Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 98 references

A study of accretion and disk diagnostics in the NGC 2264 cluster

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that inner dust holes in transition disks do not stop accretion: 82% of the 28 identified candidates accrete at the same level as full disk systems.

desk verdict A useful accretion/disk census for NGC 2264 with seven new transition disk candidates, but the 'dust hole' interpretation is weakened by the model grid's missing anemic-disk state and the hole sizes have no error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03487 v1 pith:S3YEDHKI submitted 2019-08-09 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Alana P. Sousa , Silvia H. P. Alencar , Luisa M. Rebull , Catherine C. Espaillat , Nuria Calvet , Paula S. Teixeira This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords transitiondisksNGC2264TTauristarsprotoplanetaryaccretionspectralenergydistributioninnerdiskholesphotoevaporation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper searches the young cluster NGC 2264 for transition disks—systems whose inner dust has cleared while an outer disk remains—and asks whether a cleared inner region also shuts off accretion. Using spectral energy distribution fitting of 401 T Tauri stars from optical to 24 microns, it classifies 28 systems (7 new) as transition disk candidates, about 7% of the sample. The central result is that 82% of these candidates still accrete, with H-alpha emission, UV excess, and mass accretion rates statistically indistinguishable from full disk systems. The paper also estimates inner hole sizes from 0.1 to 78 AU and finds only about 18% of those holes can be explained by X-ray photoevaporation. A sympathetic reader would take this as evidence that dust clearing and gas accretion can be decoupled, so planets, not radiation, may be opening most holes.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is SED fitting with the Hyperion radiative-transfer model grid, comparing three model families: a star only, a star plus passive disk, and a star plus passive disk with an inner hole. A star is classified as a transition disk candidate when the best fit returns an inner disk radius R_in larger than the dust sublimation radius R_sub and when the 24 micron flux exceeds the 10 micron flux. Accretion is diagnosed by H-alpha equivalent width and width, UV excess, and derived mass accretion rates, and the inferred hole sizes are compared against a published X-ray photoevaporation criterion to test whether radiation could have opened the hole.

What would settle it

High-resolution millimeter imaging (for example with ALMA) of the 28 transition disk candidates: if most show continuous inner-disk dust or no central cavity, or if deep observations reveal holes among the stars without 22/24 micron detections, the SED-based classification and the 82% accreting fraction would be wrong. Mid-infrared spectroscopy of the 5.7-14 micron region could directly test whether inner dust is truly depleted in these systems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that the presence of a dust hole in the inner disk does not stop the accretion process. From spectral energy distribution fits of 401 stars in NGC 2264, it identifies 28 transition disk candidates (7 previously unrecognized) and shows that about 82% of them accrete, displaying H-alpha emission, UV excess, and mass accretion rates at the same level as full disk systems. Hole sizes range from 0.09 to 78 AU, with a mean of 10.4 +/- 2.8 AU, and only about 18% of the candidates fall in the region where X-ray photoevaporation alone could have opened the hole; most holes require another mechanism, plausibly planet formation. The paper also reports that transition disk candidates have inner-disk dust similar to anemic disks, that they are found preferentially outside the most active star-forming regions, and that their hole sizes overlap the semimajor axes of confirmed exoplanets.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assumption that fitting passive-disk models to photometry from the U band to 24 microns correctly reveals which stars have inner dust holes and how large those holes are.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • About 82% of NGC 2264 transition disk candidates accrete at full-disk levels, so a cleared dust hole does not imply a stopped accretion flow.
  • Only about 18% of the holes are consistent with X-ray photoevaporation, so most holes need a different origin, such as a forming planet.
  • Seven newly identified transition disk candidates expand the census of objects available for planet-formation follow-up.
  • Hole sizes of 0.09 to 78 AU overlap the semimajor axes of confirmed exoplanets around similar-mass stars.
  • Anemic disk systems, identified by their intermediate infrared slope, are viable transition disk candidates, linking two previously separate disk classifications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 82% accreting fraction survives better data, gas must be flowing through the dust hole; a direct test would be detecting accreting gas or ro-vibrational CO emission inside the cavity for at least a few candidates.
  • The paper's own caveat that 47 anemic disks lack 22/24 micron data implies the true transition disk fraction in NGC 2264 could be higher than 7%.
  • Because the SED model includes only passive disks, inferred hole sizes may be underestimated; accretion-heated models or longer-wavelength data could shift the 18% photoevaporation fraction.
  • A prediction of the planet-opening scenario is that accreting transition disks with large holes should show gap or cavity substructure in millimeter observations, which ALMA can directly test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 401 T Tauri stars in NGC 2264 using SED fitting with the Hyperion code, classifying each system as a full disk, diskless, or transition disk candidate based on the best-fit model and the inner disk radius. The authors identify 28 transition disk candidates (seven new), estimate inner hole sizes from 0.09 to 78 AU, and find that 82% of the candidates accrete, showing Hα, UV excess, and mass accretion rates similar to full disk systems. They conclude that a dust hole in the inner disk does not stop accretion and that only ~18% of the holes can be explained by X-ray photoevaporation, with the remainder attributed to planet formation.

Significance. If the SED-based identification of dust holes is reliable, the paper provides a valuable cluster sample showing that inner dust clearing does not halt accretion, and the seven new candidates are useful targets for follow-up. A clear strength is that the accretion diagnostics (Hα, UV excess, mass accretion rates) are measured independently of the SED fitting, so the main accretion result is not circular. The paper also carefully compares its selection with several literature criteria. However, the central conclusion is weakened by the lack of an optically thin inner-disk model in the SED grid, by the absence of uncertainties on the fitted hole sizes, and by an unsupported attribution of the non-photoevaporating systems to planet formation. The paper is therefore of moderate significance, more as a catalog and a cautionary empirical result than as a definitive test of disk-clearing mechanisms.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, §5.2] The SED grid used for classification includes only three geometries: a photosphere, a passive disk with Rin = Rsub, and a passive disk with a sharp inner hole (Rin > Rsub). The best-fit Rin in model 3 defines both the transition disk candidacy and the hole size, but the grid does not include an optically thin (anemic) inner disk. Table 1 shows that 17 of the 28 candidates have alpha_IRAC in the anemic range (-2.56 to -1.80), and the paper itself states that the candidates 'present dust in the inner disk similar to anemic disks.' An anemic inner disk with reduced surface density can produce a near-IR deficit without a truly empty cavity, so the fitted Rin > Rsub may simply parameterize a depleted inner region rather than a physical hole. Since the central claim that a dust hole does not stop accretion requires that the candidates actually have holes, the authors should test an alternative model with an optically thin inner disk or explicitly restate the conclusion in terms of inner-disk dust depletion.
  2. [§5.2, Table 4] The hole sizes and the photoevaporation versus non-photoevaporation split rest on best-fit Rin values with no reported uncertainties. The quoted mean of 10.4 ± 2.8 AU is the standard error of the sample mean, not an uncertainty on individual fits. Without confidence intervals on Rin, for example from the Δχ2 criterion used in Appendix A, the placement of each system in Fig. 14a and the resulting 18%/82% statement are not robust. Please provide per-object uncertainties or demonstrate that the classification into the two regimes is insensitive to reasonable variations in Rin within the fitted range.
  3. [§5.2, §6] The inference that the ~82% of transition disk candidates not explained by X-ray photoevaporation 'could be explained by planet formation in different evolutionary stages' is not supported by the analysis. The paper only shows that these systems lie outside the photoevaporation region of Fig. 14a; it does not test a planet-formation model or exclude other clearing mechanisms such as dead zones, MHD winds, or dust evolution. The comparison with exoplanet orbital separations in Fig. 16 is suggestive but not a quantitative test. This claim should be toned down or explicitly presented as a hypothesis rather than a conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1] The paper states that the sample is not complete and that disk frequencies are unreliable, but the abstract still quotes 52%, 41%, and 7% without qualification. Please add a caveat near these numbers in the abstract.
  2. [Table 4] Mon-000824 and Mon-000879 have identical best-fit parameters for T*, R*, disk mass, RH, Rin, Rsub, and Rmax; this may be a transcription error and should be checked.
  3. [Appendix A] The caption of Fig. A.1 says 'all the model with (χ2 − χ2best) > 3ndata' but the standard criterion for acceptable fits is Δχ2 < 3ndata; the inequality appears to be reversed.
  4. [References] Several references lack page numbers or have incomplete bibliographic data (e.g., Konigl 1989, Shu et al. 1994, Safier 1993); please complete these entries.
  5. [§4.2] The sentence 'As a star moves from a full disk to a diskless system, it moves in different ways in the IR color-color diagrams in Fig. 4' could be clarified by specifying whether the movement is with time or across the evolutionary sequence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 82% accretion result uses independent Hα/UV diagnostics, not the SED fit that defines the transition-disk sample.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim—that 82% of transition disk candidates accrete and show Hα, UV excess, and mass accretion rates at the same level as full disk systems—is not forced by the SED modeling used to define the sample. The transition-disk classification is based on the Hyperion/Robitaille passive-disk grid returning an inner radius R_in > R_sub (Section 3.1), but the accretion diagnostics (EW Hα, W10%Hα, UV excess, Ṁ) come from independent FLAMES spectroscopy (Sousa et al. 2016; Dahm & Simon 2005), MegaCam photometry (Venuti et al. 2014), and the CTTS/WTTS thresholds of White & Basri (2003). No equation in the paper redefines these diagnostics in terms of R_in, so the 82% is an empirical count rather than a construction. The fitted parameter R_in is reported as an 'estimated' hole size (Section 5.2, Table 4), not relabeled as a prediction; the hole-size versus photoevaporation comparison is an interpretation of the fitted output against external models (Owen et al. 2011, 2017), not a circular derivation. Self-citations to Teixeira et al. (2012) for αIRAC and to Sousa et al. (2016) for Hα provide observational catalog/spectroscopic data with stated external methods; they are not unverified theoretical uniqueness claims and do not make the argument circular. The paper itself flags the anemic-disk ambiguity (Section 4.2 and 5.2), which is a model-degeneracy/correctness risk—the grid has no optically thin inner-disk state—but the accretion measurement is independent of that model choice. No circular step rises to the standard of Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or fitted parameter renamed as prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on fitted SED model parameters and standard domain assumptions about disk structure and photoevaporation. No new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameter is the inner disk radius R_in, which simultaneously defines the transition disk sample and the hole sizes, so the hole sizes are not externally validated.

free parameters (1)
  • Inner disk radius R_in (per star) = 1.4 to 696.8 Rsub; hole sizes 0.09 to 78 AU (Table 4)
    Fitted by Hyperion SED fitting; R_in > Rsub defines a transition disk candidate, and R_in sets the reported hole size. The classification and hole size claims depend directly on this fitted parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Hyperion model grid (model sets v1.1) contains adequate SED models so the best fit identifies the correct disk geometry (full disk, transition disk, or diskless).
    All 401 stars are classified by comparing observed SEDs to these models; if the grid is incomplete or biased, the sample definitions fail.
  • domain assumption The inner hole size equals the fitted inner disk radius R_in, with dust sublimation radius computed from the Whitney et al. (2004) relation with Tsub = 1600 K.
    Sec. 5.2; this empirical relation and fixed sublimation temperature convert the fitted R_in (in Rsub) to physical AU values.
  • domain assumption A passive disk model without accretion heating is sufficient; possible systematics toward smaller holes are acknowledged but not corrected.
    Sec. 3.1 and 5.2; the authors note this assumption may produce hole sizes smaller than those found with models including accretion heating (Merín et al. 2010).
  • domain assumption The Owen et al. (2011, 2017) X-ray photoevaporation region in the accretion rate vs hole size plane applies to NGC 2264.
    Sec. 5.2 and Fig. 14a; the conclusion that only ~18% of holes are photoevaporating assumes this model boundary is correct for the cluster.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A study of accretion and disk diagnostics in the NGC 2264 cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S3YEDHKI

@misc{pith2026190803487,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A study of accretion and disk diagnostics in the NGC 2264 cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S3YEDHKI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03487}
}
abstract

Understanding disk dissipation is essential for studying how planets form. Disk gaps and holes, which almost correspond to dust-free regions, are inferred from infrared observations of T Tauri stars (TTS), indicating the existence of a transitional phase between thick accreting disks and debris disks. Transition disks are usually referred to as candidates for newly formed planets. We searched for transition disk candidates belonging to NGC 2264. We characterized accretion, disk, and stellar properties of transition disk candidates and compared them to systems with a full disk and diskless stars We modeled the spectral energy distribution (SED) of a sample of 401 TTS, with Hyperion SED fitting code using photometric data from the U band to the MIPS band. We used the SED modeling to distinguish transition disk candidates, full disk systems, and diskless stars. We classified $52\%$ of the sample as full disk systems, $41\%$ as diskless stars, and $7\%$ of the systems as transition disk candidates, among which seven systems are new transition disk candidates belonging to the NGC 2264 cluster. The sample of transition disk candidates present dust in the inner disk similar to anemic disks, according to the $\alpha_{IRAC}$ classification, which shows that anemic disk systems can be candidate transition disks. We show that the presence of a dust hole in the inner disk does not stop the accretion process since $82\%$ of transition disk candidates accrete and show $H\alpha$, UV excess, and mass accretion rates at the same level as full disk systems. We estimate the inner hole sizes, ranging from 0.1 to $78AU$, for the sample of transition disk candidates. In only $18\%$ of the transition disk candidates, the hole size could be explained by X-ray photoevaporation from stellar radiation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03487 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stellar parameters modeled with Hyperion SED fitting code (Robitaille 2017) compared to stellar parameters obtained by Venuti et al. (2014). a) AV , b) distance from the Sun. The red point and error bars represent the mean and standard deviation of the distance of the cluster members studied in this work (d = 757 ± 80 pc), c) stellar radii, d) stellar temperatures. AV and distances are input parameters of the code, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of synthetic SED fitting, using Hyperion SED code (Robitaille 2017), for our sample of systems classified as diskless stars (top), transition disk candidates (middle) and full disk systems (bottom). The circles show data from the U band (0.3 µm) to the MIPS 24 µm band. Triangles, when present, represent the upper limits. The black solid line is the best fit to the SED (Robitaille 2017) and the dashed lines … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of stars belonging to NGC 2264 and ana￾lyzed in this work. Our classification of the systems is represented with different symbols and colors. The two boxes delimit the most active star formation regions, as defined by Lamm et al. (2004). The population in these boxes are predominantly composed of full disk systems. Transi￾tion disk candidates and diskless stars are preferentially found outside … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Near-IR and mid-IR color-color diagram for stars belonging to NGC 2264 broken up by spectral type ranges into three plots. We can see two different populations: stars with full disks present emission excess above the photospheric level in the inner and outer parts of t…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Different diagrams that are used in previous works to separate transition disk systems from the full disk sample. a) Selection criteria that were used by Merín et al. (2010). Systems that fall in the bottom dashed box are classified as transition disks and systems that…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Slope of the SED from 3.6 µm to 8 µm (αIRAC) measured by Teixeira et al. (2012) as a function of the spectral type obtained by Venuti et al. (2014); Dahm & Simon (2005); Rebull et al. (2002); Walker (1956). Symbols indicate our categorization (notation as in [PITH_FUL…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hα criteria (blue lines) to select CTTS and WTTS (White & Basri 2003). a) Hα equivalent width vs. spectral type. b) Hα equivalent width vs. Hα width at 10% of maximum intensity. Transition disk candidates are predominantly found among accreting systems. Therefore, the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of Hα emission line parameters. (a) Hα equivalent width and (b) Hα width at 10% of maximum intensity of our sample of diskless stars (black), transition disk candidates (red) and full disk systems (light blue). Transition disk candidates distributions are …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Mass accretion rates from Hα equivalent width calculated by Sousa et al. (2016) as a function of Hα equivalent width. The error bar represents the night-to-night variability of the accretion rate. disk (Alencar et al. 2010; Cody et al. 2014; Fonseca et al. 2014; McGinn…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: UV excess as a function of Hα equivalent width (a) and mass accretion rate as a function of UV excess (b). More negative values indicate larger UV excess. The UV excess and mass accretion rate were calculated by Venuti et al. (2014) and the Hα equivalent width was mea…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Period distribution of the samples of diskless stars (black), transition disk candidates (red), and full disk systems (light blue), that were analyzed in this work. Diskless stars are substantially more rapid rotators than full disk systems, as expected, since most st…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of morphological classification of 2011 CoRoT light curve of our sample of TTS. The CTTS morphological classifica￾tion was taken from Sousa et al. (2016), while the WTTS morphological classification is from this work. “SP” corresponds to spot-like, “AA” t…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Distribution of disk parameters obtained by the SED model fitting of transition disk and full disk systems. (Left) Disk dust mass. (Middle) Disk inner radius. (Right) Disk outer radius. For the transition disk sample, the disk inner radius is the inner hole size and f…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Accretion diagnostic as a function of disk hole size for transition disk candidates. (a) Mass accretion rates are from UV excess (pref￾erentially) (Venuti et al. 2014) and from Hα equivalent width (Sousa et al. 2016). For WTTS, we fix the value of the mass accretion r…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Disk diagnostics as a function of disk hole size for our sample of transition disk candidates. (a) Near-IR color, (b) mid-IR color, and (c) αIRAC index. Gray filled symbols identify systems that fall in the region where the inner disk hole can be explained by X-ray ph…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Mass and temperature of the central star obtained by Venuti et al. (2014) as a function of disk hole size. The overplotted data from the literature correspond to exoplanets with confirmed detection and the vertical axis is plotted as a function of the semimajor axis o…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 '...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    C., Hollenbach , D., Laughlin , G., & Gorti , U

    Adams , F. C., Hollenbach , D., Laughlin , G., & Gorti , U. 2004, ApJ, 611, 360

    2004

  4. [4]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 1433

    Affer , L., Micela , G., Favata , F., Flaccomio , E., & Bouvier , J. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1433

    2013

  5. [5]

    Alencar , S. H. P., Teixeira , P. S., Guimar \ a es , M. M., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A88

    2010

  6. [6]

    2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 475

    Alexander , R., Pascucci , I., Andrews , S., Armitage , P., & Cieza , L. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 475

    2014

  7. [7]

    M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L

    Andrews , S. M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L41

    2018

  8. [8]

    M., Wilner , D

    Andrews , S. M., Wilner , D. J., Espaillat , C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 42

    2011

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    M., Wilner , D

    Andrews , S. M., Wilner , D. J., Zhu , Z., et al. 2016, ApJL, 820, L40

    2016

  2. [10]

    P., van der Marel , N., et al

    Ansdell , M., Williams , J. P., van der Marel , N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 46

    2016

  3. [11]

    L., & Matthews , J

    Bouvier , J., Cabrit , S., Fernandez , M., Martin , E. L., & Matthews , J. M. 1993, A&A, 272, 176

    1993

  4. [12]

    2015, A&A, 578, A23

    Bustamante , I., Mer \' n , B., Ribas , \'A ., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A23

    2015

  5. [13]

    2002, ApJ, 568, 1008

    Calvet , N., D'Alessio , P., Hartmann , L., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008

    2002

  6. [14]

    M., et al

    Calvet , N., D'Alessio , P., Watson , D. M., et al. 2005, ApJL, 630, L185

    2005

  7. [15]

    & Gullbring , E

    Calvet , N. & Gullbring , E. 1998, ApJ, 509, 802

    1998

  8. [16]

    L., Stapelfeldt , K

    Cieza , L., Padgett , D. L., Stapelfeldt , K. R., et al. 2007, APJ, 667, 308

    2007

  9. [17]

    A., Schreiber , M

    Cieza , L. A., Schreiber , M. R., Romero , G. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 712, 925

    2010

  10. [18]

    J., Gendrin , A., & Sotomayor , M

    Clarke , C. J., Gendrin , A., & Sotomayor , M. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 485

    2001

  11. [19]

    M., Stauffer , J., Baglin , A., et al

    Cody , A. M., Stauffer , J., Baglin , A., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 82

    2014

  12. [20]

    M., Stauffer , J

    Cody , A. M., Stauffer , J. R., Micela , G., Baglin , A., & CSI 2264 Team . 2013, Astronomische Nachrichten, 334, 63

    2013

  13. [21]

    Dahm , S. E. & Simon , T. 2005, AJ, 129, 829

    2005

  14. [22]

    Dullemond , C. P. & Dominik , C. 2005, A&A, 434, 971

    2005

  15. [23]

    & Pascucci , I

    Ercolano , B. & Pascucci , I. 2017, Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170114

    2017

  16. [24]

    L., Muzerolle , J., & D'Alessio , P

    Espaillat , C., Calvet , N., Luhman , K. L., Muzerolle , J., & D'Alessio , P. 2008, ApJL, 682, L125

    2008

  17. [25]

    2012, ApJ, 747, 103

    Espaillat , C., Ingleby , L., Hern \'a ndez , J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 103

    2012

  18. [26]

    2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 497

    Espaillat , C., Muzerolle , J., Najita , J., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 497

    2014

  19. [27]

    S., van Boekel , R., et al

    Fang , M., Kim , J. S., van Boekel , R., et al. 2013, , 207, 5

    2013

  20. [28]

    2009, A&A, 504, 461

    Fang , M., van Boekel , R., Wang , W., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 461

    2009

  21. [29]

    G., Hora , J

    Fazio , G. G., Hora , J. L., Allen , L. E., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10

    2004

  22. [30]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63

    1999

  23. [31]

    2006, A&A, 455, 903

    Flaccomio , E., Micela , G., & Sciortino , S. 2006, A&A, 455, 903

    2006

  24. [32]

    Fonseca , N. N. J., Alencar , S. H. P., Bouvier , J., Favata , F., & Flaccomio , E. 2014, A&A, 567, A39

    2014

  25. [33]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1

    2018

  26. [34]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1

    2016

  27. [35]

    2013, ApJ, 764, 146

    Garaud , P., Meru , F., Galvagni , M., & Olczak , C. 2013, ApJ, 764, 146

    2013

  28. [36]

    L., Espaillat , C

    Grant , S. L., Espaillat , C. C., Megeath , S. T., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 13

    2018

  29. [37]

    E., Carr , M., Rockosi , C., et al

    Gunn , J. E., Carr , M., Rockosi , C., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 3040

    1998

  30. [38]

    E., Lada , E

    Haisch , Jr., K. E., Lada , E. A., & Lada , C. J. 2001, ApJL, 553, L153

    2001

  31. [39]

    1998, , 495, 385

    Hartmann , L., Calvet , N., Gullbring , E., & D'Alessio , P. 1998, , 495, 385

    1998

  32. [40]

    2007, , 671, 1784

    Hern \'a ndez , J., Calvet , N., Brice \ n o , C., et al. 2007, , 671, 1784

    2007

  33. [41]

    2005, ApJ, 631, 1180

    Hollenbach , D., Gorti , U., Meyer , M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1180

    2005

  34. [42]

    M., Andrews , S

    Hughes , A. M., Andrews , S. M., Espaillat , C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 131

    2009

  35. [43]

    S., Babler , B

    Indebetouw , R., Mathis , J. S., Babler , B. L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 931

    2005

  36. [44]

    2011, APJ, 743, 105

    Ingleby , L., Calvet , N., Bergin , E., et al. 2011, APJ, 743, 105

    2011

  37. [45]

    & Bouvier , J

    Irwin , J. & Bouvier , J. 2009, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 258, IAU Symposium, ed. E. E. Mamajek , D. R. Soderblom , & R. F. G. Wyse , 363--374

    2009

  38. [46]

    H., Watson , D

    Kim , K. H., Watson , D. M., Manoj , P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 149

    2013

  39. [47]

    H., Watson , D

    Kim , K. H., Watson , D. M., Manoj , P., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1017

    2009

  40. [48]

    M., Ercolano , B., Dale , J., et al

    Koepferl , C. M., Ercolano , B., Dale , J., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 3327

    2013

  41. [49]

    1989, ApJ, 342

    Konigl, A. 1989, ApJ, 342

    1989

  42. [50]

    1987, in Star Forming Regions, Vol

    Lada, C. 1987, in Star Forming Regions, Vol. 115, 1--17

    1987

  43. [51]

    J., Muench , A

    Lada , C. J., Muench , A. A., Luhman , K. L., et al. 2006, ApJ, 131, 1574

    2006

  44. [52]

    H., Bailer-Jones , C

    Lamm , M. H., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Mundt , R., Herbst , W., & Scholz , A. 2004, A&A, 417, 557

    2004

  45. [53]

    H., Mundt , R., Bailer-Jones , C

    Lamm , M. H., Mundt , R., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., & Herbst , W. 2005, A&A, 430, 1005

    2005

  46. [54]

    Luri , X., Brown , A. G. A., Sarro , L. M., et al. 2018, , 616, A9

    2018

  47. [55]

    F., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al

    Manara , C. F., Testi , L., Natta , A., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A18

    2014

  48. [56]

    F., Testi , L., Rigliaco , E., et al

    Manara , C. F., Testi , L., Rigliaco , E., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A107

    2013

  49. [57]

    2007, A&A, 463, 1081

    Marilli , E., Frasca , A., Covino , E., et al. 2007, A&A, 463, 1081

    2007

  50. [58]

    T., Alencar , S

    McGinnis , P. T., Alencar , S. H. P., Guimar \ a es , M. M., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A11

    2015

  51. [59]

    M., Oliveira , I., et al

    Mer \' n , B., Brown , J. M., Oliveira , I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1200

    2010

  52. [60]

    E., Megeath , S

    Muzerolle , J., Allen , L. E., Megeath , S. T., Hern \'a ndez , J., & Gutermuth , R. A. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1107

    2010

  53. [61]

    R., Strom , S

    Najita , J. R., Strom , S. E., & Muzerolle , J. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 369

    2007

  54. [62]

    W., Spaans , M., & Tielens , A

    Ormel , C. W., Spaans , M., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2007, A&A, 461, 215

    2007

  55. [63]

    Owen , J. E. 2016, PASA, 33, e005

    2016

  56. [64]

    E., Ercolano , B., & Clarke , C

    Owen , J. E., Ercolano , B., & Clarke , C. J. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 13

    2011

  57. [65]

    E., Ercolano , B., & Clarke , C

    Owen , J. E., Ercolano , B., & Clarke , C. J. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2955

    2017

  58. [66]

    & Terquem, C

    Papaloizou, J. & Terquem, C. 1999, ApJ, 521, 823

    1999

  59. [67]

    & Pudritz, R

    Pelletier, G. & Pudritz, R. 1992, ApJ, 394, 117

    1992

  60. [68]

    A., Pipher , J

    Rapson , V. A., Pipher , J. L., Gutermuth , R. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 124

    2014

  61. [69]

    Rebull , L. M. 2001, AJ, 121, 1676

    2001

  62. [70]

    M., Makidon , R

    Rebull , L. M., Makidon , R. B., Strom , S. E., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 1528

    2002

  63. [71]

    M., Stauffer , J

    Rebull , L. M., Stauffer , J. R., Cody , A. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 196

    2018

  64. [72]

    2013, A&A, 552, A115

    Ribas , \'A ., Mer \' n , B., Bouy , H., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A115

    2013

  65. [73]

    Ribas , \'A ., Mer \' n , B., Bouy , H., & Maud , L. T. 2014, A&A, 561, A54

    2014

  66. [74]

    H., Young , E

    Rieke , G. H., Young , E. T., Engelbracht , C. W., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 25

    2004

  67. [75]

    Robitaille , T. P. 2011, A&A, 536, A79

    2011

  68. [76]

    Robitaille , T. P. 2017, A&A, 600, A11

    2017

  69. [77]

    P., Whitney , B

    Robitaille , T. P., Whitney , B. A., Indebetouw , R., & Wood , K. 2007, ApJS, 169, 328

    2007

  70. [78]

    Roquette , J., Bouvier , J., Alencar , S. H. P., Vaz , L. P. R., & Guarcello , M. G. 2017, A&A, 603, A106

    2017

  71. [79]

    P., Ercolano , B., Owen , J

    Rosotti , G. P., Ercolano , B., Owen , J. E., & Armitage , P. J. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 1392

    2013

  72. [80]

    1993, ApJ, 408, 115

    Safier, P. 1993, ApJ, 408, 115

    1993

  73. [81]

    & Clarke , C

    Scally , A. & Clarke , C. 2001, MNARS, 325, 449

    2001

  74. [82]

    1994, ApJ, 429

    Shu, F., Najita, J., Ostriker, E., et al. 1994, ApJ, 429

    1994

  75. [83]

    P., Alencar , S

    Sousa , A. P., Alencar , S. H. P., Bouvier , J., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A47

    2016

  76. [84]

    M., Baglin , A., et al

    Stauffer , J., Cody , A. M., Baglin , A., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 83

    2014

  77. [85]

    M., Strom , S

    Strom , K. M., Strom , S. E., Edwards , S., Cabrit , S., & Skrutskie , M. F. 1989, AJ, 97, 1451

    1989

  78. [86]

    R., & Bessell , M

    Sung , H., Stauffer , J. R., & Bessell , M. S. 2009, AJ, 138, 1116

    2009

  79. [87]

    S., Lada , C

    Teixeira , P. S., Lada , C. J., Marengo , M., & Lada , E. A. 2012, A&A, 540, A83

    2012

  80. [88]

    W., van Terwisga , S., et al

    van der Marel , N., Verhaar , B. W., van Terwisga , S., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A126

    2016

  81. [89]

    Vasconcelos , M. J. & Bouvier , J. 2015, A&A, 578, A89

    2015

  82. [90]

    M., et al

    Venuti , L., Bouvier , J., Cody , A. M., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A23

    2017

  83. [91]

    2014, A&A, 570, A82

    Venuti , L., Bouvier , J., Flaccomio , E., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A82

    2014

  84. [92]

    2015, A&A, 581, A66

    Venuti , L., Bouvier , J., Irwin , J., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A66

    2015

  85. [93]

    Walker , M. F. 1956, APJS, 2, 365

    1956

  86. [94]

    W., Roellig , T

    Werner , M. W., Roellig , T. L., Low , F. J., et al. 2004, APJS, 154, 1

    2004

  87. [95]

    White , R. J. & Basri , G. 2003, ApJ, 582, 1109

    2003

  88. [96]

    A., Indebetouw , R., Bjorkman , J

    Whitney , B. A., Indebetouw , R., Bjorkman , J. E., & Wood , K. 2004, ApJ, 617, 1177

    2004

  89. [97]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868

    2010

  90. [98]

    P., Hartmann , L., Espaillat , C., & Calvet , N

    Zhu , Z., Nelson , R. P., Hartmann , L., Espaillat , C., & Calvet , N. 2011, ApJ, 729, 47

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.