Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 51 references

Spectral Stability of the $\bar\partial-$Neumann Laplacian: Domain Perturbations

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The variational eigenvalues of the ∂-Neumann Laplacian are Lipschitz stable under Hausdorff perturbation of smooth bounded pseudoconvex domains of uniform finite D'Angelo type.

desk verdict First stability theory for ∂-Neumann variational eigenvalues under Hausdorff perturbation; sound and novel, but the proof of one half of the central linear-rate theorem is omitted, so the headline claim is not fully verified. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03256 v1 pith:4OO36FFX submitted 2019-08-08 math.CV math.AP

Siqi Fu , Weixia Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CVmath.AP MSC 32W0532G0535J2535P15
keywords ∂-NeumannLaplacianspectralstabilityvariationaleigenvaluespseudoconvexdomainproperty(P)finitetypeconditionHausdorffdistanceresolventconvergence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to the spectrum of the $\bar\partial$-Neumann Laplacian, the basic self-adjoint operator behind $L^2$ methods in several complex variables, when the underlying domain in $\mathbb{C}^n$ is slightly deformed. It proves that for bounded pseudoconvex domains the variational eigenvalues are upper semi-continuous in the Hausdorff distance: a small perturbation cannot push any eigenvalue upward by more than an arbitrarily small amount. With the additional potential-theoretic assumption known as property (P), it proves the matching lower semi-continuity, so the eigenvalues actually converge under domain perturbation. The main quantitative result is that on smooth bounded pseudoconvex domains of uniform finite D'Angelo type, the $k$-th variational eigenvalue changes by at most a constant $C_k$ times the Hausdorff distance between the two domains—a linear, Lipschitz rate that the authors show is sharp. This matters because exact $\bar\partial$-Neumann spectra are almost never computable; the result guarantees that approximating a domain in Hausdorff distance gives a controlled approximation of its spectrum.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $k$-th variational eigenvalue $\lambda_k^q(\Omega)$ of the $\bar\partial$-Neumann Laplacian, defined by the min-max principle over $k$-dimensional subspaces of the quadratic-form domain $\mathrm{Dom}(Q_q)$. The load-bearing mechanism is the decomposition of a $(0,q)$-form into tangential and normal components at the boundary: the tangential component is handled like a classical Neumann problem and the normal component like a Dirichlet problem, which overcomes the non-coercive nature of the $\bar\partial$-Neumann boundary conditions. This decomposition is combined with the plurisubharmonic barrier construction of finite-type theory (which yields subelliptic estimates and boundary decay for eigenforms) and with a sharp Hardy inequality and boundary estimates for elliptic operators to produce the quantitative eigenvalue comparison. A general spectral-stability lemma (Lemma 2.1) converts closeness of the transported quadratic forms into a bound on the variational eigenvalues.

What would settle it

Compute, for a family of smooth bounded pseudoconvex domains of uniform finite $D_q$-type converging in Hausdorff distance to a limit domain $\Omega$, the ratio $|\lambda_1^q(\Omega_j) - \lambda_1^q(\Omega)| / d_H(\Omega_j, \Omega)$. If this ratio is unbounded as $j \to \infty$, Theorem 1.3 is false. A concrete place to look is a family of smoothly flattened ellipsoids whose defining functions are renormalized to keep all $C^\infty$ norms and subellipticity constants bounded; the ball computation of Remark 4 shows the calculation is feasible and the ratio is nonzero there.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is quantitative spectral stability in the finite-type regime. For smooth bounded pseudoconvex domains $\Omega_j$ and $\Omega$ in $\mathbb{C}^n$ that are of uniform finite $D_q$-type, $1 \le q \le n-1$, the paper establishes that for every positive integer $k$ there exist constants $\delta > 0$ and $C_k > 0$ such that $|\lambda_k^q(\Omega_j) - \lambda_k^q(\Omega)| \le C_k \, d_H(\Omega, \Omega_j)$ whenever the Hausdorff distance $d_H(\Omega, \Omega_j) < \delta$. The linear dependence on $d_H$ is sharp: for the unit ball $B$, the scaling $\lambda_k^q(rB) = r^{-2}\lambda_k^q(B)$ gives a gap proportional to $d_H(rB, B)$, so no exponent better than $1$ is possible in general. The proof works by decomposing forms in the domain of the quadratic form into tangential and normal components—the tangential part behaves like a Neumann problem and the normal part like a Dirichlet problem—and then controlling both with the plurisubharmonic barrier construction of finite-type theory, a sharp Hardy inequality, and boundary estimates for elliptic operators.

Load-bearing premise

The linear rate assumes the entire family of perturbed domains shares uniform finite $D_q$-type—the same subellipticity constants and uniformly bounded $C^\infty$ norms of the defining functions—so that the barrier, Hardy, and boundary estimates hold with constants independent of the domain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any bounded pseudoconvex domain with $C^1$ boundary, the variational eigenvalues cannot jump upward under a Hausdorff-small pseudoconvex perturbation (Theorem 1.1), and they converge if the limit satisfies property (P) (Corollary 4.5).
  • When the limit domain is smooth, bounded, pseudoconvex, and of finite $D_q$-type, an upper bound of the form $\lambda_k^q(\Omega_j) - \lambda_k^q(\Omega) \le C_k \sqrt{\delta_j}$ holds even without uniform type assumptions on the approximating domains (Theorem 5.6).
  • The $\bar\partial$-Neumann Laplacian converges in the strong resolvent sense for any sequence of bounded pseudoconvex domains with $C^1$ boundaries converging in Hausdorff distance; norm resolvent convergence can fail when the boundary of the limit contains complex varieties (Theorem 6.1 and Remark 5).
  • The linear rate in the finite-type theorem is optimal: the ball family shows that the eigenvalue gap can be exactly proportional to the Hausdorff distance (Remark 4).
  • Together, the upper and lower semi-continuity results give full continuity of the variational eigenvalues for pseudoconvex domains satisfying property (P) on the relevant form levels, extending classical domain-perturbation results for the Dirichlet and Neumann Laplacians to the non-coercive setting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The tangential/normal decomposition strategy is likely to transfer to other non-coercive boundary-value problems whose quadratic forms respect a similar splitting (for instance, the Kohn Laplacian on CR manifolds with boundary), giving analogous stability statements that the authors do not state.
  • The proof shows that the key input is not literally D'Angelo type but the uniform subellipticity estimate (5.2); any family of domains with uniformly controlled subellipticity constants and defining-function norms would satisfy the same Lipschitz conclusion, so the theorem can be read as a spectral-stability result for uniform property $(P^\alpha_q)$.
  • A testable prediction from the quantitative method: if the subellipticity exponent $\alpha$ in the family degenerates to $0$, the optimal rate should degrade from $\delta$ to $\delta^{\alpha/(\alpha+1)}$ (the general bound in Theorem 5.4), so the linear rate is intrinsically tied to a uniform positive lower bound on $\alpha$.
  • The strong resolvent convergence suggests that numerical or approximate computations of $\bar\partial$-Neumann spectra—for example, on smoothly approximated domains—are mathematically justified for pseudoconvex domains with $C^1$ boundaries, which could be useful in computational complex analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper develops spectral stability theory for the variational eigenvalues of the ∂-Neumann Laplacian when the underlying bounded pseudoconvex domain is perturbed in Hausdorff distance. The main results are: (1) upper semicontinuity of λ_k^q under arbitrary pseudoconvex perturbations of a domain with C^1 boundary (Theorem 1.1); (2) lower semicontinuity for targets satisfying Catlin's property (P_{q−1}) (Theorem 1.2); (3) quantitative two-sided estimates on finite-type domains, culminating in the linear Lipschitz bound |λ_k^q(Ω_j)−λ_k^q(Ω)| ≤ C_k δ_j under uniform finite D_q-type (Theorem 1.3, from (5.22)); and (4) strong resolvent convergence of the ∂-Neumann Laplacians (Theorem 6.1). The proofs compare quadratic forms through transition operators built from Straube-type regularization, normal shifts, extension operators, and apply the min-max perturbation lemma (Lemma 2.1).

Significance. The quantitative stability theorem is the paper's central contribution. A linear-in-δ bound for variational eigenvalues of a non-coercive boundary value problem under domain perturbation would be a substantial advance, and Remark 4 shows the linear rate is sharp for balls. The paper is largely self-contained in its use of established tools (Hörmander's L2 estimates, Catlin's subelliptic theory, Straube's regularization, Brezis–Marcus and Davies estimates) and contains no fitted parameters or circularity. The upper semicontinuity and resolvent convergence parts are proved in detail. However, the two-sided quantitative conclusions rest on reverse inequalities whose proofs are omitted; until those are supplied, the headline theorem is not fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 5.6, (5.22); Theorem 1.3] The proof of Theorem 5.6 establishes only the second inequality in (5.22), i.e. λ_k^q(Ω_j)−λ_k^q(Ω) ≤ C_kδ_j, and the first inequality is dismissed with 'proved similarly and is left to the interested reader.' This first inequality is exactly the lower half of the two-sided bound in Theorem 1.3, so the omission is load-bearing. The reverse direction requires a transition operator mapping Dom(Q_{Ω_j}) into Dom(Q_Ω), uniform boundary-layer estimates for eigenforms of Ω_j obtained from Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.5 under the uniform finite-type hypothesis, and a uniform extension operator for the family Ω_j. None of these estimates are written. In addition, the application of Lemma 2.1 requires estimates on k-dimensional orthonormal sets and their cross terms; the manuscript verifies estimates only for a single normalized eigenform of Ω. Please complete this direction with full uniform constants.
  2. [Theorem 5.4, (5.11)] The proof of Theorem 5.4 states 'The proof of the other inequality in Theorem 5.4 is similar and is left to the interested reader.' Since (5.11) is presented as a two-sided quantitative estimate, and the missing direction is an upper bound with rate δ^{α/(α+1)} that is not a formal consequence of the qualitative Theorem 3.5, this is not a cosmetic omission. The reverse transition from eigenforms of Ω to test forms on Ω_j must be supplied, including the boundary-layer estimates corresponding to (5.15)–(5.16) on the Ω_j side. As written, Theorem 5.4 is only half-proved.
  3. [Theorem 1.3 and the definition before Lemma 5.5] The hypothesis 'Suppose Ω_j and Ω are of uniform finite D_q-type' is ambiguous because uniformity is defined only for a family of domains with a common constant C in (5.2) and uniformly bounded defining functions. To make the linear rate in (5.22) meaningful, the statement must require that the enlarged family {Ω_j} ∪ {Ω} satisfies these uniform bounds. If Ω is not included in the uniform family, the constant C_k in (1.3) could a priori depend on j, and the uniform estimates from Lemma 5.5 used to improve δ^{1/2} to δ would fail. Please restate the theorem with the family explicitly containing Ω and with the uniform constants identified.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Remark 3, Section 4] The sentence 'Since Ω does not have Stein neighborhood basis ([DF77b]), we have This follows from the fact that...' is grammatically incomplete and does not convey the intended argument. Please rewrite the remark.
  2. [Lemma 4.2] The function b is constructed only on a neighborhood U of ∂Ω, but Lemma 4.1 is applied on all of Ω_j. Please add a sentence or a citation explaining the standard extension of b to a bounded plurisubharmonic function on Ω_j with the same Hessian lower bound on the boundary collar.
  3. [Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.1] The proofs of these two lemmas are omitted. A one-sentence indication that they follow from Lemma 4.2 with δ^{2α} in place of ε^2 would help the reader verify the uniformity of the constants.
  4. [Theorem 5.6 proof] The estimates in the proof are written for one normalized eigenform f of Ω. The step to Lemma 2.1 requires estimates for an orthonormal k-tuple and for the inner products ⟨T_j f_h, T_j f_l⟩−δ_{hl}; the polarization argument and the dependence of the constants on λ_k(Ω) should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Proof of Theorem 5.6, (5.43)] The improvement from δ^{1/2} to δ for the cross term in the uniform finite-type case relies on the volume bound |A_{j,3δ_j}| = O(δ_j) and uniform C^0 bounds on f_{δ_j}−Ef, which follow from the uniform C^∞ bounds on the defining functions but are not stated. Please add a sentence.
  6. [Section 6, Remark 5(2)] The phrase 'N_j does not converges to N in norm' should read 'N_j does not converge to N in norm'.
  7. [Definition before Lemma 5.5] The phrase 'the C∞-norm of ρ_j is uniformly bounded' should be quantified as uniform bounds on all derivatives of ρ_j up to each order; the singular 'C∞-norm' is imprecise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the stability estimates are derived from external subelliptic estimates, Hardy inequalities, and explicit transition operators; the omitted reverse inequality is a proof gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central results (Theorems 1.1-1.3) are derived by constructing explicit transition operators between quadratic-form domains and applying Lemma 2.1, with quantitative control supplied by Hörmander's L2 estimates, Catlin's subelliptic plurisubharmonic construction, Straube's regularization, the Brezis-Marcus Hardy inequality, and Davies' boundary estimates. No parameter is fitted to any eigenvalue data and no 'prediction' is statistically forced by an input. The self-citations ([Fu08], [Fu10], [FS98], [FS01], [FS02], [CF05]) appear as background spectral characterizations or illustrative remarks and are not load-bearing premises for the stability results. The main caveat is not circularity: the first inequality in (5.22) is explicitly left to the reader ('The first inequality of (5.22) is proved similarly and is left to the interested reader'), and the analogous reverse-direction estimate in Theorem 5.4 is also omitted; these are completeness gaps in the written proof of the two-sided rate, not reductions of the claim to its own assumptions. Lemma 3.4's (3.18) is likewise left to the reader but is a routine analogue of (3.17). Remark 3 contains a garbled sentence and a self-citation to [Fu10], but it only illustrates failure of lower semicontinuity without property (P), so it does not carry the main theorem. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external theorems and has no definitional or fitted-input circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The proofs rely on established tools from L2 ∂-Neumann theory, including Hörmander estimates, Catlin's finite-type theory, Straube's regularization, and Hardy-Davies boundary estimates. The main domain-level input for the strongest quantitative theorem is the uniform finite type condition.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Hörmander L2 estimates give uniform boundedness of ∂N and N∂ on bounded pseudoconvex domains.
    Used in Lemma 3.1 to show the regularization operator T is close to the identity; see proof of Lemma 3.1 and [CS99, Theorem 4.4.1].
  • standard math Catlin's subelliptic theorem: smooth bounded pseudoconvex domains of finite D_q-type satisfy subelliptic estimate (5.1) and admit plurisubharmonic barriers with Hessian lower bound (5.2).
    Basis of Section 5; the quantitative estimates inherit the exponent α from Catlin's construction [Ca83, Ca87].
  • standard math Property(P_q) implies boundary mass estimates such as Lemma 4.2 via Catlin's and Straube's compactness results.
    Used in Section 4 for lower semicontinuity; Theorem 1.2 assumes Property(P_{q-1}) exactly at this point.
  • domain assumption The target domain in Theorem 1.2 satisfies Catlin Property(P_{q-1}).
    This is the structural hypothesis that yields precompactness of extensions of eigenforms through Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3.
  • standard math Smooth compactly supported forms are dense in Dom(∂^*) in graph norm, and Straube's regularization operator T defined by (3.1) maps Dom(Q_1) into Dom(Q_2).
    Needed for the upper semicontinuity proofs in Section 3; the density fact is cited and used in Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 3.5.
  • standard math Brezis-Marcus Hardy inequality and Davies boundary estimate, Lemma 5.7 and inequality (5.32), control normal components of eigenforms near the boundary.
    Used to prove Lemma 5.8 and the δ and δ^{1/2} rates in Theorem 5.6.
  • standard math The signed distance to a C^1 boundary is C^1 in a neighborhood of the boundary, by Krantz-Parks.
    Justifies the normal perturbations f(z ± 2δ n_l) used in the push-out and push-in constructions throughout Sections 3 and 4.
  • domain assumption Uniform finite D_q-type is assumed for Theorem 1.3: there are constants α, δ_0, C uniform in j such that (5.2) holds on all Ω_j, with uniformly bounded C^∞ norms of defining functions.
    This is an assumption on the family Ω_j, not derived from Hausdorff convergence; it enters the linear rate in Theorem 5.6.
  • standard math Diederich-Fornaess worm domains with winding greater than π do not have a Stein neighborhood basis.
    Invoked in Remark 3 to explain failure of lower semicontinuity on level sets; the remark itself is incompletely written.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral Stability of the $\bar\partial-$Neumann Laplacian: Domain Perturbations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4OO36FFX

@misc{pith2026190803256,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral Stability of the $\bar\partial-$Neumann Laplacian: Domain Perturbations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4OO36FFX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03256}
}
abstract

We study spectral stability of the $\bar\partial$-Neumann Laplacian on a bounded domain in $\mathbb{C}^n$ when the underlying domain is perturbed. In particular, we establish upper semi-continuity properties for the variational eigenvalues of the $\bar\partial$-Neumann Laplacian on bounded pseudoconvex domains in $\mathbb{C}^n$, lower semi-continuity properties on pseudoconvex domains that satisfy property ($P$), and quantitative estimates on smooth bounded pseudoconvex domains of finite D'Angelo type in $\mathbb{C}^n$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Straube , Global regularity for the -Neumann problem: a survey of the L^2 - S obolev theory , Several Complex Variables, MSRI Publications, vol

    Harold Boas and Emil J. Straube , Global regularity for the -Neumann problem: a survey of the L^2 - S obolev theory , Several Complex Variables, MSRI Publications, vol. 37 (1999), M. Schneider and Y.-T. Siu, editors, 79-112

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Dedicated to Ennio De Giorgi, Ann

    Ha\" i m Brezis and Moshe Marcus, Hardy's inequalities revisited. Dedicated to Ennio De Giorgi, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 25 (1997), 217–237

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    V. I. Burenkov and P. D. Lamberti, Spectral stability of general non-negative self-adjoint operators with applications to Neumann-type operators, J. Differential Equations 233 (2007), 345--379

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    David Catlin, Necessary conditions for subellipticity of the - Neumann problem , Ann. of Math. 117 (1983), 147--171

    1983

  5. [5]

    , Global regularity of the - Neumann problem , Complex Analysis of Several Variables (Yum-Tong Siu, ed.), Proc. of Symp. in Pure Math. no. 41, Ameri. Math. Soc. 1984, pp. 39--49

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    , Boundary invariants of pseudoconvex domains, Ann. Math. 120 (1984), 529--586

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    , Subelliptic estimates for the - Neumann problem on pseudoconvex domains , Ann. of Math. 126 (1987), no. 1, 131--191

    1987

  8. [8]

    Debraj Chakrabarti and Mei-Chi Shaw, The Cauchy-Riemann equations on product domains, Math. Ann. 349(2011), 977--998

    work page 2011

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Boyong Chen and Siqi Fu, Comparison of the Bergman and Szeg\" o kernels , Adv. Math. 228(2011), 2366-2384

    2011

  2. [10]

    , Stability of the Bergman kernel on a tower of coverings, Journal of Differential Geometry 104 (2016) 371--398

    2016

  3. [11]

    So-Chin Chen and Mei-Chi Shaw, Partial differential equations in several complex variables, AMS/IP, 2000

    2000

  4. [12]

    Michael Christ and Siqi Fu, Compactness in the -Neumann problem, magnetic Schr\" o dinger operators, and the Aharonov-Bohm effect , Adv. Math. 197 (2005), 1-40

    2005

  5. [13]

    John D'Angelo, Real hypersurfaces, orders of contact, and applications, Ann. of Math. (2) 115 (1982), no. 3, 615--637

    1982

  6. [14]

    CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993

    , Several complex variables and the geometry of real hypersurfaces, Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993

    1993

  7. [15]

    D'Angelo and J

    John P. D'Angelo and J. J. Kohn, Subelliptic estimates and finite type, Several Complex Variables, MSRI Publications, vol. 37 (1999), M. Schneider and Y.-T. Siu, editors, 199-232

    1999

  8. [16]

    E. B. Davies, Spectral theory and differential operators, Cambridge Studies in advanced mathematics, vol. 42, Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  9. [17]

    129, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp

    , Sharp boundary estimates for elliptic operators , in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 129, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 165--178

    2000

  10. [18]

    Diederich and J

    K. Diederich and J. E. Forn ss, Pseudoconvex domains: bounded strictly plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions , Invent. Math. 39 (1977), 129--141

    1977

  11. [19]

    Diederich and J

    K. Diederich and J. E. Forn ss, Pseudoconvex domains: An example with nontrivial N ebenh \" u lle , Math. Ann. 225 (1977), 275--292

    1977

  12. [20]

    L. C. Evans , Partial differential equations , vol. 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second ed., 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    G. B. Folland, The tangential Cauchy-Riemann complex on spheres, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 171 (1972), 83--133

    1972

  14. [22]

    G. B. Folland and J. J. Kohn, The Neumann problem for the Cauchy-Riemann complex , Annals of Mathematics Studies, no. 75, Princeton University Press, 1972

    1972

  15. [23]

    Siqi Fu, Hearing pseudoconvexity with the Kohn Laplacian, Math. Ann. 331 (2005), 475--485

    2005

  16. [24]

    , Spectrum of the -Neumann Laplacian on polydiscs, Proc. Amer. Math. Society 135 (2007) 725-730

    2007

  17. [25]

    Siqi Fu, Hearing the type of a domain in ^2 with the -Neumann Laplacian, Adv. Math. 219 (2008), no. 2, 568--603

    2008

  18. [26]

    Ebenfelt, N

    , Positivity of the -Neumann Laplacian, Complex Analysis (Fribourg 2008), edited by P. Ebenfelt, N. Hungerbuhler, J. Kohn, N. Mok, and E. Straube, Trends in Mathematics, Springer, 2010, 145-158

    2008

  19. [27]

    Siqi Fu, Christine Laurent-Thi\' e baut and Mei-Chi Shaw, Hearing pseudoconvexity in Lipschitz domains with holes via , Mathematische Zeitschrift, 287 (2017), 1157-1181

    2017

  20. [28]

    Straube, Compactness of the - N eumann problem on convex domains , J

    Siqi Fu and Emil J. Straube, Compactness of the - N eumann problem on convex domains , J. Funct. Anal. 159(1998), 629-641

    1998

  21. [29]

    McNeal, ed.), Ohio State University Mathmatical Research Institute Publication 9, de Gruyter, 2001, 141-160

    , Compactness in the -Neumann problem, Complex Analysis and Geometry (J. McNeal, ed.), Ohio State University Mathmatical Research Institute Publication 9, de Gruyter, 2001, 141-160

    2001

  22. [30]

    , Semi-classical analysis of Schr\" o dinger operators and compactness in the -Neumann problem , J. Math. Anal. Appl. 271 (2002) 267-282. Correction, 280(2003) 195-196

    2002

  23. [31]

    Bent Fuglede, Continuous domain dependence of the eigenvalues of the Dirichlet Laplacian and related operators in Hilbert space, J. Funct. Anal. 167 (1999), 183--200

    1999

  24. [32]

    Harrington, Global regularity for the --Neumann operator and bounded plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions, Adv

    P. Harrington, Global regularity for the --Neumann operator and bounded plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions, Adv. Math. 228 (2011), 2522--2551

    2011

  25. [33]

    , Bounded plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions for Lipschitz pseudoconvex domains in ^n , J. Geom. Anal. 27 (2017), 3404--3440

    2017

  26. [34]

    113 (1965), 89--152

    Lars H \" o rmander, L 2 estimates and existence theorems for the operator , Acta Math. 113 (1965), 89--152

    1965

  27. [35]

    , The null space of the -Neumann operator, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 54(2004), 1305-1369

    2004

  28. [36]

    J. J. Kohn, Harmonic integrals on strongly pseudo-convex manifolds, I , Ann. of Math. 78 (1963), 112--148; II , Ann. of Math. 79 (1964), 450--472

    1963

  29. [37]

    of Differential Geometry 6 (1972), 523-542

    , Boundary behavior of on weakly pseudo-convex manifolds of dimension two, J. of Differential Geometry 6 (1972), 523-542

    1972

  30. [38]

    , Global regularity for on weakly pseudo-convex manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 181 (1973), 273--292

    1973

  31. [39]

    142 (1979), no

    , Subellipticity of the - Neumann problem on pseudo-convex domains: Sufficient conditions , Acta Math. 142 (1979), no. 1--2, 79--122

    1979

  32. [40]

    J. J. Kohn and L. Nirenberg, Non-coercive boundary value problems, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 18 (1965), 443--492

    1965

  33. [41]

    Krantz and Harold R

    Steven G. Krantz and Harold R. Parks, Distance to Ck hypersurfaces, J. Differential Equations 40 (1981), 116--120

    1981

  34. [42]

    M\' e tivier, Spectral asymptotics of the -Neumann problem , Duke Math

    G. M\' e tivier, Spectral asymptotics of the -Neumann problem , Duke Math. J. 48 (1981), 779-806

    1981

  35. [43]

    Michel and M-C

    J. Michel and M-C. Shaw, The -Neumann operator on Lipschitz pseudoconvex domains with plurisubharmonic defining functions , Duke Math. J. 108 (2001), 421--447

    2001

  36. [44]

    Ramadanov, Sur une propri\'ete de la fonction de Bergman , C

    I. Ramadanov, Sur une propri\'ete de la fonction de Bergman , C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 20 (1967), 759--762

    1967

  37. [45]

    J. A. Rhodes, Sequences of metrics on compact Riemann surfaces , Duke Math. J. 72 (1993), 725--738

    1993

  38. [46]

    Michael Reed and Barry Simon, Method of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, Revised and Enlarge Edition, Academic Press, 1980

    1980

  39. [47]

    Serre, Quelques probl\` e mes globaux relatifs aux vari\' e t\' e s de Stein , Colloque sur les Fonctions de Plusieurs Variables, 57-68, Brussels, 1953

    J.-P. Serre, Quelques probl\` e mes globaux relatifs aux vari\' e t\' e s de Stein , Colloque sur les Fonctions de Plusieurs Variables, 57-68, Brussels, 1953

    1953

  40. [48]

    Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton University Press, 1970

    Elias M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Princeton University Press, 1970

    1970

  41. [49]

    Straube, Plurisubharmonic functions and subellipticity of the -Neumann problem on non-smooth domains, Math

    Emil J. Straube, Plurisubharmonic functions and subellipticity of the -Neumann problem on non-smooth domains, Math. Res. Lett. 4 (1997), 459-467

    1997

  42. [50]

    , A sufficient condition for global regularity of the -Neumann operator, Adv. Math. 217 (2008), no. 3, 1072--1095

    2008

  43. [51]

    European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z\" u rich, 2010

    , Lectures on the L^2 -Sobolev theory of the -Neumann problem, ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z\" u rich, 2010

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.