confusing because FWHM normally denotes a velocity width in this context; please label the quantity as a spatial extent or use a different notation.
  3. [Section 3] The black hole mass estimate from Schulze et al. (2018) is quoted without giving the adopted virial relation or the continuum/luminosity quantity used; please provide the formula and the systematic uncertainty, given the extreme 9700 km/s line width.
  4. [Figure 1 caption] The sentence about the blue [N II] line having 'a fixed wavelength offset and flux ratio (3.06-1x)' is awkwardly worded; it should say that the red-to-blue [N II] flux ratio is fixed at 3.06.
  5. [Section 4.1] The statement that the AGN would be 'roughly 5 mag fainter than the prediction for the AGN before obscuration' would benefit from stating the reference magnitude or wavelength used for the prediction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Type-1 AGN detection and the bolometric-luminosity estimates rest on new observations plus independent external calibrations, not on recycled outputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The central claim that HATLAS J084933-W hosts a broad-line Type-1 AGN follows directly from new, independent data: the KMOS spectrum shows broad H-alpha spanning 9,700 km/s FWHM, and XMM-Newton detects a point-like X-ray source positionally coincident with component W. The black-hole mass estimate uses the external single-epoch H-alpha scaling relation of Schulze et al. (2018); the X-ray column density and power-law index are fitted to the new XMM spectrum; and the bolometric AGN luminosity is obtained by applying the external alpha_OX relation of Just et al. (2007) plus the bolometric correction of Richards et al. (2006), both calibrated on other AGN populations. None of these inputs is defined in terms of the paper's own output. The paper's acknowledged sensitivity of the alpha_OX conversion (footnote 8) is a model-dependence caveat, not a circular step: using the observed optical magnitudes would give alpha_OX ~ 1.1 and a lower L_bol, and the authors explicitly choose the X-ray-based route because the alternative would imply heavy UV obscuration. That is an interpretive assumption, not a prediction forced by fitting. Prior work by the same first author (Ivison et al. 2013) is cited for component identification, CO kinematics, and L_IR, but it is not used to justify the AGN detection or the luminosity conversion. The X-ray NH measurement is marginal (Delta chi^2 = 5.9 for NH = 0), but this is a statistical weakness, not circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing conclusion reduces to a self-citation. The paper is therefore best assessed as having no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The AGN detection itself rests on direct multi-wavelength data, but the quantitative claims (L_bol rivaling L_IR, M_bh, NH) depend on external scaling relations calibrated on other AGN populations. The three explanatory scenarios each postulate unseen structures (cavity, companion, recoil) without independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • Intrinsic column density, N_H = (5 ± 3) × 10^21 cm^-2
    Fitted to the XMM-Newton spectrum with an absorbed power-law model; the detection is only 2σ significant (Δχ^2=5.9) yet the summary treats 'little intrinsic absorption' as a firm result.
  • X-ray power-law index, α = 0.8 ± 0.1
    Fitted to the X-ray spectrum; typical for quasars, used to derive the 2-10 keV flux and luminosity.
  • CO-to-H2 conversion factor, α_CO = 0.8 M_sun (K km/s pc^2)^-1
    Chosen in Table 1 to convert CO luminosity to molecular gas mass for component E; different values would change M_H2.
  • Bolometric correction factor = 110× the 2-10 keV luminosity
    Taken from Richards et al. 2006; central to the claim that AGN bolometric luminosity rivals L_IR.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Scaling relation between 250-nm and 2-keV luminosity (αOX) from Just et al. (2007) applies to this object
    Used to infer rest-frame UV luminosity from the X-ray detection, then bolometric luminosity (§3).
  • domain assumption Single-epoch Hα width and luminosity trace SMBH mass via Schulze et al. (2018)
    Gives M_bh ≈ 2e9 M_sun without an independent dynamical mass.
  • domain assumption X-ray-to-Hα luminosity regression of Panessa et al. (2006) applies
    Used to estimate extinction toward the AGN (§3).
  • domain assumption Kennicutt (1998) calibration and Chabrier IMF convert L_IR to SFR
    Used to derive SFR=650 M_sun/yr for component E and 3400 M_sun/yr in the introduction.
invented entities (2)
  • Unseen companion AGN (second SMBH)
    purpose: Explains the Type-1 AGN with low absorption and no rest-frame UV/optical/mid-IR excess as a separate, more evolved system near the starburst (§4.2)
    No direct detection; the paper states it is speculative and would be hard to observe.
  • Ejected SMBH from gravitational-wave recoil
    purpose: Explains the AGN as not co-spatial with the starburst and the extreme SFR via absence of AGN feedback (§4.3)
    No observational evidence for recoil; the paper calls it speculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hyperluminous starburst gives up its secrets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H2MWVEWO

@misc{pith2026190803199,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hyperluminous starburst gives up its secrets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H2MWVEWO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03199}
}
abstract

HATLAS J084933.4+021443 was identified as a dusty starburst via its rest-frame far-IR emission. Multi-frequency imaging and spectroscopy revealed a cluster of four dusty galaxies at $z = 2.41$, covering 80 kpc. Here, we use ALMA to confirm a more distant, fifth protocluster member, and present X-ray and rest-frame optical imaging spectroscopy of the brightest, an unlensed hyperluminous IR galaxy (HyLIRG). The data reveal broad H \alpha and bright [N II] lines, and bright X-ray emission, characteristics that betray a Type-1 active galactic nucleus (AGN), strengthening evidence that AGN are ubiquitous amongst HyLIRGs. The accreting black hole is super massive, $M_{\rm bh}\approx 2\times 10^9$ M$_\odot$, with little intrinsic absorption, $N_{\rm H}\approx 5\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$. The X-ray properties suggest the accretion luminosity rivals that of the starburst, yet it is not obvious where this emerges in its panchromatic spectral energy distribution (SED). We outline three scenarios that could give rise to the observed characteristics, and how we might distinguish between them. In the first, we see the AGN through the host galaxy because of the cavity it excavates. In the others, the AGN is not co-spatial with the starburst, having been ejected via asymmetric gravitational radiation, or having evolved towards the naked quasar phase in an unseen companion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03199 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Extracted inside a 1-arcsec-diameter aperture (yellow circle, overlaid on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) F110W image from I13), the lower panel shows the broad Hα emission, spanning 9,700 km s−1 FWHM, in component W of HATLAS J084933 as observed by VLT/KMOS, unambiguously revealing the presence of a previously unseen broad-line AGN. [N II] at 654.986, 658.527 nm and [S II] can also be seen (and is also marked). Th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The XMM-Newton EPIC X-ray spectrum of HATLAS J084933. The data points correspond to the measured spectrum and the stepped line corresponds to the best-fitting absorbed power-law model. Both model and data have been divided by the product of the effective area and Galactic column as a function of energy and are plotted as EFE, channel energy multipled by the energy flux per unit energy, so that an unabsorbed power la… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Confidence contours for power-law slope, α, and intrinsic column density, NH, from the model fit to the XMM-Newton EPIC X-ray spectrum. The solid, dashed and dotted contours correspond to ∆χ 2 of 2.3, 6.2 and 11.8 respectively, equivalent to 68, 95 and 99.7 per cent confidence regions for two interesting parameters. The best-fit model parameters are indicated with a small cross. This X-ray luminosity is orders of ma… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: band-6 245-GHz (1.22-mm) continuum emission superim￾posed as contours on the HST F110W imaging of HATLAS J084933. Bot￾tom: contours of 12CO J = 1–0 emission, collapsed optimally for each ob￾ject, superimposed on a three-colour image comprising a heavily smoothed J…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rest-frame ultraviolet–through–radio SED of HATLAS J084933- W, with new photometry from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (Aihara et al. 2018) and from WISE. Also shown are the median SED of ALMA-identified SMGs [dashed line] in the Ultra-Deep Survey field…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Vz-GAL Dusty Star-Forming Galaxies: Revisiting the CO-H2 Conversion Factor Tension

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The CO-to-H2 conversion factor in high-z dusty star-forming galaxies is not required to be 0.8; intermediate to near-Galactic values (median ~4-5) remain dynamically viable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    K., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524984 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..175..297A 175, 297

    Adelman-McCarthy J. K., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524984 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..175..297A 175, 297

    doi:10.1086/524984 2008

  2. [2]

    Aihara H., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psx081 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70S...8A 70, S8

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx081 2018

  3. [3]

    M., Smail I., Bauer F

    Alexander D. M., Smail I., Bauer F. E., Chapman S. C., Blain A. W., Brandt W. N., Ivison R. J., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03473 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.434..738A 434, 738

    work page doi:10.1038/nature03473

  4. [4]

    M., Bauer F

    Alexander D. M., Bauer F. E., Chapman S. C., Smail I., Blain A. W., Brandt W. N., Ivison R. J., 2005b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/444342 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632..736A 632, 736

    doi:10.1086/444342

  5. [5]

    G., Boggs W

    Baker J. G., Boggs W. D., Centrella J., Kelly B. J., McWilliams S. T., Miller M. C., van Meter J. R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590927 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...682L..29B 682, L29

    doi:10.1086/590927 2008

  6. [6]

    D., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152255 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...183..657B 183, 657

    Bekenstein J. D., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152255 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...183..657B 183, 657

    doi:10.1086/152255 1973

  7. [7]

    Campanelli M., Lousto C., Zlochower Y., Merritt D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516712 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659L...5C 659, L5

    doi:10.1086/516712 2007

  8. [8]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    doi:10.1086/167900 1989

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    L., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339306 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.1838C 123, 1838

    Carilli C. L., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339306 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.1838C 123, 1838

    2002 doi

  2. [10]

    Carilli C. L., Riechers D., Walter F., Maiolino R., Wagg J., Lentati L., McMahon R., Wolfe A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/120 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763..120C 763, 120

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    2003 doi

  4. [12]

    Cicone C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322464 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Civano F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/49 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...752...49C 752, 49

    2012 doi

  6. [14]

    M., Huchra J

    Cutri R. M., Huchra J. P., Low F. J., Brown R. L., Vanden Bout P. A., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1994ApJ...424L..65C 424, L65

    1994 doi

  7. [15]

    I., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11383.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.375.1099D 375, 1099

    Davies R. I., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11383.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.375.1099D 375, 1099

    2007

  8. [16]

    I., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322282 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    Davies R. I., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322282 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    P., Rawlings S., Marshall P

    Deane R. P., Rawlings S., Marshall P. J., Heywood I., Kl \"o ckner H.-R., Grainge K., Mauch T., Serjeant S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts520 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430....2D 430, 2

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Decarli R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854...97D 854, 97

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    arXiv:1906.05308

    Decarli R., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190605308D p. arXiv:1906.05308

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Y., Wu X.-B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/70 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824...70D 824, 70

    Dong X. Y., Wu X.-B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/70 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824...70D 824, 70

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    Eales S., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1086/653086 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASP..122..499E 122, 499

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Efstathiou A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt131 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437L..16E 437, L16

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    L., Viswanathan A., Patton D

    Ellison S. L., Viswanathan A., Patton D. R., Bottrell C., McConnachie A. W., Gwyn S., Cuillandre J.-C., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190508830E

    2019

  16. [24]

    Elvis M., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...95....1E 95, 1

    1994 doi

  17. [25]

    Falgarone E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature23298 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.548..430F 548, 430

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    L., Malaguti G., Palazzi E., Persic M., 2000, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    Franceschini A., Bassani L., Cappi M., Granato G. L., Malaguti G., Palazzi E., Persic M., 2000, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A

    2000

  19. [27]

    T., Ivison R

    Frayer D. T., Ivison R. J., Scoville N. Z., Yun M., Evans A. S., Smail I., Blain A. W., Kneib J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311639 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...506L...7F 506, L7

    1998 doi

  20. [28]

    T., Maddalena R

    Frayer D. T., Maddalena R. J., Ivison R. J., Smail I., Blain A. W., Vanden Bout P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac49a , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...860...87F 860, 87

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C

    Freudling W., Romaniello M., Bramich D. M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C. E., Moehler S., Neeser M. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    Fu H., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12184 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.498..338F 498, 338

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2721 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.1789G 465, 1789

    Geach J. E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2721 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.1789G 465, 1789

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    S., Messias H., Nagar N

    G \'o mez J. S., Messias H., Nagar N. M., Orellana G., Ivison R. J., van der Werf P., 2018, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv180601951G

    2018

  25. [33]

    R., Liu M

    Graham J. R., Liu M. C., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309629 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...449L..29G 449, L29

    1995 doi

  26. [34]

    J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    Griffin M. J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    P., Mullaney J

    Grimmett L. P., Mullaney J. R., Jin S., Bernhard E., Daddi E., Walters K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1558 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4071G 487, 4071

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    u ver T., \

    G \"u ver T., \"O zel F., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15598.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.400.2050G 400, 2050

    2009

  29. [37]

    I., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/152 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...752..152H 752, 152

    Harris A. I., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/152 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...752..152H 752, 152

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw001 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457L.122H 457, L122

    Harrison C. M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slw001 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457L.122H 457, L122

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    K., Salvador-Sol \'e E., Wang L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2073 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4974H 480, 4974

    Hatziminaoglou E., Farrah D., Humphreys E., Manrique A., P \'e rez-Fournon I., Pitchford L. K., Salvador-Sol \'e E., Wang L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2073 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4974H 480, 4974

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    C., Kere s D., Jonsson P., Narayanan D., Cox T

    Hayward C. C., Kere s D., Jonsson P., Narayanan D., Cox T. J., Hernquist L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/159 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...743..159H 743, 159

    2011 doi

  33. [41]

    C., Wills B

    Hines D. C., Wills B. J., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173145 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...415...82H 415, 82

    1993 doi

  34. [42]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1846 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..130H 876, 130

    Hodge J. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1846 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..130H 876, 130

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts612 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2513H 430, 2513

    Holland W. S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts612 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.2513H 430, 2513

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    Ikarashi S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/133 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...810..133I 810, 133

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    Iono D., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506344 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...645L..97I 645, L97

    2006 doi

  38. [46]

    J., Ibata R

    Irwin M. J., Ibata R. A., Lewis G. F., Totten E. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...505..529I 505, 529

    1998 doi

  39. [47]

    G., McMahon R

    Isaak K. G., McMahon R. G., Hills R. E., Withington S., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/269.1.L28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.269L..28I 269, L28

    1994 doi

  40. [48]

    G., Priddey R

    Isaak K. G., Priddey R. S., McMahon R. G., Omont A., Peroux C., Sharp R. G., Withington S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04966.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.329..149I 329, 149

    2002

  41. [49]

    J., 1995, , http://ukads.nottingham.ac.uk/abs/1995MNRAS.275L..33I 275, L33

    Ivison R. J., 1995, , http://ukads.nottingham.ac.uk/abs/1995MNRAS.275L..33I 275, L33

    1995

  42. [50]

    J., Smail I., Le Borgne J., Blain A

    Ivison R. J., Smail I., Le Borgne J., Blain A. W., Kneib J., Bezecourt J., Kerr T. H., Davies J. K., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01677.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.298..583I 298, 583

    1998

  43. [51]

    J., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423249 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..124I 154, 124

    Ivison R. J., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423249 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..124I 154, 124

    2004 doi

  44. [53]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/137 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..137I 772, 137

    Ivison R. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/137 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..137I 772, 137

    2013 doi

  45. [54]

    W., Brandt W

    Just D. W., Brandt W. N., Shemmer O., Steffen A. T., Schneider D. P., Chartas G., Garmire G. P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519990 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1004J 665, 1004

    2007 doi

  46. [55]

    Karim A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt196 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432....2K 432, 2

    2013 doi

  47. [56]

    Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305588 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...498..541K 498, 541

    1998 doi

  48. [57]

    K., van der Werf P

    Knudsen K. K., van der Werf P. P., Jaffe W., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031291 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A

    2003 doi

  49. [58]

    D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aab9b4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..236...48K 236, 48

    Kocevski D. D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aab9b4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..236...48K 236, 48

    2018 doi

  50. [59]

    Koss M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/L42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...735L..42K 735, L42

    2011 doi

  51. [60]

    Lacy M., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422816 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..166L 154, 166

    2004 doi

  52. [61]

    Leipski C., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..34L 518, L34

    2010 doi

  53. [62]

    Leung T. K. D., Hayward C. C., Casey C. M., Staguhn J., Kovacs A., Dowell C. D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab11ce , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...48L 876, 48

    2019 doi

  54. [63]

    C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf057 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870...80L 870, 80

    Litke K. C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf057 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870...80L 870, 80

    2019 doi

  55. [64]

    S., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09413.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.362.1371L 362, 1371

    Loaring N. S., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09413.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.362.1371L 362, 1371

    2005

  56. [65]

    Loeb A., 2007, @doi [Physical Review Letters] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.041103 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhRvL..99d1103L 99, 041103

    2007 doi

  57. [66]

    O., Zlochower Y., 2011a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024003 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvD..83b4003L 83, 024003

    Lousto C. O., Zlochower Y., 2011a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024003 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvD..83b4003L 83, 024003

    doi

  58. [67]

    O., Zlochower Y., 2011b, @doi [Physical Review Letters] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.231102 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvL.107w1102L 107, 231102

    Lousto C. O., Zlochower Y., 2011b, @doi [Physical Review Letters] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.231102 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvL.107w1102L 107, 231102

    doi

  59. [68]

    Lu N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa77fc , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...842L..16L 842, L16

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    H., Warwick R

    Lumb D. H., Warwick R. S., Page M., De Luca A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020531 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A

    2002 doi

  61. [71]

    J., 1999, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Ap

    Lutz D., Tacconi L. J., 1999, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Ap

    1999

  62. [72]

    Ma Z., Yan H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/58 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...811...58M 811, 58

    2015 doi

  63. [73]

    Mainieri V., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08600.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.356.1571M 356, 1571

    2005

  64. [74]

    Maiolino R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425L..66M 425, L66

    2012

  65. [75]

    Mateos S., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041340 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A

    2005 doi

  66. [76]

    Mateos S., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913187 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  67. [77]

    McAlpine S., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1692 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.tmp.1605M p. 1605

    2019 doi

  68. [78]

    G., Omont A., Bergeron J., Kreysa E., Haslam C

    McMahon R. G., Omont A., Bergeron J., Kreysa E., Haslam C. G. T., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/267.1.L9L , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994MNRAS.267L...9M 267, L9

    1994 doi

  69. [79]

    P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K., 2007, in Shaw R

    McMullin J. P., Waters B., Schiebel D., Young W., Golap K., 2007, in Shaw R. A., Hill F., Bell D. J., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI. p. 127

    2007

  70. [80]

    J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201218896 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    Mehdipour M., Branduardi-Raymont G., Page M. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201218896 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  71. [81]

    W., Swinbank M., Smail I., Ivison R

    Men \'e ndez-Delmestre K., Blain A. W., Swinbank M., Smail I., Ivison R. J., Chapman S. C., Gon c alves T. S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/151 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..151M 767, 151

    2013 doi

  72. [82]

    Narayanan D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature15383 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.525..496N 525, 496

    2015 doi

  73. [83]

    J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20912.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.1614O 424, 1614

    Oliver S. J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20912.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.1614O 424, 1614

    2012

  74. [84]

    G., Cox P., Kreysa E., Bergeron J., Pajot F., Storrie-Lombardi L

    Omont A., McMahon R. G., Cox P., Kreysa E., Bergeron J., Pajot F., Storrie-Lombardi L. J., 1996a, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A

  75. [85]

    G., Solomon P

    Omont A., Petitjean P., Guilloteau S., McMahon R. G., Solomon P. M., P \'e contal E., 1996b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/382428a0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Natur.382..428O 382, 428

    doi

  76. [86]

    Oteo I., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/34 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...34O 827, 34

    2016 doi

  77. [87]

    Oteo I., et al., 2017a, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170904191O ( @eprint arXiv 1709.04191 )

    arXiv

  78. [88]

    A., Ivison R

    Oteo I., Zwaan M. A., Ivison R. J., Smail I., Biggs A. D., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5da4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..182O 837, 182

    doi

  79. [89]

    Oteo I., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1f1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...72O 856, 72

    2018 doi

  80. [91]

    J., Ho L

    Panessa F., Bassani L., Cappi M., Dadina M., Barcons X., Carrera F. J., Ho L. C., Iwasawa K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064894 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A

    2006 doi

  81. [92]

    Rev.] 10.1103/PhysRev.128.2471 , 128, 2471

    Peres A., 1962, @doi [Phys. Rev.] 10.1103/PhysRev.128.2471 , 128, 2471

    1962 doi

  82. [93]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014759 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    Pilbratt G. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014759 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  83. [94]

    K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1840 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.4067P 462, 4067

    Pitchford L. K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1840 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.4067P 462, 4067

    2016 doi

  84. [95]

    S., Isaak K

    Priddey R. S., Isaak K. G., McMahon R. G., Omont A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06279.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.339.1183P 339, 1183

    2003

  85. [96]

    E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.4320R 486, 4320

    Ramasawmy J., Stevens J., Martin G., Geach J. E., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.4320R 486, 4320

    2019 doi

  86. [97]

    T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506525 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..470R 166, 470

    Richards G. T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506525 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..166..470R 166, 470

    2006 doi

  87. [98]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12050 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.496..329R 496, 329

    Riechers D. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12050 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.496..329R 496, 329

    2013 doi

  88. [99]

    A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ccf , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850....1R 850, 1

    Riechers D. A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ccf , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850....1R 850, 1

    2017 doi

  89. [100]

    R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A...1R 590, A1

    Rosen S. R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526416 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A...1R 590, A1

    2016 doi

  90. [101]

    Rowan-Robinson M., Wang L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16733.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406..720R 406, 720

    2010

  91. [102]

    Rowan-Robinson M., et al., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1038/351719a0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991Natur.351..719R 351, 719

    1991 doi

  92. [103]

    J., Panessa F., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A

    Ruiz A., Carrera F. J., Panessa F., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066708 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A

    2007 doi

  93. [104]

    arXiv:1904.04507

    Rujopakarn W., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190404507R p. arXiv:1904.04507

    2019 arXiv

  94. [105]

    Salom \'e P., Gu \'e lin M., Downes D., Cox P., Guilloteau S., Omont A., Gavazzi R., Neri R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219955 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  95. [106]

    B., Soifer B

    Sanders D. B., Soifer B. T., Elias J. H., Madore B. F., Matthews K., Neugebauer G., Scoville N. Z., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/165983 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...325...74S 325, 74

    1988 doi

  96. [107]

    Schulze A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aae82f , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..239...22S 239, 22

    2018 doi

  97. [108]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/81 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...81S 799, 81

    Simpson J. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/81 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...81S 799, 81

    2015 doi

  98. [109]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65d0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...58S 839, 58

    Simpson J. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65d0 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...58S 839, 58

    2017 doi

  99. [110]

    R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty458 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.5075S 476, 5075

    Stacey H. R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty458 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.5075S 476, 5075

    2018 doi

  100. [111]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4648S 487, 4648

    Stach S. M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4648S 487, 4648

    2019 doi

  101. [112]

    V., Brandt W

    Strateva I. V., Brandt W. N., Schneider D. P., Vanden Berk D. G., Vignali C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/431247 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130..387S 130, 387

    2005 doi

  102. [113]

    N., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., Reynolds C

    Tombesi F., Mel \'e ndez M., Veilleux S., Reeves J. N., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., Reynolds C. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14261 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.519..436T 519, 436

    2015 doi

  103. [114]

    Valiante E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1806 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3146V 462, 3146

    2016 doi

  104. [115]

    Veilleux S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/27 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...776...27V 776, 27

    2013 doi

  105. [116]

    Veilleux S., Bolatto A., Tombesi F., Mel \'e ndez M., Sturm E., Gonz \'a lez-Alfonso E., Fischer J., Rupke D. S. N., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa767d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...18V 843, 18

    2017 doi

  106. [117]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadf35 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..159V 866, 159

    Venemans B. P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadf35 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..159V 866, 159

    2018 doi

  107. [118]

    Vernet J., Cimatti A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011442 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A

    2001 doi

  108. [119]

    Wagg J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/752/2/L30 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...752L..30W 752, L30

    2012 doi

  109. [120]

    Wagg J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/71 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...783...71W 783, 71

    2014 doi

  110. [121]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    Wright E. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    2010 doi

  111. [122]

    D., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522776 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.1531Y 671, 1531

    Younger J. D., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522776 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.1531Y 671, 1531

    2007 doi

  112. [123]

    D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591931 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...688...59Y 688, 59

    Younger J. D., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591931 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...688...59Y 688, 59

    2008 doi

  113. [124]

    S., Carilli C

    Yun M. S., Carilli C. L., Kawabe R., Tutui Y., Kohno K., Ohta K., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308164 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528..171Y 528, 171

    2000 doi

  114. [125]

    J., Papadopoulos P

    Zhang Z.-Y., Romano D., Ivison R. J., Papadopoulos P. P., Matteucci F., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0196-x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.558..260Z 558, 260

    2018 doi

  115. [126]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.