Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 83 references

On Function Spaces with Mixed Norms --- A Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves a sharper maximal-function characterization of anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces and supplies missing proofs and corrections.

desk verdict The Bagby proof and the corrections are solid, but Theorem 4.10's main step cites a scalar result where a mixed-norm analogue is needed. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03291 v1 pith:A67R6VDD submitted 2019-08-09 math.CA math.APmath.FA

Long Huang , Dachun Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath.APmath.FA MSC 42B3542B3042B2542B20
keywords mixednormweakLebesguespaceMorreyHardymaximalfunctionLittlewood–PaleyCalderón–Zygmundoperatoranisotropicquasi-homogeneous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces let different coordinate directions carry different integrability, which makes them natural for space-time estimates in partial differential equations and for problems with anisotropic geometry. This survey argues that the associated anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces $H^{{\vec p}}$_{\vec a}(\mathbb R^n) have a usable real-variable theory: the central new result is that membership in $H^{{\vec p}}$_{\vec a} is equivalent to the radial or non-tangential maximal function of $f$ lying in $L^{\vec p}$, with a smaller smoothness cutoff on the test function than was previously available. The paper also supplies the first detailed proof of an extended Hardy\,--\,Littlewood maximal inequality that had been stated without proof, and it repairs errors in earlier treatments, including an endpoint counterexample showing one maximal-operator estimate fails when an exponent is infinite. If these results are right, the standard tools of harmonic analysis\,---\,maximal functions, atoms, area functions, and singular-integral boundedness\,---\,transfer to function spaces with mixed norms, which is what makes them usable in PDE applications.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the mixed Lebesgue quasi-norm $\|f\|_{L^{\vec p}(\mathbb R^n)}=\big(\int_{\mathbb R}\cdots\big(\int_{\mathbb R}|f(x_1,\dots,x_n)|^{p_1}\,dx_1\big)^{p_2/p_1}\cdots dx_n\big)^{1/p_n}$ and the anisotropic quasi-homogeneous balls that become rectangles under coordinatewise dilations $x\mapsto(t^{a_1}x_1,\dots,t^{a_n}x_n)$. The argument is carried by a comparison of truncated weighted maximal functions: at each dyadic scale $K$ the auxiliary maximal functions $M^{0(K,L)}_\phi$ and $M^{(K,L)}_\phi$ are dominated pointwise by powers of the anisotropic Hardy\,--\,Littlewood maximal operator, and the estimate is transferred to the untruncated radial and non-tangential maximal functions by letting $K$ tend to infinity and invoking monotone convergence in mixed-norm spaces. The extended maximal inequality of Section 2.2 is proved by induction on the number of variables, with the Riesz\,--\,Thorin interpolation theorem for mixed Lebesgue spaces supplying the passage from endpoint cases to the full exponent range.

What would settle it

For the endpoint question the paper itself flags, repeat the computation of Remark 4.4: with $n=2$, $\vec p=(p_1,\infty)$, and $f(x_1,x_2)=x_2^{1-1/p_1}/x_1$ on the sector $x_1\ge x_2>0$ and zero elsewhere, the mixed norm of $f$ is finite but the anisotropic Hardy\,--\,Littlewood maximal function has infinite $L^{(p_1,\infty)}$ norm, refuting the endpoint version of the maximal-operator bound. For the improved characterization itself, a decisive check would be to test whether the threshold $\lfloor1/p_-\rfloor+2\nu+3$ can be lowered further or whether a counterexample appears at that boundary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy space $H^{\vec p}_{\vec a}(\mathbb R^n)$, defined through the non-tangential grand maximal function $M_N$, is characterized by the simpler radial and non-tangential maximal functions: for any Schwartz function $\phi$ with $\int\phi\neq 0$, a distribution $f$ belongs to $H^{\vec p}_{\vec a}$ if and only if $M^0_\phi(f)\in L^{\vec p}(\mathbb R^n)$, equivalently $M_\phi(f)\in L^{\vec p}(\mathbb R^n)$, and the quasi-norms are equivalent. The new proof lowers the required parameter $N$ to any integer at least $\lfloor 1/p_-\rfloor+2\nu+3$, where $\nu$ is the homogeneous dimension and $p_-$ the smallest component of $\vec p$, improving the earlier threshold. The paper also proves in full the extended Hardy\,--\,Littlewood maximal inequality stated without proof in the literature, uses it to justify the boundedness of the anisotropic Hardy\,--\,Littlewood maximal operator and Fefferman\,--\,Stein vector-valued inequalities on mixed Lebesgue spaces, and corrects the exponent ranges in atomic and Littlewood\,--\,Paley characterizations. In particular, it records a counterexample showing the maximal operator is unbounded on $L^{(p_1,\infty)}$, and it supplies a repaired sufficiency proof for the Lusin area function characterization.

Load-bearing premise

The new proof depends on the averaging operator over anisotropic balls being bounded on mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces only when every direction has exponent strictly between 1 and infinity; the paper's own counterexample shows this fails when one exponent is infinity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Membership in an anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy space can now be tested through a single Schwartz function with nonzero integral at smoothness cutoff $N\ge\lfloor1/p_-\rfloor+2\nu+3$, a weaker requirement than in the earlier characterization.
  • The detailed proof of the extended Hardy\,--\,Littlewood maximal inequality closes a gap in the standard derivation of maximal-operator boundedness and Fefferman\,--\,Stein vector-valued inequalities on mixed Lebesgue spaces.
  • The endpoint counterexample fixes the admissible exponent ranges in the atomic definitions, so the atomic, finite-atomic, and Littlewood\,--\,Paley descriptions of $H^{\vec p}_{\vec a}$ are consistent with the maximal-function definition.
  • The revised Calder\'on\,--\,Zygmund results cover smoothness orders $\beta\in(0,\infty)$ instead of only non-integer orders, so more singular integral operators are known to map $H^{\vec p}_{\vec a}$ into itself or into $L^{\vec p}$.
  • The dual of $H^{\vec p}_{\vec a}$ is identified with a mixed-norm Campanato space for $\vec p\in(0,1]^n$, and with $L^{\vec p'}$ for $\vec p\in(1,\infty)^n$, extending classical $H^1$\,--\,BMO duality to mixed norms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the truncation-and-interpolation strategy behind the improved maximal characterization should carry over to mixed-norm Hardy spaces defined through expansive matrix dilations, because the pointwise estimates it invokes already exist in that setting.
  • The endpoint failure for $p_i=\infty$ suggests that a genuinely useful mixed-norm Hardy theory at infinite exponents would require a maximal function with weights or an Orlicz-type norm; the paper leaves this open.
  • A testable consequence of the corrected atomic exponent range is that finite-atomic and molecular descriptions of $H^{\vec p}_{\vec a}$ should hold uniformly for all $p\in(0,\min\{1,p_-\})$, simplifying the sublinear-operator boundedness criterion.
  • The repaired Lusin area function proof likely applies to product or matrix-dilation analogues of these spaces, where the same type of dyadic-cube summation argument is used.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This survey reviews recent developments in function spaces with mixed norms, covering mixed Lebesgue spaces, iterated and weak mixed-norm spaces, mixed Morrey spaces, and anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces H^pvec_a(R^n). Its new contributions are: a detailed proof of Bagby's extended Hardy–Littlewood maximal inequality for mixed Lebesgue norms (Theorem 2.12); corrections to the range of exponents in the boundedness of the anisotropic Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator, including a counterexample when one exponent is infinity (Remark 4.4 and Lemma 4.3); a corrected and sealed proof of the Lusin area function characterization of H^pvec_a (Section 4.2.1); an improved maximal-function characterization of H^pvec_a with a smaller admissible index N (Theorem 4.10, Section 4.2.2); and revised versions of the boundedness of anisotropic Calderón–Zygmund operators (Theorems 4.18 and 4.19). The paper is largely expository but contains several genuinely new or corrected statements.

Significance. If the main new proofs are correct, the paper makes a useful contribution to the mixed-norm harmonic analysis literature. The detailed proof of Bagby's inequality fills a known gap, and the correction of Lemma 4.3 with an explicit counterexample is valuable given that the erroneous range (1,∞]^n appears in prior work. Theorem 4.10, if established, would genuinely improve the maximal-function characterization of anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces by lowering the required smoothness/moment index. The paper also carefully records corrections to the proof of the Lusin-area characterization in [42], which is a service to the community. The survey portions are extensive and well organized. However, as detailed in the major comments, the proof of the main new theorem contains a load-bearing step that is currently justified only by an appeal to a scalar result, and several auxiliary lemmas or revised theorems are stated without proof. These issues are significant but appear fixable within the manuscript's own framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2.2, proof of Theorem 4.10, implication (ii)⇒(i)] After establishing (4.59) and letting K → ∞, the proof concludes from M^0_I(f) ∈ L^pvec(R^n) that f ∈ H^pvec_a(R^n) by citing [14, p. 17, Proposition 3.10]. Bownik's Proposition 3.10 is a statement about scalar anisotropic Hardy spaces H^p_A on L^p(R^n); it does not by itself justify a conclusion in the mixed-norm space L^pvec. What is needed is a mixed-norm analogue, for example a pointwise estimate of the form M_I(f)(x) ≤ C [M_HL^a((M^0_I(f))^r)(x)]^{1/r} for some r < p_-, followed by an application of Lemma 4.3. Without such an estimate, the implication (ii)⇒(i) is not documented. This is load-bearing because Definition 4.4 defines H^pvec_a using an index N_pvec from (4.6) which can be larger than the I appearing in the argument, so one needs control of the non-tangential grand maximal function M_I, not merely the radial one. Please provide the missing mixed-norm argument or state and prove the precise proposition being invoked.
  2. [§4.2.2, Lemma 4.12] Lemma 4.12 is stated with the comment 'the details are omitted', yet it is used in both directions of the proof of Theorem 4.10. The proof is not completely immediate: one must choose λ < p_- so that the exponent vector pvec/λ lies in (1,∞)^n before applying Lemma 4.3, and the range of admissible λ depends on N. Since this lemma is central to the main improvement claimed in the paper, the omitted derivation should be supplied or at least sketched in sufficient detail. The closely related Lemma 4.11 is also stated without proof; a one-line argument or reference would suffice there.
  3. [§4.4, Theorems 4.18 and 4.19] The revised boundedness results for anisotropic β-order Calderón–Zygmund operators are asserted by saying that replacing ⌊β⌋ by ⌈β⌉−1 in the proofs of [42, Theorems 6.8 and 6.9] suffices, with details omitted. This is a substantive modification: Definition 4.13 changes the regularity and moment conditions, and the admissible range of p_- in Theorem 4.18 is altered accordingly. The authors should at least indicate where the kernel estimates are affected by the new definition and why the exponent range in p_- still closes. As written, this is an unproved claimed improvement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Lemma 4.11] Lemma 4.11 is stated with 'we omit the details'; since it is a standard monotone convergence property for L^pvec, either a reference or a one-sentence proof would improve the exposition.
  2. [Theorem 4.10, statement] The role of N in Theorem 4.10 should be clarified: since H^pvec_a is defined in Definition 4.4 with the index N_pvec from (4.6), the statement should explicitly say that (i) refers to membership in that fixed space, while the N appearing in the theorem is the index used for the maximal functions in (ii) and (iii).
  3. [Remark 2.2] There is a typo in 'curial role'; it should be 'crucial role'.
  4. [Remark 4.4] The counterexample in Remark 4.4 has some notational slips: 'for any x2 ∈ Rn' should be 'for any x2 ∈ R', and the integral expression '∫_{R^2}' appears where a one-dimensional integral is intended. These do not affect the mathematical content.
  5. [Remark 4.6] The claim that the range of N in Theorem 4.2 is a proper subset of the range in Theorem 4.10 would benefit from a short justification, since the comparison depends on a-, a+, ν, and p_-.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 4.10's new proof is assembled from external scalar anisotropic Hardy-space estimates and standard mixed-norm maximal inequalities, not from its own conclusion.

full rationale

This is a survey with corrections and new proofs, and its central new result, Theorem 4.10, is derived from external tools rather than from the theorem being proved. The proof of (ii)⇒(i) first uses Lemmas 4.12 and 4.13 to obtain ||M^{0(K,0)}_I(f)||_{L^{p⃗}} ≲ ||M^{(K,0)}_φ(f)||_{L^{p⃗}}, then cites [14, p. 17, Proposition 3.10] to pass from radial to non-tangential maximal control. Even if that cited proposition is a scalar anisotropic Hardy-space statement and would need a separate mixed-norm justification, that is a technical gap or an unsupported reduction, not a circular one: the conclusion is not already contained in the hypotheses by construction. Similarly, Lemma 4.12 is stated with 'the details are omitted', but it can be filled by choosing λ < p_- so that p⃗/λ ∈ (1,∞)^n and applying Lemma 4.3; it does not presuppose Theorem 4.10. Self-citations to [42] are to published atomic and Littlewood–Paley characterizations treated as external benchmarks, and the paper explicitly corrects errors in those papers rather than using them to smuggle in the main conclusion. The only mildly self-referential passage is Remark 4.1(i), which uses Theorem 4.10 to justify N-independence of the definition; this is a presentational loop, not a load-bearing derivation, and it does not affect the proof of Theorem 4.10. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for the purposes of circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new parameters, entities, or fitted constants. It builds on standard theorems and the previously published theory of mixed-norm spaces, which is cited and adapted. The main contributions are proofs, corrections, and improved ranges for known results.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Standard Lebesgue measure on R^n is translation invariant and doubling for anisotropic balls; |B_a(x,r)| = υ_n r^ν.
    Used throughout Section 4 to bound sums over dyadic cubes and balls and to establish the equivalence between the maximal function and its dyadic linearization.
  • standard math Riesz-Thorin interpolation on mixed Lebesgue spaces (Theorem 2.9) and Fefferman-Stein vector-valued inequalities are valid as stated.
    Invoked in the proof of Theorem 2.12 (Step 3) and in the proof of Lemma 4.12, which are essential for the corrected maximal characterizations.
  • domain assumption The anisotropic Calderón reproducing formula (Lemma 4.2) holds for Schwartz functions with vanishing moments.
    Used as the starting point for the Littlewood-Paley and Lusin area function characterizations of anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Function Spaces with Mixed Norms --- A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A67R6VDD

@misc{pith2026190803291,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Function Spaces with Mixed Norms --- A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A67R6VDD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03291}
}
read the original abstract

The targets of this article are threefold. The first one is to give a survey on the recent developments of function spaces with mixed norms, including mixed Lebesgue spaces, iterated weak Lebesgue spaces, weak mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces and mixed Morrey spaces as well as anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces. The second one is to provide a detailed proof for a useful inequality about mixed Lebesgue norms and the Hardy--Littlewood maximal operator and also to improve some known results on the maximal function characterizations of anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces and the boundedness of Calder\'on--Zygmund operators from these anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces to themselves or to mixed Lebesgue spaces. The last one is to correct some errors and seal some gaps existing in the known articles.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Liu, D. Y ang and W . Yuan, Atomic and Littlewo od–Paley characterizations of anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces and their applications, J. Geom. Anal. 29 (2019), 1991- 2067

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    D. R. Adams and R. J. Bagby , Translation-dilation invari ant estimates for Riesz potentials, Indiana Univ . Math. J. 23 (1974), 1051-1067

    1974

  3. [2]

    Almeida, J

    V . Almeida, J. J. Betancor and L. Rodr´ ıguez-Mesa, Aniso tropic Hardy–Lorentz spaces with variable exponents, Canad. J. Math. 69 (2017), 1219-1273

    2017

  4. [3]

    Antoni´ c and I

    N. Antoni´ c and I. Ivec, On the H ¨ ormander–Mihlin theore m for mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 433 (2016), 176-199

    2016

  5. [4]

    R. J. Bagby , An extended inequality for the maximal funct ion, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1975), 419-422. 72 CONTENTS

    work page 1975

  6. [5]

    Benea and C

    C. Benea and C. Muscalu, Multiple vector-valued inequal ities via the helicoidal method, Anal. PDE 9 (2016), 1931-1988

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    Benea and C

    C. Benea and C. Muscalu, Quasi-Banach valued inequaliti es via the helicoidal method, J. Funct. Anal. 273 (2017), 1295-1353

    work page 2017

  8. [7]

    Benedek, A.-P

    A. Benedek, A.-P . Calder ´ on and R. Panzone, Convolutionoperators on Banach space valued functions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48 (1962), 356-365

    work page 1962

Show all 83 references
  1. [8]

    Benedek and R

    A. Benedek and R. Panzone, The space Lp, with mixed norm, Duke Math. J. 28 (1961), 301- 324

    1961

  2. [9]

    O. V . Besov , V . P . Il ′in and P . I. Lizorkin, The Lp-estimates of a certain class of non- isotropically singular integrals, (Russian) Dokl. Akad. N auk SSSR 169 (1966), 1250-1253

    1966

  3. [10]

    O. V . Besov , V . P . Il′in and S. M. Nikol ′ski˘ ı, Integral Representations of Functions and Imbed- ding Theorems. V ol. I, Translated from the Russian, in: Scripta Series in Mathematics, Edited by Mitchell H. T aibleson, V . H. Winston and Sons, W ashington, D.C.; Halsted ...

    1978

  4. [11]

    O. V . Besov , V . P . Il′in and S. M. Nikol ′ski˘ ı, Integral Representations of Functions and Imbed- ding Theorems. V ol. II, in: Scripta Series in Mathematics, Edited by Mitchell H. T aibleson, V . H. Winston and Sons, W ashington, D.C.; Halsted Press [John W iley and Sons]...

    1979

  5. [12]

    O. V . Besov , V . P . Il′in and S. M. Nikol ′ski˘ ı, Integral Representations of Functions, and Em- bedding Theorems, (Russian) Second edition, Fizmatlit “Na uka”, Moscow , 1996, 480 pp

    1996

  6. [13]

    A. P . Blozinski, Multivariate rearrangements and Bana ch function spaces with mixed norms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 263 (1981), 149-167

    1981

  7. [14]

    Bownik, Anisotropic Hardy Spaces and W avelets, Mem

    M. Bownik, Anisotropic Hardy Spaces and W avelets, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 164 (2003), no. 781, vi+122pp

    2003

  8. [15]

    Bownik, B

    M. Bownik, B. Li, D. Y ang and Y . Zhou, W eighted anisotrop ic product Hardy spaces and boundedness of sublinear operators, Math. Nachr. 283 (2010 ), 392-442

    2010

  9. [16]

    Cabrelli, U

    C. Cabrelli, U. Molter and J. Romero, Non-uniform painl ess decompositions for anisotropic Besov and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces, Adv . Math. 232 (2013), 9 8-120

    2013

  10. [17]

    Campanato, Propriet di una famiglia di spazi funzion ali, Ann

    S. Campanato, Propriet di una famiglia di spazi funzion ali, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa (3) 18 (1964), 137-160

    1964

  11. [18]

    Chen and W

    T. Chen and W . Sun, Iterated and mixed weak norms with applications to geometric inequal- ities, J. Geom. Anal. (2019), DOI: 10.1007/s12220-019-002 43-x or arXiv: 1712.01064

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Chen and W

    T. Chen and W . Sun, Extension of multilinear fractional integral operators to linear operators on Lebesgue spaces with mixed norms, arXiv: 1902.04527

    1902 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cleanthous, A

    G. Cleanthous, A. G. Georgiadis and M. Nielsen, Discret e decomposition of homogeneous mixed-norm Besov spaces, in: Functional Analysis, Harmoni c Analysis, and Image Process- ing: A Collection of Papers in Honor of Bj ¨ orn Jawerth, 167-184, Contemp. Math., 693, Amer. Math. S...

    2017

  14. [21]

    Cleanthous, A

    G. Cleanthous, A. G. Georgiadis and M. Nielsen, Anisotr opic mixed-norm Hardy spaces, J. Geom. Anal. 27 (2017), 2758-2787

    2017

  15. [22]

    Cleanthous, A

    G. Cleanthous, A. G. Georgiadis and M. Nielsen, Molecul ar decomposition of anisotropic homogeneous mixed-norm spaces with applications to the bou ndedness of operators, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 47 (2019), 447-480

    2019

  16. [23]

    C ´ ordoba and E

    A. C ´ ordoba and E. Latorre Crespo, Radial multipliers a nd restriction to surfaces of the Fourier transform in mixed-norm spaces, Math. Z. 286 (2017) , 1479-1493

    2017

  17. [24]

    Delgado, M

    J. Delgado, M. Ruzhansky and B. W ang, Grothendieck–Lid skii trace formula for mixed- norm and variable Lebesgue spaces, J. Spectr. Theory 6 (2016 ), 781-791. CONTENTS 73

    2016

  18. [25]

    Dong and D

    H. Dong and D. Kim, On Lp-estimates for elliptic and parabolic equations with Ap weights, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), 5081-5130

    2018

  19. [26]

    E. B. Fabes and N. M. Rivi` ere, Singular integrals with m ixed homogeneity , Studia Math. 27 (1966), 19-38

    1966

  20. [27]

    Fefferman and E

    C. Fefferman and E. M. Stein, Some maximal inequalities , Amer. J. Math. 93 (1971), 107-115

    1971

  21. [28]

    Fefferman and E

    C. Fefferman and E. M. Stein, H p spaces of several variables, Acta Math. 129 (1972), 137-193

    1972

  22. [29]

    D. L. Fernandez, Lorentz spaces, with mixed norms, J. Fu nct. Anal. 25 (1977), 128-146

    1977

  23. [30]

    D. L. Fernandez, V ector-valued singular integral oper ators on Lp-spaces with mixed norms and applications, Pac. J. Math. 129(2) (1987), 257-275

    1987

  24. [31]

    Foschi and S

    D. Foschi and S. Klainerman, Bilinear space-time estim ates for homogeneous wave equa- tions, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 33 (2000), 211-274

    2000

  25. [32]

    A. R. Galmarino and R. Panzone, Lp-spaces with mixed norm, for P a sequence, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 10 (1965), 494-518

    1965

  26. [33]

    A. G. Georgiadis, J. Johnsen and M. Nielsen, W avelet tra nsforms for homogeneous mixed- norm Triebel–Lizorkin spaces, Monatsh. Math. 183 (2017), 5 87-624

    2017

  27. [34]

    A. G. Georgiadis and M. Nielsen, Pseudodifferential op erators on mixed-norm Besov and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces, Math. Nachr. 289 (2016), 2019-20 36

    2016

  28. [35]

    Giga and H

    Y . Giga and H. Sohr, Abstract Lp estimates for the Cauchy problem with applications to the Navier–Stokes equations in exterior domains, J. Funct. Ana l. 102 (1991), 72-94

    1991

  29. [36]

    V . R. Gopala Rao, Parabolic function spaces with mixed n orm, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 246 (1978), 451-461

    1978

  30. [37]

    Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, Third editio n, Graduate T exts in Math

    L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, Third editio n, Graduate T exts in Math. 249, Springer, New Y ork, 2014

    2014

  31. [38]

    J. Hart, R. H. T orres and X. Wu, Smoothing properties of b ilinear operators and Leibniz-type rules in Lebesgue and mixed Lebesgue spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), 8581-8612

    2018

  32. [39]

    Ho, Strong maximal operator on mixed-norm spaces , Ann

    K.-P . Ho, Strong maximal operator on mixed-norm spaces , Ann. Univ . Ferrara Sez. VII Sci. Mat. 62 (2016), 275-291

    2016

  33. [40]

    Ho, Mixed norm Lebesgue spaces with variable expo nents and applications, Riv

    K.-P . Ho, Mixed norm Lebesgue spaces with variable expo nents and applications, Riv . Math. Univ . Parma (N.S.) 9 (2018), 21-44

    2018

  34. [41]

    H ¨ ormander, Estimates for translation invariant op erators in Lp spaces, Acta Math

    L. H ¨ ormander, Estimates for translation invariant op erators in Lp spaces, Acta Math. 104 (1960), 93-140

    1960

  35. [43]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Liu, D. Y ang and W . Yuan, Dual spaces of aniso tropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 147 (2019), 1201-1215

    2019

  36. [44]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Liu, D. Y ang and W . Yuan, Real-variable char acterizations of new anisotropic mixed-norm Hardy spaces, Submitted

  37. [45]

    Igari, Interpolation of operators in Lebesgue space s with mixed norm and its applications to Fourier analysis, T ohoku Math

    S. Igari, Interpolation of operators in Lebesgue space s with mixed norm and its applications to Fourier analysis, T ohoku Math. J. (2) 38 (1986), 469-490

    1986

  38. [46]

    John and L

    F . John and L. Nirenberg, On functions of bounded mean os cillation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (1961), 415-426

    1961

  39. [47]

    Johnsen, S

    J. Johnsen, S. Munch Hansen and W . Sickel, Characterisa tion by local means of anisotropic Lizorkin–Triebel spaces with mixed norms, Z. Anal. Anwend. 32 (2013), 257-277

    2013

  40. [48]

    Johnsen, S

    J. Johnsen, S. Munch Hansen and W . Sickel, Anisotropic, mixed-norm Lizorkin–Triebel spaces and diffeomorphic maps, J. Funct. Spaces 2014, Art. I D 964794, 15 pp

    2014

  41. [49]

    Johnsen, S

    J. Johnsen, S. Munch Hansen and W . Sickel, Anisotropic L izorkin–Triebel spaces with mixed 74 CONTENTS norms — traces on smooth boundaries, Math. Nachr. 288 (2015) , 1327-1359

    2015

  42. [50]

    Johnsen and W

    J. Johnsen and W . Sickel, A direct proof of Sobolev embed dings for quasi-homogeneous Lizorkin–Triebel spaces with mixed norms, J. Funct. Spaces Appl. 5 (2007), 183-198

    2007

  43. [51]

    Johnsen and W

    J. Johnsen and W . Sickel, On the trace problem for Lizork in–Triebel spaces with mixed norms, Math. Nachr. 281 (2008), 669-696

    2008

  44. [52]

    C. E. Kenig, On the local and global well-posedness theo ry for the KP-I equation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 21 (2004), 827-838

    2004

  45. [53]

    C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce and L. V ega, W ell-posedness and sca ttering results for the general- ized Korteweg–de V ries equation via the contraction princi ple, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 46 (1993), 527-620

    1993

  46. [54]

    Kim, Elliptic and parabolic equations with measurab le coefficients in Lp-spaces with mixed norms, Methods Appl

    D. Kim, Elliptic and parabolic equations with measurab le coefficients in Lp-spaces with mixed norms, Methods Appl. Anal. 15 (2008), 437-468

    2008

  47. [55]

    N. V . Krylov , Parabolic equations with VMO coefficients in Sobolev spaces with mixed norms, J. Funct. Anal. 250 (2007), 521-558

    2007

  48. [56]

    L. D. Ky , New Hardy spaces of Musielak–Orlicz type and bo undedness of sublinear opera- tors, Integral Equations Operator Theory 78 (2014), 115-15 0

    2014

  49. [57]

    F . Liu, R. H. T orres, Q. Xue and K. Y abuta, Multilinear st rong maximal operators on mixed Lebesgue spaces, Preprint

  50. [58]

    J. Liu, D. Y ang and W . Yuan, Anisotropic Hardy–Lorentz s paces and their applications, Sci. China Math. 59 (2016), 1669-1720

    2016

  51. [59]

    J. Liu, D. Y ang and W . Yuan, Littlewood-Paley character izations of anisotropic Hardy- Lorentz spaces, Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B Engl. Ed. 38 (2018), 1- 33

    2018

  52. [60]

    P . I. Lizorkin, Multipliers of Fourier integrals and es timates of convolutions in spaces with mixed norm. Applications, (Russian) Izv . Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 34 (1970), 218-247

    1970

  53. [61]

    W . R. Madych, Lipschitz spaces and mixed Lebesgue space s, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (1982), 213-218

    1982

  54. [62]

    Maremonti and V

    P . Maremonti and V . A. Solonnikov , On estimates for the s olutions of the nonstationary Stokes problem in S. L. Sobolev anisotropic spaces with a mix ed norm, in: (Russian) Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov . (POM I) 222 (1995), Issled. po Lineˇ ın. ...

    1995

  55. [63]

    Milman, Embeddings of Lorentz–Marcinkiewicz space s with mixed norms, Anal

    M. Milman, Embeddings of Lorentz–Marcinkiewicz space s with mixed norms, Anal. Math. 4 (1978), 215-223

    1978

  56. [64]

    Milman, A note on L(p,q) spaces and Orlicz spaces with mixed norms, Proc

    M. Milman, A note on L(p,q) spaces and Orlicz spaces with mixed norms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1981), 743-746

    1981

  57. [65]

    Milman, On interpolation of 2 n Banach spaces and Lorentz spaces with mixed norms, J

    M. Milman, On interpolation of 2 n Banach spaces and Lorentz spaces with mixed norms, J. Funct. Anal. 41 (1981), 1-7

    1981

  58. [66]

    C. B. Morrey , On the solutions of quasi-linear elliptic partial differential equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1938), 126-166

    1938

  59. [67]

    Nogayama, Mixed Morrey spaces, Positivity (2019), D OI: 10.1007/s11117-019-00646-8 or arXiv: 1806.09293

    T. Nogayama, Mixed Morrey spaces, Positivity (2019), D OI: 10.1007/s11117-019-00646-8 or arXiv: 1806.09293

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Nogayama, Boundedness of commutators of fractional integral operators on mixed Mor- rey spaces, Integral Transform

    T. Nogayama, Boundedness of commutators of fractional integral operators on mixed Mor- rey spaces, Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. (2019), DOI: 1 0.1080/10652469.2019.1619718

    2019

  61. [69]

    J. L. Rubio de Francia, F . J. Ruiz and J. L. T orrea, Calder ´ on–Zygmund theory for operator- valued kernels, Adv . Math. 62 (1986), 7-48

    1986

  62. [70]

    Schmeisser, Maximal inequalities and Fourier mu ltipliers for spaces with mixed quasi- norms

    H.-J. Schmeisser, Maximal inequalities and Fourier mu ltipliers for spaces with mixed quasi- norms. Applications, Z. Anal. Anwend. 3 (1984), 153-166. CONTENTS 75

    1984

  63. [71]

    Sj ¨ odin, W eighted norm inequalities for Riesz potentials and fractional maximal functions in mixed norm Lebesgue spaces, Studia Math

    T. Sj ¨ odin, W eighted norm inequalities for Riesz potentials and fractional maximal functions in mixed norm Lebesgue spaces, Studia Math. 97 (1991), 239-2 44

    1991

  64. [72]

    Stefanov and R

    A. Stefanov and R. H. T orres, Calder ´ on–Zygmund operators on mixed Lebesgue spaces and applications to null forms, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 70 (2004 ), 447-462

    2004

  65. [73]

    E. M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis: Real-V ariable Methods , Orthogonality , and Oscillatory In- tegrals, Princeton Mathematical Series 43, Monographs in H armonic Analysis III, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993

    1993

  66. [74]

    E. M. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure The ory , Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Princeton Lectures in Analysis 3, Princeton Univer sity Press, Princeton, NJ, 2005

    2005

  67. [75]

    E. M. Stein and S. W ainger, Problems in harmonic analysi s related to curvature, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84 (1978), 1239-1295

    1978

  68. [76]

    E. M. Stein and G. W eiss, Introduction to Fourier Analys is on Euclidean Spaces, Princeton Mathematical Series 32, Princeton, NJ, 1971

    1971

  69. [77]

    M. H. T aibleson and G. W eiss, The molecular characteriz ation of certain Hardy spaces, in: Representation theorems for Hardy spaces, pp. 67-149, Ast´ erisque, 77, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1980

    1980

  70. [78]

    T ao, Nonlinear Dispersive Equations

    T. T ao, Nonlinear Dispersive Equations. Local and Glob al Analysis, CBMS Regional Con- ference Series in Mathematics 106, Published for the Confer ence Board of the Mathematical Sciences, W ashington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society , Providence, RI, 2006

    2006

  71. [79]

    R. H. T orres and E. L. W ard, Leibniz’s rule, sampling and wavelets on mixed Lebesgue spaces, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 21 (2015), 1053-1076

    2015

  72. [80]

    W eidemaier, Maximal regularity for parabolic equat ions with inhomogeneous boundary conditions in Sobolev spaces with mixed Lp-norm, Electron

    P . W eidemaier, Maximal regularity for parabolic equat ions with inhomogeneous boundary conditions in Sobolev spaces with mixed Lp-norm, Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (2002), 47-51

    2002

  73. [81]

    Y ang, Y

    D. Y ang, Y . Liang and L. D. Ky , Real-V ariable Theory of Mu sielak–Orlicz Hardy Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 2182, Springer-V erlag, Cham, 2017

    2017

  74. [82]

    Y ang and Y

    D. Y ang and Y . Zhou, Boundedness of sublinear operators in Hardy spaces on RD-spaces via atoms, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 339 (2008), 622-635

    2008

  75. [83]

    Y ang and Y

    D. Y ang and Y . Zhou, A boundedness criterion via atoms fo r linear operators in Hardy spaces, Constr. Approx. 29 (2009), 207-218

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.